Anthony Albanese scores major win in super tax overhaul as surprise group reveals they support the change
The federal government is controversially hoping to lift taxes on super balances above $3 million from 15 per cent to 30 per cent in a move predicted to impact about 0.5 per cent of savers.
Despite outcry from the Opposition, about 57 per cent of seniors endorse the change, according to a survey of 3,000 people aged 50 and older conducted by National Seniors Australia for the Super Members Council.
The results appear to track with broader public sentiment on Labor's bill, Super Members Council CEO Misha Schubert said.
'There seems to be broad Australian understanding about the importance of equity and sustainability in the super system, and a strong sense of fairness as the starting point,' she told AAP.
While a significant majority of those surveyed believed the super system was strong and sustainable, comparatively fewer thought it was equitable.
Women, those with poorer health and Australians with less formal education had lower levels of confidence in its fairness, the report found.
Many of these demographics do not have equal access to the benefits of superannuation because of a lack of employment opportunities or disrupted work histories.
But overall, older Australians almost universally understand the importance of super with 89.5 per cent believing it must be saved for retirement.
Just one in four supported early release of funds beyond current rules.
But the Coalition has continued to push a housing plan that would allow first-time home buyers to access up to $50,000 from their super to put down a deposit, despite protests it would raise house prices and leave savers worse-off in the future.
'Policy ideas that propose early release are dangerous and they make Australians poorer,' Ms Schubert said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
2 hours ago
- The Independent
How one Australian state has responded to a synagogue arson attack
Victoria, Australia, is establishing an anti-hate task force, comprising the premier, police minister, and Melbourne mayor, to address violent protests and a rise in antisemitism. The formation of the task force follows an arson attack on a synagogue in East Melbourne, where 20 worshippers inside escaped unharmed. Police have arrested and charged a 34-year-old man in connection with the synagogue fire and are investigating whether the incident was an act of terrorism. The Victorian government is drafting new legislation to ban face masks, the display of terror symbols, and devices used by protesters to attach themselves to objects. Antisemitic incidents across Australia have escalated since October 2023, prompting the country to pass new anti-hate crime laws in February, including mandatory jail sentences for offences like giving a Nazi salute.
Daily Mail
2 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Aussie Greens candidate is given terrifying news after she was blinded at a pro-Palestine rally
A former Greens candidate has been warned she will likely suffer permanent vision loss after receiving an serious eye injury during a police crackdown on a protest. Hannah Thomas was arrested with four others at an anti-Israel demonstration in Belmore, Sydney, on June 27. The demonstration took place outside Belmore-based business SEC Plating, which the group claimed provides supply chain services for F-35 fighter jets owned by the Israeli Defence Forces (IDF). Ms Thomas has since undergone surgery for her eye following her arrest - which was documented on a video which legal experts fear contradicts the claims of authorities. Ms Thomas, who ran against Prime Minister Anthony Albanese in his seat of Grayndler in the last federal election, said she had been told to brace for the worst. 'I don't think there's any chance of it (her eye) going back to what it was, I've been told very clearly to be prepared for the worst-case scenario, which is full vision loss in the right eye,' she told the Sydney Morning Herald. Ms Thomas faces a second round surgery this week and said she was still in shock. 'At this early stage, I can't see how my life ever gets back to the same,' she said. She said when she went to the protest, she did not expect a violent confrontation with police. 'I think I'm in a great deal of shock that it even happened. I would've never thought this would have happened. I don't want to go into the incident itself, but it's just not at all an outcome I would've expected that day.' Footage taken at the protest has prompted scrutiny over the conduct of NSW Police and its description of the arrest. Ms Thomas was charged with one count of resisting police and another of failing to comply with a direction to disperse. In the vision, Ms Thomas appeared to be pulled to the ground by police after being separated from the crowd. She appeared to stop before an officer placed a leg in front of her and they fell together. The video showed her saying 'I'm trying' as an officer repeatedly told her to 'get up'. The incident has since been declared a critical incident by the Law Enforcement Conduct Commission (LECC) and is now under investigation. Court documents show Ms Thomas was charged under rarely-used emergency powers known as Part 6A. The powers were brought into law following the 2005 Cronulla riots to deal with large-scale 'public disorder'. Ms Thomas was the only protester charged under the powers. They require authorisation by an assistant commissioner or higher. The NSW Greens Member of the Legislative Council Sue Higginson penned a formal complaint to the LECC. She alleged the assistant commissioner Brett McFadden 'issued an unlawful or retrospective authorisation to use emergency powers in violation of their conditions', according to the Guardian In a statement, Assistant Commissioner Brett McFadden said: 'I put in place a process to review the charges laid in this matter to ensure the relevant and most appropriate charges are applied'. 'The review is part of normal critical incident protocols.' Police alleged Ms Thomas received her injuries during a struggle involving police and and other protesters, with their submission to court claiming she was hurt due to the interference of several protesters. It has since been revealed police will look to drop charges laid against Ms Thomas under the emergency powers after a review found police incorrectly sought to use them for the protest. In response to the incident, NSW Premier Chris Minns defended officers' actions and stated businesses were entitled to operate without interference. The NSW Police said the action was 'an approved take down', and claimed Ms Thomas was 'resisting police'. Ms Thomas has released a video from hospital in which she said she is five foot and one inch tall and weighs 45kg.
Daily Mail
3 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Bombshell new push for Anthony Albanese's proposed super tax to go even further: What it will mean for YOUR money
A former bureaucrat who worked closely with Treasurer Jim Chalmers wants boomer retirees to be hit with a new tax on superannuation. A 15 per cent earnings tax applies to super balances during the accumulation phase when someone is working. But the superannuation becomes tax free when someone turns 60 and can enter the retirement phase of super, an option now available to all baby boomers. Ken Henry, a former Treasury secretary, wants retirees to pay a new earnings tax, depriving them of that tax-free status, now available for super balances of up to $2million. 'There are other ways of increasing the taxation that applies to high superannuation balances and improving the intergenerational equity of the superannuation system,' he told The Conversation's chief political correspondent Michelle Grattan. Dr Henry said it was unfair for wealthier, older Australians to get superannuation tax breaks. 'The thing that stands out is this big difference between the taxation of superannuation fund earnings in the so-called accumulation phase and the treatment that they get in the so-called pension phase,' he said. 'So, young people, again, these poor young workers, struggling and see the earnings on their accumulating superannuation balances being taxed at 15 per cent whilst those who have big superannuation balances and are in the retirement phase, well the earnings in their superannuation funds are completely tax exempt. And that just seems rather weird.' Dr Henry's 2009 tax review for Kevin Rudd's government proposed halving the superannuation earnings tax to 7.5 per cent, but applying it to both the accumulation and retirement phases of super. 'Halving the tax on superannuation earnings to 7.5 per cent would further increase retirement savings,' it said. 'Applying the earnings tax to the pension phase would considerably simplify the compliance requirements of superannuation funds. 'A structural weakness in the current retirement income system is a failure to provide products that would allow a person to manage longevity risk.' Chalmers was former treasurer Wayne Swan's deputy chief of staff when Dr Henry proposed taxing the retirement phase of super. The Actuaries Institute last year proposed replacing the 15 per cent superannuation tax on earnings with a 10 or 11 per cent tax on both the accumulation and retirement earnings phases of super. Dr Henry, however, is not campaigning against Labor's plan to slap a new 15 per cent tax on unrealised gains on super balances above $3million. This means super capital growth would be tax on the notional or paper value of retirement savings above this threshold before assets are sold - marking a departure from the usual capital gains tax practice of a taxing kicking in after assets are sold. 'I'm not opposed to it. The thing that stands out most, when you look at the way that superannuation is taxed is not that unrealised capital gains is not taxed,' he said. Labor needs the Greens in the Senate to pass its Better Targeted Superannuation Concessions bill. Parliament is resuming on July 22 and the government is proposing to have its super tax plan backdated to the start of this new financial year, July 1. The Greens want the threshold lowered from $3million to $2million but indexed for inflation. Nick McKim, the party's economic justice spokesman, said richer Australians needed to pay more tax. 'Over time Australia's superannuation system has become less about providing a dignified retirement for working people, and more of a vehicle for wealth accumulation. This needs to change,' he said. 'The Greens want to ensure that very wealthy Australians pay their fair share of tax, so that governments can do more to support people who need it.' 'Obviously we have not yet seen the legislation or regulations that Dr Chalmers intends to introduce.' A productivity-focused economic roundtable is being held in August, which will include discussions on tax policy. Chalmers in March praised Dr Henry when asked about his observation that relying too heavily on income tax revenue was hurting young people. 'I think the world of Ken Henry. I take his opinions very seriously. I worked with him very closely in this building, actually not that long ago and so I respect Ken and when he makes comments like that, I take them seriously and I do reflect on them,' he told Sky News. Super earnings have been tax free in the retirement phase since July 2007 but an indexed cap was introduced in 2017. A spokesman for Chalmers suggested Dr Henry's suggestion would be unlikely to become government policy. 'Our tax policies haven't changed. We've got a significant tax reform agenda that we're rolling out,' he told Daily Mail Australia. 'Our focus when it comes to tax is our tax cuts for every taxpayer, improving tax compliance, ensuring multinationals pay a fairer share of tax, our changes for high balance super.'
