Lectures hit out at TN govt over CAS benefit
"On one hand, the Commissioner of Collegiate Education issued a letter on June 9, instructing all regional joint directors to urgently submit updated CAS-related data of eligible teachers by June 10," K Raja of the AUT said in a statement.
However, in a "contradictory move", it said, "a communication dated June 16 addressed to A Muraliraj, assistant professor of Mathematics, Urumu Dhanalakshmi College, Trichy, reveals that the govt has chosen to challenge a favourable high court judgment in the Supreme Court by filing a Special Leave Petition (SLP) to deny CAS monetary benefits."
Urging the authorities to honour the high court verdict, the association said that the CAS is a statutory right, not a privilege. "Any attempt to delay or deny it adversely affects the morale, dignity, and academic integrity of the teaching community," it added.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
20 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Denied toilet access, made to kneel overnight: US deportee says he was tortured in El Salvador prison
Kilmar Armando Abrego Garcia was supposed to be safe. In 2019, a US immigration judge ruled that the 29-year-old Salvadoran could not be deported to his home country, citing credible fears that local gangs there would persecute him and his family. But in March 2025, the Trump administration deported him anyway. What followed has triggered a political and legal firestorm over the administration's immigration enforcement, reaching all the way to the US Supreme Court. The White House has repeatedly claimed that Abrego Garcia is a member of MS-13, the Salvadoran gang the US government has designated a foreign terrorist organisation. US President Donald Trump, speaking last month, declared that Abrego Garcia 'will never live' in the United States again. Yet multiple judges, including one on the Supreme Court, have ruled that he was deported in error and that the government is obliged to help 'facilitate' his return to Maryland, where he had lived since 2012. That court order came only after Abrego Garcia had already spent nearly three harrowing months inside El Salvador's notorious Terrorism Confinement Center, or CECOT, where he was sent immediately after his wrongful deportation. 'Welcome to CECOT. Whoever enters here doesn't leave,' one official reportedly told him upon arrival, according to court documents filed by his lawyers. Held in an overcrowded, windowless cell with bright lights on 24 hours a day, Abrego Garcia says he was forced to sleep on a metal bunk with no mattress and was denied access to a bathroom, eventually soiling himself. He said he lost 14 kg in two weeks. In his testimony, he lists harrowing details. Upon arrival, he says he was kicked and hit repeatedly, leaving his body bruised and swollen. He and 20 others were made to kneel overnight, with guards striking anyone who collapsed, he claims. At times, he was told he would be transferred to cells with known gang members who would 'tear' him apart. He also said he heard screaming through the night. He saw prisoners assaulting each other in nearby cells. He was told by prison staff that his tattoos would mark him for death—until they later admitted they weren't gang-related at all. According to the new court filings, Salvadoran prison officials determined that Abrego Garcia was not affiliated with any gang. The Trump administration initially brushed aside the deportation as an 'administrative error.' But after weeks of legal pressure, it abruptly flew Abrego Garcia back to the US last month—not to release him, but to indict him. He is now in federal custody in Nashville, Tennessee, facing charges of participating in a conspiracy to smuggle undocumented immigrants, allegedly as a member of MS-13. His lawyers argue the evidence is flimsy and that the government is backpedalling on its previous mistake by doubling down on criminal accusations. Justice Department attorney Jonathan Guynn told a Maryland judge that the US intends to deport Abrego Garcia again, this time to an unnamed third country. There is no set timeline, but his attorneys say the threat is immediate and illegal. 'This was not a mistake,' one of his lawyers told reporters. 'It was a deliberate defiance of a court order.' The Justice Department has not commented publicly on whether it will comply with the Supreme Court's latest ruling or where it intends to send Abrego Garcia next.
Deccan Herald
2 hours ago
- Deccan Herald
Maharashtra: No reviving practice of live worship of snakes, say animal rights activists
BJP legislator Satyajit Deshmukh moved a calling attention motion to raise the issue of serpent worship and said Jallikattu, a traditional and ancient bull-taming sport practised in Tamil Nadu, was restarted by the Supreme Court.
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
2 hours ago
- Business Standard
80% of vehicle owners in Delhi against fuel ban on old vehicles: Survey
As many as 8 out of 10 vehicle owners in Delhi are against the government's fuel ban on old vehicles, which prohibits petrol pumps from selling fuel to diesel vehicles older than 10 years and petrol vehicles older than 15 years, according to a recent survey conducted by LocalCircles. The new policy affects approximately 6.2 million end-of-life vehicles (ELVs) in the city and has sparked widespread public discontent. The survey highlights a stark difference in opinion between two-wheeler and four-wheeler owners. While 87 per cent of two-wheeler owners oppose the fuel ban, only 44 per cent of four-wheeler owners share this view. Given that two-wheelers constitute about 70 per cent of the affected vehicles, this opposition represents a significant portion of daily commuters who rely on older bikes for transportation. Many owners of older two-wheelers, especially from lower-income groups, feel unfairly targeted as they struggle to afford replacements and face vehicle impoundments. Public criticism of the policy Many Delhi residents have criticised the policy as "arbitrary and unfair", particularly for those with well-maintained vehicles that still meet pollution standards. Social media reactions describe the ban as elitist and disconnected from the financial realities of middle-class families. Critics also argue that forcing owners to scrap functioning vehicles contradicts sustainability goals and imposes financial burdens through recurring loans for new vehicles. There is also frustration over the policy's focus on vehicle age rather than actual emissions performance. The survey also found that 65 per cent of respondents believe the Delhi government should have prioritised other pollution reduction initiatives before implementing the fuel ban. Suggested alternatives include tackling stubble burning, improving street cleaning with mechanised equipment, enforcing bans on garbage burning, and stricter controls on construction dust. Many feel these measures would have a greater impact on air quality than the current vehicle fuel restrictions. Enforcement and public response The Delhi government has enforced the ban using Automatic Number Plate Recognition (ANPR) cameras at over 500 fuel stations to identify and prevent refuelling of old vehicles. On the first day of the ban, 24 vehicles, mostly two-wheelers, were impounded, with fines imposed on owners. The transport department, municipal corporation, and Delhi Police are jointly overseeing enforcement. However, fuel pump operators have expressed concerns about confrontations with angry vehicle owners and have requested police presence for safety. Meanwhile, Delhi Chief Minister Rekha Gupta has defended the policy, saying it aligns with Supreme Court and Commission for Air Quality Management orders aimed at phasing out polluting vehicles. The government insists the move is regulatory, not political, and blames previous administrations for delays in addressing vehicular pollution. Besides, Transport Minister Pankaj Kumar Singh has said that court directives since 2014 have compelled the government to act. Survey details and demographics The survey gathered over 33,000 responses from residents across Delhi's 11 districts, with 67 per cent male and 33 per cent female participants. The survey aimed to gauge public opinion on the fuel ban and explore whether citizens support alternative pollution control strategies.
