Surrey County Council approves reorganisation plans
11 minutes ago
Share
Save
Jack Fiehn
BBC Surrey, political reporter
Share
Save
Getty Images
The government is expected to make a decision by the end of 2025
A plan to reorganise councils in Surrey into two unitary authorities has been approved by the county council.
Surrey County Council (SCC), supported by Elmbridge Borough Council and Mole Valley District Council, is proposing that two new councils are created, with one in the east and another in the west.
Epsom & Ewell, Guildford, Reigate & Banstead, Runnymede, Spelthorne, Surrey Heath, Waverley and Woking borough councils and Tandridge District Council are backing a plan for three new authorities.
The government has given councils a deadline of Friday to submit their proposals.
The leader of Surrey County Council says a two unitary east/west model is the best option.
At a cabinet meeting, the Conservative leader of SCC, Tim Oliver, said the decision had been based on evidence.
"At the end of the day, this is not – and should not be – looked at through a political lens," he said.
"This is about what is in the best interest for residents… how can we establish unitaries that are going to be financially secure going forward."
The proposal for two councils has Spelthorne, Surrey Heath, Runnymede, Woking, Guildford and Waverley in the west authority; and Elmbridge, Mole Valley, Epsom & Ewell, Reigate & Banstead and Tandridge in the east.
'Much more balanced'
The leader of the Residents' Association and Independents Group, Catherine Powell said the plan for the west of Surrey "cannot be financially sustainable".
"It will include all three areas with the highest need for children's services and the three areas with the lowest council tax band base, which also happen to be the same three areas with the highest levels of debt," she said.
"The three unitary option is much more balanced."
At a full meeting of SCC on Wednesday, Liberal Democrat, Labour and Green Party councillors also said they were opposed to two unitary councils.
In the plan for three authorities, Surrey Heath, Woking, Guildford and Waverley would be in the west; Mole Valley, Epsom & Ewell, Reigate & Banstead and Tandridge would be in the east; and Runnymede, Spelthorne and Elmbridge would be in the north.
Mr Oliver said he felt the issue of the debt owed by councils across Surrey, particularly in Woking, had been "almost weaponised" and that there continue to be conversations with the government.
Ministers are expected to make a decision on the final proposals by the end of 2025.
Follow BBC Surrey on Facebook, and on X. Send your story ideas to southeasttoday@bbc.co.uk or WhatsApp us on 08081 002250.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
20 minutes ago
- The Independent
Sir James Cleverly to make frontbench comeback as Kemi Badenoch reshuffles team
Sir James Cleverly is expected to return to the Conservative front bench as Kemi Badenoch makes changes to her senior team. The Leader of the Opposition is expected to reshuffle her shadow cabinet on Tuesday. A Conservative source said: 'The Leader of the Opposition will be making some changes to her frontbench team today. 'The changes reflect the next stage of the party's policy renewal programme and underline the unity of the party under new leadership. 'Sir James Cleverly is expected to return in a prominent frontbench role to take the fight to this dreadful Labour Government.' Sir James served as both foreign secretary and home secretary when the Conservatives were in power. He stood as a candidate in last year's Conservative leadership election, but lost out on the Tory top job ahead of the final heat between Mrs Badenoch and her now-shadow justice secretary Robert Jenrick. Since the leadership contest, Sir James has returned to the Tory back benches as the MP for Braintree. He has used his influential position as a former minister to warn against pursuing populist agenda akin to Nigel Farage's Reform UK. Appearing at the Institute For Public Policy Research (IPPR) think tank last week, the senior Tory hit out at calls to 'smash the system' and 'start again from scratch', branding them 'complete nonsense'. He also appeared to take a different position on net zero from party leader Mrs Badenoch in a recent speech, urging the Conservatives to reject climate change 'luddites' on the right who believe 'the way things are now is just fine'. A list of full changes to the Conservative frontbench team will be announced on Tuesday afternoon. Allies of shadow chancellor Sir Mel Stride believe he will remain in his post, while attention will be focused on whether Mrs Badenoch keeps Mr Jenrick in his current role. The former leadership contender has strayed well beyond his justice brief, building a prominent social media presence with campaigns on a range of issues from tackling fare dodgers on the London Underground to the impact of immigration on housing.
Telegraph
21 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Labour voters back plans to stop wealthy non-doms fleeing Britain
Labour voters would back plans to stop ultra-wealthy individuals fleeing the UK after Rachel Reeves's tax raid prompted thousands to leave. On Tuesday, research published by think tank Onward found that nearly three-quarters (69pc) of Labour supporters would back the Government if it exempted the richest from some taxes in return for them paying a small lump sum in cash and investing in the UK economy. Under Onward's proposal, wealthy residents could be exempt from taxes on foreign income, capital gains, and inheritance for 15 years in return for paying a flat £300,000 fee. They would also have to invest £3m into one of the Government's industrial priorities, such as life sciences, clean energy and financial services, to qualify for the tax break. Sir Simon Clarke, the director of Onward, said: 'It is crazy for us to chase wealthy people out of this country when they could be both paying tax and making a hugely important wider economic contribution here.' The proposal comes as Ms Reeves faces mounting pressure from Labour backbenchers and union backers to make the rich pay more. Ms Reeves has already increased taxes since coming to power last year. These include abolishing the non-dom status and tightening inheritance tax rules, along with tax rises on business. However Labour backbench MPs have increasingly called for a wealth tax from the Chancellor to fix Britain's finances. Lord Kinnock, the former Labour leader, said recently that the public was 'fed up' with the richest going 'unscathed'. He said imposing a 2pc tax on asset values above £10m would deliver £10bn to £11bn for the Treasury. However, Lord Mendelsohn, Labour's former business spokesman, said: 'A small group of wealthy individuals pay a significant proportion of the tax we rely upon. I do not agree with some colleagues that we should wave goodbye to the wealthy.' Many wealthy figures have already left Britain, including Goldman Sachs' most senior UK banker Richard Gnodde, Aston Villa co-owner Nassef Sawiris and Charlie Mullins, the founder of Pimlico Plumbers. Henley & Partners, an advisory firm, expects the UK to lose more millionaires than any other country this year as high taxes drive away the wealthy. According to its research, 16,500 millionaires will leave the UK in 2025 - up from 10,800 last year. Andrew Griffith, shadow business secretary, said: 'There is nothing good about wealth creators fleeing the country leaving the rest of us to pay higher taxes or have worse public services.' Last night, a Treasury spokesman said: 'The UK remains highly attractive. 'Our main capital gains tax rate is lower than any other G7 European country and our new residence-based regime is simpler and more attractive than the previous one, whilst it also addresses tax system unfairness so every long-term resident pays their taxes here.'
BreakingNews.ie
21 minutes ago
- BreakingNews.ie
Views sought on plans to criminalise deepfake images of adults
Views are being sought on proposals to criminalise deepfake images of adults in Northern Ireland. Stormont Justice Minister Naomi Long described such images as 'abhorrent behaviour which can have devastating consequences'. Advertisement A public consultation has been launched on proposals to criminalise the creation and sharing of sexually explicit deepfake images of adults in an effort to protect the public from growing issues relating to the use of deepfake technology. Ms Long said it is an issue that can ruin lives. 'I am proposing to criminalise the increasingly prevalent and despicable behaviours of creating and sharing sexually explicit deepfake images, where somebody's image is inserted into sexually explicit content without their consent,' she said. 'It is abhorrent behaviour which can have devastating consequences for those whose identities are misused, the overwhelming majority of whom are women. Advertisement 'Victims report feeling embarrassed, humiliated, violated and unsafe, they can suffer from anxiety and post-traumatic stress disorder, and some people even consider suicide because of their experiences. 'In short, this is an issue which can ruin lives, which is why we are proposing to criminalise the creation and sharing of sexually explicit deepfake images.' The consultation includes consideration of the sentences that should be available to judges should the creation and sharing of a sexually explicit deepfake image become a criminal offence. Ms Long said deepfake images are another form of sexual abuse. 'The creation of these new offences will add to a suite of measures already in place to protect people from intolerable sexually motivated behaviours and eradicate violence against women and girls,' she said. 'In 2022, I introduced a number of offences to deal with downblousing, upskirting and cyberflashing. 'Sexually explicit deepfake images are another form of sexual abuse and exploitation. I will continue to react and respond to enhance legislation relating to those who misuse developments in technology in such a way.' The consultation will close on October 6 2025.
