
Not top-down, it's time to go stock specific; wait for clarity on consumption stocks: Harsha Upadhyaya
Remove Ads
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
, CIO-Equity,, says the earning season may see slow headline growth . Cement and quick commerce sectors show strength. Industrials and defence also look promising. Stock-specific bets are favored over broad sector views. Telecom and aviation sectors are expected to perform well. Select banking and financial stocks are also doing well. Within the chemical segment, specialty chemicals stand out. Individual stocks may offer better growth than the market average.As far as the earning season is concerned, this is going to be a subdued kind of a season as far as headline earnings growth is concerned. However, certain segments of the market are delivering a good set of numbers, and that is where incremental money would probably move in. Sector-wise, cement has done well and is likely to continue doing well. We have seen quick commerce numbers coming in very strongly, and that is another subsegment where things are fine.We also believe that there are certain pockets of industrials and defence where the numbers are going to be quite strong. So, rather than taking a sectoral top-down view on the market, it is prudent to take stock specific bets depending on where the valuations are, where the earnings are expected to grow, etc.It has been a moving goalpost and we have been seeing some of these deadlines coming and going and new deadlines coming in again. We still do not know for sure which way the tariffs are going to go, when is that finally going to come out in the public, etc. However, it is very clear that probably the relative impact on Indian exporters compared to some of our peers in the Southeast Asian market and Asian markets would be relatively less worst off.So to that extent, we should be fine and if you look at our own portfolio, we have taken some prudent measures many quarters earlier just before the US elections when we tilted our portfolios more towards domestic-oriented businesses thinking that the domestic businesses have better resilience in terms of growth and the valuations were also a lot more conducive at that point of time, and still that view continues and we have not really increased our exposure to exporters in a big way apart from chemicals which has turned around in terms of the cycle itself and also compared to China our tariff rates are expected to be lower.So, to that extent, it is unlikely that we will see big negatives from tariffs on that sector. But by and large, we will still wait for full clarity, then only we will probably look at adding more exporters.That is why I started saying that a top-down sectoral view at this point of time may not be the right way to construct your portfolios and within every sector you will see winners and losers as you go ahead depending on how they deliver on earnings. However, there are certain segments within the domestic businesses where there seems to be a reasonable amount of clarity in terms of earnings going forward.For example, telecom should be a good area in terms of how the earnings are going to pan out over the next couple of years. Aviation is another sector. We have seen similarly good numbers from cement and we also expect it to continue delivering better numbers as on the raw material side, there is a lot of positives and also the volume growth as per the commentary that we have seen from certain managements seem to indicate that probably things are going to improve on the volume front. So, overall, this is another segment.Within banking and financials, certain names are doing well and the impact of repo rate cut on the NIMs is also probably more or less behind us. So, to that extent, things should be fine in this basket as well. There are several other sectors. Maybe from a top-down perspective, you will not find too many great stories. However, individual names will still offer better growth compared to overall average market growth.Within the chemical segment, we continue to like specialty chemicals. That is where there is a competitive advantage on a relative basis even in the global market for Indian manufacturers and some of the companies have delivered on the quality, on the innovation in terms of newer molecules, etc. We have also seen inventory destocking in certain segments of specialty chemicals over the last two years.So, the impact that it had on the volume growth as well as on the margins is possibly behind us. We are slowly seeing volume growth coming back and there are expectations of better pricing in the markets as of now. When you are looking at the sector, you should be looking at specialty chemicals and also companies where management have continued to invest in capacity over the last couple of years. That is very important. If any management has continued to expand its capacity despite the cyclical downturn that we saw in the industry, that shows that they are confident in terms of medium to long-term growth and if they are already ready with the capacities, those are the names that you need to bet on as you go out.Within banking, you need to be more bottom-up at this point of time. There are certain banks which are delivering on growth as well as asset quality. There are certain other names which are finding some headwinds on either asset quality or on the growth, that is where you need to look and also keep valuation in mind.While the banking and financial sector has outperformed in the last six to nine months, it is no longer very attractive in terms of valuations. We have seen some absolute performance as well as relative performance from this basket. So, to that extent, we need to keep all of this in mind and as we discussed in the earlier part of the show as well, this is unlikely to be a season where you will see too much growth across segments and businesses. So, to that extent, you need to be careful in terms of what valuation you are paying for some of these names and how resilient the earnings growth would be as you go ahead.Clearly, macro tailwinds are there for consumption and we need to see which of those baskets are likely to see tailwinds from tax cuts, inflation going down, EMI hit going down for consumers, and more. Within the overall consumption basket, we think that discretionary consumption will still continue to be better than staples, that is our view at this point of time until we see a full-fledged recovery from the rural economy which could be a couple of quarters away in our opinion.As far as discretionary consumption is concerned, you need to look at some of the sectors which from an AMFI sectoral basis or from a market perception perspective, may be classified into other sectors, but they are essentially consumer discretionary segments such as hotels, travel, tourism, aviation and even quick commerce in our view is likely to do well.These are some pockets of consumption which we are very positive on. As far as FMCG is concerned, we would probably wait for a little more clues in terms of how volume growth is likely to pick up. The valuations are not so cheap while the stocks may not have done much in the last couple of years, even the earnings have not moved anywhere.So, to that extent, the valuations have not really changed for this basket. We would wait for a little more clarity on that side and on the white goods and other consumer discretionary including autos, the volume growth seems to be a question mark at this point of time. We would wait for probably lower levels to really look at them.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time of India
23 minutes ago
- Time of India
GST's identity crisis: One nation, multiple headaches
Academy Empower your mind, elevate your skills Rajesh Sodhi still remembers the night of June 30, 2017. The Ludhiana-based textile manufacturer had stayed up past midnight, watching Parliament TV as the Goods and Services Tax (GST) was announced. 'One Nation, One Tax' was the clarion call. It sounded like music to his years on, Sodhi's enthusiasm has morphed into frustration. His factory now employs three accountants just to handle GST compliance . "We were promised simplicity," he says. "Instead, we got something more complicated than what we had before."Sodhi's story isn't unique. Across India, individuals and corporates alike are grappling with a tax framework that seems to have developed a mind of its complexity starts with the basics. Instead of 'One Tax', today's GST comes with five different tax rates: 0%, 5%, 12%, 18%, and 28%. Add in numerous exemptions, differential rates for services, and sector-specific rules, and you have a system that's making the old tax regime look something as basic as determining which rate applies to popcorn, which is still a hot-button issue months after the December 2024 GST Council meeting. Is it taxed at 5%, 12%, or 18%? The answer depends on factors so nuanced that even tax lawyers disagree, but the lowdown is: it's 5% if sold loose (such as in a movie theatre), 12% if packaged and savoury-flavoured, and 18% if caramelised. But if your popcorn comes bundled with your movie ticket, the GST would be 18% because this would be treated as a composite such as these have prompted entrepreneurs and companies, regardless of industry, to reclassify their products and services after routine audits, resulting in demands for additional tax ranging from lakhs to crores of rupees."There has to be a philosophy to taxation that informs decision-making. GST is far from the good and simple tax it was supposed to be," says former Finance Minister (FM) Yashwant Sinha. "When I was FM, I rationalised the multiple central excise rates down to three. GST has a rate multiplicity problem. It's creating classification, implementation, and filing issues. The slabs must be reduced— ideally to one."The digitalisation of the Indian economy has revealed another vital limitation in the implementation of GST. App-based services, digital payments, and e-commerce platforms have created a whole new category of tax disputes that the system wasn't designed to Karnataka, vendors are protesting after having received GST notices for UPI-based transactions exceeding ₹40 lakh a year. They are currently demanding that the state revoke such notices, and that enforcement of such rules be relaxed for small-scale consider fintech entrepreneurs whose lending platforms are embroiled in disputes over whether algorithmic credit scoring should be taxed as a software solution or a financial service, a distinction that could mean the difference between 0% and 18% tax rates. Software as a Service (SaaS) companies are unclear and thus unable to determine whether they're selling goods or services. There's confusion over e-commerce platforms' marketplace versus inventory models, and skill-based online gaming companies are still contending with the massive retrospective demands rising from the hike from 18% to 28%, on par with chance-based activities such as gambling and there's the 'luxury' classification. As Aarin Capital Chairman and former Infosys executive Mohandas Pai puts it:"Air conditioners and TVs larger than 32 inches are taxed at 28%, but these aren't luxury items. They're mass goods today. Two-wheelers and sedans are also not considered luxury goods in 2025. Cement, which is critical for building India, also falls in the 28% bracket. The number of slabs should be reduced, and classifications revised."A concern on GST's complexity is the volume of disputes it has generated. There were significant judgments pertaining to GST in 2024, rendered by High Courts across the nation. And 2025 is even busier, as evidenced by recent multinational corporations across sectors have taken the international arbitration route to seek relief from retrospective tax claims. Several disputes are ongoing. Two, online real money gaming platforms are challenging retrospective GST notices amounting to ₹1.12 lakh crore, which exceed the industry's turnover of approximately ₹20,000 crore. The Supreme Court heard their arguments on July 15 and has scheduled its final hearing for July 25. Three, food delivery aggregators are wondering whether delivery charges attract 5% or 18% GST, which could further dent make or break their razor-thin margins. Four, airlines and shipping companies were mired in compliance issues around 'place of supply rules' that confused rather than clarified. Lastly, life and health insurance companies contended with 18% GST, a move that was passed on to already-burdened cases highlight that retrospective tax actions, especially those related to indirect taxes like GST, may impact not only compliance but also business overall "pay first, argue later" approach is also a hurdle for micro, small, and medium enterprises (MSMEs), which have minimal resources, including cash flows, to sustain specialised tax compliance teams. And the paperwork doesn't help. This includes mandatory multi-factor authentication for GST portal access and restrictions on E-Way Bill (EWB) generation to curb fraudulent practices, which have added yet another layer of complexity to daily operations. As Rajesh Sodhi, the entrepreneur from Ludhiana, says:'Tax refund delays are my biggest problem. I'm spending most of my time on GST-related tasks. I became a businessman to sell hosiery and other textiles, not to become a tax expert. But that's what this system has forced me to become."Although India's foreign direct investment (FDI) performance has shown resilience, recent data indicates moderation in investment momentum. In FY25, net FDI inflows dropped to a record 96.5%, as reported by The Economic Times. This has everything to do with investors exiting lucrative IPOs here and Indian firms ramping up overseas investments. But here's something to consider: the retrospective application of tax laws also undermines the principle of legal certainty, which is critical for investor confidence. Such enforcement imposes additional due diligence requirements and risk assessment protocols on foreign investors, particularly in sectors with complex supply chains and cross-border Financial Times reported that disputed tax demands, totalling around ₹13.4 lakh crore (as of March 2024), may have contributed to the decrease in net FDI inflows. Automaker Volkswagen is contesting a tax demand of approximately ₹12,000 crore related to import duties stemming from a 12-year investigation. Similarly, Maruti Suzuki (~₹20,000 crore) and Hyundai (~₹4,000 crore) are also among the top companies. Such prolonged battles and uncertainty surrounding tax obligations could raise concerns among investors about the predictability of India's tax are signs that policymakers are finally acknowledging pain points. Owing to Budget 2025, enterprises can expect some GST rate rationalisation in the 56th GST Council meeting, to be held later this month. Two major measures reportedly being considered are the elimination of the 12% slab and the abolition of GST altogether for term for businesses like Sodhi's, the question isn't whether reforms will come. It's whether they'll arrive soon enough. After eight years of promises and patches, India's entrepreneurs are running out of patience with the great tax answer, it seems, is written in the stars… or perhaps in the next GST Council meeting.

Time of India
23 minutes ago
- Time of India
Hamas Vindicated? Explosive Report Junks Trump Admin's Gaza Aid Loot Claim: ‘Israel Not Weaponising'
'Looking For High-Scoring Partnership': Modi Bats For Youth, Farmers, MSMEs & Global Trade | UK FTA India and the United Kingdom have signed a historic Free Trade Agreement (FTA) that promises to double bilateral trade, unlock new markets for Indian exports, and make UK products more affordable in India. Signed by Commerce Minister Piyush Goyal and UK counterpart Jonathan Reynolds, the deal was sealed in the presence of PM Modi and UK PM Keir Starmer. Modi called the moment 'historic,' comparing India-UK ties to a cricket match played with a straight bat. From Indian textiles and engineering goods to UK whisky and medical devices, the FTA aims to benefit both nations, but especially India's youth, farmers, fishermen, and MSMEs. This deal puts India on a stronger global footing, showing that even amid turbulent global trade dynamics, Delhi is batting with vision, confidence, and purpose. Watch how India's 'Vision 2035' is turning trade into transformation.#pmmodi #narendramodi #indiaukdeal #modistarmer #modiukvisit #modistarmermeeting #modicrickettalk #cricket #modicricketanalogy #cricketanalogy #fta #indiauktarde #freetradeagreement #brexitindia #globaltrade #newchapter #indiaeconomy #ukindiarelations #modidiplomacy #keirstarmer #toi #toibharat #bharat #trending #breakingnews #indianews #toi #toibharat #bharat #trending #breakingnews #indianews 33.7K views | 22 hours ago


Time of India
23 minutes ago
- Time of India
Indian automobile industry may grow by 6-7% in FY26 amid damp consumer demand: Report
The Indian automobile sector is expected to grow by 6-7 per cent in the fiscal year (FY26) amid damp consumer demand across most vehicle categories, according to a report by Motilal Oswal. As per the report, volumes in the two-wheeler category fell the highest compared to passenger vehicles (PV) and commercial vehicles (CVs) in the first quarter of FY26 (Q1FY26). The two-wheeler segment remained under pressure due to muted demand. In the April-June quarter of FY26, motorcycle sales fell by 9 per cent year-on-year, ICE scooter sales declined 5 per cent year-on-year, and moped volumes also slid by 11 per cent year-on-year. By contrast, the PV category posted a 1.4 per cent decline in volumes, with the small car segment being impacted significantly due to the volumes of key models such as Maruti Alto, Spresso, and Celerio witnessing sharp year-on-year declines in Q1FY26. The commercial vehicle (CV) segment, meanwhile, saw a marginal decline in volumes. While MHCV goods registered a 4.5 per cent dip, LCV goods fell by 0.5 per cent. However, bus sales remained a bright spot, with MHCV buses growing 7.6 per cent and LCV buses up 8.8 per cent. In terms of OEMs' performance, Tata Motors underperformed across all four CV sub-segments, while VE Commercial Vehicles (VECV) managed to outperform in most, according to Motilal Oswal. 'Our focus would be to deliver industry-beating growth (in FY26) because one, this year is possibly the strongest product cycle for us, and the freshest portfolio. We have a low base for FY25. On the SUV side also, we will be coming with a multipowertrain on Harrier and Safari, including the petrol version,' said Shailesh Chandra, MD, Tata Motors & Tata Passenger Electric Mobility, earlier at the Q4FY25 post-earnings conference call in May. Chandra had said that there would be re-varianting and repositioning of certain products in the portfolio. 'We have the full year for Nexon CNG and also, we will launch Sierra. So, even SUVs are going to be strong…it's going to be a very strong year for us,' he said. The top Tata Motors executive had said that the company will strengthen its value proposition of its existing EV products, in terms of value-price equation. 'It's going to be a strong year for us on the EV side also,' Chandra said. Its homegrown rival, Mahindra & Mahindra, too, is confident of growth this year. Nalinikant Gollagunta, CEO (automotive division) at Mahindra & Mahindra, said the company remains confident of mid-to-high teens growth in the SUV segment, along with strong double-digit export growth. He also reaffirmed guidance for high single-digit growth in LCVs for the full fiscal, according to a report by news agency ANI . The brokerage said that the industry may remain in a cautious phase in the near term, with a rebound largely dependent on rural demand recovery, fuel price stability, and broader economic conditions.