logo
RIC redux: How India should navigate old groupings in a new world order

RIC redux: How India should navigate old groupings in a new world order

First Post20-07-2025
Growing interest in RIC among Indians is not about rejecting the US or embracing China—it's about building leverage through diversified partnerships, given today's fragmented global order further disrupted by Trump-era unpredictability read more
In recent times, there has been a noticeable resurgence of interest among Indians in the Russia-India-China (RIC) grouping. This renewed attention stems in large part from a growing sense of unease—if not disillusionment—with the United States, particularly during the Trump presidency, where abrupt policy shifts and erratic rhetoric left New Delhi confused, concerned, and confounded.
Once regarded as a staunch ally of New Delhi, Donald Trump's sudden, unpredictable tilt toward Islamabad—his public praise for Pakistan's military and even his offer to mediate on Kashmir, a diplomatic red line for India—was seen as either dangerously naïve or strategically duplicitous. For a country that had embraced Trump as a potential ally and viewed the US as a strategic partner in countering growing Chinese hegemony, this U-turn was jarring.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
This perceived betrayal has triggered growing introspection within New Delhi's strategic circles. Has India placed too many eggs in the American basket? Is the time ripe for recalibrating and revisiting older platforms like RIC—not out of ideological affinity, but as a pragmatic counterbalance in a turbulent world?
RIC: Rhetoric vs Reality
The RIC grouping, first conceptualised in the 1990s, was designed as a forum for three major Eurasian powers to coordinate on global and regional affairs. Though often overshadowed by broader groupings such as Brics and the SCO, RIC still offers potential as a platform for strategic dialogue—especially as global power dynamics shift toward multipolarity.
Russia remains a steadfast partner for India, despite its increasing dependence on China in the wake of Western sanctions over the ongoing Ukraine war. The Indo-Russian partnership has stood the test of time, rooted in mutual trust and decades of cooperation.
China, by contrast, presents a complex duality: it is both a vital economic partner and a strategic adversary. Border tensions—including the standoffs in Doklam and Galwan—and broader concerns about China's activities in the Indian Ocean and South Asia underscore the trust deficit. China's growing alliance with Pakistan, vividly manifested during Operation Sindoor, further deepens India's apprehensions.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
While RIC presents an opportunity to engage China in structured dialogue, India must approach such forums with realism. New Delhi cannot afford to fall for the 'Hindi-Chini bhai-bhai' narrative—even when American perfidy becomes too obvious to ignore.
Playing Both Sides, Committing to None
Given today's fragmented global order—further disrupted by Trump-era unpredictability—India must resist aligning fully with any single bloc. This isn't about returning to Nehruvian non-alignment, but about pursuing interest-based alignment rooted in realism.
India must engage all major powers—but on its own terms. From the West, India can leverage defence technology, economic investment, and support on global platforms. And from Russia and China, it can secure energy cooperation, regional stability dialogues, and support for a multipolar global order.
This two-track diplomacy should not be viewed as indecision but as pragmatic statecraft. In this scheme of things, no one is a pariah. What matters is India's supreme national interest—a fact that the Ministry of External Affairs reminded Nato's secretary-general of this week when he threatened New Delhi with 'secondary sanctions' over its ties with Moscow.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
The goal is not to choose sides but to make choices that serve India's long-term interests and aspirations.
Significance of Strategic Autonomy
Since Independence, strategic autonomy has been the cornerstone of India's foreign policy. Since 2014, this policy has been reoriented from 'non-alignment' to 'all-alignment', with the country's strategic autonomy intact. Whether it is forging closer ties with the US, buying arms and oil from Russia, or even standing by Israel without abandoning the Palestinian cause—India has consistently asserted its right to act independently.
That tradition must continue. Groupings like the Quad or RIC should be treated as platforms for engagement, not as binding alliances. India must adopt a model of issue-based alignment—collaborating where interests converge, disengaging where they don't.
New Delhi's rising global profile brings both opportunities and challenges. India must recognise that while partnerships are helpful, its rise will largely depend on its own internal strength—economic resilience, military modernisation, and political stability.
The truth is that neither Washington nor Beijing truly wants New Delhi to emerge as a rival power. Both offer engagement—but often attach strategic strings. Recognising this reality is essential.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
In today's volatile global order, which is akin to a 3D chessboard of overlapping alliances and competing interests, India must therefore act like a fox rather than a hedgehog. The fox, as the old saying goes, knows many things, while the hedgehog knows one big thing. India cannot afford to get locked into any singular worldview or alliance structure. It must embrace complexity and prepare for multiple contingencies.
In this scenario, India's best bet is to stay pragmatic and relentlessly focused on its own interests. The growing interest of Indians in RIC must be viewed through this lens. It is not about rejecting the US or embracing China—it's about building leverage through diversified partnerships.
A Lonely but Glorious Rise
This stand comes with a price. India often finds itself alone in a bloc-oriented world order. Both sides see it as suspect. Recently, following the Brics summit in Brazil, some geopolitical analysts went so far as to call India an outlier—or worse, a Trojan horse in the grouping. Conversely, the US-led West finds India's engagement with countries like Russia and Iran, as well as its presence in Brics and the SCO, problematic.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
What both sides don't realise is that it is the presence of a country like India that helps keep the volatility of the world in check—whether political or economic. It helps maintain some degree of balance in a bloc-based global order.
India's journey toward great-power status may be lonely—but it can also be glorious, provided it is navigated with strategic wisdom and restraint. The world respects strength and consistency—not dependence or ideological rigidity. New Delhi must continue to walk its own path: open to all, beholden to none.
In the global power game, there are no permanent friends or enemies—only permanent interests. This, however, does not mean that India's foreign policy should become unethically Nixonian in nature. For India, a civilisational state steeped in dharmic consciousness, foreign policy must be more than transactional—dictated largely through the wider lens of dharma. It is this timeless principle that must guide India's foreign policy. And in this worldview, there's always space—and scope—for both Quad and RIC.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
The views expressed in the above piece are personal and solely those of the author. They do not necessarily reflect Firstpost's views.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

‘I'm disappointed in Putin': Trump suggests he may cut 50-day deadline over Ukraine ceasefire
‘I'm disappointed in Putin': Trump suggests he may cut 50-day deadline over Ukraine ceasefire

Indian Express

time19 minutes ago

  • Indian Express

‘I'm disappointed in Putin': Trump suggests he may cut 50-day deadline over Ukraine ceasefire

US President Donald Trump said on Monday that he may shorten the 50-day deadline he gave to Russian President Vladimir Putin to reach a ceasefire deal over the war in Ukraine. 'I'm disappointed in President Putin,' Trump said while speaking alongside UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer in Scotland, according to Reuters. 'I'm going to reduce that 50 days that I gave him to a lesser number.' However, Trump did not say what the new timeline would be. Two weeks ago, Trump threatened 'very severe tariffs' on Russia's trading partners 'if we don't have a deal in 50 days' The BBC reported that Trump was responding to a question from a journalist about the Ukraine conflict. He said he had been close to reaching a ceasefire agreement with Putin five times. 'I've spoken to President Putin a lot. I've gotten along with him very well,' Trump said, according to the BBC. 'But then he goes out and starts launching rockets into some city, like Kyiv, and kills a lot of people in a nursing home or whatever you have bodies lying all over the street.' Trump added, 'I may reduce that 50 days that I gave him to a lesser number, because I think I already know the answer what's going to happen.' Following Trump's remarks, Russia's MOEX stock index dropped by as much as 1.2% during the day, according to Reuters. The index was down 0.8% from yesterday's close as of 1219 GMT, MOEX data showed. Russia's Foreign Ministry responded by rejecting Trump's approach. 'The language of ultimatums, blackmail, and threats is unacceptable to Moscow,' it said. The ministry also called the threat of new sanctions 'mundane. (With inputs from Reuters and BBC)

Jobs, inflation, Fed move: This week could decide the fate of the US economy for years to come
Jobs, inflation, Fed move: This week could decide the fate of the US economy for years to come

Economic Times

time19 minutes ago

  • Economic Times

Jobs, inflation, Fed move: This week could decide the fate of the US economy for years to come

US economy 2025: In what could be a defining week for the US economy, a number of critical data, political decisions, and international negotiations are converging, each with the power to shape the American economy for years to come, as per a report. The data comes amid US President Donald Trump's economic agenda, which is facing its toughest stress test yet. From the health of the job market and consumer confidence to inflation trends and the Federal Reserve's next move on interest rates, this week could offer the clearest picture yet of whether Trump's economic gamble is paying off or pushing the country toward instability, according to a CNN report. Friday's July jobs report will give an indication of how American workers are faring, as per the report. So far, job growth, once a pillar of post-pandemic recovery, is showing signs of strain, according to the report. Monthly employment gains have slowed to levels not seen since 2010, excluding pandemic-era losses, as per the CNN report. Particularly troubling: manufacturing jobs, which Trump has vowed to revive, have declined for two straight months, according to the report. ALSO READ: Forget 10,000 steps! Scientists just revealed the real number you should be walking daily Adding to the pressure is a shrinking labor force, as foreign-born workers, who were long essential to several US industries, are deported in increasing numbers due to Trump's mass deportation move, as per CNN. That trend is raising concerns among employers and economists alike, as per the report. The Federal Reserve's preferred measure of inflation, the Personal Consumption Expenditures (PCE) index, has been moving higher, which is further away from its 2% goal in recent months, which is one of the reasons behind the central bank's decision on rate cuts, as reported by CNN. While inflation cooled after the pandemic, it's now creeping higher again, fueled in part by Trump's aggressive trade policies, according to the for everyday goods, including furniture and back-to-school supplies, are rising as importers work through pre-tariff inventories, as reported by READ: Jennifer Lopez's music career in trouble? Singer parts ways with label after flop following Ben Affleck divorceOn Wednesday, the Federal Reserve is expected to hold interest rates steady after its two-day policy meeting, as reported by CNN. While Trump has repeatedly pressured Fed Chair Jerome Powell to cut rates, most Fed officials say the economy can still handle higher borrowing costs, according to the two Fed governors are expected to vote against the consensus, a rare display of dissent that underscores how uncertain the path forward is, as per the CNN are betting the Fed will begin cutting rates in September, a move that could offer relief for homebuyers and borrowers struggling under high interest rates, according to the report. But that's far from guaranteed, especially if inflation keeps climbing, as per second-quarter Gross Domestic Product (GDP) report is due on July 30, as per the Bureau of Economic Analysis' report. While economists expect a rebound from the surprising shrinkage seen in the first quarter, they warn that, just as an inventory spike may have artificially hurt GDP in the first quarter, companies working through their warehoused goods in the second quarter may make the economy look better than it actually is, as reported by CNN. Another important moment of the week may come on Friday, when Trump's pause on sweeping tariffs is set to expire, as per the report. The president has promised to send letters to more than 200 countries, setting unilateral tariff rates that could range from 10% to 20% or more, as per are watching closely. Economists say any increase above current average tariff levels, now near 18%, the highest since 1934, could rattle Wall Street and weigh heavily on consumers, according to the US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent will meet Chinese officials this week to finalise the details of the framework the two countries agreed upon at their London and Geneva meetings, as reported by CNN. The trade framework with China came after months of tariff sparring that nearly shut down commerce between the two superpowers, as per the report. Both countries agreed to pause their respective 145% and 125% tariffs until August 12, reported Thursday, the US Court of Appeals will hear arguments on whether Trump legally used emergency powers to impose his tariffs after a lower court ruled he had exceeded his authority in doing so, reported happening with Trump's tariffs?A pause expires this Friday. Trump plans to set new rates for over 200 countries, possibly raising costs for consumers. How do Trump's deportation policies affect jobs? They're shrinking the labor force, making it harder for businesses to hire, especially in agriculture and manufacturing.

Trump says will cut 50-day deadline for Russia to end Ukraine war
Trump says will cut 50-day deadline for Russia to end Ukraine war

Mint

time19 minutes ago

  • Mint

Trump says will cut 50-day deadline for Russia to end Ukraine war

US President Donald Trump said on Monday he will cut the 50-day deadline he gave to Russian President Vladimir Putin to end the war in Ukraine. "I'm disappointed in President Putin, very disappointed in him. So we're going to have to look and I'm going to reduce that 50 days that I gave him to a lesser number," Trump said while speaking alongside British Prime Minister Keir Starmer ahead of their meeting in Turnberry in western Scotland. In Russia, the Moscow Exchange Index (MOEX) declined by 0.93% on Monday after Trump's comments on reducing 50-day deadline for Russia to agree to a ceasefire in Ukraine.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store