logo
RIC redux: How India should navigate old groupings in a new world order

RIC redux: How India should navigate old groupings in a new world order

First Post2 days ago
Growing interest in RIC among Indians is not about rejecting the US or embracing China—it's about building leverage through diversified partnerships, given today's fragmented global order further disrupted by Trump-era unpredictability read more
In recent times, there has been a noticeable resurgence of interest among Indians in the Russia-India-China (RIC) grouping. This renewed attention stems in large part from a growing sense of unease—if not disillusionment—with the United States, particularly during the Trump presidency, where abrupt policy shifts and erratic rhetoric left New Delhi confused, concerned, and confounded.
Once regarded as a staunch ally of New Delhi, Donald Trump's sudden, unpredictable tilt toward Islamabad—his public praise for Pakistan's military and even his offer to mediate on Kashmir, a diplomatic red line for India—was seen as either dangerously naïve or strategically duplicitous. For a country that had embraced Trump as a potential ally and viewed the US as a strategic partner in countering growing Chinese hegemony, this U-turn was jarring.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
This perceived betrayal has triggered growing introspection within New Delhi's strategic circles. Has India placed too many eggs in the American basket? Is the time ripe for recalibrating and revisiting older platforms like RIC—not out of ideological affinity, but as a pragmatic counterbalance in a turbulent world?
RIC: Rhetoric vs Reality
The RIC grouping, first conceptualised in the 1990s, was designed as a forum for three major Eurasian powers to coordinate on global and regional affairs. Though often overshadowed by broader groupings such as Brics and the SCO, RIC still offers potential as a platform for strategic dialogue—especially as global power dynamics shift toward multipolarity.
Russia remains a steadfast partner for India, despite its increasing dependence on China in the wake of Western sanctions over the ongoing Ukraine war. The Indo-Russian partnership has stood the test of time, rooted in mutual trust and decades of cooperation.
China, by contrast, presents a complex duality: it is both a vital economic partner and a strategic adversary. Border tensions—including the standoffs in Doklam and Galwan—and broader concerns about China's activities in the Indian Ocean and South Asia underscore the trust deficit. China's growing alliance with Pakistan, vividly manifested during Operation Sindoor, further deepens India's apprehensions.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
While RIC presents an opportunity to engage China in structured dialogue, India must approach such forums with realism. New Delhi cannot afford to fall for the 'Hindi-Chini bhai-bhai' narrative—even when American perfidy becomes too obvious to ignore.
Playing Both Sides, Committing to None
Given today's fragmented global order—further disrupted by Trump-era unpredictability—India must resist aligning fully with any single bloc. This isn't about returning to Nehruvian non-alignment, but about pursuing interest-based alignment rooted in realism.
India must engage all major powers—but on its own terms. From the West, India can leverage defence technology, economic investment, and support on global platforms. And from Russia and China, it can secure energy cooperation, regional stability dialogues, and support for a multipolar global order.
This two-track diplomacy should not be viewed as indecision but as pragmatic statecraft. In this scheme of things, no one is a pariah. What matters is India's supreme national interest—a fact that the Ministry of External Affairs reminded Nato's secretary-general of this week when he threatened New Delhi with 'secondary sanctions' over its ties with Moscow.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
The goal is not to choose sides but to make choices that serve India's long-term interests and aspirations.
Significance of Strategic Autonomy
Since Independence, strategic autonomy has been the cornerstone of India's foreign policy. Since 2014, this policy has been reoriented from 'non-alignment' to 'all-alignment', with the country's strategic autonomy intact. Whether it is forging closer ties with the US, buying arms and oil from Russia, or even standing by Israel without abandoning the Palestinian cause—India has consistently asserted its right to act independently.
That tradition must continue. Groupings like the Quad or RIC should be treated as platforms for engagement, not as binding alliances. India must adopt a model of issue-based alignment—collaborating where interests converge, disengaging where they don't.
New Delhi's rising global profile brings both opportunities and challenges. India must recognise that while partnerships are helpful, its rise will largely depend on its own internal strength—economic resilience, military modernisation, and political stability.
The truth is that neither Washington nor Beijing truly wants New Delhi to emerge as a rival power. Both offer engagement—but often attach strategic strings. Recognising this reality is essential.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
In today's volatile global order, which is akin to a 3D chessboard of overlapping alliances and competing interests, India must therefore act like a fox rather than a hedgehog. The fox, as the old saying goes, knows many things, while the hedgehog knows one big thing. India cannot afford to get locked into any singular worldview or alliance structure. It must embrace complexity and prepare for multiple contingencies.
In this scenario, India's best bet is to stay pragmatic and relentlessly focused on its own interests. The growing interest of Indians in RIC must be viewed through this lens. It is not about rejecting the US or embracing China—it's about building leverage through diversified partnerships.
A Lonely but Glorious Rise
This stand comes with a price. India often finds itself alone in a bloc-oriented world order. Both sides see it as suspect. Recently, following the Brics summit in Brazil, some geopolitical analysts went so far as to call India an outlier—or worse, a Trojan horse in the grouping. Conversely, the US-led West finds India's engagement with countries like Russia and Iran, as well as its presence in Brics and the SCO, problematic.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
What both sides don't realise is that it is the presence of a country like India that helps keep the volatility of the world in check—whether political or economic. It helps maintain some degree of balance in a bloc-based global order.
India's journey toward great-power status may be lonely—but it can also be glorious, provided it is navigated with strategic wisdom and restraint. The world respects strength and consistency—not dependence or ideological rigidity. New Delhi must continue to walk its own path: open to all, beholden to none.
In the global power game, there are no permanent friends or enemies—only permanent interests. This, however, does not mean that India's foreign policy should become unethically Nixonian in nature. For India, a civilisational state steeped in dharmic consciousness, foreign policy must be more than transactional—dictated largely through the wider lens of dharma. It is this timeless principle that must guide India's foreign policy. And in this worldview, there's always space—and scope—for both Quad and RIC.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
The views expressed in the above piece are personal and solely those of the author. They do not necessarily reflect Firstpost's views.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Google Cracks Down on 11,000 YouTube Channels Linked to Global Disinformation Networks
Google Cracks Down on 11,000 YouTube Channels Linked to Global Disinformation Networks

Hans India

time26 minutes ago

  • Hans India

Google Cracks Down on 11,000 YouTube Channels Linked to Global Disinformation Networks

In a major step against global disinformation, Google has removed close to 11,000 YouTube channels and related accounts in the second quarter of 2025. The takedowns targeted influence operations tied to state-linked propaganda networks, with China and Russia accounting for the bulk of the activity. According to a blog post by Google and reporting by CNBC, over 7,700 of the removed YouTube channels were traced to China. These channels were primarily posting in Chinese and English, promoting the Chinese government, praising President Xi Jinping, and commenting on U.S. foreign policy in a favorable light. Russia was also a key focus. More than 2,000 YouTube channels connected to Russian operations were terminated for spreading multilingual content that supported Russia's geopolitical stance and criticized Ukraine, NATO, and Western countries. Many of these were found to be affiliated with state-backed media and consulting outfits. The effort is part of the ongoing mission led by Google's Threat Analysis Group (TAG), which is tasked with monitoring and neutralizing coordinated influence operations across Google platforms. A YouTube spokesperson commented that 'the latest findings are in line with the company's expectations for this regular and ongoing work,' emphasizing that such investigations are routine and form part of their broader defense strategy. Earlier in May, Google had also taken down a smaller cluster of accounts—20 YouTube channels, four advertising profiles, and one Blogger blog—linked to Russia Today (RT), the state-run broadcaster. RT has faced prior allegations of paying social media influencers to shape public sentiment ahead of the 2024 elections. YouTube had already blocked RT's main channels following Russia's 2022 invasion of Ukraine. But China and Russia weren't the only countries flagged. Google also took down state-linked influence campaigns from Iran, Azerbaijan, Turkey, Israel, Romania, and Ghana. These included content targeting political opponents and commenting on contentious regional issues, such as the Israel-Palestine conflict and internal elections. One such example included 457 channels connected to Azerbaijan, which pushed pro-Azeri messaging while attacking Armenia and domestic opposition. In the case of Iran, the removed content often supported Tehran and Palestine while portraying the U.S., Israel, and Western nations in a negative light. The disinformation campaign wasn't limited to YouTube alone. Google confirmed that the removals spanned Ads, AdSense, Blogger, and Google News, with several domains being blocked from appearing in both Google News and Discover due to their misleading content. In the first quarter of 2025 alone, Google had removed more than 23,000 accounts. With the second quarter's actions, the total takedowns for the year now exceed 30,000 accounts, signaling an alarming surge in the scale and coordination of global influence campaigns. Separately, Meta has also been actively working to tackle digital manipulation. The company recently disclosed that it had removed 10 million fake profiles, many of which were impersonating high-profile content creators. These actions are part of Meta's broader strategy to cut down on spam and misleading content. As the information war intensifies online, tech giants like Google and Meta are doubling down on their efforts to detect and dismantle orchestrated propaganda efforts before they mislead users or undermine democratic discourse.

BYD rolls out 13 millionth new energy vehicle from Shenzhen plant
BYD rolls out 13 millionth new energy vehicle from Shenzhen plant

Time of India

time26 minutes ago

  • Time of India

BYD rolls out 13 millionth new energy vehicle from Shenzhen plant

Chinese automaker BYD rolled out 13-millionth new energy vehicle (NEV) at its Shenzhen production line. The vehicle marking the milestone is the YANGWANG U7 , part of the company's high-end electric lineup. According to BYD, the company recorded domestic sales of over 2.11 million NEVs in the first half of 2025, reflecting a year-on-year increase of 31.5 per cent. Overseas sales during the same period stood at 472,000 units, up 128.5 per cent from the previous year. As the EV race heats up, BYD has also upped its game with the target to capture global market share. With this volume, BYD retains its position as the world's top-selling NEV manufacturer and becomes the first global automaker to produce 13 million new energy vehicles. The company's YANGWANG brand continues to play a role in positioning Chinese manufacturers within the premium electric vehicle segment. BYD's latest production figures highlight both growing global demand and China's expanding influence in the new energy vehicle market.

Trump ‘Had No Clue' About Israel's Syria Attack Plan, US Hails Sharaa's ‘Best Efforts' In Sweida
Trump ‘Had No Clue' About Israel's Syria Attack Plan, US Hails Sharaa's ‘Best Efforts' In Sweida

News18

time26 minutes ago

  • News18

Trump ‘Had No Clue' About Israel's Syria Attack Plan, US Hails Sharaa's ‘Best Efforts' In Sweida

Trump 'Had No Clue' About Israel's Syria Attack Plan, US Hails Sharaa's 'Best Efforts' In Sweida |4K US president Donald Trump was "caught off guard" by Israeli strikes in Syria last week, White House spokesperson Karoline Leavitt said on July 21Leavitt added that the president quickly called the Israeli prime minister and told him to "rectify" the situation n18oc_world n18oc_crux

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store