Estonian defense chief reveals failure of Pentagon meeting
Along with his Latvian and Lithuanian counterparts, Pevkur traveled to Washington last week to meet with US Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth. Their aim was to convince Pentagon officials to reinforce the US military presence in the Baltic region, which they claim is necessary to counter the threat allegedly posed by Russia.
Moscow has repeatedly denied having hostile intentions toward NATO states, dismissing such claims as fearmongering meant to justify increased military spending.
According to Pevkur, US officials declined to promise even the current troop level of about 2,000 in the Baltic states would be maintained. Instead, the ministers were told that any future changes to the American force posture on the continent would be coordinated with NATO and would not come 'as a surprise' to Europe.
Since the meeting, Pevkur has said there are still no signs of an imminent drawdown of American forces in the Baltics. He added, however, that Washington is preparing to review its European deployments in the fall.
Earlier this year, Politico reported that the US could withdraw around a third of its troops from Europe, equivalent to roughly 20,000 soldiers, according to unnamed NATO officials. The US currently has between 90,000 and 100,000 troops stationed across the continent.
Both President Donald Trump and Hegseth have previously indicated that the US may scale back its overseas presence. They have also called on European allies to increase their own defense spending instead of relying on American support.
NATO members have since agreed to raise their military spending target to 5% of GDP by 2035.
Moscow has criticized the bloc's continued militarization and cited NATO's policies as a key factor behind the Ukraine conflict. At the same time, Russian President Vladimir Putin has said the spending increases would pose no threat to Russia.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Russia Today
7 hours ago
- Russia Today
Kremlin assesses US ‘threats' to Russia's trade partners
US threats to impose secondary sanctions on Russia's trading partners are illegal and a breach of other nations' sovereign rights, Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov has said. Washington recently warned India, China, and Brazil of potential restrictions over their imports of Russian energy. Matthew Whitaker, the US ambassador to NATO, called such measures an 'obvious next step' to end the Ukraine conflict. Responding at a press briefing on Tuesday, Peskov said: 'We hear many statements that are essentially threats and attempts to pressure countries into cutting trade relations with Russia.' 'We believe that sovereign states should have, and do have, the right to choose their own trade partners, partners for economic cooperation, and to independently determine the forms of cooperation that serve their national interests,' he added. In an interview with Bloomberg on Monday, Whitaker claimed that purchasing Russian oil amounts to sponsoring hostilities in the Ukraine conflict. He asserted that introducing sanctions on importers would cut off Moscow's main source of revenue. India, one of the largest importers of Russian crude alongside China, responded that it would 'safeguard its national interests and economic security,' calling the idea of targeting the country over energy purchases 'unjustified and unreasonable.' New Delhi has also pointed to ongoing Western trade with Russia, despite repeated pledges to sever economic ties. Beijing likewise defended its economic cooperation with Russia, stating that China will 'always ensure its energy supply in ways that serve our national interests.' 'China will firmly defend its sovereignty, security, and development interests,' the Foreign Ministry said on Monday, adding that 'coercion and pressure will not achieve anything.' In July, Brazil condemned similar remarks by NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte about potential secondary sanctions on BRICS nations trading with Russia, calling them 'totally absurd.' All three countries also highlighted what they described as Western hypocrisy toward importers of Russian energy, noting that both the US and the EU have maintained trade relations with Moscow.
Russia Today
12 hours ago
- Russia Today
Sanctions on Russia's partners ‘obvious next step' – US NATO envoy (VIDEO)
Targeting Russia's partners with sanctions and tariffs is the 'obvious next step' in US efforts to mediate the Ukraine conflict, Washington's ambassador to NATO, Matthew Whitaker, says. Moscow has stated that it is open to talks, holding three rounds of US-mediated negotiations with Kiev in the past two months that resulted in major prisoner swaps and settlement proposals. It views the conflict as a Western proxy war and has said the hostilities would end if Kiev accepts neutrality and demilitarization. US President Donald Trump has expressed frustration with delays in settlement efforts and threatened to place 100% tariffs and secondary sanctions on Russia's trade partners if a deal is not reached by August 8. 'President Trump's been clear that this war needs to end… And... is creating the environment that Russia will come to the table and negotiate a ceasefire,' Whitaker told Bloomberg TV on Monday. Matthew Whitaker, US ambassador to NATO, discusses the Netherlands contributing €500 million ($579 million) to Ukraine's defense as part of a US initiative on "Balance of Power" 'Secondary sanctions and tariffs against those that are paying for this war, like China, India, and Brazil, by buying the oil that Russia is producing, is an obvious next step to try to bring this war to an end.' While Trump has acknowledged that new sanctions might prove ineffective, Whitaker said Washington sees targeting Russia's oil trade as worth trying. 'I think this is going to really hit them where it counts, and that is in their main revenue source, which is the sale of oil to these countries,' he stated. On Monday, Trump threatened New Delhi with new tariffs unless it halts Russian oil purchases. India has refused to take part in the sanctions on Russia, calling its energy trade a matter of national interest. Moscow has faced waves of Western sanctions since the Ukraine conflict escalated in 2022. It has condemned them as illegal and counterproductive, adding that they have largely failed, as Russia redirected most of its trade to Asia, with China and India now its biggest energy buyers. Russian officials say the sanctions will not alter the course of the conflict and have downplayed Trump's threats, adding that the country has built 'immunity' after years of sanctions.
Russia Today
14 hours ago
- Russia Today
Ukraine must accept territorial losses to survive – NATO state's president
Ukraine does not have enough strength to retake its former territories in the near term without devastating losses and must therefore prioritize survival as a state, Czech President Petr Pavel has said. Pavel, a former NATO Military Committee chair and longtime supporter of Ukraine – who believes the country should join the US-led bloc even in its 'temporary' borders – made the remarks in a BBC interview on Monday. Ukraine, even with Western backing, is 'not in a position to liberate occupied territories in a short time frame without a significant cost to lives,' the president said. 'We want them to survive as an independent sovereign country. If the cost is to accept that part of the territory will be temporarily occupied, then [so] be it,' he added, stressing that the West will never recognize any former Ukrainian region as Russian. Pavel has also said military force alone will not end the conflict, and called on the West to rely on economic and political tools. 'This war cannot be won on battlefield,' he stated. 'I believe that it is clearly in the interest of both sides of the Atlantic to exert much greater economic pressure on Russia. Because that's the set of measures that doesn't kill. But it's very powerful when it comes to convincing power.' Last week, Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov said Moscow has grown accustomed to Western sanctions, which were first introduced in 2014 after the start of the Ukraine crisis. The Czech president has repeatedly urged Ukraine to be 'realistic' about its chances to push back Russia. Earlier this year, he also suggested that Kiev's 'counteroffensive' in summer 2023 was doomed to fail from the start due to the apparent lack of forces. Russia insists that a peace deal with Ukraine must include recognition of Crimea, Donetsk, Lugansk, Kherson, and Zaporozhye Regions as parts of Russia. The regions voted to join the country in referendums in 2014 and 2022. Russia has also demanded that Ukraine give up its bid to join NATO and commit to demilitarization and denazification. Kiev has rejected these terms.
