Westerly, R.I., acquires 7-acre coastal site for conservation, public use
'This property represents a major win for coastal habitat preservation, climate resiliency, and public shoreline access,' Terry Gray, the department's director, said in a statement. 'DEM is grateful for the federal funding that helped bring this vision to life, and we deeply appreciate the partnership of [the Rhode Island Coastal Resources Management Council], The Town of Westerly, and Save The Bay in making this project a reality.'
Get Rhode Map
A weekday briefing from veteran Rhode Island reporters, focused on the things that matter most in the Ocean State.
Enter Email
Sign Up
According to the department, local and state officials are developing a management plan for the site 'for a project to support public recreation on Winnapaug Pond, which is expected to be completed in November.'
'A restoration plan will be developed by the project team and Save The Bay which will include regrading the site, the removal of invasive plants and the planting of native vegetation, and stormwater management,' officials said. 'The restoration plan will also include the creation of accessible and sustainable public access features including permeable paths and a paddlecraft launch. The conservation of this parcel protects important habitat that supports coastal wetland wildlife migration as sea levels rise due to climate change.'
Advertisement
The conservation efforts also helps buffer nearby communities from rising tides, according to the agency.
'The addition of this conservation easement is a great asset for the local community and visitors alike by preserving the property for public access to Winnapaug Pond, allowing endless recreation activities year-round,' Westerly Town Administrator Shawn Lacey said in a statement. 'This partnership and investment will protect the property for many generations to enjoy.'
Water Wizz
Christopher Gavin can be reached at
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
18 hours ago
- Yahoo
Update: One dead, two seriously injured in Block Island plane crash. What we know.
NEW SHOREHAM – One of three people aboard a small airplane that crashed on Block Island on Wednesday, July 30, did not survive the crash, according to Block Island Fire Chief Chris Hobe. The other two people aboard were seriously injured in the single-plane crash and airlifted off the island for medical treatment, said Hobe, who provided no further comment. The crash drew firefighters and rescue teams to the east end of the runway. According to the Rhode Island Airport Corp., at about 12:29 p.m., "a Cherokee Archer aircraft was involved in an accident at Block Island State Airport. There were three individuals on board at the time." The airport corporation said emergency responders, including more than 20 personnel from New Shoreham fire and police departments, Rescue Squad, and on-site Rhode Island Airport Corp. operations staff, were immediately deployed to the scene. This story has been updated with new information. This article originally appeared on The Providence Journal: One killed, two injured, in plane crash at Block Island Airport Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
6 days ago
- Yahoo
Archaeologists Have Confirmed the Shipwreck of Captain Cook's Long-Lost Endeavour
Here's what you'll learn when you read this article: Experts have finally confirmed that a shipwreck off the coast of Rhode Island is the wreckage of Captain James Cook's HMS Endeavour. Also known as the HMB Endeavour and the Lord Sandwich, the ship was purposely sunk in 1778. The Australian National Maritime Museum claimed the identified wreck, called RI 2394, was the Endeavour back in 2023, but the Rhode Island Maritime Archeology Project required more evidence before confirming the remains in question were indeed those of the lost vessel. This story is a collaboration with Popular Mechanics A shipwreck off the coast of Rhode Island has officially been confirmed to be the HMS Endeavour, according to a new report from the Australian National Maritime Museum. The sunken vessel, also known as the HMB Endeavour (short for His Majesty's Bark) and the Lord Sandwich, had long been sought since it was purposefully sunk in 1778. Now, the wreckage once labeled RI 2394 has been confirmed to be that same ship, once made famous by Captain James Cook. But if you feel like you'd actually read this same story years ago, it's not just deja vu. As Popular Mechanics previously reported, RI 2394 had been announced by the Australian National Maritime Museum to be the HMS Endeavour in February of 2022. But at that time, their research partners involved in the project, the Rhode Island Maritime Archeology Project, questioned the announcement, feeling that while RI 2394 was certainly a strong candidate, more research was needed to officially declare it the Endeavour. Then, in December of 2023, the Australian National Maritime Museum reasserted their declaration, pointing to further evidence gleaned from the wreckage's pump well and bow. At that time, they stated that they '...call on the preponderance of evidence where we've got a whole series of things that tie into Endeavour. And so far, we've found lots of things that tick the boxes for it to be the Endeavour and nothing on the list which says it's not.' Yet, only now, in this new final report for 2025, has the Rhode Island Maritime Archeology Project come to see eye to eye with the Australian National Maritime Museum. The report's executive summary, written by Kieran Hosty & James Hunter and published by the Australian National Maritime Museum, states: 'In 1999 and again in 2019, RIMAP and ANMM agreed on a set of criteria that, if satisfied, would permit identification of RI 2394 as Lord Sandwich[…] Based on the agreed preponderance of evidence approach, enough of these criteria have now been met for the ANMM to positively identify RI 2394 as the remnants of Lord Sandwich, formerly James Cook's HMB Endeavour.' So now, there is no dispute. The long-sought Endeavour wreckage has officially been identified. What made the search for the Endeavour such enduring one across these centuries? As the report writes, 'His Majesty's Bark (HMB) Endeavour is a significant vessel in Australian maritime history,' though they concede that it is 'one that elicits mixed opinions.' 'For some, the Pacific voyage led by James Cook between 1768 and 1771 embodies the spirit of Europe's Age of Enlightenment, while for others it symbolizes the onset of colonization and the subjugation of First Nations Peoples,' the report reads. But even for those in Australia deeply aware of Captain Cook, they might not know the other role the Endeavour played, that of a 'British troop transport and prison ship caught up in the American War of Independence.' Hence why the then-named Lord Sandwich was sunk near Rhode Island, only just now to be officially, formally found. This final definitive declaration identifying the vessel isn't just the resolution of an announcement controversy from a few years back; it's the culmination of what the reports notes was 'a 26-year program of archival and archaeological research.' The collaboration between the two organizations began in 1999, due in part to the state of Rhode Island having claim over all wrecks that had been scuttled in Newport Harbor in 1778, which would include the wreck proved to be the Endeavour. Building on the archival research of Australian historians Mike Connell and Des Liddy and the Rhode Island Marine Archaeology Project's Dr. Kathy Abbass, the report notes this collaboration 'led to a series of archaeological expeditions in Newport Harbor in 1999, 2000, 2001, 2002, and 2004.' These endeavors to find the Endeavour consisted of 'remote sensing of the seafloor, underwater survey by divers, and analysis of samples of stone, coal, timber, and sediment raised from a range of shipwreck sites of 18th-century vintage.' But none of the wreckages exhibited characteristics which could be indicative of the Lord Sandwich. Their efforts resumed in 2015, and by 2016 they had narrowed down where in the harbor the ship had been scuttled. That allowed them to whittle down a group of 13 ships sunk in 1778 to just 5, which were, in the absence of proper identification, labelled as RI 2396, RI 2397, RI 2578, RI 2393, and RI 2394. 'The two largest shipwreck sites, RI 2578 and RI 2394, were considered the most likely candidates for the remains of Lord Sandwich,' the report continues. But further analysis determined that RI 2578 didn't demonstrate enough of the requisite characteristics to be the Lord Sandwich. In investigating RI 2394, however, the team found a number of characteristics that looked promising, including 'dimensions of a range of structural timbers' which 'compare favorably with measurements taken when Endeavour was surveyed by the Royal Navy in 1768,' and procured timber samples which suggest repairs made with European timber, much in the same fashion as the Endeavour/Sandwich, 'which underwent significant repairs in 1776, shortly after being sold out of naval service.' After much analysis, all parties involved can now confidently conclude that RI 2394 is, in fact, Captain Cook's long lost HMS Endeavour/HMB Endeavour/Lord Sandwich. If anyone else has any reason why this wreckage should not be identified as such, speak now or forever hold your peace. You Might Also Like Nicole Richie's Surprising Adoption Story The Story of Gypsy Rose Blanchard and Her Mother Queen Camilla's Life in Photos Solve the daily Crossword
Boston Globe
23-07-2025
- Boston Globe
R.I. country club gets 30 more days to submit plan to replace illegal seawall
'Just further disappointment with the lack of progress here and the continued delays,' said Christopher Dodge, Narragansett Baykeeper for Save the Bay. 'We feel like this long ago should have gone to a hearing officer and that would've set a schedule on these things. There would've been findings of facts. It just an instance of delay after delay.' Advertisement Representatives for the country club have said they have been trying for decades to protect the golf course from erosion and damage. But the dispute has become Get Rhode Map A weekday briefing from veteran Rhode Island reporters, focused on the things that matter most in the Ocean State. Enter Email Sign Up But the country club failed to submit an acceptable restoration plan within that 30-day window. And one day before that deadline, the club Advertisement During Tuesday's council meeting, club attorney Jennifer Cervenka said that despite the lawsuit, 'it is still the country club's intention to try to come to an agreement with CRMC staff on an acceptable restoration plan.' Cervenka, a former chairwoman of the Coastal Resources Management Council, said the club met twice with council staff after the June 10 decision, and on Friday it proposed replacing the seawall with The TrapBag barriers consist of bags that are connected together 'like an accordion is stretched out,' she explained. 'And then you can put water or sand into these. There's an envelope with sand or other natural materials inside the envelopes.' Cervenka asked the council for an extension to submit a restoration plan using the TrapBag technology. " We believe that this could be an effective solution on the shoreline," she said. But Rich Lucia, supervising engineer for the council, said the TrapBag technology involves geosynthetics that are not biodegradable — meaning it's not the kind of 'non-structural shoreline protection' the council is seeking. Emily Hall, the council's coastal geologist, said TrapBag technology involves a 'heavy duty, permeable polypropylene fabric.' 'So that's another way of saying plastic, which is not biodegradable,' she said, adding that the definition of non-structural shoreline protection states that it shall be biodegradable. Cervenka said the club has been trying to use non-structural shoreline protection for 30 years without success, and she said there is precedent for allowing a hybrid of structural and non-structural shoreline protection. Advertisement 'I think it's not just structural versus non-structural,' she said. 'I think it's in between those two, and it's something that we would like to address as part of our proposed new restoration plan.' CRMC executive director Jeffrey Willis said the two sides had been making progress in meetings after the June 10 vote. He said staff were looking at relaxing requirements for the slope of the shoreline protection so it wouldn't cut too far into the 14th hole fairway and its 15th hole tee box. But Willis said the staff wanted a restoration plan that met regulations for non-structural soil protection, and he noted staff are concerned that the TrapBag technology is a structural material. After building the seawall without permission in 2023, the country club asked the council to In the lawsuit, the club says the council repeatedly refused to bring the dispute over the seawall to a hearing officer even though state law requires all contested enforcement proceedings and fines to be heard by an administrative hearing officer. At the June 10 meeting, Willis contended that it was not a contested matter because the club has never disputed the charges that it built the seawall without authorization, removed vegetation at the site, or filled tidal waters. Cervenka disagreed, and said the vegetation was destroyed by storms, not by the club, and that the club disputes the location where the council wants the restoration to take place. Advertisement In the lawsuit, the club said it submitted multiple plans to restore the shoreline in 2024 and 2025. But the council rejected the plans mainly because it disagreed with the proposed location of the 'toe of the berm' line — meaning the distance to which the shoreline protection can extend seaward. The lawsuit claims the line favored by the council would require the club 'to cut into its golf course and lose its 14th hole, even though the golf course and the location of the 14th hole predate the agency itself.' And the lawsuit claims the council was 'arbitrary and capricious' it insisting on a line that contradicts a 2013 restoration plan that the council had approved. 'Despite costly efforts over the last decades to protect (the club's) shoreline, the coastal area has been ravaged by storms and eroded aggressively, causing irreparable damage to the golf course and loss of property,' according to the lawsuit. Jed Thorp, director of advocacy for Save the Bay, said the environmental group has been 'pretty squarely on the opposite side of Quidnessett on this issue,' but he agreed that such disputes should go before hearing officers. 'We want to see the wall come down,' he said. 'But the council has to follow their own rules.' Thorp noted that 694 days have passed since the council first issued a cease-and-desist order for the seawall, and he said the matter might already have been resolved if the council had sent the dispute to a hearing officer right away. Save the Bay appreciates the attempt to move ahead on enforcement, Thorp said. 'But if they go about this the wrong way, they run the risk of further delay, which only hurts the public and the environment,' he said. Advertisement Edward Fitzpatrick can be reached at
