logo
Hongkong Land back in the black with H1 underlying profit of US$297 million

Hongkong Land back in the black with H1 underlying profit of US$297 million

Business Times29-07-2025
[SINGAPORE] Hongkong Land posted an underlying profit of US$297 million for the six months ended Jun 30, reversing from a net loss of US$7 million in the corresponding year-ago period.
Excluding the impact of non-cash provisions for its build-to-sell segment in China, H1 underlying profit stood at US$320 million, 11 per cent higher than the US$288 million recorded the year before.
In an interview with The Business Times on Tuesday (Jul 29), Hongkong Land's chief financial officer Craig Beattie said market sentiment in Hong Kong has improved significantly in the first six months of this year, led by the huge jump in capital markets activity.
Rents in Hong Kong have been on the decline for five years, and that is unlikely to continue, he added.
'The uptick in capital markets activity combined with rents being at a level that many occupiers feel this is a good point to really jump (in)... has meant that we've seen an improvement in inquiries.
'When you start to see some very savvy (and) large financial firms securing their presence in Hong Kong for the long term, I think people sit up and start to realise that maybe this could be the bottom of the market.'
A NEWSLETTER FOR YOU
Tuesday, 12 pm Property Insights
Get an exclusive analysis of real estate and property news in Singapore and beyond.
Sign Up
Sign Up
Vacancies on a committed basis for the group's portfolio declined to 6.9 per cent as at end-June, compared to 7.1 per cent at the end of 2024. This was also lower than the 11.8 per cent vacancy in Hong Kong's wider Central Grade A office market.
In Singapore, the group's office portfolio 'continued to perform well and was effectively fully let', Hongkong Land said. Rental reversions were positive, with average rents increasing to S$11.40 per square foot (psf), compared to S$11.10 psf for the same period in 2024.
The group uses underlying profit in its internal financial reporting to distinguish between ongoing business performance and non-trading items, as its management considers this to be a key measure that provides additional information on the group's underlying business performance.
Revenue for the first half of 2025 fell to US$751.2 million, down 23 per cent from US$972.4 million year on year as the group winds down its build-to-sell business .
Including net non-cash valuation movements, the group recorded US$221 million in profit attributable to shareholders, compared to a loss of US$833 million in H1 2024.
Underlying earnings per share for H1 2025 stood at US$0.1351, from an underlying loss per share of US$0.0031 in H1 2024.
The board is proposing an interim dividend of US$0.06 per share, unchanged from a year ago.
Giving an update on its capital recycling efforts, Hongkong Land said that, as at Jun 30, it has secured 33 per cent of its US$4 billion target. This includes the sale of office floors and retail space in One Exchange Square to the Hong Kong Stock Exchange for US$810 million.
'Capital recycling continues to be prioritised to reduce net debt and increase investment capacity, with a number of significant initiatives currently under way.'
On the build-to-sell segment, the group said the outlook is 'expected to remain challenging with weak sales levels across most cities on the Chinese mainland'. 'Stimulus measures have had a limited impact on improving broader market sentiment outside of Tier 1 cities. Profit contribution is likely to be substantially lower in the second half of 2025 due to lower profit margins on completed projects.'
The group's Landmark retail space in its Hong Kong Central portfolio will continue to be impacted by renovations in the second half of 2025, although this is expected to be 'partially offset' by scheduled re-openings in the fourth quarter.
Asked about the impact of tariff uncertainty on the group, Beattie said that in terms of capital recycling, for strategic transactions where buyers see long-term value, those deals will continue to move forward.
'Given the fact that Hong Kong has been in a difficult place but hopefully (is) now coming out of that… I think a lot of investors are perhaps thinking this could be a time to pivot back into this part of the world.'
Speaking on whether Hongkong Land still plans to divest MCL Land, Beattie said the group's Singapore property development arm is 'a very strong business overall'.
'Most of our projects are almost effectively fully sold. Whether there (are) opportunities for a buyer to take over the custodianship of our business... we'll just have to see. There's a number of options that we're looking at (in) the moment.'
Shares of Hongkong Land closed 2.1 per cent or US$0.13 higher at US$6.39 on Tuesday, before the H1 results were announced.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump's sharp India criticism on tariffs, Russia oil corner Modi as rift deepens
Trump's sharp India criticism on tariffs, Russia oil corner Modi as rift deepens

Straits Times

timean hour ago

  • Straits Times

Trump's sharp India criticism on tariffs, Russia oil corner Modi as rift deepens

Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox - Any expectation of the camaraderie that Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi enjoyed with US President Donald Trump during the latter's first term in office – united in part over the common threat of China – has all but evaporated. India underestimated just how transactional Mr Trump would be in his second term in power, as he has made little distinction between friends and adversaries. Ties have unpredictably and quickly gone south as Mr Trump has torn into India over its long-standing ties with Russia and the slow pace of negotiations for an India-US trade deal. The strain in US-India ties is a challenge for Mr Modi, who also faces domestic calls not to cave into Mr Trump's demands on trade and oil imports from Russia. India has benefitted from cheap Russian energy imports, which the US leader claims is helping to fund Russia's invasion of Ukraine . Mr Trump's vow to 'substantially raise' tariffs on Indian exports to the US from the already substantial 25 per cent because of New Delhi's Russian oil imports, is an indication of his administration's priorities in achieving broader geopolitical goals, say analysts. 'This (oil sanctions) is obviously a pressure tactic the US is using on Russia to get an outcome of its choice in the Ukraine war. We are collateral damage,' Mr Ashok Malik, a partner at the Asia Group business consultancy, told The Straits Times. Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. Singapore More train rides taken in first half-year, but overall public transport use stays below 2019 levels Singapore BlueSG needs time to develop software, refresh fleet, say ex-insiders after winding-down news Asia Cambodia-Thailand border clash a setback for Asean: Vivian Balakrishnan Singapore 'She had a whole life ahead of her': Boyfriend mourns Yishun fatal crash victim Singapore Doctor hounded ex-girlfriend, threatened to share her intimate photos, abducted her off street Asia Trump's transactional foreign policy fuels 'US scepticism' in Taiwan Business Women on corporate boards give firms a competitive advantage, says Australian Governor-General Singapore CEO of sports car distributor accused of offences including multiple counts of false trading 'I think things are very challenging at this juncture. It is the most challenging in a long, long time,' Mr Malik said. Mr Trump came into power promising he would end the war in Ukraine on his first day in office. But a long-term ceasefire has not materialised, and Russia has instead intensified its strikes on Ukraine, much to Mr Trump's frustration. India-Russia-US nexus 'India is not only buying massive amounts of Russian Oil, they are then, for much of the Oil purchased, selling it on the Open Market for big profits,' Mr Trump wrote on his Truth Social platform on Aug 4. 'They don't care how many people in Ukraine are being killed by the Russian War Machine. Because of this, I will be substantially raising the Tariff paid by India to the USA.' Mr Trump has lumped Russia and India together, calling them 'dead economies' in another Truth Social post on July 31, despite the fact that India is the world's fourth-largest economy by nominal GDP after the US, China and Germany. India has a longstanding relationship with Russia dating ba ck to the Cold War, and is the among the largest importer of Russian oil along with China . It imported about 1.75 million barrels a day from January to June 2025, up 1 per cent from a year ago, according to Reuters. On Aug 4, the Ministry of External Affairs called the US President and European Union 's targeting of India for buying Russian oil 'unjustified and unreasonable.' 'India began importing from Russia because traditional supplies were diverted to Europe after the outbreak of the conflict. The United States at that time actively encouraged such imports by India for strengthening global energy markets stability,' the MEA said in a statement. 'India's imports are meant to ensure predictable and affordable energy costs to the Indian consumer. They are a necessity compelled by the global market situation. However, it is revealing that the very nations criticizing India are themselves indulging in trade with Russia. ' The European Union had imposed sanctions on Russian-backed Indian refiner Nayara and banned the import of refined oil made from Russian crude. In particular, New Delhi called out the United States for its continual imports from Russia of 'uranium hexafluoride for its nuclear industry, palladium for its EV industry, fertilisers as well as chemicals.' Mr Trump is not the first US president to disapprove of India's ties with Iran and Russia. But previous US leaders like Mr Joe Biden and Mr Barack Obama chose to look the other way due to the strategic calculation of India's importance as a fast-growing economy a nd as a counter to China in America's Indo-Pacific strategy. In any case, India's ties with Russia are also not what they were once, as Russia has drawn closer to China and Pakistan, while India has grown closer to the West. The South Asian giant has also been diversifying its defence weapon purchases to include products from the US and Israel. But that doesn't mean India can walk away from the Russia relationship as desired by Mr Trump, according to Mr Nandan Unnikrishnan, a Distinguished Fellow at the Observer Research Foundation, a New Delhi-based think tank. 'We need warm relations. India is a growing economy; it is going to consume natural resources and Russia is a country that has every element in huge abundance. We will end up buying a lot of resources,' he said. US-India tariff negotiations Mr Trump is also frustrated that a trade deal with India to his liking has so far not materialised. He has used tariffs to force countries that have a trade surplus with the US into what he claims is a more reciprocal bilateral trade relationship. The US is India's largest export market, with exports reaching US$86.51 billion (S$111.37 billion) from April 2024 to March 2025. India's imports from the US were US$45.33 billion for the same period, according to Indian government figures . While both countries are still locked in negotiations, New Delhi has refused to grant the concessions that the Trump administration is seeking, including the opening up of heavily protected agriculture and dairy sectors to US imports. More than 60 per cent of the Indian population depends on these two sectors for their livelihoods in some form or another. Farmers have opposed opening up of the agriculture and dairy sectors , arguing they would not be able to withstand competition from US agriculture. Unlike US farms, India's farms are small, fragmented and hardly mechanised . In another post on Truth Social on July 30 , Mr Trump criticised India for imposing the most 'strenuous and obnoxious' tariffs in the world. India's refusal to give in to Trump for now may also be seen as a recognition that it is not just trade interests which are at stake. 'Trump has not only unleashed a trade war but is also deploying commercial instruments for geopolitical ends,' India's former foreign secretary Shyam Saran wrote in The Indian Express newspaper on Aug 4. 'These actions threaten India's core interests and its ability to follow a policy of strategic autonomy, which every government, irrespective of its political colour, has remained wedded to since Independence,' he said. 'We should not treat the current disruption in India-US relations as just a trade dispute. It is much more than that.' Mr Modi's response to Mr Trump's belligerent language, which has pushed the Indian prime minister into a corner domestically, took a nationalistic tone. 'The world economy is facing instability and uncertainty. In such times, countries are focusing solely on their own interests. India, too, is on the path to becoming the world's third-largest economy and must remain alert to its own economic priorities,' Mr Modi said in his constituency of Varanasi on Aug 2, even before Mr Trump's latest escalation. 'At a time when the world is going through uncertainty, let us take a pledge to sell only Swadeshi (made in India) goods from our shops and markets. Promoting made-in-India goods will be the truest service to the country.' Political watchers noted that it would be very difficult for the Indian Prime Minister to give any large concessions in the trade deal, given the growing anger within India towards Mr Trump. Even the right-wing Hindu nationalist ecosystem, which has been very supportive of the US president, is angry at what it perceives as a series of other slights to India. This includes Mr Trump's statements on how he engineered the ceasefire between India and Pakistan, after the neighbours were embroiled in a military conflict over a terror attack in Kashmir, and Mr Trump's subsequent hosting of Pakistan's Army chief Asim Muneer in the White House. 'Mr Modi doesn't have much space to manoeuvre on the trade deal. The economic and political costs of accepting US demand are something this government will find difficult to swallow,' said Dr Biswajit Dhar, a trade expert and former professor at Jawaharlal Nehru University. 'We have to wait and watch. What the Trump administration has done is push India into a corner.'

Trump says he will meet China's Xi if a trade deal is struck
Trump says he will meet China's Xi if a trade deal is struck

CNA

time2 hours ago

  • CNA

Trump says he will meet China's Xi if a trade deal is struck

WASHINGTON: President Donald Trump said on Tuesday (Aug 5) the US was close to a trade deal with China and that he would meet his Chinese counterpart Xi Jinping before the end of the year if an agreement is struck. "He asked for a meeting, and I'll end up having a meeting before the end of the year most likely, if we make a deal. If we don't make a deal, I'm not going to have a meeting," Trump told CNBC in an interview referring to China's Xi. "We're getting very close to a deal. We're getting along with China very well," Trump said. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said last week he believed the US had the "makings of a deal" with China after officials from the two countries met in Stockholm in a bid to resolve economic disputes aimed at extending their truce on a trade war by three months. China is facing an Aug 12 deadline to reach a durable tariff agreement with the US administration, after Beijing and Washington reached preliminary deals in May and June to end escalating tit-for-tat tariffs and a cut-off of rare earth minerals. Without a deal, global supply chains could face renewed turmoil from US duties snapping back to triple-digit levels that would amount to a bilateral trade embargo.

Foreign Affairs Minister Vivian Balakrishnan expresses concern at changing global trading system
Foreign Affairs Minister Vivian Balakrishnan expresses concern at changing global trading system

CNA

time2 hours ago

  • CNA

Foreign Affairs Minister Vivian Balakrishnan expresses concern at changing global trading system

Foreign Affairs Minister Vivian Balakrishnan says the baseline 10 per cent tariff imposed by the US on Singapore is still a disappointment and a drag on economic growth. This is even though the situation is not as bad as it initially sounded. But beyond the numbers, Dr Balakrishnan says what is of concern is how the global trading system is changing. He was speaking at a dialogue organised by the Singapore Institute of International Affairs.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store