Tulsi Gabbard became a ‘weapon of mass distraction'
The Independent
Critics have accused Tulsi Gabbard of trying to shield Donald Trump's administration from scrutiny through her recent claims that top Obama administration officials should be prosecuted for leading a "coup" against the president in 2016 by investigating Russian efforts to help his campaign. The allegations and conspiracy theories "would be sad if they weren't so dangerous," Democratic Rep. Jason Crow told Fox News on Sunday. "She has turned herself into a weapon of mass distraction, is what I've been calling it." Crow accused Trump's national intelligence director of "trying to curry and get back into favor with Donald Trump and has concocted these theories to do so," an apparent reference to Gabbard and Trump's public disagreement over the state of Iran's nuclear programme.
This month, Gabbard spearheaded the release of materials regarding the then-outgoing Obama administration's attempts to probe Russian influence operations during the 2016 election. Critics saw the release as an attempt to distract from continued criticism of the Trump administration for its handling of the Jeffrey Epstein files and the president's ties to the late financier, who died in prison while awaiting a federal sex trafficking trial. "Nothing in this partisan, previously scuttled document changes that," Senator Mark Warner, the ranking Democrat on the Senate Intelligence Committee, told The Hill after the disclosures.
"Releasing this so-called report is just another reckless act by a Director of National Intelligence so desperate to please Donald Trump that she is willing to risk classified sources, betray our allies, and politicise the very intelligence she has been entrusted to protect," he said. Gabbard claims the Obama materials, including a declassified 2020 Republican report from the House intelligence committee, reveal his "years long coup" against Trump. She claims that top Obama officials pushed to override past intelligence findings to allege that Russians specifically wanted to boost the Trump campaign, rather than undermine faith in the US election system more generally, and has called for Obama and others to face criminal charges. Trump has echoed such claims, sharing a fake, AI- generated video of Obama being arrested and thrown in jail on his Truth Social account.
As evidence of the alleged coup, Gabbard honed in on past conclusions that Russian actors did not successfully hack digital voting infrastructure or change vote counts, suggesting these findings clashed with intelligence officials' later assessments that Russia sought to help Trump. Susan Miller, a former CIA officer who helped oversee the 2017 intelligence assessment, said Gabbard was "lying." "We definitely had the intel to show with high probability that the specific goal of the Russians was to get Trump elected," Miller told NBC News, adding that intelligence officials had briefed Trump on their findings and he had thanked them. "At the same time, we found no two-way collusion between Trump or his team with the Russians at that time," she said.
Obama's office issued a rare public statement denouncing Gabbard's allegations. "These bizarre allegations are ridiculous and a weak attempt at distraction. Nothing in the document issued last week undercuts the widely accepted conclusion that Russia worked to influence the 2016 presidential election but did not successfully manipulate any votes," a spokesperson said. The White House has pushed back against the argument that Gabbard's investigation is a partisan play. "The only people who are suggesting that the director of national intelligence would release evidence to try to boost her standing with the president are the people in this room who constantly try to sow distrust and chaos among the president's Cabinet," White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said during a Wednesday briefing. "And it's not working," she said.
Multiple assessments have backed up the intelligence community's original findings of a general, one-way Russian influence operation that sought to boost Trump through tactics like hacking Democratic party materials and spreading disinformation online, even though the Trump campaign itself wasn't shown to have collaborated on the effort. Special counsels have investigated both the underlying "Russiagate" claims and the origins of the FBI investigation into the Trump campaign without uncovering any intentional "coup" by the Obama administration.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Arabian Post
2 hours ago
- Arabian Post
Trump Plan To End Free Elections In 2026 Midterm And 2028 Presidential Revealed
By Mark Gruenberg NEW YORK—The Trump administration and its radical right foot-soldiers in the federal government and in the states are undertaking a comprehensive scheme to undermine future state and federal elections, in effect rigging the rolls to keep themselves in power no matter what the voters decide. So far, other than the report itself, by the Brennan Center for Law and Justice at New York University, there's been little—or little-noticed—response. The comprehensive scheme is detailed in a combination of a Trump executive order on March 25 and the notorious SAVE Act, a GOP voter repression law that would disenfranchise at least 21 million people, most of them women—the voters most likely to oppose the Trump-right-wing-corporate agenda. Detailed and footnoted protests were aired by the Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW) to the GOP-run House Administration Committee and by the Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights—whose members include the AFL-CIO—to the GOP-run Senate Rules and Administration Committee. And states have gone to court to try to block Trump, the Brennan Center adds. 'A president has no right to rewrite the country's election rules or regulate federal elections on his own,' the center's report says. 'As a federal court recently put it, 'The Constitution vests none of these powers in the president.' In issuing the order, the president claimed extraordinary unilateral authority to regulate federal elections and usurp the powers of Congress, the states, and the (U.S.) Elections Administration Commission, an independent, bipartisan federal agency.' Protecting U.S. elections, at all levels, from partisan manipulation, is now and has been for more than a century, important to workers, union, and non-union. One, as AFL-CIO President Liz Shuler often points out, is that the GOP Trump regime views organized labor as a key roadblock to its partisan and repressive agenda. And the best way to crush labor is to crush workers' right to vote. And, second, and just as important, restricting who can vote, and who cannot, centralizes power in the hands not just of Trump but of the corporate interests that back him and who turn a blind eye—or worse–to repression both at the workplace and at the ballot box. After all, paraphrasing the late UAW President Walter Reuther, what is won at the bargaining table can be taken away by the stroke of a pen. The elements in the right wing's coordinated attempt to entrench itself in power go far beyond what Trump tried in the aftermath of the 2020 presidential election. Trump lost it to Democratic nominee Joe Biden, and knew it. But he tried to overturn the results in lawsuits and other intimidation in selected swing states—and went 0-for-62 in court cases. When that failed, he turned to aiding and abetting the Jan. 6, 2021, Trumpite invasion, insurrection, and attempted coup d'etat at the U.S. Capitol. But now the Trump right-wing playbook to undermine and rig coming elections is much more extensive and much more under the radar, the Brennan Center reports. It includes: Attempting to rewrite election rules to burden voters and usurp control of election systems. Targeting or threatening to target election officials and others who keep elections free and fair. Federal officials, at the Justice Department, had an important role in countering disinformation and combating racial discrimination. This federal protection for fair elections may no longer exist. Supporting people who undermine election administration by putting them on state and local elections boards. Retreating from the federal role of protecting voters and the election process by defunding agencies Congress established to safeguard the vote and ensuring the Federal Elections Commission, already hobbled by a years-long deadlock, remains toothless. Giving a 'go' signal to future violence to overturn elections, by Trump's pardons of the January 6 insurrectionists. The Brennan report leaves out one tactic of Trump, the MAGAites and the right-wing: Stacking state and local elections boards. An attempt occurred in Nevada, a swing state in 2020 and 2024. And after the four-member, evenly split Wayne County, Mich. (Detroit) elections board voted 3-1 to certify Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden's margin there in 2020, Michigan MAGAites forced the Republican commissioner who voted for certification out of office. 'Why do we conclude this represents a concerted strategy? Among other things, President Trump tried to do this before,' the Brennan Center points out. 'He was the first president to try to overturn the results of a presidential election and used federal power to do so. 'Institutions and key officials blocked him. These internal checks, however, are now gone, and many public officials will likely carry out the president's will. 'This campaign to undermine elections runs afoul of the U.S. Constitution. Only Congress and the states can set election rules. The executive branch, especially the Department of Justice (DOJ), is charged with enforcing federal laws. But neither the president nor the DOJ has the authority to set rules governing elections or to supervise' state elections procedures. Yet Trump is trying just that. And, as CREW and the Brennan Center point out, the misnamed SAVE Act, a key goal of the House's ruling right-wing Republicans, would aid and abet that campaign. Other specifics include: Attempting to impose a 'Show Your Papers' requirement on voters. Trump, in a March 25 executive order, and the GOP congressional majority, in the SAVE Act, say doing so would prevent 'voter fraud,' which even Trump's last Attorney General in his first term, Bill Barr, called non-existent. But 'show your papers' mandates, using a citizenship document to even register to vote, 'would undermine voting and disrupt election administration in multiple respects.' Estimates are that the mandate, the SAVE Act, or both, would disenfranchise at least 21 million voters nationwide. Most of them would be women, whose names on their initial voter registrations are different from the name they now use. Force the states to re-certify all their voting machines, buy new ones, or both. That would cost billions of dollars. It's also one step removed from Trump's demand for hand counts of all elections. The certification would be done by federally approved firms and methods, and only one has been okayed by the federal Elections Administration Commission, on July 7, 2025. There are also bans on unauthorized access to voting machines and equipment. The result of violating them is to toss the machines—and the votes they count—out. Tina Peters, former county clerk in rural 'red' Mesa County, Colo., is now serving a 9-year term in prison for allowing Trumpite election deniers access to her county's machines after the 2020 balloting. She was convicted last year. There is a plan for retaliation against opponents of the right-wing's voter rigging. The targets include state and local elections officials, non-partisan groups such as the League of Women Voters, civic groups that mobilize voters 'and other individuals and entities that protect elections and the rule of law,' the Brennan Center reports. That kind of retaliation could target both unions and their get-out-the-vote drives and groups such as the Poor People's Campaign, which registers and mobilizes poor and low-wealth people—the very voters least likely to participate, but also the most likely to oppose the Trumpite, right-wing and corporate hegemony. The Brennan Center reports likely targets for 'law enforcement' type retaliation would include individual voters, election officials, 'perceived political adversaries, and journalists.' The last two groups of targets have been GOP targets before: On Richard Nixon's enemies list. Labour leaders—AFSCME President Jerry Wurf and UAW President Leonard Woodcock—were on it, too. Trump's FBI Director Kash Patel 'stated 'We're going to come after the people in the media who lied about American citizens, who helped Joe Biden rig presidential elections–we're going to come after you,'' the Brennan Center adds. The Brennan Center reports three active task forces leading that retaliation: The Justice Department's 'Weaponization Working Group, the New Jersey U.S. Attorney's Office Election Integrity Task Force, and the Washington, D.C., Attorney's Office Special Unit. Letting DOGE—Trump's so-called Department of Government Efficiency–access sensitive private and personal voter registration files, just as it did with other agencies, including the Labour Department and the National Labour Relations Board. And the threat isn't only from DOGE's misuse of the files. The Brennan Center adds that when DOGE grabbed the NLRB's files, its security was so lax that foreign hackers immediately invaded them. 'The administration could abuse voter file access to claim fraud and erode public trust in elections,' the Brennan Center warns. 'It could also pressure state officials to target groups of voters and carry out unwarranted voter purges. Any disclosure of sensitive personal information puts individuals and groups at risk of being intimidated or doxed. And mishandling voter file data could expose U.S. elections to political and foreign interference.' As regards intimidating election officials. after what happened in 2020 to the two African-American women in Georgia at the hands of Trump consigliere Rudy Giuliani—one a ballot counter, the other her mother—local elections officials are scared and defecting in droves. 'Criminal investigations and prosecutions would impose a severe personal and financial toll on election officials or nonprofit employees for simply doing their jobs to help keep elections free and fair. But beyond that, the harms that stem from targeting the officials and civil society groups that make our elections work are manifold,' the Brennan Center report says. 'Even if the administration never charges any officials, the threat alone of criminal investigation or prosecution will likely exacerbate the exodus of election officials. In 2024 33% of local election officials knew at least one colleague who resigned in part due to fear for their safety, of increased threats, or of intimidation; 21% stated they were unlikely to continue serving in their role for the 2026 midterms. In 2025, 59% of officials reported fear of political interference in their ability to do their jobs. And 46% were very or somewhat concerned about potential politically motivated investigations of themselves and their families.' The Brennan Center reports 'federal and state law prohibit anyone, including federal officials, from intimidating voters and those, like election officials or civic engagement organizations, who assist or encourage them to vote. And though voters rarely do so, they are able to sue DOJ officials under anti-intimidation law in federal court.' 'The Constitution establishes a system of checks and balances to ensure free and fair elections. The power to regulate elections lies in the hands of states and Congress. Courts and advocates complement this system to uphold the Constitution and federal law,' the Brennan Center declares. 'U.S. election infrastructure leaves no room for the president to insert himself. Yet that is exactly what he purports to do.' (IPA Service) Courtesy: People's World
Sharjah 24
4 hours ago
- Sharjah 24
Trump says pharma, chips tariffs incoming as trade war widens
Trump made his latest comments in an interview on CNBC days before a separate set of tariff hikes come into effect on dozens of economies later this week. His sweeping plans have sparked a flurry of activity as governments seek to avert the worst of his threats -- with Switzerland's leaders heading to Washington on Tuesday in a last-minute push to avoid punitive duties. But he appears set to further widen his trade wars. The US president told CNBC that upcoming tariffs on imported pharmaceuticals could reach 250 percent, while adding that he plans for new duties on foreign semiconductors soon. "We'll be putting (an) initially small tariff on pharmaceuticals, but in one year, one-and-a-half years, maximum, it's going to go to 150 percent," Trump said. "And then it's going to go to 250 percent because we want pharmaceuticals made in our country." Trump also said that Washington will be announcing tariffs "within the next week or so." He added: "We're going to be announcing on semiconductors and chips." India threat Trump has set out varying tariff rates for dozens of economies after imposing a 10-percent levy on almost all trading partners in April. But these broad duties taking effect Thursday exclude products like pharmaceuticals, steel, aluminum and lumber, which are being separately targeted by sector. This means that although the 39-percent tariff Swiss leaders seek to avoid come Thursday excludes pharmaceuticals, Trump's plans for a steep levy on such imports will likely remain a point of contention in any talks. Pharmaceuticals represented 60 percent of Swiss goods exports to the United States last year. Outside of Switzerland, most products from the European Union face a 15 percent tariff starting Thursday, after Washington and Brussels struck a deal to avoid higher levies. But Trump warned Tuesday that the EU could see its tariff level surge again if it did not fulfil obligations under their recent pact. Besides probing pharmaceuticals and chips imports, Trump has already imposed steep duties of 50 percent on steel and aluminum, alongside lower levels on autos and parts. In the same CNBC interview, Trump said he expects to raise the US tariff on Indian imports "very substantially over the next 24 hours" due to the country's purchases of Russian oil. This is a key revenue source for Moscow's military offensive on Ukraine. His pressure on India comes after signaling fresh sanctions on Moscow if it did not make progress by Friday towards a peace deal with Kyiv, more than three years since Russia's invasion. Moscow is anticipating talks this week with the US leader's special envoy Steve Witkoff, and the Kremlin has criticized Trump's threat of raising tariffs on Indian goods. Weak employment data last week pointed to challenges for the US economy as companies take a cautious approach in hiring and investment while grappling with Trump's radical -- and rapidly changing -- trade policy. The tariffs are a demonstration of raw economic power that Trump sees as putting US exporters in a stronger position while encouraging domestic manufacturing by keeping out foreign imports. But the approach has raised fears of inflation and other economic fallout in the world's biggest economy.
Middle East Eye
6 hours ago
- Middle East Eye
US looking to take over Gaza aid effort: Report
The Trump administration is looking to take over the aid effort in Gaza, albeit reluctantly, Axios reported on Tuesday, citing unnamed US officials. The project is something the Israelis welcomed, Axios said. "They are going to spend a lot of money in order to help us significantly improving the humanitarian situation so that it will be less of an issue," an unnamed Israeli official was quoted as saying. It remains unclear exactly how this would be different to the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF), which has been mired in scandal and controversy since it began operations in late May. Nearly 1,000 Palestinians have been killed waiting for aid at GHF sites, according to the United Nations.
