I'm disabled and Rachel Reeves is my MP - cutting Pip won't get me back to work
That was part of the reasoning for major cuts to benefits, including Universal Credit and the Personal Independence Payment (Pip) for disabled people.
By making those measures less generous, the state would save money and people would be incentivised to find work – or so the government argued.
But back in the Chancellor's constituency of Leeds West and Pudsey, Anastasia Tempest was watching on in frustration.
Anastasia, who has cerebral palsy and uses a wheelchair, had been searching for work for some time and was being supported in that effort by a local organisation called Pathways to Progress.
But around the same time Reeves was giving her speech in Westminster, Pathways to Progress was closing its doors permanently. It had lost its government funding.
Craig Munro breaks down Westminster chaos into easy to follow insight, walking you through what the latest policies mean to you. Sent every Wednesday. Sign up here.
Anastasia told Metro: 'They're cutting back on access to work.
'That's a very good scheme and there needs to be more support, because there isn't a lot of support. And the support that was there has either been cut or eradicated altogether.'
The initial measures announced by the Department for Work and Pensions in March were watered down last week as Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer faced a significant rebellion from Labour backbenchers.
Most significantly, everyone currently on Pip will continue to receive the same level of payment, with the changes to eligibility only applying to new claimants from November next year.
However, a government assessment of the changes published today revealed 150,000 people would still be pushed into poverty under the altered measures.
Charlotte Gill, Head of Campaigns and Public Affairs at the MS Society, says: 'We're appalled that the government are choosing to rush through this reckless and harmful bill.
'It's outrageous that MPs are being asked to vote for dramatic welfare changes, without having time to properly scrutinise their impact.'
Facing a rebellion of more than 120 backbench Labour MPs, Keir Starmer announced a range of concessions to the bill ahead of a debate and vote today. All current Pip recipients will stay on the system without any changes
The changes to eligibility – including the requirement for recipients to get at least four points from a single activity in their assessment in order to qualify – will only apply to those who claim after November 2026
200,000 people with the most severe, lifelong conditions will not be called for a University Credit reassessment
Current recipients of the UC health element and some new claimants who have 12 months or less to live will see their income rise at least in line with inflation until 2029/30
Anastasia said she doesn't like seeing Pip being 'abused' and accepts it can be misused.
She said: 'I do think it's really good if somebody with a disability or some kind of health condition can work, even if it's a little bit, it can be quite healthy.
'I mean, it's a difficult one, because Pip shouldn't be used for people not to work.'
But she said the Chancellor could find alternative ways to find money: 'I have met Rachel Reeves on Zoom. I spoke to her once a couple of years ago.
'If I was to speak to her again, I would ask, go after the billionaires.'
Anastasia continued: 'Why people with disabilities? Pip is often misunderstood, it's not means tested, and I think it's good that it's not means tested because it's related to having a disability. More Trending
'Nobody, nobody wants to be disabled. Nobody would choose to be disabled. You know, I don't choose to have cerebral palsy.
'I think some people think, I mean, I've read stuff, they think you receive a lot of money if you have a disability. That's nonsense.'
Today, MPs will vote for the first time on the welfare cuts when the Universal Credit (UC) and PIP Bill has its second reading in the House of Commons.
The proposed legislation is expected to pass following the government concessions, but the PM is still likely to see one of his biggest MP rebellions just days ahead of his first anniversary in the job.
Get in touch with our news team by emailing us at webnews@metro.co.uk.
For more stories like this, check our news page.
MORE: Benefit cuts will push 150,000 people into poverty despite U-turn, government admits
MORE: I dehydrate myself so I don't have to use public disabled toilets
MORE: All of Keir Starmer's welfare cut U-turns 'will cost £4,500,000,000'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
17 minutes ago
- Reuters
UK's Starmer defeats wrecking amendment on welfare reform
LONDON, July 1 (Reuters) - British Prime Minister Keir Starmer cleared the first hurdle in his quest to reform the welfare system on Tuesday, when lawmakers opposed to the proposed law failed to halt its progress with a so-called "reasoned amendment". Several lawmakers tabled a "reasoned amendment," used to express opposition to a proposed law, to the welfare reforms, which if it had passed would have halted the bill. The attempt failed with 328 to 149 lawmakers voting against the amendment. Lawmakers will immediately hold another vote on whether or not to progress the bill to the next stages of the parliamentary process. If the government also wins that vote, those next stages are scheduled for July 9.
Telegraph
22 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Starmer's benefits Bill turns to farce
Sir Keir Starmer has rendered his flagship welfare cuts legislation 'pointless' in a farcical climbdown to win the support of Labour rebels. A planned crackdown on the personal independence payment (Pip), which helps disabled people with extra costs, was dropped just 90 minutes before the crunch vote. The late concession came when it appeared dozens of rebels were still willing to vote down the package, even though it had already been gutted last week to appease critics. Even with the change, 49 Labour MPs voted against the Bill – the biggest rebellion of the Starmer premiership, which marks its one-year anniversary this week. Government ministers faced ridicule from Labour critics, who dubbed the handling of the changes 'shambolic', 'unedifying' and a 'total clusterf--- of Godzilla proportions'. The U-turn means that almost all of the £4.6 billion of annual savings the Bill was meant to deliver have been lost, increasing the chance of new tax rises this autumn. Labour Left-wingers are expected to seize on Sir Keir's weakness and push for further policy changes, such as a new raid on wealth or relaxed rules on immigration. The mishandling of the welfare package, despite a working majority in the House of Commons of 165, is also likely to fuel Labour calls for an overhaul in Number 10. The Prime Minister threw his support behind Morgan McSweeney, his chief of staff blamed by some welfare rebels, in Cabinet meeting on Tuesday morning. Kemi Badenoch, the Conservative leader, said: 'This is an utter capitulation. Labour's welfare Bill is now a total waste of time. It effectively saves £0, helps no one into work, and does not control spending. 'It's pointless. They should bin it, do their homework, and come back with something serious. Starmer cannot govern.' Mel Stride, the Tory shadow chancellor, said 'This farcical climbdown is the most humiliating moment of Labour's first year in office.' He added: 'This isn't serious government, it's chaos. Labour has bottled welfare reform, left a multi-billion-pound hole in the nation's finances, and set the country on course for higher taxes or a debt spiral. It doesn't have to be this way.' The total disability and incapacity benefits bill is set to continue rising, from £76 billion last year to £98 billion by the end of the decade, piling pressure on the public finances. Rachel Reeves, the Chancellor, faces a black hole that some estimates suggest could run to tens of billions of pounds, meaning she risks being forced into a new tax raid in her autumn Budget. Helen Miller, the deputy director of the Institute for Fiscal Studies, said the changes would not save any money by 2029-30. She said: 'This is a Government with a majority of 165 that is seemingly unable to reform either pensioner winter fuel payments or working-age disability benefits. That doesn't bode well for those hoping this Government will grasp the nettle and address the deeper, structural challenges facing the UK public finances.' Labour rebels, some of whom are emboldened by forcing billion-pound changes on the Starmer administration, told The Telegraph they will push for new wealth taxes this autumn. One Labour rebel told The Telegraph: 'I'd say the new review will last longer than the PM. His sell-by date just got a lot closer after this week.' Andy McDonald, a Labour MP who voted against the welfare plan, said of wealth taxes: 'It is the broadest shoulders argument. 'Distributed to each according to his need.' That's not Marx, it's the Bible.' A second Labour rebel told The Telegraph: 'I think it is inevitable. I don't think the Chancellor has got any options left.' Sir Keir had been facing a huge rebellion last week when 127 Labour MPs – around one in four – signed an amendment to effectively block the Universal Credit and Personal Independence Payment Bill. In an attempt to quash the revolt last week, Mr McSweeney, Angela Rayner, the Deputy Prime Minister, and Sir Alan Campbell, the Chief Whip, personally negotiated a compromise that meant all current recipients of disability benefits would not be affected by the changes. Instead, the new system would kick in from November 2026. A review of the most contentious part – toughening the eligibility for Pip – would also return that autumn. But on Tuesday afternoon, ministers were forced to make yet another alteration, removing the entire section of the Bill referring to changes to Pip. The sudden extra concession, which removed the most important part of the legislation just before the key vote, suggested government whips were not confident the legislation would pass. It eventually did by 335 votes in favour and 260 votes against - a much tighter result than expected given how drastically it had been watered down. As well as the 49 Labour MPs who voted against the Bill, 19 abstained. The concession was announced by Sir Stephen Timms, the minister for social security and disability, during the Commons debate just 90 minutes before votes were due to be called. It came just hours after Liz Kendall, the Work and Pensions Secretary, had insisted there would be no further changes. Ms Kendall, who told broadcasters there were 'lessons to learn' after the result, was the driving force behind the Bill and is likely to face questions over her position. Labour rebels were left infuriated that the Government was continuing to force through a Bill which had lost the vast majority of its major elements, rather than pulling the legislation entirely. Paula Barker, the Labour MP for Liverpool Wavertree: 'Whilst grateful for the concessions, this has further laid bare the incoherent and shambolic nature of this process. It is the most unedifying spectacle that I have ever seen.' Ian Lavery, the Labour MP for Blyth and Ashington, urged the Government to withdraw the 'hodgepodge of a Bill which means nothing to nobody'. Ms Lavery said: 'This is crazy, man. This is outrageous, man. This Bill isn't fit for purpose.' 'I went out for a banana – and the whole thing changed' Mary Kelly Foy, the Labour MP for the City of Durham, expressed shock at what had happened after she returned to the Commons after leaving for a snack. Ms Foy said: 'I popped out for a banana earlier on and, when I came back in, things had changed again. So I'm even more unclear on what I'm voting on.' The Tories were also critical of how the legislation had been handled. Simon Hoare, the Conservative MP for North Dorset: 'I have never seen a Bill butchered and filleted by their own sponsoring ministers in such a cack-handed way. 'Nobody can understand the purpose of this Bill now. In the interest of fairness, simplicity and natural justice, is it not best to withdraw it, redraft it and start again?' Around 800,000 claimants of Pip had been expected to lose money under the original cuts package, including 370,000 current recipients. The changes have now been shelved. It means the Government is still expected to spend £28.5 billion on Pip by the end of the decade. Already 3.8 million people get the payments, according to official figures. Sir Stephen will continue with his review, announced last week as part of the initial concessions deal, into Pip eligibility and report back in Autumn 2026. But government sources were unable to say if any of the original changes would be kept. That includes the most contentious element, which was to increase the number of points someone must get in an assessment for the payments. The legislation still contains the halving of the health top-up in Universal Credit for new claimants and the scrapping of the work capability assessment, as well as an increase in the amount of standard Universal Credit.
The Sun
22 minutes ago
- The Sun
Scrapping the Rwanda migrant deterrent scheme has been Labour's biggest act of self-harm
French farce NEXT week Britain will roll out the red carpet for the State visit of French President Emmanuel Macron. Someone should give him a tour of our asylum hotels instead. 1 After all, Macron's done precious little for the £480million we handed him to stop the boats. A record 20,000 have now crossed the Channel illegally in 2025 and been taken straight to free accommodation. Clearly, it's not just the migrants taking British taxpayers for a ride. Yesterday, French cops gave a demonstration of their expensive drones, cars and a beach buggy — all of which we helped pay for. Presumably their most-used bit of kit is new binoculars used by the gendarmes to make sure migrants are firmly on their way to Dover. Scrapping the Rwanda scheme has been Labour's biggest act of self-harm. Ministers are left making lame claims about smashing the people-smuggling gangs, while handing migrants millions more in legal aid to fight removal. Desperate Britain is now considering a 'one-in-one-out' returns agreement. In theory, the French set up asylum processing hubs and for every migrant with a genuine claim that they forward to Britain, we send an illegal back. But given their uselessness, how many will the French actually process? How car washes are being fined £3m a year for hiring illegal migrants to work - is your local firm among them? Migrants will keep chancing their luck until they know for a fact they will definitely be deported. Lost control WHAT total chaos. Normally, a Government with a huge majority would mark its first year in office by trumpeting a raft of great achievements. Sir Keir Starmer's Number Ten has chosen to blast itself in both feet. Last week's U-turn to try to salvage his flagship benefits bill was bad enough. Last night's second capitulation to Labour rebels renders it almost meaningless. No savings worthy of the name. No reform. No clue. We can now look forward to a second year in which Labour jacks up our taxes to fill the financial black hole. Still, at least the Prime Minister's Left-wing MPs will be happy. They look like the ones in control now. Cost of Red Ed In fact bills will go UP by a cumulative £104 by 2031 thanks to a massive upgrade of the network and green taxes. His uselessness would almost be considered funny. If it wasn't costing hard-up families yet another fortune.
