This May Be The World's Oldest Human Fingerprint, And That's Not All
This one small marking on this one small stone still exists to this day. It was discovered in 2022 in the San Lázaro rock shelter of Central Spain, and it may be the world's oldest complete human fingerprint.
More than that, it could also be one of the oldest known artistic representations of a human face.
That latter claim remains controversial, but the red fingerprint does sit in the very middle of the pebble, below two divots and above another – an artistic 'boop' right where a nose should be.
On site, the face immediately jumped out to archaeologists, led by David Álvarez-Alonso at the Complutense University of Madrid.
If the team is right, this stone was probably carried from the nearby river to the San Lázaro rock shelter.
The Neanderthal who selected it must have seen something special in its shape to take it home and paint it with ocher, especially as it seems to serve no functional purpose and no other ocher has been found at the site.
"The ocher dot does not appear as a shapeless addition or a mere stain," explain the authors, "rather, it contains a fingerprint that implies the pigment has been applied specifically with the tip of a finger soaked in pigment."
There's always a chance the print was made by accident.
But Álvarez Alonso and colleagues think it is more likely the marking was an intentional act of imagination and symbolic art – a skill we have only just started giving Neanderthals credit for.
"If we had a pebble with a red dot on it that was done 5,000 years ago by Homo sapiens, no one would hesitate to call it portable art," Álvarez Alonso told Sam Jones at The Guardian.
"But associating Neanderthals with art generates a lot of debate. I think there's sometimes an unintentional prejudice."
The study was published in Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences.
Robot Hand Could Help Scientists Decode Why Tickling Makes Us Giggle
Earliest Known Whale Bone Tools Discovered in Europe's Museum Collections
Are Dogs Replacing Babies in Countries With Declining Birth Rates?
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
Endurance athletes that carry Neanderthal genes could be held back from reaching their peak
When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission. Scientists have uncovered a genetic variant, inherited from Neanderthals, that may limit athletic performance. The mutation is thought to affect roughly 8% of modern-day Europeans and influences the activity of a key enzyme in the production of energy in skeletal muscle. In a study published July 10 in the journal Nature Communications, researchers analyzed more than 2,700 individuals, which revealed that those who carried the Neanderthal gene variant were half as likely to become top athletes as those without the variant. The variant was found in up to 8% of present-day Europeans, 3% of Native Americans and 2% of South Asians, while it was absent in Africans, East Asians and African-Americans. "Since modern humans mixed with Neanderthals around 50,000 years ago, particularly in Europe and Western Asia, non-African populations today carry about 1–2% Neanderthal DNA," Dominik Macak, the study's first author and Doctoral Student at Max-Planck-Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, told Live Science in an email. While the Neanderthal variant is not linked with any major health issues, its impact on the body's ability to produce energy during intense exercise could lead to reduced athletic performance in endurance and power sports, the researchers say. During exercise, cells gain energy by breaking down a molecule called adenosine triphosphate (ATP), often described as our body's "batteries". One way that our body creates ATP, particularly during intense exercise, is by turning two molecules of adenosine diphosphate (ADP) into one molecule of ATP and one of adenosine monophosphate (AMP). The ATP produced by this reaction is used to power energetic processes in our cells, while the AMP byproduct is removed by an enzyme called AMPD1. It's this enzyme that is impaired in those with the Neanderthal gene variant, the researchers found. To test the impacts of this gene variant, scientists recreated the Neanderthal version of the AMPD1 enzyme in the lab. They found that it was 25% less active than the enzyme produced in humans with other variants of the gene. Next, they genetically engineered mice to express the altered AMPD1 and found that the enzyme was up to 80% less active than the non-Neanderthal variant. RELATED STORIES — East Asians who can digest lactose can thank Neanderthal genes — Papua New Guineans, genetically isolated for 50,000 years, carry Denisovan genes that help their immune system, study suggests — Viking DNA helps reveal when HIV-fighting gene mutation emerged: 9,000 years ago near the Black Sea The researchers then analyzed the prevalence of the gene among elite athletes and non-athletes. They found that 4% to 14% of athletes carried this genetic variant, while 9% to 19% of non-athletes had the variant. Carrying just one copy of the Neanderthal gene (out of the two copies inherited from parents) led to a 50% lower probability of achieving elite athletic status, the data suggested. Those that carry the Neanderthal gene may struggle with more extreme exercise because the impaired enzyme will allow AMP to build up in their muscles, making it harder for them to produce ATP as fast as their cells need. However, having the Neanderthal gene variant is unlikely to affect most people's daily activities, where energy is obtained by other means. It is only during endurance sports or in exercises that demand muscular power that carriers might be at a slight disadvantage, the researchers said. But how might this variant have impacted the Neanderthals themselves? "It's very unlikely that this single genetic variant played a role in the extinction of the Neanderthals," Macak said. "We find it in both early and later Neanderthal individuals, suggesting it was stably present over thousands of years. Additionally, some modern humans today carry mutations that disrupt the AMPD1 protein entirely, often without any major health issues. So, while the gene affects muscle metabolism, it likely wasn't a decisive factor in their ability to survive."
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
Neanderthal meat butchering patterns suggest cultural diversity
(NewsNation) — New archeological research reveals Neanderthals had varying food preferences and spiced up their diets by using different food preparation techniques. The way Neanderthals, an extinct species of humans, butchered their meat varied depending on where they lived, a study published Wednesday found. The archaeological discovery suggests cultural differences among early groups of people. Researchers studied and compared butchery cut mark patterns of 344 animal bone fragments from two nearby cave sites in modern-day Israel, where Neanderthals were known to have inhabited. Ground squirrels are taking over a North Dakota city, and officials are not amused 'This evidence might suggest distinctive butchering strategies between the Neanderthal populations in Amud and Kebara caves despite comparable occupation intensities, similar lithic technologies, and access to similar food resources,' the authors wrote in the study. 'Such discrepancies could possibly reflect inter-group cultural differences related to carcass processing preferences, organization of tasks within the group, or socially transmitted traditions.' In other words, although the two cave sites were close in distance and had similar tech and food resources, the people there developed unique food habits. Food is often one representation of a culture, and the research showed Neanderthals formed their own sub-cultures, similar to today. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
4 days ago
- Yahoo
Did Neanderthals have 'family recipes'? Study suggests butchery practices in ancient groups
Their meticulous examination of cut-marks on the remains of animal prey revealed patterns that cannot be explained by differences in skill, resources, or available tools at each site. New research into the butchery practices of Neanderthals living in two nearby caves in northern Israel between 50,000 and 60,000 years ago suggests surprisingly distinct food preparation methods, hinting at the possibility of early cultural traditions being passed down through generations. Despite living only 70 kilometers apart and utilizing the same tools and prey, the Neanderthals of Amud and Kebara caves appear to have processed their food in visibly different ways, according to a study led by Anaëlle Jallon from the Institute ofArchaeology at Hebrew University. The study, published in Frontiers in Environmental Archaeology, involved collaboration with colleagues Lucille Crete and Silvia Bello from the Natural History Museum of London, under the supervision of Hebrew University's Prof. Rivka Rabinovich and Prof. Erella Hovers. Their meticulous examination of cut-marks on the remains of animal prey revealed patterns that cannot be explained by differences in skill, resources, or available tools at each site. 'The subtle differences in cut-mark patterns between Amud and Kebara may reflect local traditions of animal carcass processing,' stated Anaëlle Jallon, a PhD candidate at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem and the lead author. She added, 'Even though Neanderthals at these two sites shared similar living conditions and faced comparable challenges, they seem to have developed distinct butchery strategies, possibly passed down through social learning and cultural traditions." Were Neanderthal butchery techniques were standardized Jallon emphasized the unique opportunity these two sites present: 'These two sites give us a unique opportunity to explore whether Neanderthal butchery techniques were standardized. If butchery techniques varied between sites or time periods, this would imply that factors such as cultural traditions, cooking preferences, or social organization influenced even subsistence-related activities such as butchering.' Both Amud and Kebara caves were occupied by Neanderthals during the winters, leaving behind not just food remains but also burials, stone tools, and hearths. The two groups relied on similar diets, predominantly gazelles and fallow deer, and used identical flint tools. However, subtle distinctions emerged from the archaeological record. Neanderthals at Kebara appear to have hunted more large prey and more frequently transported large kills back to the cave for butchering, rather than processing them at the kill site. Further differences in bone remains provided clues: at Amud, 40% of the animal bones were burned and highly fragmented, potentially due to cooking or post-depositional damage. In contrast, only 9% of the bones at Kebara were burned, less fragmented, and believed to have been cooked. Additionally, bones from Amud showed less evidence of carnivore damage compared to those found at Kebara. To investigate these variations in food preparation, the research team meticulously examined cut-marked bones from contemporaneous layers at both sites, using both macroscopic and microscopic analysis. They recorded various characteristics of the cut-marks, hypothesizing that similar patterns would suggest consistent butchery practices, while differing patterns would point to distinct cultural traditions. The analysis revealed that while the cut-marks were clear, intact, and largely unaffected by later damage, and their profiles, angles, and surface widths were similar (likely due to the shared toolkits), the cut-marks at Amud were more densely packed and less linear in shape than those at Kebara. The researchers explored several hypotheses for these observed patterns. They ruled out explanations based on different prey species or bone types, as the differences persisted even when comparing only the long bones of small ungulates found at both sites. Experimental archaeology also indicated that the variations couldn't be attributed to less skilled butchers or more intensive butchering to maximize food yield. Instead, the evidence strongly suggested that the differing cut-mark patterns were a result of deliberate butchery choices made by each Neanderthal group. One compelling explanation proposed by the researchers is that the Amud Neanderthals might have been pre-treating their meat before butchering. This could involve drying the meat or allowing it to decompose, similar to how modern butchers hang meat. Decaying meat is known to be more challenging to process, which would explain the greater intensity and less linear nature of the cut-marks observed at Amud. Another possibility is that differences in group organization, such as the number of individuals involved in butchering a single kill, played a role. However, further research is needed to fully explore these intriguing possibilities. "There are some limitations to consider,' Jallon acknowledged. 'The bone fragments are sometimes too small to provide a complete picture of the butchery marks left on the carcass. While we have made efforts to correct for biases caused by fragmentation, this may limit our ability to fully interpret the data." She concluded, "Future studies, including more experimental work and comparative analyses, will be crucial for addressing these uncertainties — and maybe one day reconstructing Neanderthals' recipes.' Solve the daily Crossword
