Section 39 workers accept pay proposal, paving way for end to years-long dispute
The deal, worth 9.25 per cent over two years, starting last October, was backed by 87 per cent of
Siptu
members and 86 per cent of those in
Fórsa
. The result of a ballot by a smaller number of workers attached to the the
Irish Nurses and Midwives Organisation
was not finalised on Thursday afternoon but they too were expected to accept the terms on offer.
[
'I could be beside someone doing the same work for more money.' The plight of section 39 workers
Opens in new window
]
Under the agreement, the care workers, administrators and therapists, many employed by well-known organisations such as the Irish Wheelchair Association, Rehab and Enable Ireland paid to provide services on behalf of the
Health Service Executive
and a number of government departments, will receive a pay increase of 2.25 per cent backdated to October along with 1 per cent from the start of last month.
Further increases of 2 per cent in November of this year as well April 1st and October 1st of 2026 will follow.
READ MORE
The two main unions involved said they would work with funding departments and employers to ensure the increases are implemented as quickly as possible.
'While the terms acknowledge that pay for some in the sector has fallen behind public-sector levels and allows for future increases in public pay agreements to be applied to the community and voluntary sector, we need to see the funding bodies move quickly to ensure our members receive these pay improvements as they fall due,' said Fórsa's head of health and welfare, Ashley Connolly.
The staff involved working in the health sector are often referred to as Section 39 workers, a reference to the piece of legislation under which the HSE pays the organisations involved for the provisions of services. Other workers covered by the deal are employed in areas such as housing and family services.
Their dispute briefly attracted a lot of attention during the general election campaign after an encounter between Simon Harris and S39 worker Charlotte Fallon.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Post
2 days ago
- Irish Post
Ireland commits to sending €2m funding for food as Gaza faces famine
IRELAND has committed €2m in funding to support a programme delivering food to Gaza. Humanitarian agencies have warned this week that the war-torn region faces famine as deaths due to malnutrition and starvation are increasing as the Israeli-Palestinian conflict continues. The IPC (Integrated Food Security Phase Classification) has issued an alert claiming that the 'worst-case scenario of famine is currently playing out in the Gaza Strip'. 'Conflict and displacement have intensified, and access to food and other essential items and services has plummeted to unprecedented levels,' they said in a statement. 'Mounting evidence shows that widespread starvation, malnutrition, and disease are driving a rise in hunger-related deaths,' they add. The IPC has warned that famine thresholds have been reached in war-torn Gaza (Pic: IPC) The IPC further confirmed that famine 'thresholds' have been reached for food consumption in most of the Gaza Strip and for acute malnutrition in Gaza City. 'Malnutrition has been rising rapidly in the first half of July,' they explained. 'Over 20,000 children have been admitted for treatment for acute malnutrition between April and mid-July, with more than 3,000 severely malnourished. 'Hospitals have reported a rapid increase in hunger-related deaths of children under five years of age, with at least 16 reported deaths since July 17.' They added: 'Immediate action must be taken to end the hostilities and allow for unimpeded, large-scale, life-saving humanitarian response. 'This is the only path to stopping further deaths and catastrophic human suffering." Yesterday Tánaiste Simon Harris confirmed Ireland would send €2m to support the World Food Programme (WFP) to deliver food to Gaza. 'Deliberately denying food to people, including babies, in Gaza is beyond comprehension,' he said. 'Children are starving in what is a catastrophic situation on the ground,' he added. 'In recent days I've asked my officials to examine how best Ireland can play a part in helping. 'This emergency package of funding being announced today will support the World Food Programme to get food to people who urgently need it. 'The WFP managed to deliver 4,000 tonnes of food to people in Gaza last week. 'This is life-saving work but WFP estimate that 62,000 tonnes of food aid is needed per month. 'Once again, we call on Israel to remove the many restrictions and delays on transport into and within Gaza. 'This is the only feasible way to avert famine in Gaza.' Ireland's Minister for International Development, Neale Richmond, said the situation in Gaza is 'catastrophic'. 'People are being deliberately denied food and are now on the brink of famine, this must stop," he said. 'The World Food Programme is best placed to deliver food to people in Gaza," the minister added. :This is the only way to avert a famine in Gaza. Ireland will continue to support their life-saving work.' See More: Famine, Food, Funding, Gaza, Ireland, Israel
Irish Examiner
3 days ago
- Irish Examiner
Government's decision to delay alcohol health labelling is bowing to lobbyist influence
How are decisions made in government? One would hope that decision-makers would have access to facts and that this would form the basis of decision making. However, while officials are certainly in possession of the facts when it comes to alcohol harm, the basis of decision-making seems to rest with who has access to government. Never was this clearer than in relation to the recent decision to delay the introduction of alcohol health information labelling. These labels provide basic information to consumers including that alcohol causes liver disease and fatal cancers as well as a warning about drinking in pregnancy; they also include details of calories, alcohol content and a link to a public health website. The regulations are part of a package of legislative measures, Public Health (Alcohol) Act, introduced in 2015 and passed overwhelmingly in 2018 by the Oireachtas. The aim was to reduce Ireland's alcohol consumption by 20% by 2020 - a modest target still not fully achieved. The labelling had been through extensive assessment and notification processes with the EU Commission and the World Trade Organisation and had been signed into law in 2023 to become operational in 2026. Polling indicated strong public support of over 70% for the measures. Labels had even started to appear on dozens of wines, beers and ciders from at least 10 countries in shops right across Ireland as businesses adapted to the regulations expecting the government to deliver on its own law. However, following extensive lobbying of government by the alcohol industry, a memo was brought to Cabinet last week by the Tánaiste and minister for foreign affairs and trade, Simon Harris, to delay labelling until 2028. Does a postponement matter? Some seemed to regard the labels as merely an administrative issue as opposed to a serious public health matter designed to help address issues such, as, for example, the birth of 15 babies every day in Ireland with the life-long neurodevelopmental condition of Foetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorder, (FASD), or the fact that three people daily get a cancer diagnosis caused by alcohol, or that rates of liver disease have nearly doubled over the past two decades. According to lobbying records, alcohol industry representatives met with senior members of government, including the Taoiseach, at least seven times between January and April 2025. Freedom of Information requests also revealed that immediately upon the formation of the new government, multiple letters were sent to ministers all making the same points – such as worries about possible tariffs, costs to small businesses and a call to wait for an EU label. Alarmist claims were made about jobs and trade, even though labels have nothing to do with exports and the EU Commission adjudicated that labelling does not constitute a barrier to trade. To be clear, this industry has opposed these labels from the outset and employed variations of all the above arguments for years - in addition to false claims that alcohol has health benefits and doesn't really cause cancer. Whatever industry says to government about supporting public health measures (though not just at this time) what they say to their shareholders is that labelling might lead to reduced alcohol consumption. Perhaps the most ridiculous claim from industry is that as population-level alcohol consumption has decreased in recent years, there is apparently no need for further regulation - an argument akin to saying if road deaths decrease, why not increase drink-driving limits. The various entreaties worked and in early April comments were made by the minister for finance about the regulations needing to be 'examined again'. This opened space for industry and bad-faith actors to rehash all the debates which had already taken place over the past decade – debates which had been settled by evidence and fact. Once again health experts were dragged into discussing whether alcohol really causes cancer; the answer is the same now as it was in 2018 – yes. Moreover, we have since learned even more about alcohol and cancer and that it can cause the disease at even relatively low levels of consumption. The usual, unoriginal, worn-out tropes of nanny statism reappeared as if only the alcohol industry has the right to decide what information consumers are entitled to. Government ministers trumpeted that other measures of the Alcohol Act had been introduced (albeit painfully slowly) as if somehow that reduced the necessity to commence all of the legislation which is designed to work as a package. At the same time, multiple health and social organisations, those who are at the coal face dealing with the impact of alcohol harm, were writing to the government warning of the consequences of delaying the regulations. Academics highlighted that alcohol costs Ireland at least 2.5% of GDP - €12 billion annually – in health, justice and lost productivity. That's 10 times what is raised through excise duties. There are other voices which were raised but were ignored. Some of those most hurt by alcohol including those who have grown up with the trauma of alcohol harm in the home, those who are now in recovery and some who have lost precious family members to this drug wrote to government and the media highlighting the importance of these measures. Dr Sheila Gilheany: 'Perhaps the most ridiculous claim from industry is that as population-level alcohol consumption has decreased in recent years, there is apparently no need for further regulation - an argument akin to saying if road deaths decrease, why not increase drink-driving limits.' Requests were made for meetings to the Taoiseach, Tánaiste, minister for finance and the minister for enterprise. These were refused. Meetings were granted with Department of Health officials including the minister, but it is clear that the running on this issue was being made by other departments and in any case, surely the minister for health didn't need to be convinced of the importance of her own department's regulations? All of this, though, distracted focus from the fundamental question which is not, do we need labels, but rather, why is the alcohol industry getting an opportunity to overturn democratically mandated regulations which are there to protect public health? This assault on democratic processes is being presented as a mere delay due to unfortunate trading uncertainties. There are assurances that the regulations will go ahead in 2028. Yet the alcohol industry is already crowing - 'This pause shall be more than just a delay, it is a much-needed chance to rethink how we ensure consumers are well-informed, while also safeguarding the legal and economic coherence of the European market,' said European wine trade body, CEEV. The twist is that industry wants a weak-worded label buried in a meaningless QR code. So, the government decided to pander to the alcohol industry, choosing to believe their claims over the evidence that was presented to them by unbiased sources. Perhaps they didn't really believe the industry arguments but somehow it was expedient to go along with it, maybe in the hope of obtaining a supposedly better trade deal regardless of the health and economic impacts of ignoring the harm from alcohol. Or maybe it is the default position of elements of government to place shareholder profit ahead of public interest since private whispers are louder than the voices of civil society. If so, the dangers are not just to public health but also to public trust in government. Dr Sheila Gilheany is the CEO of Alcohol Action Ireland
Irish Times
25-07-2025
- Irish Times
Whistleblowers lodge 67 valid HSE disclosures, with a third about patient health and safety
There were 67 valid protected disclosures made to the Health Service Executive last year, of which more than a third related to the alleged 'endangerment of health and safety' of patients or service users. On Friday, the HSE published its 2024 annual report, which found there were 135 protected disclosures received by the executive last year, up 38 per cent when compared with 2023. A total of 67 disclosures were deemed to be 'valid'. Of these, 26 were closed over the 12-month period and 41 are 'still under examination'. More than 80 per cent of disclosures were made by HSE employees, with the remainder coming from Section 38/39 workers who were not HSE employees. READ MORE A total of 37 per cent of disclosures related to the endangerment of health and safety, 15 (22 per cent) related primarily to alleged unlawful or improper use of funds, with a further 15 relating to 'oppressive, discriminatory or behaviour that constitutes gross misconduct by a public body'. The responsible area that had the highest number of disclosures was HSE Dublin and Midlands with 15, followed by HSE Dublin and North East at 12 and HSE Dublin and South East at 10. According to the annual report, Ireland's population grew by approximately 100,000 people last year, reaching 5.38 million. The number of people aged 65 and over has increased by 37 per cent since 2015 and life expectancy now stands at 82.6 years – above the EU average. As a result of the ageing population, the burden of chronic disease and cancer 'remains high, particularly among older adults'. The report highlighted a number of areas in which services have improved, including a reduction in waiting times for elective procedures as well as fewer people on trolleys. However, it also acknowledged the provision of disability services as a key challenging area for the health service. 'A major priority for the HSE is to significantly improve access for children and families to services,' the report said. 'There is still much to do to significantly improve access when needed, particularly for children and young people.' [ Opinion: Nobody wants to stay in hospital longer than necessary. There's a better way to handle patient discharge Opens in new window ] Speaking about the annual report, HSE chief executive Bernard Gloster said last year marked 'real progress'. 'We reduced the number of people waiting on trolleys by over 10 per cent, expanded community services and improved access to scheduled care with an additional 24,000 patients seen within target time frames,' he said. 'Our focus in 2025 will be to build on this momentum, improve patient flow and continue to reform how care is delivered across seven days.' [ HSE aims to bring in new weekend work rosters for healthcare staff over summer Opens in new window ]
