Kari Lake brought back a skeleton crew to Voice of America. They're ‘angry most of the time'
'I am angry most of the time I'm in there,' one staffer told Poynter this week.
In March, President Donald Trump issued an executive order calling for the U.S. Agency for Global Media, which oversees VOA and its sister outlets, to reduce staffing down to the 'statutory minimum.' Lake, the failed Arizona politician who now serves as senior adviser overseeing the agency, subsequently laid off hundreds of contracted employees and placed the rest of VOA's staff on indefinite leave.
Following a series of lawsuits from VOA employees and executives, Lake was ordered by a district court judge last month to restore Voice of America and bring back its workforce. Additionally, the judge ruled that the administration needed to reinstate Radio Free Asia and Middle East Broadcasting Networks.
'Not only is there an absence of 'reasoned analysis' from the defendants; there is an absence of any analysis whatsoever,' Judge Royce C. Lamberth wrote.
Earlier this month, however, a three-judge appellate court panel decided to freeze the lower court's injunction, saying it needed more time to consider the merits of the case. On Thursday, the full appellate court said it would not intervene at this time.
'We are devastated and concerned that this ruling might lead to further adverse reactions from the administration,' Patsy Widakuswara, the lead plaintiff in the lawsuit and VOA's White House bureau chief for Voice of America, told The Independent about the appeals court decision. 'But our day in court is not over yet, and we are committed to fighting until we can return to our congressionally mandated right to broadcast factual, balanced, and comprehensive new.'
After Lamberth's initial order to return Voice of America to the air and staff it back up, a small group of 30 employees – from a staff of 1300 workers on leave – was brought back by Lake earlier this month. In an article for Poynter, Liam Scott – VOA's press freedom reporter until he was placed on leave in March and informed he would be terminated this month – spoke to several of the staffers who returned this month and described the 'grim and confusing' atmosphere in VOA headquarters.
'People who are in there do not see this as some kind of hopeful return,' one employee told Scott. 'I am angry most of the time I'm in there… They can't credibly say that they haven't shut us down when zero people are working,'
Prior to the president's executive order, VOA broadcast in 49 languages around the world to a weekly measured audience of roughly 360 million people, some of whom live in highly censored authoritarian states. Now, according to those at the pared-down network, Voice of America's content is only translated into Dari, Mandarin Chinese, Pashto and Persian.
'The amount of programming that's being produced is not a credible replacement for what was on air before,' a staffer said.
'We were a 24/7 news operation. Now we're a five-minutes-a-day, five-days-a-week operation,' another source added. 'We all know that this is not what this place is meant to be doing.'
Voice of America's primary English-language newsroom, meanwhile, produces just one television segment and a handful of articles a day, which are then translated into four different languages and published, according to Poynter. Notably, with press freedom experts expressing concern about Kremlin propaganda filling the airspace left vacant by VOA's absence, the network is not publishing in Russian in its current depleted state.
At the same time, the small cohort that is currently working to produce what little VOA content they can is still following the network's charter, noting that they haven't received any editorial requests from the agency since returning. Interestingly, despite Lake's recent announcement that VOA had partnered up with MAGA cable channel One America News to provide a news feed, Voice of America has yet to air any OAN content.
'No one's really in charge,' a staffer told Poynter, noting the lack of clear leadership at VOA right now. Mike Abramowitz, the network's director, remains on administrative leave.
The Independent has reached out to Lake and the USAGM for comment.
While fewer than three dozen employees man the ship, hundreds of other full-time VOA staffers remain on the sidelines and in limbo as they wait to hear from the administration about their fate. All the while, Lake has cut other 'frivolous expenditures' from VOA and its sister broadcasters.
In March, for instance, she canceled the agency's contracts to carry reporting from wire services such as Reuters, Associated Press and Agence France-Presse. The media agency also reneged on a 15-year lease for new office headquarters – even though it actually saved the government more than $150 million.
Though much of the network's full-time staff remains on administrative leave, such as Widakuswara, hundreds of others have already been told they are gone. Last week, Lake announced that 584 total employees were terminated across the agency, the majority of whom came from VOA.
'We will continue to scale back the bloat at [the agency] and make an archaic dinosaur into something worthy of being funded by hardworking Americans,' she told The Washington Post of the terminations before adding: 'Buckle up. There's more to come.'
Widakuswara, meanwhile, bluntly described how she feels that Lake and the administration are treating the VOA staff at the moment.
'My assessment of the situation is that this is just more emotional terror that they're applying to us,' she told The Independent. 'There's no rhyme or reason why they're bringing people back and then kicking them out. To me, it feels like emotional terror to ensure obedience.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
Mossad to Tehran: we already know your ‘secret' war commander
'We know exactly who he is and know him well. Unfortunately, such basic information is hidden from the Iranian people. Please send us your guesses about his name.' Israel's Mossad intensified its online campaign against Tehran on Tuesday, seizing on a Tasnim News Agency report that the Islamic Republic would not reveal the name of the newly appointed commander of the Khatam al-Anbiya Central Headquarters and declaring on its Persian-language X account: 'We know exactly who he is and know him well. Unfortunately, such basic information is hidden from the Iranian people. Please send us your guesses about his name.' The Khatam al-Anbiya post—Mossad's second major tweet of the day—came minutes after Tasnim said the regime was withholding the commander's identity 'for his protection' following the killings of his two predecessors in Israeli strikes last month. Earlier on Tuesday, the same Mossad account asserted that Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei had 'surrendered' and approved negotiations with both the United States and Israel, calling the move 'the beginning of the end of the Islamic Republic' and proclaiming that 'the countdown has begun.' The twin messages are the latest salvoes in a Farsi-language influence campaign Mossad launched last month. Initial posts mocked senior Iranian officials for secretly following the feed, offered VPN tips, and warned ordinary Iranians not to like or share content to avoid detection by security services. Iranian officials haven't acknowledged appointing a successor to the slain Maj.-Gen. Ali Shadmani. Khamenei, 86, last appeared on state television on June 26, vowing that Iran would 'never surrender,' a stance starkly at odds with Mossad's earlier claim.


Forbes
a day ago
- Forbes
Trump Media Takes Truth+ Streaming Global After President Slashes Voice Of America
President Donald Trump's media company is testing a global rollout of its streaming platform, raising conflict-of-interest questions, just months after he ordered sharp cuts to Voice of America, the U.S.-funded broadcaster that's delivered international news for decades. President Donald Trump speaks in front of a map of his proposed "Golden Dome" missile defense system ... More in the White House on May 20. (Photo by) Getty Images Trump Media & Technology Group (NASDAQ: DJT), the parent company of Truth Social—of which Trump owns 114.8 million shares—announced Monday it's beta testing an international rollout of its streaming platform, Truth+, aiming to expand beyond North America. Trump Media CEO and chairperson Devin Nunes said in a statement accompanying the news: 'International viewers who want to get the other side of the story will soon have an easy opportunity to do so.' The global push follows Trump's February executive order slashing Voice of America's parent company's work to the ' by law,' with the White House labeling the outlet 'the voice of radical America.' Voice of America is the largest U.S. international broadcaster, reaching 354 million people a week in 50 languages, and is funded by Congress 'to provide comprehensive coverage of the news and tell audiences the truth,' according to its website. Trump Media did not share a date for when it plans to officially launch Truth+ globally. Spokespeople for Trump Media and the Trump Organization did not respond to requests for comment, but White House deputy spokesperson Anna Kelly told Forbes in a statement the president's assets are in a trust managed by his children and 'there are no conflicts of interest.' There's no evidence tying Trump Media's global push to his administration's move to slash Voice of America. While Trump Media's filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission and press releases don't appear to explicitly mention plans to take Truth+ global, its 2024 annual report does warn that foreign governments could restrict the streaming platform— suggesting overseas ambitions were on the radar. Chief Critic Noah Bookbinder, president of government ethics watchdog Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington and a former federal corruption prosecutor, told Forbes Trump's expansion raises perennial concerns about whether his decisions serve the country or his own bottom line. While most ethics laws don't apply to the president, Bookbinder said, the moves to shrink Voice of America and grow Trump Media abroad 'highlight the inherent conflicts posed by his ongoing business interests, which are ever expanding.' Trump can still earn income from his businesses while in office through the Donald J. Trump Revocable Trust, the same structure he used during his first term. He is its sole donor and beneficiary, while Donald Trump Jr. serves as the trustee. The Trump Organization confirmed in an April regulatory filing in the United Kingdom that Trump retains control over his businesses. Truth+ programming includes rightwing political content from outlets like Real America's Voice and One America's News Network, movies including flattering documentaries on Elon Musk and Clarence Thomas and Christian shows. Its international expansion will make Newsmax available globally for the first time. Meanwhile, Trump Media is in the midst of restructuring its finances. It raised $2.3 billion from institutional investors in May to buy bitcoin, registered a crypto ETF with the SEC and announced plans last week to buy back up to $400 million in shares. In 2024, Trump Media reported just $3.6 million in sales and a net loss of nearly $401 million, according to its annual report. News Peg The Trump administration announced it was laying off 639 employees at Voice of America's parent organization last month. On Friday, however, the administration reversed course, rescinding the notices after employees flagged errors in the terms, The New York Times reported. Big Number $2 billion. That's the value of Trump's 114.8 million shares in Trump Media, as of Tuesday's close. Surprising Fact Trump Media warned in May of possible 'material misstatements' in its financial filings, citing weak internal controls and a lack of SEC reporting expertise—though a company spokesperson told Forbes the filing was 'a routine disclosure that TMTG has repeatedly made in the past, and is typical for former shell companies, that does not in any way indicate an intention to restate any of TMTG's financial reporting.' Tangent Eric Swider, one of seven board members at Trump Media and a leader in the deal to take Truth Social public, has sold around 90% shares since November, netting roughly $4.4 million before taxes, SEC filings show. Swider did not respond to Forbes' inquiry and does not appear to have commented publicly on the sales. He is in the process of launching another blank-check company with Nunes. Forbes estimates Donald Trump's net worth at $5.2 billion. Editor's Note In November 2023, Trump Media sued 20 media outlets, including Forbes, for reporting that included calculations of its financial results while still a private company. The defendants have moved to dismiss the claims but the case is currently ongoing. Further Viewing The 3 Easy New Ways Anyone Can Funnel Money Directly To Donald Trump's Businesses (Forbes) CEO Devin Nunes Made $47 Million While Truth Social Parent Company Reported $401 Million In Losses In 2024 (Forbes) Trump Media Shares Rise After Planning Fintech Brand—Trump's Net Worth Spikes Over $200 Million (Forbes) Truth Social Hosted Party At Trump's Mar-A-Lago (Forbes) Trump-Linked SPAC Spent $10.8 Million On Legal Fees Amid Regulatory Probes (Forbes) When It Comes To Truth Social, Republicans In Congress Aren't Buying What Trump's Selling (Forbes)
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
Trump's Attack on Iran May Have Made the Nuclear Crisis Worse
Iran still has the components needed to build a nuclear weapon after President Donald Trump ordered airstrikes on its nuclear sites, even as military hardliners dissatisfied with the weakness shown by their country's clerical leadership are poised to gain greater control, multiple sources tell Rolling Stone. Trump has insisted America's strikes on Iran's nuclear sites caused 'total obliteration,' and has attacked the media for questioning this narrative after a leaked report from the Defense Intelligence Agency contradicted the administration's claims. Given outstanding questions about covert aspects of Iran's nuclear program, there are few definitive claims to be made about a timeline for Iran to build a bomb — or whether it will now decide to do so. However, the attacks by Israel and the U.S. initiated an ideological realignment within the Iranian government, known as 'the System' in Persian. Most critically, the elites advocating a policy of 'strategic patience' — a key component of which was forsaking a nuclear weapons program to avoid direct confrontation with the West — have now been discredited. 'The hardliners in the System may be on the ascendancy, because many of their critiques of efforts at diplomacy and a negotiated settlement of the nuclear issue were basically confirmed,' says Nicole Grajewski, a fellow in the Nuclear Policy Program at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, with expertise in Iran. 'The System is under pressure and extreme constraints now that it is militarily weakened — not to mention Israel's proven ability to dominate their airspace. It may not be the end of strategic patience, but a transition towards a much more paranoid, hardline, and secretive political space.' 'There's a limit to what Israel and the United States know about what actually happened with their strikes,' says Ali Vaez, the Iran program director at the International Crisis Group. 'It has become a much more complicated crisis. It's certainly not resolved at all.' There's little sign any of the belligerents agree about what they want to happen next. Israel, which says the primary goal of its attack was to prevent Iran from acquiring a nuclear weapon, had also encouraged Iranians to overthrow their government. Trump, too, floated 'regime change' as the ultimate solution to the crisis — as did GOP hawks — but now his administration says it hopes to return to negotiations. Creating a nuclear weapon requires access to uranium; the ability to mine and process the metal ore into a gaseous state; construction and operation of centrifuges to enrich the radioactive material to a high grade of purity; and the technical expertise to construct a device. Fissile material for civil use is enriched to a low grade — around five percent purity — while weaponized applications require highly enriched uranium, as pure as 90 percent or more. 'I'm not quite sure how well designed the strikes themselves were, to completely knock out the elements of Iran's capacity to build a device with weapons-grade uranium relatively quickly,' says Farzan Sabet, a researcher focused on the Middle East at the Global Governance Center, who runs the blog Iran Wonk. 'Color me a little bit skeptical until we have more data.' The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), which oversees compliance with the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT), released a report on May 31 that noted Iran was stockpiling highly enriched uranium and conducting other 'illicit' activities. 'Iran can convert its current stock of 60 percent enriched uranium into 233 kilograms [513 pounds] of WGU [weapon-grade uranium] in three weeks at the Fordow Fuel Enrichment Plant, enough for nine nuclear weapons,' wrote analysts at the Institute for Science and International Security, a think tank specializing in non-proliferation, in their analysis of the IAEA's report. Findings like that formed the basis for claims that Iran was close to getting a nuclear weapon, but whether it was trying to do so is as much a question of political intent as physical capabilities. Neither Israeli nor U.S. officials provided any direct evidence that Iran had begun building a bomb since Hamas attacked Israel on Oct. 7, 2023, touching off Israel's current confrontation with Iran. Indeed, Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard said in March that U.S. intelligence 'continues to assess that Iran is not building a nuclear weapon, and Supreme Leader Khamenei has not authorized the nuclear weapons program that he suspended in 2003.' Amid criticism from Trump and MAGA loyalists, she has since reversed her public stance, posting on X recently that 'Iran is at the point that it can produce a nuclear weapon within weeks to months, if they decide to finalize the assembly.' Prior to the strikes, a robust monitoring and inspection regimen was essential to keeping tabs on Iran's nuclear program, and analysts at the Institute for Science and International Security asserted that moving forward: 'The urgent need is to place IAEA inspections at the heart of relations with Iran and reaffirm that Iran will never be allowed to get a nuclear weapon.' Iranian officials have now threatened to expel IAEA inspectors. Whether this is intended as leverage during potential future negotiations is unclear, but if the IAEA is kicked out, the international community loses visibility about Iran's nuclear program — even as internal pressure to 'break out' and make a dash to build a weapon becomes critical. IAEA officials have said Iran has 900 pounds of highly enriched uranium, and analysts spoken to by Rolling Stone believe at least some of this was dispersed from Fordow prior to American strikes, but acknowledge lacking any specific details. 'We do not have information of the whereabouts of this material,' IAEA Director General Rafael Grossi told an interviewer last week. 'Iran officially told me 'We are going to be taking protective measures,' which may or may not include moving around this material.' There are also outstanding questions about Iran's existing enrichment centrifuges. In 2018, Trump withdrew from former President Barack Obama's 2015 nuclear deal with Iran. The treaty, called the 'Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action,' or JCPOA, was intended to curb Iran's nuclear program. The JCPOA placed limits on the number of centrifuges Iran was allowed to operate, allowed the IAEA to verify compliance under the NPT. In the wake of the U.S. withdrawal from the plan — which was signed by all five UN Security Council members, as well as the EU — Iran maintained compliance, until a succession of Israeli attacks in 2020 and 2021 on a centrifuge manufacturing site. Tehran then prevented the IAEA from monitoring at that site. As a result, 'we knew that they had produced hundreds of advanced centrifuges. We just didn't know where they were,' Vaez says. In a post-attack analysis published on Tuesday, the Institute for Science and International Security asserted that 'Overall, Israel's and U.S. attacks have effectively destroyed Iran's centrifuge enrichment program.' But it also noted: 'That being said, there are residuals such as stocks of 60 percent, 20 percent, and three to five percent enriched uranium and the centrifuges manufactured but not yet installed at Natanz or Fordow. These non-destroyed parts pose a threat as they can be used in the future to produce weapon-grade uranium.' It's unlikely that U.S. and Israeli military operations have fully accounted for all of these centrifuges. Despite whatever level of destruction was achieved at the Fordow enrichment site, there remain uranium hexafluoride production and enrichment facilities at the complexes in Natanz and Isfahan, which were largely untouched. 'You cannot 'obliterate' a program if you still have both centrifuges and enriched uranium up to the 60 percent level that still exists,' Sen. Chris Murphy told reporters last Thursday, after receiving a classified briefing about the strikes. Vaez observes that if Iran is committed to building a nuclear bomb, the barrier might not be as high as some policymakers assert. 'A few dozen advanced centrifuges could fit in a relatively small room and would have no detectable footprint, and could be used in order to enrich up to 90 percent, if you have the 60 percent stockpile as feed,' he says. 'With their 60-percent stockpile, they can get enough fissile material for a single nuclear weapon in six days, and they can have enough for an arsenal worth in less than a month,' Vaez tells Rolling Stone. But whether or not Iran retains the materials needed to create a nuclear weapon, it doesn't necessarily mean it has decided to do so — and there is a substantial difference between building a single functioning device, and creating multiple weaponized nuclear warheads needed to create a credible deterrent. 'I'm not sure if they have a game plan about how they're going to conduct diplomacy,' Sabet says. 'I'm not sure if they have a game plan about the end state they want, and the concessions they're willing to make.' 'The bottom line conclusion here is that Iran's nuclear weapons capacity has been reduced. But its intent to acquire nuclear weapons has increased,' Vaez says. Whether its intent has increased or not, certainly there was no regime change. In the wake of the U.S. and Israeli attacks, the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) — the military branch charged with the protection of Iran's government — has tightened its grip over the country. IRGC militias have set up surprise checkpoints, are searching people's phones for incriminating information, are conducting mass arrests, and have carried out multiple executions. Iranians largely rallied around the flag despite widespread discontent with the System, which proved its resilience by continuing to function despite Israel's attacks on its leadership. That was by design. After the invasion of Iraq in 2003, the IRGC instituted the 'Mosaic Doctrine,' designed to ensure the survivability of the regime. 'The idea of the Mosaic Doctrine was based on the threat of an invasion — an Iraq-style invasion and occupation by the United States, which was what they were expecting,' Sabet says. 'They understood that the leadership could be decapitated either through assassination or precision strikes.' This, Sabet says, 'created the capacity for IRGC regional and provincial headquarters to assume responsibility for local security, either in the case of a domestic emergency, or in the case of a foreign hostile threat.' Israel killed top IRGC commanders when its Operation Rising Lion began in mid-June. Many of these were veteran leaders fully invested in the strategic patience strategy — central to Iran's response after the U.S. assassinated an influential IRGC commander, Major General Qasem Soleimani, in 2020. 'They wanted to take their time to think about what would look proportional, while preventing the need for President Trump, in his first term, to retaliate,' Sabet says. A week after Soleimani's assassination, Iran carried out limited strikes on American facilities in Iraq, telegraphed well in advance. Iran's response last Monday to the U.S. strikes echoed the 2020 dynamic. Tehran launched six short-range ballistic missiles against the U.S. airbase at al-Udeid in Doha, Qatar — all of which were shot down by Patriot air defense batteries. Surreally, Trump actually thanked the Iranians for conducting the counterstrike in such a manner. 'I want to thank Iran for giving us early notice, which made it possible for no lives to be lost and nobody to be injured,' Trump wrote on social media. Indeed, social media has been a key front in this conflict, and modern militaries are becoming more sophisticated about how they engage with it, says Matthew Ford, the author of War in the Smartphone Age, and a professor of War Studies at the Swedish Defense University in Stockholm. Ford notes in particular Israel's online showcasing of its intelligence and military prowess during Operation Rising Lion. Indeed, as Rolling Stone has reported, Trump appears to have changed his mind about becoming involved in the conflict after seeing how Israel's operation was playing out on Fox News. Governments seek to impose a top-down information strategy in an effort to control the narrative, but this is increasingly difficult in the era of 'participatory media,' Ford says. Both Israel and Iran took steps to limit information — with Israel imposing a media clampdown in reporting on ballistic missile strikes and seeding memes about its operations across social media, while Iran simply cut off internet access for much of its population. The United States also used deception aimed at online audiences. After a Trump spokesperson said he would take action 'within two weeks,' keen-eyed observers breathlessly tracked groups of U.S. B-2 Spirit stealth bombers and refueling aircraft online, using publicly available flight data to follow them moving west, apparently on their way to Guam. In the meantime, the actual strike aircraft were heading east unnoticed, without broadcasting their flight information, and bombed Iran's nuclear sites while the decoy group was still over the Pacific. 'There is a moment where what is happening online can have meaningful kinetic effects on the ground,' Ford observes. Chatter online and on TV is also central to managing the domestic political response. Amid a fierce debate inside the MAGA coalition about the wisdom of direct action against Iran, the Trump administration has become hypersensitive about the media's reporting on the strikes. 'Time and time again, classified information is leaked or peddled for political purposes to try to make the president look bad, and what's really happening is you're undermining the success of our incredible pilots,' said Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth in a press briefing at the Pentagon last Thursday. While a 'If you don't trust us, it's because you hate the troops' strategy may play well with the self-licking Rocket Pop that is America's right-wing news ecosystem, it has little bearing on the situation on the ground. Even if the White House wins a public debate despite painting itself into a corner with its claim of 'total obliteration' at the Fordow enrichment site, it ultimately obscures the bigger question: Will the attacks help convince Iran to forsake nuclear weapons? That question will not be answered in a press conference, or in a social media post. More from Rolling Stone Team Trump Is Serious About Unleashing the Espionage Act on the Media White House Pushes B.S. About 'Big Beautiful Bill' as Popularity Craters Kristi Noem Secretly Pocketed Cash From Dark Money Group: Report Best of Rolling Stone The Useful Idiots New Guide to the Most Stoned Moments of the 2020 Presidential Campaign Anatomy of a Fake News Scandal The Radical Crusade of Mike Pence