Are threats against Transnet over? CCMA sends revised offer to halt strike
There might be light at the end of the tunnel in the wage negotiations deadlock between Transnet and the United National Transport Union (Untu), as a revised offer has been put on the table.
The Union representing the majority of Transnet workers has stated multiple times that it would not mind bringing the already-struggling entity to its knees if its members do not receive the salary increase they deserve.
Untu had promised that its members would down tools on Thursday if the Commission for Conciliation, Mediation and Arbitration (CCMA) had not sent a revised salary offer. CCMA delivered the revised offer on Tuesday, instead of Monday, as the union had requested.
ALSO READ: Transnet faces standstill on Thursday as Untu demands revised offer
Offer delivered by Transnet
The cost of living is high for the middle and lower classes of South Africa, and salary increases are justifiable. However, some companies, such as Transnet, are already struggling to maintain operations. Are salary increases that match the cost of living possible?
Transnet offered a salary increase of 6% this year, 6% in 2026, and 5.5% in 2027. Untu is demanding a 10% wage increase, as well as housing and medical subsidies.
The union representing the minority of Transnet workers, the South African Transport and Allied Workers' Union (Satawu) accepted the offer by the cash-strapped entity. The entity previously stated that the increase is effective as of 1 April 2025, and since Untu did not accept the offer, its members were not eligible for the increase.
Offer put on the table by CCMA
The revised offer made by CCMA, following the facilitation of the S150 process between the entity and Untu, is for the next three years.
'The proposed agreement will apply to all bargaining unit employees as defined in the Transnet Bargaining Constitution,' said Untu spokesperson, Atenkosi Plaatjie.
The offer is a three-year agreement that will commence on 1 April 2025, and will end on 31 March 2028. Each year, all Transnet employees will receive a 6% increase.
Plaajie said it is now up to Untu members to either accept or reject the offer made by the CCMA. If the majority of the members accept the offer, the leaders will sign the agreement, which will be binding for all employees.
ALSO READ: S&P places Transnet on 'credit watch'
What about the strike?
She added that, should the majority of the members reject the offer, the leaders will issue a strike notice to Transnet, as previously mandated by their members through a balloting process.
'Employees in the Bargaining Unit who had not received the wage adjustment on 1 April 2025, will receive such adjustment from the June 2025 pay-month, backdated to 1 April 2025.
'The modus of calculation and payment period must be determined by agreement between the parties, similar to the previous wage agreement.'
Transnet also committed to no mandatory retrenchments over the three years outlined in the tabled proposal.
'The Parties must revert to the Commissioners by 10 June 2025,' added Plaajie.
Will government bailout Transnet?
Moody's Ratings has warned that the state-owned logistics company, Transnet, could run out of money in the next three months.The warning raises the question of whether Transnet can afford salary increases for more than 46,000 employees
Moody's provides data, intelligence, and analytical tools to help business and financial leaders make informed decisions. The warning that Transnet could run out of money within the next three months could intensify pressure on the government to initiate a financial rescue.
The ratings agency believes Transnet needs further government support to refinance upcoming debt maturities and secure funds for its expanded capital expenditure programme.
NOW READ: SA's poor service delivery linked to almost R500 billion spent on SOE bailouts
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
IOL News
12 hours ago
- IOL News
Want to reform South Africa's ports? We need to make room for rivalry
South Africa's ports are crucial for trade and economic growth, yet they lag in efficiency. As the National Ports Authority pursues long-term concessions, experts warn that without fostering competition, the country risks high costs and lost opportunities. Image: Armand Hough / Independent Newspapers South Africa's ports play a vital role in supporting trade, investment, and economic growth. Yet despite their strategic importance, they remain among the least efficient in the world – a situation that contributes to high costs, delays, and declining competitiveness. As the National Ports Authority (NPA) moves forward with long-term terminal concessions – often awarded to a single operator in joint ventures with other Transnet divisions – there's growing concern that the current approach may do little to resolve the systemic issues facing the country's port sector. One of the most prominent voices raising the alarm is Dr Ryan Hawthorne, director at Acacia Economics and a leading expert in competition and regulatory policy. In a paper presented at the 43rd Southern African Transport Conference*, Hawthorne argues that building rivalry into port operations is essential. 'If we're simply replacing public monopolies with private ones,' he says, 'we're missing the opportunity to build a more competitive, efficient port system that truly serves the country's interests.' Monopoly concessions: A risky strategy The core issue lies in how terminal concessions are structured. The NPA, still legally part of Transnet, has awarded a number of 25-year leases to single terminal operators, often involving Transnet Port Terminals as a joint venture partner. According to Hawthorne, this approach entrenches monopoly control and limits the potential for service improvement. 'Monopolies tend to charge more, deliver less, and innovate slowly,' he notes. 'We're seeing a pattern of partial privatisation rather than real reform.' There is an emerging pattern of monopolies being partially privatised by Transnet, with little consideration for rivalry and the benefits this might bring to consumers and port users. Rather than breaking up dominant positions, the current model risks reinforcing them – just with new stakeholders. These concerns are echoed by global benchmarking. The World Bank recently ranked Cape Town's container terminal dead last out of 405 ports globally in 2024, with Durban and Port Elizabeth also performing poorly. 'While private-sector participation is a welcome step, it risks becoming a missed opportunity if it doesn't introduce genuine competition,' warns Hawthorne. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ Ad Loading The case for competition But can so-called 'genuine competition' actually work? Hawthorne believes there is ample scope for rivalry within South Africa's port system. Durban alone is expected to expand its container-handling capacity to more than 11 million TEUs – enough for multiple competing operators. 'Ports of similar size internationally to Durban's current capacity host four or more terminal operators competing on quality and cost,' he explains. 'There's no reason South Africa can't follow suit.' Legal framework already in place The Ports Act of 2005 provides the basis for introducing competition by separating the NPA from Transnet and mandating that port access be granted in a transparent and competitive manner. However, the key step of structurally separating the NPA has not been completed. 'If the NPA were truly independent,' says Hawthorne, 'it would have an incentive to lease space to multiple terminal operators – not preserve the dominance of its sister company.' What can be done now In the short term, Hawthorne proposes a number of practical reforms. 'We need to complete the structural separation of the NPA from Transnet, as envisioned in the Ports Act. This would allow the NPA to operate independently and invest in expanding port capacity and enabling rival terminal operators, rather than protecting Transnet's downstream interests,' he notes. Furthermore, the Minister of Transport should issue a policy directive requiring competition assessments in all future concession processes. The new Transport Economic Regulator (TER) should be given the authority to review and, if necessary, amend monopoly concession agreements. 'The Competition Commission could also be called upon to investigate exclusionary practices in port operations, including abuse of dominance or refusal to grant access to essential infrastructure,' he proposes. Long-term vision: Foster inter-port competition Beyond immediate fixes, Hawthorne encourages a return to inter-port rivalry, as seen prior to the 1910 formation of South African Railways and Harbours. At that time, ports like Cape Town and Durban competed actively for shipping traffic, spurring innovation and improved service delivery. Today, similar systems exist in countries such as Brazil, Canada, and Australia, where individual port authorities operate independently under national regulatory oversight. 'We need to stop thinking of South Africa's ports as a single block,' says Hawthorne. 'Independent port authorities promoting competition within and between ports could drive the efficiency gains we desperately need. 'Competition is the missing piece in South Africa's port reform puzzle. Without it, we risk pouring money into concessions that do little for users. With it, we unlock the real potential of our ports – for traders, for consumers, and for the economy as a whole.'
eNCA
3 days ago
- eNCA
Government backs Transnet again
JOHANNESBURG - Transnet has secured almost R95-billion in government guarantees as part of efforts to revive its failing operations. Is it a worthwhile investment or a waste of money? READ: Government approves additional guarantees for Transnet Mark Evans a partner at Oliver Wyman, a management consulting firm discussed the value of this investment with eNCA.
IOL News
3 days ago
- IOL News
FlySafair strike over – Here's what pilots finally agreed to
Passengers queue at check-in counters during strike-related delays as FlySafair worked with reduced pilot staffing. Image: Jonisayi Maromo/IOL FlySafair pilots have returned to duty after what was regarded as the longest pilot strike and lockout in South African history, following a 12-day dispute over scheduling and working conditions. The breakthrough came as the airline and Solidarity, the union representing its striking pilots, signed a formal agreement facilitated by the Commission for Conciliation, Mediation and Arbitration (CCMA). 'After 12 days of lockout and strike action by FlySafair pilots, an agreement has finally been reached through the CCMA's proposed settlement,' said Gideon du Plessis, general secretary of Solidarity. The resolution ends weeks of tension that saw grounded flights, public confusion, and growing criticism from both sides. 'There are no winners in this process,' said Helgard Cronjé, deputy general secretary of Solidarity, who confirmed that both parties accepted the CCMA-led proposal as the closest possible middle ground. A key point of contention was FlySafair's rostering system, which pilots argued allowed management to arbitrarily adjust schedules using vague 'soft rules.' The new agreement introduces fixed scheduling rules, removing this discretion. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ IOL News previously reported that the FlySafair had initially resisted the fixed rules, pointing out the need for flexibility to ensure operational efficiency. The airline's system, it said, was aligned with international standards and allowed pilots to receive full rosters by the 20th of the preceding month, with a marketplace to facilitate duty swaps. However, Solidarity contended that the lack of predictability in scheduling disrupted pilots' personal lives, denied them leave due to staff shortages, and raised safety concerns. However, the final deal now guarantees pilots at least one 60-hour weekend off every six weeks, totaling a minimum of nine weekends off per year. They will also receive at least 10 days off per month. Pilots required to work on scheduled days off will be allowed to reclaim that time the following month. Cronjé said that under the agreement, pilots will receive salary increases of 6%, 6.5%, 6.8%, and 6.9% over the next four years. These increases will also apply to annual adjustments of travel, accommodation, and medical allowances. In addition, pilots will be paid extra for any hours flown beyond 65 hours per month. To help offset losses from the strike under the 'no work, no pay' rule, FlySafair will make a one-time ex gratia payment equal to 15% of pilots' monthly salaries. Pilots can also cash in up to five days of leave. Earlier in the week, with the strike stretching into its second week and no resolution in sight, Solidarity released an open letter to the public, defending the pilots against accusations of greed. 'Let us be clear: this strike is not about greed. It is about dignity. It is about safety. It is about fairness. It is about being heard,' the statement read. The union highlighted what it described as a 'growing culture of silence and fear' at the airline, where safety concerns, fatigue, and staff attrition were routinely dismissed or met with intimidation. Solidarity also pushed back on claims that pilots earned between R1.8 million and R2.4 million annually, clarifying that only a small group of senior captains earned at that level. Most pilots, it said, earn significantly less and have not seen salaries return to pre-COVID levels, despite earlier promises. The union disputed FlySafair's claim that pilots fly an average of 63 hours per month, stating that many fly between 85 and over 100 hours per month, excluding standby and training duties. The union further claimed the total duty time often exceeds 180 hours monthly, close to the legal limit of 200. Solidarity also raised concerns about a legal exemption FlySafair obtained to fly pilots up to 120 hours a month, calling it unsafe in a high-risk industry. Cronjé criticised FlySafair management for what he called unnecessary delays in negotiations. 'This agreement could already have been reached in February,' he said. 'Had FlySafair management made the same concessions regarding the roster at that time, the strike and lockout could have been avoided. Management's obstinance in response to the reasonable appeals of their pilots led to conflict and losses for all parties. It also caused severe disruption for passengers and the public.' He said Solidarity has never encountered such a difficult negotiation process in its history. 'The pilots' input during the finalisation of the agreement only confirmed how little trust they have in FlySafair's management,' he said. 'If drastic change does not take place, this settlement will not prevent an outflow of pilots - something that will be to the great detriment of the company and the country.' Meanwhile, FlySafair, welcomed the conclusion of the strike. 'We are pleased to confirm that the strike action by a portion of our pilot workforce has officially come to an end,' said Kirby Gordon, FlySafair's chief marketing officer.
