logo
Shooting Marianne Faithfull and more secret stories behind the greatest rock 'n' roll photos

Shooting Marianne Faithfull and more secret stories behind the greatest rock 'n' roll photos

Yahoo31-01-2025
No home is complete without an iconic rock n roll print on the wall. And no-one has produced quite so many iconic rock 'n' roll images as Gered Mankowitz.
You'll know his photos from your mind's eye; when you picture certain musicians you'll likely recall the shots he took, such is their timeless power. The Jimi Hendix shot. The Rolling Stones shot. The Kate Bush shot.
'The key to my work is to try and create an image that the artist can live with, that works for them, that promotes them, that is true to them,' he tells the Standard.
Mankowitz talked us about his exhibition at the The Gibson Gallery within the newly opened Gibson Garage, the first contributing photographer in the space, where his best-loved shots will be on display for three months, with signed prints available to buy.
The still spritely and hard-working Mankowitz helped form the Sixties and tells us he was always destined to work in showbusiness. His father, Wolf, was a producer, novelist, playwright and very prominent in London's 50s theatre scene.
Gered says he was first introduced to the idea of photography when Peter Sellers came over to their house for lunch one day: 'Peter brought with him a full Hasselblad camera kit and a great big Polaroid camera. In those days the Polaroid was really rare: seeing a photo come to life in front of you was magical. Then Peter demonstrated the Hasselblad for me, took it apart showed me all the elements, but he did it in an insane, Goon Show, Swedish chef-type voice. I was weeping with laughter and when he left I said, 'I want to be photographer'.'
'I was very young, rebellious, trying to rock the boat and change the way we saw musicians.'
By the time he was 17, in 1963, he had his own studio, in Mason's Yard, a locale which quickly became a hub of the Sixties scene as first the legendary club The Scotch of St James opened in 1965, and then the avant-garde art gallery Indica opened in 1967, the place where John Lennon met Yoko Ono.
Mankowitz shot all the greats from that time, but was close to the Stones in particular. He puts his remarkable access and images down to the fact he was a similar age and 'the opposite of a Fleet Street photographer…I was very young, rebellious, trying to rock the boat and change the way we saw musicians. And they all wanted that.'
Here Gered takes us through some of his photos, starting with the sadly now departed Marianne Faithfull:
Andrew worked with Marianne but I hadn't met him yet. This shoot was in the Salisbury pub in St Martin's Lane. It was about the fourth or fifth shoot I'd done with Marianne.
But Andrew loved it and he called me up and that was how I started working with him and the Stones and Andrew's label, Immediate Records.
'Singers are not models. You have to help them.'
I had fallen for Marianne, I thought she was beautiful, very funny, very charming. We've had a 60 year friendship. We had a great time on the shoot, and I did a lot of pictures. with the mirror, the lights.
She was going through a period of wearing long knee socks which were sweet and sexy. When it comes to posing, you try and guide your subject into a pose that works, you guide them, try and encourage them. Singers are not models. You have to help them.
I knew Chas Chandler, who found Jimi in New York at the Café Wah, and brought him to London in 1966. He actually brought him straight from the airport to the Scotch of St James, just off the plane, he'd never been in London before.
I then got a call from Chas, saying 'I've got a wonderful new artists you're going to love him, come to the Bag O'Nails club in Kingly Street.'
Jimi was playing when I walked in. and the noise, the sound was overwhelming. To be honest, I didn't care for the sound very much that first listen, it was quite raucous and I found it hard to get into it. But I was mesmerised by Jimi, he was extraordinary. All the major guitarists were there, Clapton, Beck. Townsend - they couldn't work out how he was doing it. The guitar was tuned the wrong way, it was upside down, nobody understood.
'But you have to understand that in those days, young men didn't want to smile in photographs, it wasn't cool.'
As a visual person, I was struck by how he looked. I met him there, and he was very humble very quiet completely different to how he was on stage. And it was arranged that he should come to my studio, which he did in early 1967.
On the shoot he was lovely. Very quiet and humble, modest. And very funny. Very smiley and open and warm. But you have to understand that in those days, young men didn't want to smile in photographs, it wasn't cool. You wanted to be moody and sexy.
We kept breaking up. What particularly made us laugh was Mitch Mitchell, the baby faced drummer. He was younger than all of us, and Mitch Mitchell trying to look hard, just broke us up. Jimi would look at this little boy's face trying to be hard and just collapse in laughter.
She was divine, she was marvellous to work with, great in front of the camera.
She was just instinctive. She had hardly done any professional photography.
I was brought in, and was played Wuthering Heights which hadn't been released yet. I just thought, 'this is extraordinary'. And then they played me the video they had made for it and I realised how important dance and movement was to Kate.
I went back a few days later to meet her and I think she was only 17. She was lovely.
'The biggest problem with photographing Kate was trying to get her to focus and stop buzzing around and coming up with ideas.'
I said I thought it'd be good to photograph you in a leotard and she loved that idea. She just blew us away. She looked absolutely sensational and that's what I tried to capture.
She was very free and expressive and animated and hard to pin down. The biggest problem with photographing Kate was trying to get her to focus and stop buzzing around and coming up with ideas.
She was continually creating. Her energy level was just overwhelming. I finished the session like a discarded dishrag, sitting on my studio sofa breathing heavily.
I said to my assistant, Richard, 'Did we get anything?', and he said, 'well we shot 27 rolls of film, I think we got something.'
This is one of my favourite pictures.
It was taken at the end of the Rolling Stones' 1965 American tour. I went on that whole tour which was about seven weeks on the road and then they went into RCA studios in Hollywood to record what would become the Aftermath album.
Mick and Keith had been under a lot of pressure to write tracks on the road. They'd write in the evenings. I'd been in a recording studio a lot by that time, and I understood the process, when I was able to take my pictures and when to step back.
And we were very close, we were good friends by this time. I was just trying to capture the recording process as much as I could. The doodling around, making disparate sounds, which then suddenly would all gel and become a magical thing. If you weren't a musician it was really extraordinary.
'It wasn't a debauched time. I'm sorry to disappoint but that all came later.'
Keith here was tuning or just feeling it. It's an intimate picture, he's caressing the guitar. And it's a beautiful guitar, the Gibson Hummingbird. I did a lot of pictures of that time but that particular shot has a magic and intimacy to it.
It wasn't a debauched time. I'm sorry to disappoint but that all came later. The business wasn't that wild yet. They had to work.
This is what came as a shock to me, how hard they had to work, and how boring touring could be, and how exhausting. They were flying out after each show on their own plane, a little two engine prop airliner from the Forties called a Martin. It was slow!
We'd finish the show, get straight into the limousines, and were in the air by midnight, but we wouldn't get anywhere until three or four in the morning and it would be dead. There was no potential for any debauchery!
I'm not being coy, the opportunity wasn't there. They weren't the debauched hedonistic band they became only a year or so later.
I'd been asked to interview them for the cover of Mojo, in 1996. So early-ish in their career.
I didn't think very much of Oasis at the time, I thought they were like a tribute band. And I suggested I photograph them as a sort of pastiche of my Rolling Stones cover of Between the Buttons, because I thought that was an appropriate way of representing them.
But when they arrived at the studio, I don't know what had happened, but they were in the most terrible state. Furious.
Noel wouldn't talk, he stormed into the studio and threw himself down on a sofa and apparently went to sleep. Liam was just shouting and kicking out at the furniture. I really have no idea what was wrong.
'Noel wouldn't talk, he stormed into the studio and threw himself down on a sofa and apparently went to sleep. Liam was just shouting and kicking out at the furniture.'
Fortunately I knew their tour manager and after an hour of this behaviour, I said to him, 'Look is there anything you can do? You should just take them wherever they're going next.' He said, 'let me have a word.'
He knew me and my work and managed to convince them that this was an important session for them. Anyway they mellowed down, and soon we had a fantastic shoot. But it was touch and go. And quite alarming. Me and my assistant were quite nervous.
They weren't rude to me but it was rude to the room, to not say anything, to look daggers and stomp around and kick furniture.
It was rude to everyone - boorish, childlike behaviour. It was an unruly class of small children. But to reiterate, when they came to together, we got a really good shoot.
And of course attitude is so important to a band in photography. Projecting the attitude they want captured is key. It's just you have to understand where the line is, where the performance is.
That's from the session for her second album Kafunta, and was an attempt to visually introduce her African roots and at the same time have a psychedelic element in the colouration.
The session was a big deal for us, and for Immediate Records. It was typical of Andrew to give us the resources and encouragement to do something that was very avant-garde and ahead of its time.
'We all wanted the cover to be astounding. We were constantly trying to do something spectacular.'
The actual album cover was a double exposure which was a very brave thing to do. Not for me to shoot but for Andrew to put it on the cover. This shot in the show was one of the other portraits that he did.
Her first album was well received so this was really important.
We all wanted the cover to be astounding. We were constantly trying to do something spectacular, and we really pulled it off, I'm really proud of it.
The difference [between the Oasis shoot and the original Stones shoot] is huge. With Between the Buttons, in late 1966, I was so close to the Stones and so comfortable with them.
They used to record through the night and I would hang out at the studio listening, shooting a bit, and just being there.
Then one morning as we were leaving the studio, we all tumbled, stoned, hungover, onto the pavement in the early morning light. And I looked at the band as they were shivering, coat collars all turned up, and I said to [their manager] Andrew Loog Oldham, 'Bloody hell, they look just like the Stones.' And he went, 'yes they do, they really do.' I said let's shoot an early morning session, and so we did.
'We dragged them up to Primrose Hill because it was a high point and I thought we'd get good early morning light, which we did.'
I had this clumsy filter to go on the front of my camera to give this druggy, stoned blur. We dragged them up to Primrose Hill because it was a high point and I thought we'd get good early morning light, which we did. And we had about 45 minutes before everyone just crashed.
Andrew is, was and always will be an inspiration to me. He remains a close friend. He was a brilliant catalyst at bringing the best of out of people.
On this particular shoot, Brian Jones was a bit erratic by this time, and I was worried he was screwing up the pictures. He was turning away, pulling his collar up all around him, sort of hiding from the camera.
I turned around and said to Andrew, 'I'm worried about Brian.' and he said 'You don't have to worry at all because anything that Brian does can only contribute to the Stones' image. It doesn't matter what he does, he can turn his back, it'll make a great shot.'
That was fantastic, it really freed me to do the shoot and disregard Brian's antics.
When it comes to posing, you try and guide your subject into a pose that works, you guide them, try and encourage them.
Singers are not models. You have to help them.
The Gered Mankowtiz Exhibition is showcasing at The Gibson Gallery within the newly launched Gibson Garage London - the ultimate destination for guitar and music fans. To find out more please visit gibson.com
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

A former Rolling Stone says the Met has his stolen guitar. The museum disputes it
A former Rolling Stone says the Met has his stolen guitar. The museum disputes it

Yahoo

time42 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

A former Rolling Stone says the Met has his stolen guitar. The museum disputes it

LONDON (AP) — It's only rock 'n' roll, but it's messy. A guitar once played by two members of the Rolling Stones is at the center of a dispute between the band's former guitarist Mick Taylor and the Metropolitan Museum of Art. The 1959 Gibson Les Paul was donated to the Met as part of what the New York museum calls 'a landmark gift of more than 500 of the finest guitars from the golden age of American guitar making.' The donor is Dirk Ziff, a billionaire investor and guitar collector. When the Met announced the gift in May, Taylor thought he recognized the guitar, with its distinctive 'starburst' finish, as an instrument he last saw in 1971, when the Stones were recording the album 'Exile on Main St.' at Keith Richards' rented villa in the south of France. In the haze of drugs and rock 'n' roll that pervaded the sessions, a number of instruments went missing, believed stolen. Now, Taylor and his team believe it has reappeared. The Met says provenance records show no evidence the guitar ever belonged to Taylor. 'This guitar has a long and well-documented history of ownership,' museum spokesperson Ann Ballis said. Taylor's partner and business manager, Marlies Damming, said the Met should make the guitar 'available for inspection.' 'An independent guitar expert should be able to ascertain the guitar's provenance one way or the other,' she said in a statement to The Associated Press. While its ownership is contested, there's no disputing the instrument's starring role in rock history. It was owned in the early 1960s by Keith Richards, who played it during the Rolling Stones' first appearance on 'The Ed Sullivan Show' in 1964. The Met says that performance 'ignited interest in this legendary model.' The guitar – nicknamed the 'Keithburst' – was also played by guitar legends Eric Clapton and Jimmy Page. Taylor says he got it from Richards in 1967, two years before he joined the Stones, replacing original member Brian Jones. Jones died in 1969. Taylor left the band in 1974, reuniting with them for the Stones' 50th anniversary tour in 2012-2013. Jeff Allen, who was Taylor's manager and publicist for decades from the 1990s, said Taylor 'told me he got it as a present from Keith,' and also mentioned the theft. 'Mick did tell me that the guitar solo that he became quite famous for, on 'Can't You Hear Me Knocking,' was with the Les Paul that got stolen,' Allen said. The Met's records say the Les Paul was owned by Richards until 1971, when it was acquired by record producer and manager Adrian Miller, who died in 2006. The guitar has changed hands several times since then, and reappeared twice in public. It was put up for auction by Christie's in 2004, when it failed to sell. Ziff bought it in 2016, and loaned it to the Met in 2019 for an exhibition titled 'Play it Loud: Instruments of Rock & Roll.' It's unclear what will happen next. The Met, which plans to open a new gallery dedicated to its collection of American guitars, says it has not been contacted by Taylor or his representatives. ___ Associated Press writer Jocelyn Noveck in New York contributed to this story. Jill Lawless, The Associated Press Sign in to access your portfolio

A former Rolling Stone says the Met has his stolen guitar. The museum disputes it
A former Rolling Stone says the Met has his stolen guitar. The museum disputes it

Associated Press

time44 minutes ago

  • Associated Press

A former Rolling Stone says the Met has his stolen guitar. The museum disputes it

LONDON (AP) — It's only rock 'n' roll, but it's messy. A guitar once played by two members of the Rolling Stones is at the center of a dispute between the band's former guitarist Mick Taylor and the Metropolitan Museum of Art. The 1959 Gibson Les Paul was donated to the Met as part of what the New York museum calls 'a landmark gift of more than 500 of the finest guitars from the golden age of American guitar making.' The donor is Dirk Ziff, a billionaire investor and guitar collector. When the Met announced the gift in May, Taylor thought he recognized the guitar, with its distinctive 'starburst' finish, as an instrument he last saw in 1971, when the Stones were recording the album 'Exile on Main St.' at Keith Richards' rented villa in the south of France. In the haze of drugs and rock 'n' roll that pervaded the sessions, a number of instruments went missing, believed stolen. Now, Taylor and his team believe it has reappeared. The Met says provenance records show no evidence the guitar ever belonged to Taylor. 'This guitar has a long and well-documented history of ownership,' museum spokesperson Ann Ballis said. Taylor's partner and business manager, Marlies Damming, said the Met should make the guitar 'available for inspection.' 'An independent guitar expert should be able to ascertain the guitar's provenance one way or the other,' she said in a statement to The Associated Press. While its ownership is contested, there's no disputing the instrument's starring role in rock history. It was owned in the early 1960s by Keith Richards, who played it during the Rolling Stones' first appearance on 'The Ed Sullivan Show' in 1964. The Met says that performance 'ignited interest in this legendary model.' The guitar – nicknamed the 'Keithburst' – was also played by guitar legends Eric Clapton and Jimmy Page. Taylor says he got it from Richards in 1967, two years before he joined the Stones, replacing original member Brian Jones. Jones died in 1969. Taylor left the band in 1974, reuniting with them for the Stones' 50th anniversary tour in 2012-2013. Jeff Allen, who was Taylor's manager and publicist for decades from the 1990s, said Taylor 'told me he got it as a present from Keith,' and also mentioned the theft. 'Mick did tell me that the guitar solo that he became quite famous for, on 'Can't You Hear Me Knocking,' was with the Les Paul that got stolen,' Allen said. The Met's records say the Les Paul was owned by Richards until 1971, when it was acquired by record producer and manager Adrian Miller, who died in 2006. The guitar has changed hands several times since then, and reappeared twice in public. It was put up for auction by Christie's in 2004, when it failed to sell. Ziff bought it in 2016, and loaned it to the Met in 2019 for an exhibition titled 'Play it Loud: Instruments of Rock & Roll.' It's unclear what will happen next. The Met, which plans to open a new gallery dedicated to its collection of American guitars, says it has not been contacted by Taylor or his representatives. ___ Associated Press writer Jocelyn Noveck in New York contributed to this story.

Meet the NYC artist turning Manhattan's streets into viral masterpieces: ‘A lot of people know me now'
Meet the NYC artist turning Manhattan's streets into viral masterpieces: ‘A lot of people know me now'

New York Post

time2 hours ago

  • New York Post

Meet the NYC artist turning Manhattan's streets into viral masterpieces: ‘A lot of people know me now'

For this artist, New York City is the only canvas big enough. When Benny Cruz picked up a paintbrush for the first time, he had no idea that his art would catapult him to the highest heights of social media. 'I always wanted to be a painter, until I reached a point where I wasn't going anywhere with my art,' the Swedish-born artist, 49, told The Post. 11 Artist Benny Cruz has found his rightful place in the New York City art scene. Courtesy @johnjohnsonphoto 'That was tough. Then and there, I started painting for myself.' Cruz, also known as 'Your Local Benny' on his social media, discovered only later in life that his work spoke to millions — many of them New Yorkers. 'I saw that a lot of people who followed me were from New York, and they started buying my art,' he said of his popular subway collection, pieces that sell for hundreds to thousands of dollars. 11 One of Cruz's window displays in NYC reads, 'New York is a [love] story worth telling.' Courtesy @johnjohnsonphoto 11 The Brooklyn artist works with text-based art using acrylics and markers on sustainable paper. Courtesy @johnjohnsonphoto 'So to think I felt I was going nowhere with my work, to now is a big difference. I started to get more and more relevant. I felt total darkness before, and New Yorkers brought the light.' The Brooklyn-based artist, who currently divides his time between New York and Sweden, where his family resides, experienced a boon to his career after picking up MTA subway maps and experimenting with text work over them. Cruz, who uses acrylics and markers on sustainable paper, has gained notice for his Manhattan street art in recent months. The pieces, spotted on subway cars across the Big Apple, soon reached every corner of social media, with many gathering thousands of likes, as well as New Yorkers — past, present and future — liking, sharing and posting his work. 'I felt total darkness before, and New Yorkers brought the light.' 'With New York, I feel an enormous sense of gratitude,' he said. 'I wanted to express my emotions, so I thought about the most symbolic aspect of the city: the subway. The subway connects every part of New York. From there, I found the map and started to make my art.' The prolific pieces soon racked up thousands of impressions on social media, making Cruz synonymous with subway-inspired artwork now woven into the city's fabric. 'These went completely viral because a lot of people, even people that live in New York, embraced it. And that's a huge scale of people. It's powerful, and there is emotion behind it. And I think that's the reason people resonate with my art,' added Cruz, who boasts 40,000 Instagram followers. 11 'The truck was the perfect canvas for me. I had been spotting this structure for a long time and finally asked for a permit from its owner,' Cruz told The Post. Courtesy @johnjohnsonphoto 11 Cruz, 49, garnered global recognition for his Manhattan street art in recent months. Courtesy @johnjohnsonphoto Cruz, who was once an apprentice under the late Chilean artist Alfredo Mosella, said he's finally found an artistic purpose. 'With text, I found home. It's the most simple but most complex way to express my emotions,' he said. 'I wasn't going to have a future with my art, but New York changed everything.' After obtaining a permit to write on a 'perfect' blank canvas — in the form of a truck parked outside 14th Street — Cruz crafted a message to New Yorkers who pass the stationed vehicle on their everyday commute. 'I'm aiming so high I keep forgetting I'm already living my dream,' reads text emblazoned on the truck, an Instagrammable backdrop for passersby. 11 The artist experienced a career boost after picking up MTA subway maps and experimenting with text over them. Instagram / @bennycruz 11 'I wasn't going to have a future with my art, but New York changed everything,' he said. Courtesy @johnjohnsonphoto It is one of Cruz's most recognizable artworks, calling it his proud 'donation to the people of New York.' When asked about his favorite piece, he couldn't choose just one. 'I have several, but the first one for me is the one that went completely viral online. It says, 'New York, I have so much to thank you for.' I mean, that really went viral,' he explained. 11 His most viral piece to date is text that reads, 'New York, I have so much to thank you for.' Instagram / @bennycruz 11 'It's the most simple but most complex way to express my emotions,' Cruz said of his text-based art. Instagram / @bennycruz 'This other one I love says, 'She's got a soft heart but is New York tough.' And that one was successful because much of my audience is female. 'New York is a place you feel connected, and art connects people,' he added. 'I'm getting more involved with the city, and a lot of people know me now. Either they know me or my art.' Asked what he hopes his art will achieve, Cruz admits that legacy was never the goal for him. 'To be honest, I haven't thought about that. This started out because I wanted to express how I feel, and that's the core of my history. I still make art that is emotional and true to my expression. 'The only thing is, my relationship with New York has changed, but in a good way.' Still, Cruz revealed plans to host a large-scale art show in the Big Apple as soon as 2026 as his social media presence evolves. 11 His truck, parked on 14th Street, proudly serves as a backdrop to one of Cruz's most famous artworks. Courtesy @johnjohnsonphoto 11 Cruz said his art is his proud 'donation to the people of New York.' Instagram / @bennycruz 'I wasn't going to have a future with my art, but New York changed everything,' he said. 'And it's like my artwork says, 'I'm aiming so high I keep forgetting I'm already living my dream.''

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store