Prostate cancer could be diagnosed faster with ‘game changing' ultrasound scan
Currently patients must undergo both an MRI scan and biopsy, in which a sample is removed and tested for cancer.
The MRI scan is mapped onto an ultrasound image for the biopsy, which can often be on a different day, allowing doctors to pinpoint the position of the cancer and get a sample.
But scientists have found that a new, high-resolution micro-ultrasound – a clearer, more detailed version of the technology used to image a baby in a womb – could speed up the process with just as accurate results.
The researchers, led by the University of Toronto, said using micro-ultrasound (microUS) was quicker, cheaper and safer than MRI scans, and so could speed up diagnosis, reduce hospital visits, and free up MRI machines for other people.
The Optimum trial, which is being presented at the European Association of Urology (EAU) Congress in Madrid on Sunday, and published in the journal, JAMA, involved 677 men who underwent biopsies at 19 hospitals across Canada, the US and Europe.
Patients were randomly assigned to one of three groups: half underwent MRI-guided biopsy, a third received microUS-guided biopsy followed by MRI-guided biopsy and the remainder received microUS-guided biopsy alone.
The study revealed there were very similar rates of prostate cancer detected across all three groups, with biopsies taken using the micro-ultrasound scan just as effective as MRI.
About 100,000 men in the UK undergo a prostate biopsy every year and more than 50,000 men are diagnosed with prostate cancer.
A lack of accurate screening tests means many men with high protein-specific antigen (PSA) scores are sent for such scans and biopsies to confirm or rule out cancer.
The MicroUS uses a higher frequency than standard ultrasound and provides images that have three times greater resolution, and can therefore capture similar detail to MRI scans.
Prof Laurence Klotz, lead researcher and professor of surgery at the University of Toronto, said the trial's results could have a similar impact to that of MRI when it was introduced.
'When MRI first emerged and you could image prostate cancer accurately for the first time to do targeted biopsies, that was a game changer,' he said. 'But MRI isn't perfect. It's expensive. It can be challenging to get access to it quickly. It requires a lot of experience to interpret properly.'
He said MRI also used 'gadolinium which has some toxicity' and that certain patients – such as those with hip replacements or pacemakers – could not have an MRI scan.
'But we now know that microUS can give as good a diagnostic accuracy as MRI and that is also game changing,' Prof Klotz added.
'It means you can offer a one-stop shop, where patients are scanned, then biopsied immediately if required. There's no toxicity. There are no exclusions. It's much cheaper and more accessible. And it frees up MRIs for hips and knees and all the other things they're needed for.'
Commenting on the findings, Prof Jochen Walz, a urological imaging expert from the Institute Paoli-Calmettes, a cancer centre in Marseille, said it added 'a very important tool to the diagnosis of prostate cancer'.
He said it was also 'safer' because it avoided the potential for 'errors that can creep in' when MRI images are manually transferred to ultrasound.
'It does require training to spot the patterns and interpret micro-ultrasound images correctly. But once that's been mastered, then it could enable prostate cancer diagnosis and biopsy to happen at the same appointment,' Prof Walz said.
'The ease and cost of micro-ultrasound means it could be an important tool for screening programmes as well, but further research would be needed to understand its potential role in that setting.'
The trial was sponsored by Canadian company Exact Imaging, which has developed the microUS technology.
Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
an hour ago
- The Hill
Beshear on potential White House bid: ‘I'll think about it after next year'
Gov. Andy Beshear (D-Ky.) said he'll consider a 2028 White House bid in an article published Friday while seething over the 'big, beautiful bill' backed by Republicans in Congress. 'Two years ago, I wouldn't have considered [running for president]. But if I'm somebody who could maybe heal and bring the country back together, I'll think about it after next year,' Beshear told Vanity Fair. The Kentucky governor's term ends in 2027 and he's pledged to complete his tenure in office before launching another political bid for a higher office. Fellow party members Gov. Gavin Newsom (D-Calif.), Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.) and Gov. Josh Shapiro (D-Pa.) have also been listed as potential contenders for the presidency as Democrats look to claw back the executive branch after their November loss. Political pundits have suggested the GOP-authored spending package will have a significant impact on midterm elections and cycles that follow as Americans grapple with the possibility of losing their healthcare coverage, a top issue for Beshear. 'What the Republican majority is getting wrong is that the American people don't view health care in a partisan way. They want to be able to see their doctor when they need to, and they want their neighbor to be able to see their doctor,' Beshear, Kentucky's former attorney general, said in the interview. 'No state will be able to compensate for the level of devastation that this bill would cause. What they're doing is immoral, and it's certainly not Christian,' he added. The legislation is set to remove millions from Medicaid and introduce stricter work requirements for food stamp benefits and other social services. However, Beshear said in order to break through on the cuts, Democrats will need to help voters conceptualize the ongoing impact of the bill. 'If Democrats say this bill is going to increase food insecurity, their point's not going to get through. If they say people are going to go hungry, it will,' he said. 'And we have to explain not just what we disagree with in this bill, but why. And my why is my faith. The parable of the fishes and the loaves is in every book of the gospel. My faith teaches me that in a country that grows enough food for everyone that no one should starve.'
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Hospitals scan more patients with AI technology
Staff at NHS hospitals in Hull said AI technology had cut MRI scan times, allowing them to see more patients. Hull University Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust said the software used algorithms to help reduce background noise, helping to achieve sharper images in a shorter time. Karen Bunker, head of imaging, said: "This means we can reduce the scanning time on certain sequences, but still get the same imaging quality." The software has been installed at Hull Royal Infirmary and Castle Hill Hospital and will also be introduced at Scunthorpe General Hospital and Diana, Princess of Wales Hospital in Grimsby. The Air Recon Deep Learning (ARDL) software was installed on the hospitals' existing MRI machines. Staff said the software was cutting between 10 and 15 minutes from average scan times. A routine MRI head scan used to take 30 minutes but now takes 20, the trust said, while a prostate scan now takes 30 minutes instead of 45. The trust added it can now scan 31 lumber spine patients over a 12 hour period, instead of 21 before. Ms Bunker said: "People who struggle with claustrophobia or those with learning disabilities, who previously couldn't tolerate a scan, are finding they are able to endure the shorter scan times." Staff also reported fewer children needed to have a general anaesthetic to get through a scan. Listen to highlights from Hull and East Yorkshire on BBC Sounds, watch the latest episode of Look North or tell us about a story you think we should be covering here. AI in healthcare: what are the risks for the NHS? Hospitals will use AI to speed up patient care AI 'co-pilot' used to speed up cancer diagnosis Hull University Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Historic Medicaid cuts to come as Trump signs domestic policy bill
This story was originally published on Healthcare Dive. To receive daily news and insights, subscribe to our free daily Healthcare Dive newsletter. President Donald Trump on Friday signed Republicans' major tax and domestic policy bill into law, setting into motion massive cuts to Medicaid that could remove millions of people from the safety-net insurance coverage. The legislation was sent to Trump's desk on Thursday, after months of rancorous debate in Congress. The Senate narrowly passed its version of the bill earlier this week, calling in Vice President JD Vance to cast the tiebreaking vote. House Republicans then scrambled to get their caucus in line, as moderates raised concerns about the Senate's steeper cuts to Medicaid and conservatives lambasted the legislation's growing contribution to the national debt. But the lower chamber ultimately voted to pass the megabill 218 to 214, nearly entirely along party lines. Only two Republicans, Reps. Thomas Massie of Kentucky and Brian Fitzpatrick of Pennsylvania, declined to support the legislation. GOP lawmakers cheered its passage Thursday. Rep. Brett Guthrie, R-Ky., chairman of the House Committee on Energy and Commerce, said the law 'strengthens Medicaid for those who need it most.' Here are some of the healthcare provisions in the law: Medicaid work requirements. Some beneficiaries in the safety-net insurance program — including childless adults and those with children older than 14 — would need to work, volunteer or go to school at least 80 hours a month to stay enrolled. Medicaid eligibility. States would be required to check enrollees' eligibility for the coverage every six months instead of yearly. The law also prevents the HHS from enforcing a regulation that aimed to streamline eligibility and enrollment for Medicaid and the Children's Health Insurance Program. Cost-sharing in Medicaid. Higher-income beneficiaries would have to pay cost-sharing up to $35 per service for some care. Provider taxes. The law freezes provider taxes — arrangements states use to finance their share of Medicaid funding — in states that haven't expanded Medicaid, and gradually lowers allowed rates in expansion states. State-directed payments. The arrangements that allow states to make supplemental payments for services covered in Medicaid managed care contracts face new restrictions. The law directs the HHS to revise that payment limit from the average commercial rate to Medicare rates in expansion states, and 10% above the Medicare rate in non-expansion states. Affordable Care Act subsidy verification. The law requires pre-enrollment verification of eligibility for premium tax credits that subsidize the cost of health plans on the ACA exchanges. Limit immigrant eligibility for Medicare, Medicaid and ACA premium tax credits. Only green card holders and certain classes of immigrants would be eligible for these programs. Cut Medicaid funding to Planned Parenthood. The law blocks Medicaid funds for services offered by abortion providers like Planned Parenthood for one year. Rural healthcare support. The policy includes a $50 billion fund to help states support providers and hospitals in rural communities. Nursing home staffing. The HHS is prohibited from enforcing a Biden-era regulation that would have required long-term care facilities to increase staffing and have a registered nurse on-site. The Medicaid provisions of the law have been some of the most contentious. The policies reduce federal spending on the safety-net coverage by $1 trillion, according to a Tuesday estimate by health policy researcher KFF. Nearly 12 million additional people would become uninsured by 2034 under the law, according to an analysis published Saturday by the Congressional Budget Office. As such, the policies have been lambasted by the healthcare sector. Hospitals worry the growing number of uninsured patients would cause uncompensated care to soar, weighing on their bottom lines. Rural hospitals and providers that serve large numbers of Medicaid patients would be particularly hard hit, forcing them to cut services to close their doors altogether, experts say. Dr. Bobby Mukkamala, president of the American Medical Association, said in a statement Thursday the impact from the law 'will reverberate for years,' leaving patients sicker with less access to care. Chip Kahn, president and CEO of the Federation of American Hospitals, urged Congress to take action to mitigate damage from the law's healthcare provisions by extending enhanced financial assistance for people who buy coverage on the ACA marketplaces, which is set to lapse at the end of the year. 'Time is of the essence,' he said in a Thursday statement. 'Without action extending these credits, we will see the gains to health care access and affordability our country has made over the years further evaporate, and too many will not be able to pick up the slack.' Recommended Reading Senate passes Trump's spending bill with massive Medicaid cuts
