JSE fines former EOH director Bogdanov R500k for faking qualifications
Image: Social media
The JSE on Friday said it had fined Anushka Bogdanov, a former director of EOH Holdings, R500 000 and immediate disqualification from holding the office of a director or officer of a company listed on the JSE for a period of 10 years for fake qualifications.
It said that Bogdanov was appointed as an independent non-executive director of EOH Holdings on June, 20, 2019 and served as the chairperson of the Social and Ethics Committee, a member of the Governance and Risk Committee and Nomination and Remuneration Committee and then as the lead independent non-executive director in February 2020.
Bogdanov resigned from EOH with effect from July 28, 2020.
Upon Bogdanov's appointment as director of EOH, her Curriculum Vitae provided to the company stated that she held a PhD in International Finance obtained from the London Business School in 2007/2008. In addition thereto, as required by the provisions of Schedule 13 of the JSE's Listings Requirements, Bogdanov submitted a Director's Declaration to the JSE wherein she attested to and confirmed that she possessed a PhD in International Financial Management and Mathematics.
Based on the information contained in Bogdanov's CV provided to the company and the Schedule 13 Directors' Declaration submitted to the JSE, EOH made various disclosures to the market and the public in their SENS announcements and annual reports, specifically that Bogdanov possessed a PhD in International Finance and/or referred to her as "Doctor".
However, the JSE said it was subsequently established by EOH that Bogdanov falsely stated that she had obtained a PhD in International Finance from the London Business School or any other institution during 2007/2008 or at any other time.
Video Player is loading.
Play Video
Play
Unmute
Current Time
0:00
/
Duration
-:-
Loaded :
0%
Stream Type LIVE
Seek to live, currently behind live
LIVE
Remaining Time
-
0:00
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque
Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps
Reset
restore all settings to the default values Done
Close Modal Dialog
End of dialog window.
Advertisement
Next
Stay
Close ✕
Ad loading
Based thereon, the JSE said it had initiated an investigation into concerns about the veracity of Bogdanov's qualification and credentials.
"Throughout the process, Ms. Bogdanov was afforded numerous opportunities to refute these allegations, make submissions and provide the JSE with proof that she did obtain a PhD in International Finance and Mathematics from the London Business School. The facts and information obtained during the investigation indicated that there were significant discrepancies and irregularities relating to the authenticity of her qualification, and her statements and representations made in respect thereof," the JSE said.
"These findings were supported by independent verification and objective evidence, which raised serious concerns about the accuracy and reliability of the documentation submitted by Ms. Bogdanov as well as the veracity of Ms. Bogdanov's representations about her qualification."
The JSE had initially engaged with Bogdanov in November 2020 regarding allegations about the authenticity of her PhD qualification. The JSE explained that the length of time necessary to conclude the investigation was caused by numerous requests from Bogdanov for more time in responding to the JSE's queries. Despite the JSE's efforts of engagements with Bogdanov over the past five years, Bogdanov could not provide the JSE with such confirmation. Finally, in late 2024, Bogdanov confirmed and admitted to the JSE that she did not have a PhD degree from the London Business School.
The JSE concluded that Bogdanov falsely stated to the EOH and the JSE that she had a PhD qualification. As a result of this falsehood, EOH in turn, misrepresented Bogdanov's PhD qualification to its shareholders, the JSE and the investing public.
It is for this reason that the JSE found Bogdanov in breach of the provisions of General Principle (v) and (vii) of the Listings Requirements.
"Bogdanov's false statement that she obtained a PhD qualification in International Financial Management and Mathematics from the London Business School raises serious and material concerns about her integrity and suitability as a director of companies listed on the JSE, and casts serious doubt on her ability to fulfill these important responsibilities. Furthermore, Ms. Bogdanov's actions demonstrate a grave violation of professional integrity and an unacceptable disregard for ethical standards, the JSE said,
For these reasons and with reference to the JSE's findings of breach, the JSE has decided to impose the public censure and a fine her.
BUSINESS REPORT
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The South African
an hour ago
- The South African
Why 85% of applicants don't comply with SPAZA shop fund
Four months since its launch, the R500-million spaza shop fund has failed to reach initial expectations. The Department of Trade, Industry and Competition revealed recently that the spaza shop fund has attracted more than 10 000 applications. However, a worryingly low amount of spaza shop fund applications have meant compliance requirements. As such, applications have had to be split into two categories. The first group, made up of 14% who comply. And a second group of the remaining 86%, 'who do not yet meet requirements' but will be assisted. Experts say if you include South Africa's informal sector, the country's unemployment rate is actually closer to 10%, and not 33% as reported by Stats SA. Image: File A group representing the informal traders says government's 'rigid compliance criteria' is to blame for the low uptake, reports Daily Maverick . The fund is the brainchild of the Minister of Small Business Development, Stella Ndabeni-Abrahams. And it came about following the 2024 poisoning of several young children. However, the South African Spaza Shops Association's Kgothatso Ramautswa, says it is 'deeply concerned' by the lack of compliance: 'This is not a reflection of spaza shop owners, but rather a failure of government to design a realistic funding support system. The fund is failing its intended beneficiaries. If 86% are non-compliant, the problem lies in the system, not the people,' Ramautswa says. South Africa's tax-free informal sector is worth billions, say economists. And the fund is a way to 'get them on the books.' Image: File However, in the face of such low compliance, the department says it will provide non-financial support. This will include assistance in applying for the necessary documentation through their local municipality for spaza shop fund applicants. The current maximum funding available per spaza shop fund is R100 000. And this is offered as a blended finance instrument, with a 50% grant and 50% interest-free loan. The debt portion of which is repayable with zero interest. As a reminder, the government's R100 000 per qualifying owner is made up like so. R40 000 for stock purchases, R10 000 for business training and R50 000 for infrastructure upgrades. As such, the package is designed to promote sustainability, competitiveness and regulatory compliance versus larger retailers. As of now, no spaza shop fund applications have actually been denied. However, in future they could be for the following non-compliance: Applicant is not a South African citizen. If the applicant is misrepresenting ownership or control of the business. Any fraudulent or misrepresentation documents in the application. Invalid or non-existent trading permit or a business licence. Use of funding for personal or non-business-related purposes. Let us know by leaving a comment below, or send a WhatsApp to 060 011 021 1. Subscribe to The South African website's newsletters and follow us on WhatsApp, Facebook, X and Bluesky for the latest news.
IOL News
an hour ago
- IOL News
JSE fines former EOH director Bogdanov R500k for faking qualification
Anushka Bogdanov, a former director of EOH Holdings Image: Social media The JSE on Friday said it had fined Anushka Bogdanov, a former director of EOH Holdings, R500 000 and immediate disqualification from holding the office of a director or officer of a company listed on the JSE for a period of 10 years for fake qualifications. It said that Bogdanov was appointed as an independent non-executive director of EOH Holdings on June, 20, 2019 and served as the chairperson of the Social and Ethics Committee, a member of the Governance and Risk Committee and Nomination and Remuneration Committee and then as the lead independent non-executive director in February 2020. Bogdanov resigned from EOH with effect from July 28, 2020. Upon Bogdanov's appointment as director of EOH, her Curriculum Vitae provided to the company stated that she held a PhD in International Finance obtained from the London Business School in 2007/2008. In addition thereto, as required by the provisions of Schedule 13 of the JSE's Listings Requirements, Bogdanov submitted a Director's Declaration to the JSE wherein she attested to and confirmed that she possessed a PhD in International Financial Management and Mathematics. Based on the information contained in Bogdanov's CV provided to the company and the Schedule 13 Directors' Declaration submitted to the JSE, EOH made various disclosures to the market and the public in their SENS announcements and annual reports, specifically that Bogdanov possessed a PhD in International Finance and/or referred to her as "Doctor". However, the JSE said it was subsequently established by EOH that Bogdanov falsely stated that she had obtained a PhD in International Finance from the London Business School or any other institution during 2007/2008 or at any other time. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ Ad Loading Based thereon, the JSE said it had initiated an investigation into concerns about the veracity of Bogdanov's qualification and credentials. "Throughout the process, Ms. Bogdanov was afforded numerous opportunities to refute these allegations, make submissions and provide the JSE with proof that she did obtain a PhD in International Finance and Mathematics from the London Business School. The facts and information obtained during the investigation indicated that there were significant discrepancies and irregularities relating to the authenticity of her qualification, and her statements and representations made in respect thereof," the JSE said. "These findings were supported by independent verification and objective evidence, which raised serious concerns about the accuracy and reliability of the documentation submitted by Ms. Bogdanov as well as the veracity of Ms. Bogdanov's representations about her qualification." The JSE had initially engaged with Bogdanov in November 2020 regarding allegations about the authenticity of her PhD qualification. The JSE explained that the length of time necessary to conclude the investigation was caused by numerous requests from Bogdanov for more time in responding to the JSE's queries. Despite the JSE's efforts of engagements with Bogdanov over the past five years, Bogdanov could not provide the JSE with such confirmation. Finally, in late 2024, Bogdanov confirmed and admitted to the JSE that she did not have a PhD degree from the London Business School. The JSE concluded that Bogdanov falsely stated to the EOH and the JSE that she had a PhD qualification. As a result of this falsehood, EOH in turn, misrepresented Bogdanov's PhD qualification to its shareholders, the JSE and the investing public. It is for this reason that the JSE found Bogdanov in breach of the provisions of General Principle (v) and (vii) of the Listings Requirements. "Bogdanov's false statement that she obtained a PhD qualification in International Financial Management and Mathematics from the London Business School raises serious and material concerns about her integrity and suitability as a director of companies listed on the JSE, and casts serious doubt on her ability to fulfill these important responsibilities. Furthermore, Ms. Bogdanov's actions demonstrate a grave violation of professional integrity and an unacceptable disregard for ethical standards, the JSE said, For these reasons and with reference to the JSE's findings of breach, the JSE has decided to impose the public censure and a fine her. BUSINESS REPORT
The Citizen
an hour ago
- The Citizen
The tenant who won't leave
Another tale of a victim of rental fraud and the legal system that allowed the occupant to stay. The owner of a Parkwood home estimates that her direct loss already exceeds R500 000, excluding legal fees and unpaid municipal charges. Picture: AdobeStock South Africans are no strangers to bureaucratic indifference. But sometimes a single story reveals just how deeply systemic failure has set in. A Moneyweb reader – at her wits' end – shared her sad tale of losing more than R500 000 after a tenant moved into her house under false pretences, then refused to pay rent and won't leave. The email describes the owner's serious dilemma and highlights the risks of investing in rental property. She says the elaborate scam involves fake documents, visa violations, falsified payslips and a brazen abuse of legal processes. The reader owns a R4.5 million property in Parkwood and she says almost every institution charged with protecting honest citizens – including the Rental Housing Tribunal, the police, SA Revenue Services (Sars), the Department of Home Affairs, banks and the courts – has failed to act. 'This isn't just about me,' she says. 'This is happening to people all over the country. Just because we are ordinary South Africans, we are expected to absorb the loss and move on. 'Must we accept that this is just the way things are? I have the evidence to show how to thrive illegally in this country and get away with it,' she says. The facts are straightforward. The owner leased her property to a man who arrived in a Land Rover, claiming to run multiple businesses. He promised to pay six months' rent upfront into a trust account. Needless to say, that never happened. ALSO READ: How to evict tenants 'He paid rent for the first three months. Then nothing. After a protracted battle, I managed to extract another three months' payment. Since then, for more than seven months, not a cent. 'Meanwhile, rates and taxes have gone unpaid, my bond with Investec is under pressure and my overdraft facility has been threatened,' she says. The reader says she had to sell her car, take on extra consulting work, and drained her savings to keep the house from being repossessed. Despite the clear breach of contract, her efforts to get rid of the defaulting tenant were unsuccessful. She alleges that the Gauteng Rental Housing Tribunal has refused to enforce the lease's termination clause or allow eviction proceedings. 'Instead, they insist on inspecting the house to determine whether the tenant's 'comfort' has been adequately prioritised. 'The tenant has refused entry to me as the owner and landlord as well as the rental agents – and even the inspectors that were appointed by the tribunal. Nonetheless, the tribunal has imposed maintenance obligations on me, but I cannot access my own property to do the work. 'They told me that my notice of termination means nothing. They say we must wait for another inspector. Or another tribunal officer. Or another counterclaim. Each one delays the case for months,' she says. ALSO READ: More South Africans rent, but arrears and tenant risk rise False documents According to the homeowner, the tenant submitted false payslips with tax deductions that do not match standard Sars tax tables. His visa documents appear fraudulent – a claim the owner says has been (verbally) confirmed by Home Affairs officials. Despite this, officers at the Rosebank Police Station refused to open a case of fraud. When she tried to remove her furniture from the property, the police were called and stopped her. She says the tenant's personal bank account, held at RMB Private Bank, has seen more than R2 million in activity over just two months, based on the copy of the bank statements she insisted on when considering the lease. 'He lives on the premises with his girlfriend and at least two other men who are not SA citizens. He claims to run several businesses, but I could not find any confirmation that any of the businesses exist. None are registered with the Companies and Intellectual Property Commission (CIPC). 'He writes his own legal letters, which a real law firm then forwards on their official letterhead. He knows the system better than anyone,' the homeowner claims. 'He knows that all you need is a delay. Just say 'I submitted a counterclaim', and the tribunal will postpone again. No one checks anything.' She believes the bank statements the tenant offered are fake. 'But RMB has ignored my repeated emails asking for verification.' ALSO READ: Your rights when you rent a place to stay Institutions in silos What's striking in this case is how every institution involved seems either unwilling or unable to act. There appears to be no coordination between Home Affairs, Sars, CIPC, the banks or the tribunal. The homeowner has done a lot of research about the errant tenant. She says he has a student and a working visa, a contradiction in itself. 'He apparently operates businesses in clear violation of his immigration status. He is not Vat registered, has no visible employees, and does not file tax returns. His companies' addresses cannot be verified. 'And yet, the banks have not flagged his transactions under anti-money laundering or Fica (Financial Intelligence Centre Act) rules. Home Affairs will not intervene unless he is found on a public street or place of business. The tribunal demands that the landlord comply with obligations, even while being denied access to the property. 'I've contacted every institution I can think of,' she says. This is not just a personal nightmare. It points to a national governance failure that affects thousands of property owners, particularly middle-income landlords who cannot afford long legal battles. South African law appears to offer tenants near-absolute protection, while offering landlords almost no practical recourse when contracts are ignored or fraud is involved. This imbalance is often justified as protecting vulnerable tenants, but the unintended result is that unscrupulous operators, including illegal immigrants and con artists, can exploit the system with impunity. 'What is the point of the law if someone with fraudulent documents can move into a house, refuse to pay rent, violate immigration law and still be protected?' the aggrieved landlord asks. ALSO READ: Here's a list of what your landlord is responsible for in your rented flat Legal delays The economic cost is real. The property owner estimates that her direct loss already exceeds R500 000, excluding legal fees and unpaid municipal charges. Multiply that across similar cases nationwide, and the scale becomes obvious. 'This tenant lives rent free in a R4.5 million home with a permanent 'guard' who's not South African. Meanwhile, I've had to sell my car to pay rates.' The homeowner adds that the system fails to protect landlords and actively penalises them for trying to enforce legal agreements. She argues that her problem highlights significant gaps in the legal system: Rental Tribunal: There must be clearer legal boundaries regarding the tribunal's powers. Leases must matter; otherwise, why have contracts at all? There is no coordination between institutions. Visa status, tax compliance, business registration and tenant behaviour must be cross-checked in cases of alleged fraud. Bank oversight: Financial institutions must be held accountable for monitoring and flagging suspicious activity. 'It cannot fall on private citizens to investigate a bank's clients,' the homeowner says. She also asks that landlords get some support. 'Middle-income landlords need legal mechanisms and government-backed structures to address tenant abuse without being forced into expensive court battles.' The landlord says her crooked tenant 'is smart, charming, eloquent, and knows the law better than most lawyers. He is completely without accountability. The system seems to reward his behaviour'. However, she's not giving up, even if she knows she's unlikely to recover her losses. 'This isn't just my story. It's a SA story. It is playing out, house by house, lease by lease.' This article was republished from Moneyweb. Read the original here.
