Mysterious black debris in Sydney was not tar balls but ‘much more disgusting' waste
Initially thought to be tar balls, the golf-ball-size debris turned out to be something much different — a combination of decomposed cooking oils, hair and food waste, the New South Wales Environment Protection Authority (EPA) said Wednesday.
The investigation, carried out by the Australian government and scientists from the University of New South Wales, revealed that the black balls 'likely originated from a source that releases mixed waste,' the EPA said in a statement.
'Authorities have considered several possible causes, such as a shipping spill or wastewater outflow,' it said.
The exact origin is yet to be confirmed due to the 'complex composition of the balls and the time they have spent in the water,' the statement said. 'But final results are due in the coming weeks.'
Thousands of the dark balls were discovered starting in mid-October on multiple Sydney beaches, including the famous Bondi Beach, leading to beach closures across the city's shores.
At the time, authorities advised the public not to swim near or touch the debris. They said preliminary test results indicated that the blobs were tar balls formed when oil comes into contact with debris and water.
However, further investigation has disproven that theory.
'What we found is much more — this is not going to sound very scientific — but much more disgusting than we previously thought,' said William Alexander Donald, a chemistry professor at the University of New South Wales Sydney, who is part of the research team.
While initial testing suggested that the blobs had formed from crude oil or natural oil seeps from the ocean floor, further analysis revealed plenty of 'fatty, oily, greasy' molecules typical of spent cooking oil and soap scum, as well as traces of recreational drugs and birth control medication, Donald told NBC News.
'When we're doing the testing, these balls smell worse than anything you've ever — at least for me, worse than anything I've ever smelled before,' Donald said, with all the signs pointing toward human waste that could 'clog up the sewage pipes.'
'This is a hugely complex analytical challenge where we've detected hundreds of different molecules and components in these blobs,' he said.
It would be interesting to follow up on how often this kind of debris occurs and whether scientists can trace it back to the exact source, Donald said, noting that his team has received a few unconfirmed reports of similar debris washing up in the past in similar areas and even in the southeastern state of Victoria.
Sydney Water confirmed there were no issues at the Bondi or Malabar water facilities, while Transport for NSW Maritime reviewed recent weather patterns but found no clear answers, according to the statement.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NBC News
13 hours ago
- NBC News
Behind the scenes of 'Jurassic World Rebirth'
Director Gareth Edwards sits down with NBC News' Gadi Schwartz to discuss the cinematography and technology behind the newest installment in the Jurassic Park franchise, "Jurassic World Rebirth."
The Guardian
2 days ago
- The Guardian
EPA employees sign ‘declaration of dissent' over agency moves under Trump
A group of Environmental Protection Agency employees on Monday published a declaration of dissent from the agency's policies under the Trump administration, saying they 'undermine the EPA mission of protecting human health and the environment'. More than 170 EPA employees put their names to the document, with about 100 more signing anonymously out of fear of retaliation, according to Jeremy Berg, a former editor-in-chief of Science magazine who is not an EPA employee but was among non-EPA scientists or academics to also sign. The latter figure includes 20 Nobel laureates. The letter represents rare public criticism from agency employees who could face blowback for speaking out against a weakening of funding and federal support for climate, environmental and health science. Scientists at the National Institutes of Health made a similar move earlier in June. 'Since the Agency's founding in 1970, EPA has accomplished [its] mission by leveraging science, funding, and expert staff in service to the American people. Today, we stand together in dissent against the current administration's focus on harmful deregulation, mischaracterization of previous EPA actions, and disregard for scientific expertise,' the letter read. Agency spokespeople did not immediately respond on Monday to messages seeking comment. 'I'm really sad. This agency, that was a superhero for me in my youth, we're not living up to our ideals under this administration. And I really want us to,' said Amelia Hertzberg, an environmental protection specialist at the EPA who has been on administrative leave since February from the office of environmental justice and external civil rights, while the administration works to close down her department. Hertzberg's work focused on the most vulnerable groups affected by pollution: pregnant and nursing people, young children and babies, the elderly, people with pre-existing and chronic health conditions and people living in communities exposed to higher levels of pollution. That was not supposed to be controversial, but it had become so in this political climate, she said. 'Americans should be able to drink their water and breathe their air without being poisoned. And if they aren't, then our government is failing,' she said. Berg, who also directed the National Institute of General Medical Sciences at NIH from 2003-2011, said the dissent was not motivated by partisan criticism. He said the employees hoped it would help the EPA get back to the mission for which it was established – which 'only matters if you breathe air and drink water'. The letter outlines what the EPA employees see as five main concerns: undermining public trust; ignoring scientific consensus to benefit polluters; reversing the EPA's progress in America's most vulnerable communities; dismantling the office of research and development; and promoting a culture of fear, forcing staff to choose between their livelihood and wellbeing. Under Lee Zeldin, the agency's administrator, the EPA has cut funding for environmental improvements in minority communities, vowed to roll back federal regulations that lower air pollution in national parks and tribal reservations, wants to undo a ban on a type of asbestos and proposed repealing rules that limit planet-warming greenhouse gas emissions from power plants fueled by coal and natural gas. Sign up to This Week in Trumpland A deep dive into the policies, controversies and oddities surrounding the Trump administration after newsletter promotion Zeldin began reorganizing the EPA's research and development office as part of his push to slash their budget and gut their study of climate change and environmental justice. And he is seeking to roll back pollution rules that an Associated Press examination found were estimated to save 30,000 lives and $275bn every year. 'People are going to die,' said Carol Greider, a Nobel laureate and professor of molecular and cellular biology at the University of California, Santa Cruz, who also signed the letter. She described last week's east coast heatwave as evidence of the ways people are feeling the effects of climate change. 'And if we don't have scientists at the EPA to understand how what we do that goes into the air affects our health, more people are going to die,' she added. Berg said the declarations of dissent from both the NIH and EPA employees are noteworthy because they represent scientists speaking out as their careers are on the line. Even non-agency employees have to consider whether the government will withdraw research funding. Greider, asked about fears of repercussions or retaliation, said she was 'living the repercussions of everything'. She regularly meets with graduate students who are worried about pursuing scientific careers as labs lose funding. She said it was a long-term problem if we are not supporting the next generation of scientists: 'That's decades worth of loss.'
NBC News
2 days ago
- NBC News
EPA employees put names to 'declaration of dissent' over agency moves under Trump
A group of Environmental Protection Agency employees on Monday published a declaration of dissent from the agency's policies under the Trump administration, saying they 'undermine the EPA mission of protecting human health and the environment.' More than 170 EPA employees put their names to the document, with about 100 more signing anonymously out of fear of retaliation, according to Jeremy Berg, a former editor-in-chief of Science magazine who is not an EPA employee but was among non-EPA scientists or academics to also sign. The latter figure includes over 70 Nobel laureates. The letter represents rare public criticism from agency employees who could face blowback for speaking out against a weakening of funding and federal support for climate, environmental and health science. Scientists at the National Institutes of Health made a similar move earlier in June. 'Since the Agency's founding in 1970, EPA has accomplished (its) mission by leveraging science, funding, and expert staff in service to the American people. Today, we stand together in dissent against the current administration's focus on harmful deregulation, mischaracterization of previous EPA actions, and disregard for scientific expertise,' the letter read. Agency spokespeople did not immediately respond Monday to messages seeking comment. Employees want the EPA get back to its mission 'I'm really sad. This agency, that was a superhero for me in my youth, we're not living up to our ideals under this administration. And I really want us to,' said Amelia Hertzberg, an environmental protection specialist at the EPA who has been on administrative leave since February from the Office of Environmental Justice and External Civil Rights, while the administration works to close down her department. Hertzberg's work focused on the most vulnerable groups impacted by pollution: pregnant and nursing people, young children and babies, the elderly, people with preexisting and chronic health conditions and people living in communities exposed to higher levels of pollution. That wasn't supposed to be controversial, but it's become so in this political climate, she said. 'Americans should be able to drink their water and breathe their air without being poisoned. And if they aren't, then our government is failing,' she said. Berg, who also directed the National Institute of General Medical Sciences at NIH from 2003-2011, said the dissent isn't motivated by partisan criticism. He said the employees hope it will help the EPA get back to the mission for which it was established — which 'only matters if you breathe air and drink water.' The letter outlines what the EPA employees see as five main concerns: undermining public trust; ignoring scientific consensus to benefit polluters; reversing EPA's progress in America's most vulnerable communities; dismantling the Office of Research and Development; and promoting a culture of fear, forcing staff to choose between their livelihood and well-being. EPA has cut funding and rolled back federal regulations Under Administrator Lee Zeldin, EPA has cut funding for environmental improvements in minority communities, vowed to roll back federal regulations that lower air pollution in national parks and tribal reservations, wants to undo a ban on a type of asbestos and proposed repealing rules that limit planet-warming greenhouse gas emissions from power plants fueled by coal and natural gas. Zeldin began reorganizing the EPA's research and development office as part of his push to slash their budget and gut their study of climate change and environmental justice. And he's seeking to roll back pollution rules that an Associated Press examination found were estimated to save 30,000 lives and $275 billion every year. 'People are going to die,' said Carol Greider, a Nobel laureate and professor of molecular and cellular biology at the University of California, Santa Cruz, who also signed the letter. She described last week's East Coast heat wave as evidence of the ways people are feeling the effects of climate change. 'And if we don't have scientists at the EPA to understand how what we do that goes into the air affects our health, more people are going to die,' she added. Berg said the declarations of dissent from both the NIH and EPA employees are noteworthy because they represent scientists speaking out as their careers are on the line. Even non-agency employees have to consider whether the government will withdraw research funding. Greider, asked about fears of repercussions or retaliation, said she's 'living the repercussions of everything.' She regularly meets with graduate students who are worried about pursuing scientific careers as labs lose funding. It's a long-term problem if we aren't supporting the next generation of scientists, she said: 'That's decades worth of loss.'
