
How The U.S. Can Reduce Dependence On China's Rare Earth Minerals
China's commerce ministry issued a statement on July 4 saying that Beijing and Washington have accelerated efforts toward the agreement reached during the June 9-10 trade talks in London, all while warning the Trump administration against undermining their "hard-won" consensus. American and Chinese officials agreed upon a framework to implement the Geneva agreement in early May, expediting rare earth shipments to the United States. In a reference to its own rare earth export curbs, the Chinese commerce ministry said that the Chinese government "is currently reviewing and approving eligible export license applications for controlled items." Confirming reports that the United States resumed exports of chip design software, ethane and jet engines, the statement added that the White House had also undertaken reciprocal steps "to lift a series of restrictive measures against China and has informed China about the relevant situation.'
This diplomacy underscores how China has been able to effectively counter U.S. restrictions on semiconductor sales and technology transfers. The Trump administration's negotiations with the government of President Xi Jinping are a necessary short-term step to avoid disruptions to the American economy and its military superiority. But it must be treated as an extremely temporary measure because the deal struck last month perpetuates U.S. dependence on China for critical minerals.
Over the past couple of years there has been a massive surge in high-frequency Chinese air and naval exercises, especially incursions into Taiwan's Air Defense Identification Zone. Such incursions surged with nearly 450 flights recorded in mid‑2024 and continuing activity into the current year includes live-fire drills, amphibious landings, rocket force launches, and aircraft carrier operations encircling the island nation. Last summer, the Chinese navy held wargames with their Russian counterparts in the waters off the Aleutian Islands. Then this June, for the first time, both of China's two carrier strike groups operated together entering the second-island chain near Japan. Earlier this year, in February, a People's Liberation Army task group carried out live-fire navy drills in Australia's Exclusive Economic Zone in the Sea of Tasman.
U.S.-Chinese diplomacy can help manage tensions, but it is extremely unlikely that Beijing will give up its strategic military plans. While the U.S. remains a superior military force, the United States remains vulnerable due to economic dependence on Chinese rare earth mineral supply chains. The American strategy has been to place restrictions on semiconductor exports as part of a broader effort to curb access to advanced technologies, along with discouraging investments. More recently, tariffs have become yet another element of trade restrictions. Washington has also been actively promoting India as a strategic alternative to China's global-scale manufacturing prowess with the aim of diversifying supply chains, de-risking economic dependence, and countering Beijing's industrial dominance.
Considering that Beijing has had a major head start in the strategic field of rare earth minerals, the United States will have to work hard on multiple fronts to alter the current reality that the People's Republic controls 60–90% of global refining and processing capacity for critical minerals and raw ores mined elsewhere (e.g., Australia), which also have to be sent to China for processing.
Current efforts are scattered across several different arenas: extraction and refining, public investment and market incentivization, supply chains involving allied and partner nations, technological innovation, downstream industrial strategy, trade policy and strategic reserve, and transparency and market reforms. The Trump administration will need to weave these various lines of efforts into a grand strategy on critical minerals security.
One key strategic ally in this endeavor is Kazakhstan, which can become a reliable source of 17 of the 30 minerals critical for the U.S. economy. Astana can also serve as a geopolitical partner in the forging of non-Chinese supply chains.. Most importantly, Kazakhstan, while maintaining relations with its neighbors Russia and China, has a demonstrated desire to work with the United States and its western allies.
The Eurasian landmass is thus a major battleground in great power competition, particularly between the United States and China. Beijing's objective is to maintain close economic relations with Washington while at the same time it grows its military power to undermine the U.S. global position. America cannot accept this situation. And the key to dealing with it entails making critical minerals security a top national priority.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
10 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Mark Cuban Says Its Not The Students At Fault But The School If Answers Can Be Generated With AI: Kids Take 'Path Of Least Resistance'
Billionaire entrepreneur and investor Mark Cuban says schools that still teach for model-ready answers will be 'way behind' within a decade, arguing curricula must evolve with artificial intelligence. What Happened: In an X post on Sunday, the investor wrote, 'Within 5–10 years, if a school teaches in a manner where answers by students can be generated by a model, it's a sh*tty school and way behind.' He added that 'kids will always take the path of least resistance' and said AI should be 'part of the solution.' Trending: Be part of the breakthrough that could replace plastic as we know it—Cuban's point is less about cheating than design. If assignments can be solved by a general‑purpose model, he argues, the problem is the assignment, not the student's ingenuity. He urged educators to change 'the path and how they learn,' warning that 'teaching like it's 2024' will soon be obsolete as generative systems spread. The billionaire has been on this beat for months. He told Gen Z at South by Southwest in March to "spend every waking minute" learning AI and has encouraged teens to build AI side hustles rather than wait for credentials. He's also warned there will be 'two types of companies,' those great at AI and those they put out of business, a framing he now extends to It Matters: Cuban has said AI could mint the world's first trillionaire, potentially 'one dude in a basement,' highlighting his view that mastery will drive outcomes over pedigree in the next decade. To him, classrooms that simulate that tool‑rich environment will serve students best. The former Shark Tank investor says he made it in the business world by refusing to retire in his mid‑30s and by pushing to be the best. Fresh out of Indiana University's Kelley School of Business, he founded MicroSolutions in his 20s, aimed to retire by 35, but instead sold the firm at 32 for $6 million and took home about $2 million in profit. Photo Courtesy: Kathy Hutchins on Read Next: $100k+ in investable assets? Match with a fiduciary advisor for free to learn how you can maximize your retirement and save on taxes – no cost, no obligation. These five entrepreneurs are worth $223 billion – they all believe in one platform that offers a 7-9% target yield with monthly dividends Up Next: Transform your trading with Benzinga Edge's one-of-a-kind market trade ideas and tools. Click now to access unique insights that can set you ahead in today's competitive market. Get the latest stock analysis from Benzinga? This article Mark Cuban Says Its Not The Students At Fault But The School If Answers Can Be Generated With AI: Kids Take 'Path Of Least Resistance' originally appeared on


New York Times
10 minutes ago
- New York Times
States Sue Trump Administration Over Efforts to Get Food Stamp Data
A coalition of 21 states and Washington, D.C., sued the Trump administration on Monday, seeking to block a Department of Agriculture demand that states surrender sensitive personal information about millions of food stamp recipients. The lawsuit, filed in federal court in San Francisco, argues that the federal government's demand violates federal privacy laws and the U.S. Constitution. It appears to be part of a coordinated effort to collect information that can be used to 'advance the president's agenda on fronts that are wholly unrelated to SNAP program administration,' including immigration enforcement, the lawsuit says. 'We will not allow this lifesaving program to be illegally used to hunt down immigrants and their families,' Attorney General Letitia James of New York said at a news conference on Monday announcing the lawsuit, appearing with the attorneys general of California and Michigan. All three are Democrats. 'This administration cannot intimidate vulnerable families and prevent them from putting food on the table,' Ms. James added. The Agriculture Department said in May that it planned to create a database of Americans who receive nutrition benefits through the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, or SNAP, which serves about 42 million people. The federal government pays for the benefits and shares the administrative costs with the states. But after a coalition of public interest groups and people receiving SNAP benefits sued in May in Washington to block the government from collecting the information on recipients, largely on privacy grounds, the Agriculture Department said it would pause the plan until it could 'ensure that data received would be appropriately safeguarded' and would satisfy legal requirements. That lawsuit is still pending. The lawsuit filed Monday asks the court to find the department's demand for the data unlawful and to prevent the administration from conditioning receipt of SNAP funding on compliance by states. It also asks the court to declare that the administration cannot disclose the requested SNAP data to the so-called Department of Government Efficiency or the Department of Homeland Security for any purpose other than administering the SNAP program. The Agriculture Department declined to comment on the lawsuit. The department has said the new policy is designed to help implement an executive order Mr. Trump signed in March, ostensibly focused on streamlining federal databases and minimizing barriers between agencies and between state and federal governments. It has argued in court that the requirement is necessary to administer the program more effectively, as states play a major role overseeing the day-to-day distribution of benefits. Rob Bonta, California's attorney general, said at the news conference Monday that the administration's demand that states turn over personal sensitive data such as names, Social Security numbers and home addresses — even for people who applied years ago — was 'a bait and switch of the worst kind.' 'This isn't about oversight and transparency,' Mr. Bonta added. 'This is about establishing widespread surveillance under the guise of fighting fraud. We can call it what it is: an illegal data grab designed to scare people away from public assistance programs.' The lawsuit pending in Washington argues that the information the government has traditionally collected on SNAP recipients is for largely administrative purposes such as confirming eligibility, and that the new reporting requirements violate the spirit and purpose of the laws governing that data collection. The new case filed on Monday appeared to go further by pointing out the potential for abuse if newly collected data was shared outside the Agriculture Department or used for tracking and immigration enforcement. Those concerns have been compounded by evidence that the Trump administration, with the assistance of Elon Musk and DOGE, have already taken steps to merge highly specialized databases at different agencies with the goal of hastening deportations. This year, the Trump administration cemented an interagency agreement to provide taxpayer data housed at the Internal Revenue Service to Immigration and Customs Enforcement, resulting in the resignation of several senior I.R.S. officials. According to reporting by ProPublica, the I.R.S. is also building infrastructure to supply details within that data, such as home addresses, to Homeland Security officials on demand. In June, the Supreme Court also allowed DOGE to proceed in reviewing personal data held by the Social Security Administration, with minimal restrictions on how that data might be used. In addition to New York, California, Michigan and Washington, D.C., the other plaintiffs in the lawsuit announced Monday are Arizona, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Hawaii, Illinois, Kentucky, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Minnesota, Nevada, New Jersey, New Mexico, Oregon, Rhode Island, Washington and Wisconsin.


New York Times
12 minutes ago
- New York Times
Dozens of Licensed Weed Shops Were Placed Too Close to Schools
More than 100 licensed cannabis dispensaries in New York were allowed to open too close to schools and may have to move, state regulators said on Monday. State law prohibits dispensaries from opening within 500 feet of schools. For the past three years, regulators in the Office of Cannabis Management have measured the distance from the entrance of the potential dispensary to the entrance of a school. However, the agency said on Monday that the distance should have been measured to a school's property line. The announcement has created uncertainty around the future of dozens of dispensaries at a time when suitable locations have become increasingly rare and expensive. A vast majority of the affected businesses are in New York City and owned by veterans, people affected by the state's past anti-marijuana laws and others who were given preference to receive licenses. Felicia Reid, the agency's acting executive director, told her staff in an email obtained by The New York Times that the affected businesses include 60 dispensaries that are currently open and 45 others that are getting off the ground, as well as 47 applicants who were required to secure deeds or leases in advance. Officials said the change stemmed from a review of the agency's practices that Ms. Reid ordered last year. In letters to the businesses, Ms. Reid acknowledged that her agency's decision might have harmful repercussions for people who have poured their time, money and energy into jump-starting the legal cannabis industry. 'To give you this news, and for the weight of it, I am incredibly sorry,' she said. In a statement, the agency said it was seeking an unspecified legislative solution to help the dispensaries stay in place. But in online guidance, officials cautioned that if lawmakers did not act, the agency could not renew the dispensaries' licenses at their existing locations. The agency has also set aside $15 million to help cover the expenses of finding a new location for the affected applicants looking to open dispensaries. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.