These are the deadliest fighter jets in world, invisible in sky, hard to hit because…, not China's J-20 or US's F-16, they are...
Whether it's the Russia-Ukraine war or the conflict between Israel and Iran, the significance of fighter jets has been clearly proven. These fighting machines are loaded with next-generation technologies and carry the latest weapons. Even the latest radars fail to detect them because of their stealth technology and unmatched speed. There are several fighter jets from different generations used by various countries — but do you know which are the deadliest? We have curated a list of five of the deadliest fighter jets that are hard to hit. Let's check them out.
Why Some Jets Are Nearly Impossible To Shoot Down?
There is no doubt that fighter jets are one of the most advanced machines made by humans so far. These machines not only fly fast but are also almost invisible in the sky to most advanced radars. As per experts, advanced fighter jets are equipped with stealth shapes, powerful engines, and advanced electronics that makes them super powerful machines.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
8 hours ago
- Time of India
Mercedes-Benz rolls out 600,000th G-Class SUV
Mercedes-Benz on Tuesday said it has rolled out the 600 ,000th unit of its G-Class SUV from its manufacturing facility in Graz, Austria. The luxury carmaker rolled out the G G 580 with EQ Technology, its 600,000th unit of the G-Class SUV, in obsidian black metallic finish. Launched in 1979, the G-Class combines rugged off-roading capabilities with luxurious features and amenities. The all-electric G 580 consumes between 27.7 to 30.3 kWh per 100 km and produces zero tailpipe emissions, aligning with the brand's push towards sustainable mobility . 'The G-Class has retained its unmistakable silhouette, iconic design features such as round headlights and exposed spare wheel, and essential off-road capabilities including full-time all-wheel drive and a robust ladder frame,' the company said in a statement. A significant driver of customisation within the G-Class range has been the MANUFAKTUR programme , launched in 2019. More than 90 per cent of customers now select at least one bespoke option, with over a million configurations now possible. Since 2024, buyers can choose from up to 20,000 paint colours, reflecting rising demand for heritage and exclusive finishes.
Time of India
17 hours ago
- Time of India
New space race: Acting Nasa chief Duffy to announce plan for building nuclear reactor on moon this week- Here's what we know
US transportation secretary Sean Duffy is set to reveal accelerated plans for constructing a lunar nuclear reactor this week, marking his first significant initiative as Nasa 's interim administrator. According to documents reviewed by POLITICO, this announcement will establish a clearer timeline for the lunar reactor project, despite Nasa facing substantial budget reductions. This initiative demonstrates Duffy's intention to influence Nasa's policy direction, even as he faced criticism for managing dual roles. "It is about winning the second space race," said a Nasa senior official, granted anonymity to discuss the documents ahead of their wider release. Following a disagreement with Tesla CEO Elon Musk in July, President Donald Trump appointed Duffy after withdrawing billionaire Jared Isaacman's nomination. Duffy has also issued instructions to expedite the International Space Station's replacement. These decisions could enhance American progress towards lunar and Martian missions, objectives that China is also pursuing. These initiatives reflect the Trump administration's emphasis on human spaceflight. The White House's 2026 budget proposal increases funding for crewed missions whilst significantly reducing other programmes, including a nearly 50 per cent reduction in science mission funding. The reactor initiative requires Nasa to request industry proposals for a 100 kilowatt nuclear reactor, targeting a 2030 launch date, crucial for lunar astronaut missions. Previously, Nasa funded research for a 40 kilowatt lunar reactor, planning deployment in the early 2030s. The directive warns that the first nation to establish a reactor could "declare a keep-out zone which would significantly inhibit the United States," reflecting concerns about a China-Russia collaborative project. Nasa must appoint a project leader and gather industry feedback within 60 days. The 2030 launch target aligns with China's planned first lunar landing. Nasa maintains involvement in nuclear development despite the Pentagon's recent termination of a joint nuclear-powered rocket engine programme. "While the budget did not prioritise nuclear propulsion, that wasn't because nuclear propulsion is seen as a non-worthy technology," the Nasa official stated. The space station directive seeks to replace the current International Space Station with commercial alternatives through revised contract procedures. Nasa intends to award contracts to at least two companies within six months of the proposal request. The goal is to establish a new station by 2030, preventing China from being the sole operator of a crewed orbital station. Several companies, including Axiom Space, Vast, and Blue Origin, have shown interest. However, legislators have expressed worry about insufficient funding allocation speed.
Economic Times
2 days ago
- Economic Times
The stealth war: How China is quietly squeezing the lifeline of US military technology through 'magnets'
TIL Creatives Representative AI Image China is tightening its grip on the minerals that power the Western world's most advanced weapons, as reported by the Wall Street Journal. The controls aren't loud or flashy, but they're being felt in boardrooms, warehouses, and weapons factories across the United States. The Pentagon has already started to feel the strain. Missiles, fighter jets, radar systems, drones — all depend on a steady stream of materials like gallium, germanium, and rare earth magnets. And right now, that stream is being choked. In one example, a US drone component maker had its shipments of key Chinese-made magnets held up for weeks. Chinese suppliers had suddenly begun demanding detailed information about where the parts were going and how they'd be used. Chris Thompson, Vice President of Global Sales at ePropelled, said the company refused.'Of course we are not going to provide the Chinese government with that information,' Chris Thompson told a result, the magnets stopped arriving. Production delays followed. ET has not been able to independently verify these claims. These minerals aren't obscure. They're the building blocks of nearly every modern military is used in radar and satellite communications. Germanium is key for night vision and infrared imaging. Antimony is used in explosives and armour-piercing ammunition. Rare earth elements like neodymium and samarium are found in high-performance magnets, which power everything from missile guidance systems to drone propulsion and F-35 flight like dysprosium and terbium, are essential for heat-resistant alloys in jet engines. Others, like gadolinium, are critical for sonar and underwater surveillance materials aren't just important, they're irreplaceable. Substitutes either don't exist or don't work nearly as the problem isn't just that China mines a lot of them. It's that China processes and refines most of the global supply. Even when the raw materials come from somewhere else, they often pass through Chinese refineries before reaching the production isn't just a one-off problem. The deeper you look, the more it becomes clear: America's defence supply chain is built on materials it doesn't a defence analytics firm, recently found that more than 80,000 parts used across Pentagon weapons systems rely on minerals now facing Chinese restrictions. In many cases, these supply chains include only one or two vendors, and nearly all of them are connected to China. 'We talk about this daily and our companies talk about it daily,' said Dak Hardwick, Aerospace Industries Association, as reported by WSJ. Leonardo DRS, a US military tech supplier, warned it's already down to its "safety stock" of germanium, a metal essential for missile infrared sensors.'In order to sustain timely product deliveries, material flow must improve in the second half,' said Lenardo DRS's CEO Bill Lynn during a conference call with WSJ. That's the reality. Without these minerals, weapons can't be built. Full control isn't just about rare earths. It includes antimony, used in explosives. Gallium and germanium, critical for semiconductors and optics. Samarium, gadolinium, dysprosium, all found in advanced radar and targeting China blocked exports of germanium and gallium in late 2024, the market barely blinked at first. But by April 2025, it expanded the bans to cover seven more categories of rare earths. Prices spiked. Delivery times stretched out. In one case, a western buyer was quoted a rate 60 times above the usual market another, US Antimony Corporation had a shipment of 55 tonnes of Australian-mined antimony blocked at Ningbo port. It sat for three months before being sent back, with seals broken and no clear not supply chain risk. That's only one operational rare earths mine in the United States: Mountain Pass in California. While it's been scaling up output, refining remains a problem. Much of the ore it produces still ends up in China for Materials, which runs the mine, received over $400 million in US government funding to close that loop. But the gap between extraction and end-use is still has emerged as a possible new source of rare earths and titanium, with the US pushing to support its mining sector as part of postwar reconstruction. But experts are blunt about the timeline. 'Developing mine sites and sufficient infrastructure in the war-torn nation will take time, potentially decades,' said Aidan Knight, an associate analyst from GlobalData, as per a report by US Critical Minerals website. In the meantime, the Pentagon has invoked emergency powers under the Defence Production Act to fast-track domestic mining. DARPA is trying to predict global supply trends using modelling software. And companies like Charles River Analytics are being paid millions to map out alternative sourcing strategies. Still, none of this is fast. And none of it changes the fact that in 2024, China produced 750 out of 760 tonnes of primary gallium worldwide. The US produced is now the biggest factor. The Pentagon has ordered contractors to phase out all Chinese rare earth magnets by 2027. Most firms have a few months of stockpiles, at best. For smaller defence suppliers, that's not a transition, it's a cliff isn't the first time China has flexed its minerals. Back in 2010, it cut off rare earth exports to Japan over a maritime dispute. The move worked. Japan backed down. The message time, the target is wider. And the stakes are logic is simple. You can't build 21st-century weapons without 21st-century materials. If a missile guidance system needs gallium and there's no gallium, that missile doesn't get made. If a fighter jet needs neodymium magnets and none are arriving, the assembly line per a report by US Critical Minerals website, Lewis Black, CEO of Almonty Industries, which mines tungsten, put it plainly, 'We are trying to break that addiction [to Chinese supply] because… like all addictions, it is unhealthy. We cannot afford to go cold turkey because we are just not strong enough to do it."Until the addiction is broken, through new mines, new partnerships, and new infrastructure, Washington's military ambitions will remain dependent on decisions made in just a trade problem. A strategic vulnerability.
