
Young voters hold the power this election. These are the people they listen to
Rather than writing articles about the budget, they posted TikTok videos and Instagram reels, and shared information with their followers via Instagram stories. In the lead up to , many are encouraging their followers to engage with politics and policy — and it's working. Brisbane woman Emina is 29 years old and has never been interested in politics, but after following influencer and podcast host Abbie Chatfield, she was motivated to update her voting details and keep up to date with this year's election. Chatfield first gained a public profile after appearing on TV show The Bachelor and is now a podcast host and media personality.
In the lead-up to the election, Chatfield has interviewed Prime Minister Anthony Albanese and Greens leader Adam Bandt, hosted a DJ event with Bandt and the Greens, and made regular posts about the election and policies. "I've followed Abby since she was on The Bachelor, and she's always been really opinionated and I love her for that," Emina said. "I've always found her to be making it engaging and bringing to the surface the things that are often not spoken about enough."
Emina said she believes influencers speaking about politics can be empowering and educational for their followers. While Chatfield has openly said she personally supports the Greens, Emina said she hasn't felt pressured to vote the same way. "I haven't found Abbie to be forceful to tell me who to vote for, so that's also something that I've really respected … her message has been one of empowerment," she said.
For Holly Rankin, who also performs as a singer-songwriter and recording artist under the name Jack River, pop culture and policy have always been linked. Alongside her professional music career, Rankin has been involved in campaigns and activism for years. She is also the co-founder of Sentiment, a strategic communications and creative agency that aims to bridge the gap between politics and pop culture. Rankin believes online content creators are often not taken seriously by older generations or traditional media and argues the term 'influencer' can be used to denigrate or dismiss their work and advocacy. "At the end of the day, they're likely very good communicators who are passionate about something and they've grown an online community who have shared values with them," she said.
This election, Rankin believes young voters and social media are becoming more powerful. According to a 2024 report from the Australian Communications and Media Authority, 46 per cent of 18 to 24-year-olds nominated social media as their main source of news, and 31 per cent said celebrities and influencers were sources of their news content. "The voting electorate is younger, and I think the world is in a really kind of frightening spot for a lot of younger people, so it's inspiring them to lean into politics," she said. "Content creators are seeing not even an opportunity, more like a responsibility, to jump in and be part of the conversation." With the election predicted to be close, Rankin said young voters could be the people who decide the results, particularly in marginal seats. "So it's really important that they get good information and that they engage and also just learn about civics and politics," she said. "If they're not getting it [from] politicians themselves, if they're not reading the news, how else are they going to get this information?"
With millennials and gen Z voters now outnumbering baby boomers on the electoral roll, appealing to younger voters is becoming increasingly important to political parties. According to the Australian Electoral Commission (AEC), there are 1,831,800 voters aged 18 to 24 enrolled for the 2025 election. The youth enrolment rate, which tracks eligible voters in this age group, is sitting at 92 per cent. Dr Susan Grantham, a lecturer in communication at Griffith University, believes social media has become "absolutely essential" in politics. On platforms like Instagram and TikTok, Grantham said influencers have a "stronger hold over the audience" and may have more sway than posts made by candidates or political parties, which politicians are starting to realise. "There's always been influencers out there that have been politically aligned and have promoted politics during election campaigns previously," she said. But she said this election, political parties and leaders were now doing joint posts and podcasts with influencers. "That's going to be highly influential and far more influential than what we would expect from a politician directly," Grantham said.
Hannah Ferguson, founder and CEO of news commentary platform Cheek Media, told SBS News she believes political parties are beginning to recognise the power of social media and podcasts in driving change. "A lot of influencers — and I say 'influencer' but content creators and new media — have really powerful engagement with their audience who may not know that much about politics," she said. "Our ability to communicate directly with our audiences about the issues that matter to them is far more engaged and far more relevant than large parts of legacy media."
Ferguson also believes young audiences have an increased expectation that influencers or people with public profiles should be engaged in politics and social issues. She said there is now a "newfound interest and demand" for content creators to make their values clear, with many viewers preferring to "invest time and trust into the people that they see as resonating with them". "We expect the people that we look up to, the celebrities, the influencers, the people with public presences — to have political opinions and to talk about these things because we are very much a values-driven generation," she said. "And we are the most powerful voting bloc in Australia in the lead up to the federal election."
Fellow content creator Daphne Berry said she believes many young voters turn to new media platforms for more relatable discussions about politics. Berry, who hosts the music podcast Airing Your Dirty Laundry, told SBS News her platform is "about learning". "I'm completely out of my depth in a lot of ways, but [I try] to come in and really learn and really listen to people who perhaps know a bit more than I do and ask questions," she said. "[I then] explain it to people who ... don't fully understand what's going on in the country."
Not everyone is on board with new media and influencers becoming involved in politics When content creators were invited to the federal Budget lockup in March, critics labelled the influencers as "self-obsessed" and questioned whether they were paid to attend. Clips of Chatfield's interviews with Bandt and Albanese were reviewed by the AEC after Liberal senator Jane Hume questioned if they had breached electoral rules by not including an authorisation statement.
The posts were cleared of breaching any laws, with the AEC finding no evidence the podcaster had been paid for any political posts, or that Albanese or Bandt had any creative control in the interviews. In a post on Instagram, Chatfield accused the Liberal Party of trying to discredit influencers speaking on politics. "I'm all for the AEC making sure that everything goes by regulations [so] that we have safe and fair elections," she said. "But the reality is there was no reason to question the integrity of my posts because I repeatedly stated publicly that I was not paid." Chatfield said she believed the Liberal Party was trying to "minimise the impact of influencers and new media" and discourage content creators from speaking about politics. According to Grantham, new media and influencers largely play a positive role in politics and education, but she acknowledged it is a "tricky space". "We have to be careful that we don't let the traditional news media die; it still has a very solid place in politics," she said. "What we do see is influencers taking on a similar role, and some of them are doing that very, very well, but they don't have to work to the same ethical codes or media law that go along with this sort of public commentary."
Grantham believes young people need to be taught how to question what they see and to think critically about social media and political commentary. "But until we as a society are really good at doing that, there's obviously always going to be potential negatives," she said. In a time of climate crisis, conflict, and global uncertainty, Rankin believes young voters and social media can ultimately play a part in creating a better future. "I feel critically concerned [about the future], but I know we can write a new story. "I feel optimistic, but there is a lot of work to do." Visit the to access articles, podcasts and videos from SBS News, NITV and our teams covering more than 60 languages.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


SBS Australia
6 hours ago
- SBS Australia
Donald Trump says TikTok sale is 'pretty much' finalised, only needing China's sign off
President Donald Trump says the United States "pretty much" has a deal on the sale of popular short-video app TikTok. Trump told reporters on Saturday (AEST) that he would start talking to Chinese President Xi Jinping "or one of his representatives" early next week. When asked how confident he was that China would agree to the deal, he said: "I'm not confident, but I think so." "I think the deal is good for China, and it's good for us" Trump said. "And for us, it's money ... we make a lot of money if the deal goes through." The TikTok saga started after bipartisan legislation to ban the app on national security grounds unless it was sold to American buyers was signed early last year under the Biden administration. What do we know about the potenial buyers? ByteDance has previously confirmed talks with the US government, saying key matters needed to be resolved and that any deal would be "subject to approval under Chinese law". For the deal to comply with US law, ByteDance cannot own more than 20 per cent of TikTok. Late last month, Trump told Fox News a buyer had been found and could be disclosed in about two weeks. He didn't name the potential buyers, but said they are "very wealthy people". In May, Trump also mentioned that a group of buyers was prepared to pay "a lot of money" for TikTok. The previous month he said China would have agreed to a deal on the sale of TikTok if it were not for a dispute over Trump's tariffs on Beijing . Several US media outlets reported earlier this year that TikTok's US technology partner, Oracle, could take over in a deal that would potentially include the app's American investors. And there have also been reports that a group called The People's Bid for TikTok might also be a potential buyer. The group is owned by billionaire Frank McCourt, who is known as the former owner of the Los Angeles Dodgers baseball team. With reporting by the Reuters and Agence France-Presse news agencies.

The Age
7 hours ago
- The Age
For the children, the system must change
Just meaningless As much as I admire Kate Halfpenny, this time she is just plain wrong. The wedding was hyper meaningless and gross. Frank Flynn, Cape Paterson Racialised hate Friday night's events in Melbourne mark a terrifying turning point. An Israeli restaurant was targeted. A synagogue was set alight. This is racialised hate. It does nothing to help Palestine. In fact, it makes Palestinian dignity more elusive. Some on the terminally-online far left will claim it's 'anti-Zionism', not antisemitism. But when Jewish businesses are attacked and houses of worship are burning, that excuse collapses. 'Zionist' has become a socially acceptable slur – a veil for bigotry. The far right plays the same game: when Donald Trump said 'Shylocks and bad people,' he claimed it was just a literary reference. Elements of the far left now launder hatred with the same trick. This is what happens when politicians aren't censured for saying Jews have 'tentacles,' when parties like the Greens scapegoat entire populations, when people get their news from TikTok, when unrepresentative fringe groups are given a megaphone again and again, and when even legacy media platforms platform the same predictable polemics, afraid to break ranks or admit moral complexity. What begins with euphemism ends with fire. This isn't about Israel. It's about whether Jews in Australia can walk the streets and live without fear. Say it, and say it clearly: this is racism. Simon Tedeschi, Newtown, NSW The deeper currents The article ″ Radical Israeli settlers fan the flames of hatred in West Bank ″ (5/7) is deeply disturbing. We are told these settlers are 'radical,' 'extremist,' 'fanatical.' But what if they are not? A recent Penn State University poll, reported in Haaretz, revealed that 82 per cent of Jewish Israelis support the forced expulsion of Palestinians from Gaza, and 56 per cent support their expulsion from all of historical Palestine. Two-thirds believe Palestinians are a modern-day incarnation of Amalek – an ancient enemy God commanded to be 'blotted out' – and most of those believe that command still applies today. Given these findings, one is forced to consider that when settlers torch olive groves, shoot at farmers, , they may no longer be outliers, but echoes of a deeper current. It is not enough to be horrified. We must speak, act, withdraw support, and refuse to take part in the machinery that allows this to continue. Fernanda Trecenti, Fitzroy A big ugly bill There is nothing beautiful about Donald Trump's big beautiful bill. It is a disgraceful and inhumane outcome for the nation and most of its citizens. Mary Fenelon, Doncaster East The Wright stuff Tony Wright's piece (″ Why a treaty is key to better future ″, 5/7), illustrated by the beautiful images of Justin McManus, should be read by all, not just those of us with a conscience and a heart. Vikki O'Neill, Ashburton History's echoes Eva-Jo Edwards' recollection of her and her siblings' forced removal from their Swan Hill family struck an uncomfortable chord with me. In 1969, I visited Burwood Boys' Home and observed the presence there of some Aboriginal children. Without a doubt two of them would have been Eva-Jo's brothers; not for one moment did I wonder why they were there. Now we all know that trauma for our First Peoples isn't just something from centuries-old history, but has occurred, and continues to occur in our own lifetimes. If white children were legislated to be taken from their families, if young white people died in disproportionate numbers in, and out of custody, if blue-eyed people like me had to endure constant enmity and discrimination, heaven and earth would be moved to redress the inequity, and the iniquity. The Yoorrook Justice Commission's recommendations must be supported in full. David Johnston, Healesville Negative profit Private enterprises are supposed to be more efficient than government-run organisations but, how often does the pursuit of profits result in poorer services? Michael Brinkman, Ventnor A sinking feeling I am afraid the AUKUS nuclear submarine deal will go the way of all our sub deals – binned just like the Japanese and French plans.

Sydney Morning Herald
7 hours ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
Australian government super tax: Most Australians are far from being affected by new tax on Superannuation, ATO data shows
Known as the super guarantee, this rate has gradually climbed from 9 per cent in 2013 to 12 per cent, beginning this month, meaning younger workers will be contributing a larger slice of their income to their super over a longer period. Chalmers has said Labor's legislation would not increase the $3 million threshold in line with inflation, meaning more people would be pushed past the cap in decades to come, and by which time that amount will not be worth as much in real terms. Loading Australian Council of Trade Unions secretary Sally McManus told Channel Nine's Today program this week that it would be 'a very long time into the future' before the average worker would be affected by the $3 million cap. McManus also said the threshold has 'got to be indexed' to make sure most people do not end up being hit by the new tax rate. Calculations based on the latest ATO data, for example, suggest a surgeon – the highest income occupation in 2022-23 – earning the job's average salary of about $470,000 a year, and contributing 12 per cent to a super fund (returning an average of 5 per cent), would still have to work about 22 years to accumulate $3 million in superannuation. That includes an assumption that their wages grow at 3.5 per cent a year. Under the same assumptions, an individual earning $180,000 would have to work 34 years before reaching the $3 million cap, and a person earning the median salary of $62,000 in 2022-23 would have to work five decades. The data from the Tax Office shows the median super account balance for those earning more than $180,001 grew from nearly $304,000 in 2021-22 to just over $315,000 in 2022-23, while the overall median balance climbed from $57,900 to $60,000. Grattan Institute Housing and Economics Security program director Joey Moloney, meanwhile, says that in 30 years' time, the $3 million threshold will still hit only the top 10 per cent of income earners, and the threshold – like ones for personal income tax – is likely to change under future governments even without indexation. 'There are people forecasting 30-, 40-plus years into the future as if this threshold will never change,' Moloney said. 'That strikes me as a very bold assumption because there'll be 10 electoral cycles in between that.' Moloney also noted that 85 per cent of those with super balances over $3 million are aged over 60 and the super tax change would reduce the pressure on younger Australians because older, wealthier Australians would shoulder more of the burden of budget repair and the ageing population. Latest data from the ATO shows men aged 60 to 64 and women aged 70 to 74 have the biggest median super balances, at just under $225,000, with both seeing a drop-off in the size of their nest eggs after 75. Men in the ACT, Western Australia and South Australia had the highest median super balances in 2022-23, while among women, median super balances were highest in the ACT, South Australia and Tasmania. Cut through the noise of federal politics with news, views and expert analysis. Subscribers can sign up to our weekly Inside Politics newsletter.