New and existing Universal Credit claims under review for ‘incorrect payments'
Reasons your Universal Credit may be cut by DWP
More than £1 billion in incorrect Universal Credit payments have been blocked by the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) in a drive to stop people falling into financial difficulties. The milestone was reached after a programme to review payments was ramped up by the Labour Government when it first came into power last summer, with more than one million cases now looked at.
Overpayments can ultimately lead to financial difficulties for claimants by causing them to fall into debt. The 'Targeted Case Review' was introduced in 2022 to detect incorrect payments, with around 25,000 claims reviewed in the first year.
Since July 2024, DWP has nearly doubled the number of people working in its Universal Credit Targeted Case Review team to 6,000.
The Department said this significant increase in staff has boosted the number of existing claims reviewed to over one million, saving £1 billion in incorrect payments by detecting historic errors and preventing future overpayments that can result in debts accruing.
The number of claim reviews will continue to ramp up now the department has reached its staff target, with nearly 6,000 staff to review claims with forecasted savings of £13.6 billion by 2030.
Minister for Transformation, Andrew Western, said: 'This target could not have been reached without this significant boost to staffing numbers - meaning we now have forecasted savings of £13.6 billion by 2030.
'This is a vital programme not only ensuring overpayments are corrected but also makes certain people who are being underpaid receive the money they are entitled to.
'We will not tolerate fraud, error or waste and are committed to safeguard taxpayers' money so it can be invested in the public services we all deserve.'
What is a Targeted Case Review?
The 'Targeted Case Review' team reviews payments to prevent customers falling into or accumulating further debt, identify unreported changes in circumstances, correct claims retrospectively, and refer suspected cases of fraud for investigation.
Reviews verify claimants' eligibility for the benefits they receive by sending a notification to their online account to request proof of identity and other documentation.
In the Autumn Budget, the Labour Government committed to the continuation of Targeted Case Review activity for a further two years, with learnings used to prevent error from entering the welfare system in the first place.
The aim is to help provide a fair, high-quality service that ensures customers receive their full entitlement and avoid unnecessary debt.
These major milestones come as the UK Government outlines further plans to strengthen its ability to reduce fraud and error through the Public Authorities (Fraud, Error and Recovery) Bill.
DWP said: 'This is alongside its work to support people into work and become less reliant on the benefit system to drive productivity and unlock growth as part of its Plan for Change.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mirror
5 hours ago
- Daily Mirror
Millions of over-60s told 'withdraw cash and move it' amid cost of living crisis
Mistakes over-60s are making include not claiming DWP benefits they are entitled to - like Pension Credit or the state pension. Others include drawing from a private pension while still paying in A crucial alert has been issued for millions of UK households aged over-60. Those above 60 are being urged to "act now" to prevent missing out on vital funds as the Cost of Living crisis persists across the nation. Blunders that over-60s are committing include failing to claim Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) benefits they're eligible for, such as Pension Credit or the state pension - if aged over 66. Additional errors involve withdrawing from a private pension whilst continuing to contribute, which can activate the Money Purchase Annual Allowance (MPAA) and slash your tax-free pension contribution ceiling from £60,000 to merely £10,000 annually. Families are advised to steer clear of making flexible withdrawals (such as UFPLS or income drawdown) where possible, and urged to examine interest rates on their banking accounts, as many currently sit below one per cent interest. Households can extract cash and transfer funds to an easy access savings account, with some offering up to 4.98 per cent. As an alternative, over-60s can deposit their money into fixed-rate ISAs and bonds providing up to 4.58 per cent, reports Birmingham Live. Funderer's chief analyst commented: "Many over-60s are unknowingly leaving money on the table. These aren't complicated strategies - they're simple steps that can have a big impact on financial security in retirement. Acting now can make your money last longer and give you peace of mind." Mark Hicks, head of savings at Hargreaves Lansdown, has stated: "Given that markets now expect two or three more rate cuts for the remainder of the year, savings rates are likely to continue trending downwards in the months to come, and fixed rate deals above 4.5% may not be around for much longer. "For savers, this means keeping an eye on your savings rate, and being prepared to switch. You need to keep your emergency fund in easy-access savings, which are likely to drop. "However, some banks will be in more of a hurry to cut rates than others, so you could more than double the rate from a pedestrian high street giant by shopping around among online banks and savings platforms. "For money you don't need for longer, this is a decent opportunity to consider fixed rate savings. Fixed rate deals, which guarantee the rate for a specific period – from a couple of months to five years – will let you lock in a rate for the duration. "These have come down from the peak, but you can still make around 4.5%, and as easy access deals get less generous, these deals will look increasingly attractive. "It means anyone who has money they don't need for a fixed period of a few months or longer should consider tying it up for a better rate."
The Independent
6 hours ago
- The Independent
Smiling Starmer steals PMQs victory as Badenoch misses her mark
Beware the phrase 'everyone knows'. When a consensus takes hold it is worth checking that it is soundly based. Everyone knows, for example, that the Labour government has made a terrible mess of its first year. That means it should be simple for the leader of the opposition to embarrass the prime minister in the Commons, because all she had to do was to ask awkward questions that expose the government's record. Kemi Badenoch made a good start, by quoting Richard Hughes, the chair of the Office for Budget Responsibility, who said yesterday: 'Higher and higher levels of taxes are … not good for growth.' She asked Keir Starmer if he agreed. Funnily enough, he didn't answer the question. 'I tell you what's bad for growth,' he said. 'Fourteen years of Tory government.' Lincoln Jopp, the theatrical Conservative MP, later said he could see why they were called 'Prime Minister's Questions and not Prime Minister's Answers'. But Badenoch ploughed on, asking Starmer for a definition of the 'modest incomes' earned by 'working people' that some of his ministers have implied would be exempt from tax rises. He gave a surprisingly specific answer, saying that he was working for 'the sort of people who work hard but haven't necessarily got the savings to buy their way out of problems'. In other words, the chancellor was thinking of taxing savings – despite what Rachel Reeves said in opposition: 'There are people who do have savings, who have been able to save up, and those are working people as well.' Strike one to Badenoch. Starmer ended his answer by accusing his opponent of talking the country down, to which she responded: 'I'm not talking the country down, I'm talking him down.' Strike two to Badenoch. But that was about it. She tried to get the prime minister to admit that a tax on pension contributions would be a tax on 'working people', but he said, 'I'm not going to write a Budget.' She then asked a complicated question that I thought was absolutely fascinating, but which in the cut and thrust of adversarial debate made no sense at all. She started by saying that the Tories had an alternative to tax rises. This was a response to last week's exchanges, when Starmer said she complained about tax rises but wanted the spending on the NHS made possible by those taxes. He challenged her to say how else the Conservatives would pay for such investment. She didn't answer it then, but it clearly rankled, so she said today that the alternative to tax rises is 'cutting spending'. She pointed out that he had retreated from cutting the welfare bill, which had 'sent a signal' to the markets and sent the cost of borrowing up. Finally, she got to a question, which was to ask what he would be doing 'over the summer to get a grip on the cost of borrowing'. The analysis was a mini economics lesson. She is quite right that the markets are nervous because they think that spending and taxes are in a never-ending upward ratchet, but the question at the end fell flat. Given the state of the economy, and the painfulness of Reeves's dilemma over the Budget in the autumn, it is surprising that Badenoch cannot make life a bit more difficult for Starmer. Given that 'everyone knows' Labour has made a bad start in its first year, the prime minister seemed unexpectedly cheerful, as if he knows something the rest of us don't. The fundamental problems for Badenoch remain the same two that she has been worrying about for a week: that it was her party that left things in a terrible state, and that she doesn't really have an alternative to Labour's attempts to clear it up. Starmer cannot go on blaming the state of his inheritance for ever, but he can continue to ask what the Tories would do instead. She says she would cut public spending, but the Tories were no good at that when they were in charge. When she and Starmer traded their end-of-year report cards on Labour's first year, his list – including breakfast clubs and four, now four-and-a-half, million NHS appointments – didn't sound too bad. When she said 'the worst is yet to come' and he responded 'we're only just getting started', he sounded the more believable.
Scottish Sun
6 hours ago
- Scottish Sun
Households can apply for £500 cost of living cash boost NOW ahead of summer holidays
Plus, we reveal other councils handing out support CLAIM IT Households can apply for £500 cost of living cash boost NOW ahead of summer holidays Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window) Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) THOUSANDS of households can still apply for £500 worth of free cost of living cash ahead of the summer holidays. Cash-strapped families can get support via the government's Household Support Fund. Sign up for Scottish Sun newsletter Sign up 1 Families can apply for support through the government's household support Credit: Alamy The scheme has been extended multiple times, with the latest round running between April 2025 and March 2026. Each council in England has been allocated a share of the £742million, which they can dole out to residents in need. Eligibility criteria varies, but help is usually offered to those on benefits or a low income. Residents in Worcestershire can apply for support worth up to £500 to help with water and energy costs. How much you receive depends on factors such as your age and if you live in a household with children. For example, households with just adults aged between 18-66 can receive up to £300 in support. This is also the case for households with one adult or a couple of pensionable age. But homes with children aged under the age of 18, or young adults up to the age of 21 in full time education, can receive up to £500. To be eligible for the support you must have an income before tax of £24,570 if you are a single adult. All other households must have a yearly income of £31,000. Families can get FREE washing machines, fridges and kids' beds or £200 payments this summer – and you can apply now You must also have no savings, unless you are of state pension age - in which case you can have up to £5,000. You can be on Universal Credit but at least one person in your household must meet one of the following: Be of state pension age Have a long-term diagnosed health condition or be registered disabled Have a child under four Be in receipt of DWP benefits like Attendance Allowance, Carer's Allowance, PIP or Disability Living Allowance Be receiving support from services such as food banks, Citizens Advice, Age UK, mental health or housing support, or your GP's social prescribing team If you are keen to apply visit What if I don't live in Worcestershire? The £742million Household Support Fund has been shared between all councils in England. So, if you don't live in this area but are struggling financially or are on benefits you will likely be eligible for help. This is because the fund was originally set up to help those on low incomes or classed as vulnerable. What type of help you can get will vary but it could range from a free cash payment to supermarket vouchers. For example, households in Ealing Council can apply for support worth £180. Elsewhere, Doncaster residents can still apply for £300 worth of support to be paid this winter. Households in Redcar & Cleveland can also now apply for support worth up to £230.
