US government employee blocked from leaving China amid tensions
'We are tracking this case very closely and are engaged with Chinese officials to resolve the situation as quickly as possible,' a State Department spokesperson said.
The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office is part of the federal Department of Commerce.
The individual's name and whether the person was detained were not disclosed.
The Chinese embassy in Washington and the U.S. Commerce Department did not immediately respond to requests for comment.
The Washington Post reported on Sunday that a U.S. citizen who works for the Commerce Department had traveled to China several months ago to visit family. The man was being prevented from leaving the country after he failed to disclose on his visa application that he worked for the U.S. government, the newspaper said, citing sources.
Beijing has used exit bans on both Chinese and foreign nationals in connection with civil disputes, regulatory enforcement and criminal investigations. Analysts say the tactic is at times used to crack down on local dissent and also as diplomatic leverage in disputes with other nations.
Washington and Beijing have had friction for years over issues ranging from tariffs to the origins of COVID-19 and Taiwan.
Chenyue Mao, a Wells Fargo banker, has also been blocked from leaving China. Beijing's foreign ministry said on Monday she was involved in a criminal case and obliged to cooperate with an investigation.
Mao was the latest of several executives from foreign corporations to be stopped as they tried to depart China.
The U.S. bank suspended all employee travel to China after Mao's exit ban, a person familiar with the matter told Reuters last week, saying Mao was a U.S. citizen. - Reuters
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Star
43 minutes ago
- The Star
Microsoft server hack has now hit 400 victims, researchers say
FILE PHOTO: A view shows a Microsoft logo at Microsoft offices in Issy-les-Moulineaux near Paris, France, March 25, 2024. REUTERS/Gonzalo Fuentes/File photo WASHINGTON (Reuters) -A sweeping cyber-espionage campaign organization centered on vulnerable versions of Microsoft's server software has now claimed about 400 victims, according to researchers at Netherlands-based Eye Security. The figure, which is derived from a count of digital artifacts discovered during scans of servers running vulnerable versions of Microsoft's SharePoint software, compares to 100 organizations cataloged over the weekend. Eye Security says the figure is likely an undercount. "There are many more, because not all attack vectors have left artifacts that we could scan for," said Vaisha Bernard, the chief hacker for Eye Security, which was among the first organizations to flag the breaches. The spy campaign kicked off after Microsoft failed to fully patch a security hole in its SharePoint server software, kicking off a scramble to fix the vulnerability when it was discovered. Microsoft and its tech rival, Google owner Alphabet , have both said Chinese hackers are among those taking advantage of the flaw. Beijing has denied the claim. The details of most of the victim organizations have not yet been fully disclosed. Bernard declined to identify them. (Reporting by Raphael Satter; Editing by Jan Harvey and Mark Porter)
The Sun
43 minutes ago
- The Sun
Defence ministry to monitor contract performance with new system
KUALA LUMPUR: The Ministry of Defence is set to develop a new contract monitoring system to enhance efficiency and transparency in managing asset and project procurement. Deputy Defence Minister Adly Zahari announced the move following findings in the Auditor-General's Report (LKAN) 2/2025, which identified weaknesses in enforcing contract terms, particularly regarding late penalties. Under the current system, penalties for delays are only imposed when extension of time (EOT) applications are reviewed, even though enforcement could occur earlier. Adly explained, 'An EOT should come with two scenarios — either with or without a late penalty. 'Sometimes EOT is granted without a penalty due to technical issues... but I believe if an EOT is to be granted, we can enforce it with a penalty.' The ministry has already taken action against delays in the delivery of 68 Gempita armoured vehicles and two non-armoured type B vehicles between 2020 and 2023. A late penalty notice of RM162.75 million was issued on Jan 15 to the supplier, who later appealed for a waiver citing force majeure due to the COVID-19 pandemic and the Russia-Ukraine conflict. Adly stated, 'The appeal was presented at the Contract Coordination Panel (CCP) meeting on May 6 and it was decided that the company would be subjected to the full late penalty of RM162.75 million.' Additionally, the ministry is recovering RM53.93 million from the performance bond and will claim the remaining penalty through set-off or direct collection. Regarding procurement via the 'breakdown' method involving RM107 million, Adly clarified that logistical challenges and varying technical expertise necessitated the approach. 'Our assets are located in places like Kota Belud, Sabah, and Port Dickson and Gemas in Negeri Sembilan, among others. That is why in this breakdown approach, we took into account those aspects, as well as the readiness of the assets,' he said. The new monitoring system aims to streamline contract enforcement and ensure timely project completion while safeguarding national security interests. – Bernama
The Star
2 hours ago
- The Star
Singapore warehouse owner and tenant sue each other over fire in 2020, judge awards landlord S$814
SINGAPORE: The owner of a Sungei Kadut warehouse that was set ablaze in May 2020 blamed its tenant for starting the fire, claiming more than S$600,000 in damages in a lawsuit. The tenant, a scrap vehicle company, countersued for unspecified losses due to the fire, alleging that the fire hose reel in the warehouse malfunctioned because the landlord had failed to properly maintain it. The High Court dismissed both sides' claims, but ordered the tenant to reimburse $814 to the landlord for stamp duty under the tenancy agreement. On July 18, Judicial Commissioner Christopher Tan issued written grounds setting out the reasons for his decision. The judge said the landlord, Feida Bus Consortium, failed to show that the tenant, Royal Autoz Exporter, had breached any terms of the tenancy agreement, except for the clause on stamp duty. Feida Bus Consortium had alleged that the fire started when the tenant's employees carried out works either on or near a car at the warehouse – a claim the tenant denied. It sued Royal Autoz Exporter for alleged breach of contract and negligence. The judge said there was insufficient evidence to establish that the tenant's employees had been working in the warehouse at the time of the fire. In rejecting the tenant's counterclaim, the judge said there was evidence that the fire hose was working at the time. In any event, he said, there was no evidence that the landlord was obliged to maintain fire-fighting equipment in the warehouse. Reports from experts, as well as SCDF, said the fire likely originated from the Chery Tiggo car, but the exact cause remains unknown. - Photo: Court documents On May 23, 2020, a total of 19 emergency vehicles and about 100 firefighters were deployed to battle the blaze at 6 Sungei Kadut Way, a Facebook post by the Singapore Civil Defence Force (SCDF) stated. The post said the SCDF was alerted to the fire at about 7pm that day; the fire was put out at 9.15pm. According to the judgment, the two-storey warehouse was divided into sections, one of which was rented out to the defendant. The landlord, which provided chartered bus services and conducted vehicle repairs, occupied one section. Another section was used as a dormitory for workers employed by the landlord and its related companies. The landlord and the defendant entered into a tenancy agreement on March 24, 2020, which stipulated a monthly rent of $15,000. Barely two weeks later, 'circuit breaker' restrictions were implemented to curb the spread of Covid-19, and no work was supposed to be carried out in workshops and factories. On May 4, 2020, a deregistered 2.4-litre Chery Tiggo car was towed into the warehouse. On May 23, 2020, two of the tenant's employees were in the warehouse when the fire broke out. The tenant claimed they were there only to move vehicles into the warehouse. At about 6.30pm, one employee spotted flames underneath the Chery's engine and used a forklift to elevate the car. A resident of the dormitory pulled a fire hose from a reel in the warehouse. The tenant claimed that no water came out of the hose, but the landlord disputed this. Flammable liquid ignited as it leaked from the car. Despite various workers fighting the flames with fire extinguishers, the fire spread, forcing them to flee the warehouse. The fire damaged the tenant's stock of vehicles and spare parts. The landlord said various parts of the warehouse's structure were damaged. The building was ordered to be closed for about 18 months for repairs. SCDF conducted investigations and issued a report in September 2023. A forensic firm engaged by the landlord's fire insurance company prepared an expert report for the trial. The tenant, represented by Palaniappan Sundararaj, engaged a fire investigation consultant as the defence expert. The judge noted that both experts, as well as SCDF, were unanimous in their view that the fire likely originated from the car. The exact cause of the fire remains unknown, said the judge. The landlord, represented by Thomas Toh, contended that the tenancy agreement prohibited the tenant from storing 'diesel' tanks in the warehouse. The judge said he saw no reason to extend this clause to tanks containing other types of fuel. The landlord also argued that by storing vehicles and a forklift on the premises, the defendant had breached a clause which stated that the warehouse was to be used for 'vehicle spare parts and body kit'. The judge said this clause did not prevent the tenant from using the warehouse for other purposes. He added that the landlord knew and consented to the tenant using the warehouse for scrapping vehicles. The landlord also argued that the tenant should have removed fuel from the vehicle before storing it in the warehouse, citing a clause that any chemical that is fire hazardous was to be stored in a safe corner. The judge disagreed that this meant the tenant was obliged to remove fuel from the vehicle. - The Straits Times/ANN
