Apple's €14bn escrow account wound down
Apple
escrow account has been closed, resulting in the transfer of almost €14.25 billion to the exchequer, the
Department of Finance
has revealed.
The value of the assets held in the account increased by €470 million in the 16 months in advance of its closure in May, having already grown by €400 million during the preceding year.
This left the total value of the funds at €14.244 billion – slightly less than the €14.3 billion originally lodged by Apple in 2018 after the
Court of Justice of the European Union (ECJ)
found that the group had received illegal state aid from Ireland.
The financial assets had depreciated in value for five successive years before recording their first gain in 2023 as a result of higher interest rates and investment in assets with higher yields.
READ MORE
The final accounts, just published by the Department of Finance, show that the Ireland Apple Escrow Fund increased in value by €475 million in the 16 months before its closure, resulting in a €470 million profit after operating expenses.
Following the closure of the fund on May 16, €1.567 billion was transferred directly to State coffers, while €12.677 billion was paid to the Revenue Commissioners for onward transfer to the Exchequer.
Apple had originally transferred €14.3 billion to the escrow account in 2018 pending its appeal against a European Commission decision, which found that the tech giant owed Ireland €13.1 billion plus interest of €1.2 billion.
The figure amounted to the tax the multinational previously had not paid on profits, due to a favourable tax arrangement that existed for its Irish subsidiaries over several years.
Last September, the ECJ delivered its final verdict in the long-running tax case, ruling against Apple's latest bid to overturn the Commission's decision. Its ruling 'set aside' a ruling by the EU's second-highest court, the General Court, four years ago, which had quashed the commission's decision that Apple owed the Republic the back taxes.
The long-running dispute was the world's largest antitrust case to date.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
2 hours ago
- Irish Times
Developer says 28 homes may face demolition to comply with council's order
A nearly-completed 28-unit housing development in Co Waterford may have to be demolished to comply with a planning enforcement order, the High Court has heard. Lawyers for Cosmo Development Kilmeaden Ltd said the development is being built as social housing for Waterford City and County Council, which is also the planning enforcement authority. The council's enforcement order issued in May deems the scheme to be an unauthorised development because, it says, the dwellings sit three to four metres higher than permitted, the court heard. Cosmo Development, with a registered address in Kilcock, Co Kildare, denies this and is asking the court to quash the order directing it to cease works on the project in Kilmeaden, Co Waterford. The order also requires it to bring the finished floor levels of the dwellings into compliance with the development's grant of planning permission. READ MORE The finished floor levels refers to the elevation of a building floor after all flooring material has been installed. According to Cosmo Development, compliance with the order would require demolition of the houses, the excavation of nearly four metres of material, 'equating to thousands of truckloads', and the reconstruction of the houses at the lower level. The order says the floor level of the units under construction are not in line with the development's planning permission when measured against a temporary benchmark on the construction site. In planning applications, applicants typically include a temporary local benchmark or an Ordnance Survey Ireland (OSI) datum point – the national standard benchmark – as a reference point for measurements within the proposed development. In its court documents, Cosmo Development says the development's original planning application – compiled by an architecture firm that is not a party to the action – mistakenly did not include either a temporary local benchmark or an OSI datum point. The temporary benchmark referenced in the council's enforcement order was introduced 'arbitrarily and without any explanation' by the architecture firm in a compliance submission, after permission had been granted for the development subject to certain conditions, according to the developer. The planning permission for the development was initially granted in April 2022 to a previous owner of the site. '[The temporary benchmark's] retrospective use amounts to the imposition of an entirely new level regime after the grant of permission,' the developer's court papers say. Cosmo Development's position is that the planning permission intended for the houses to be constructed 'relative to the existing topography', not 'under the existing ground level with extensive excavations required'. The developer says the order should be quashed for a number of reasons, including that work directed by the order is based on a mistaken interpretation of the grant of planning permission. This week, barrister John Kenny, appearing for the developer, said the development is being built as social housing for Waterford City and County Council. Mr Justice David Holland permitted the developer to bring judicial review proceedings against the council. He granted a temporary pause to the enforcement order. It is due to last until the case returns later this month.
Irish Times
3 hours ago
- Irish Times
Dublin gay bar to keep late-night licence after judge dismisses objection
One of Dublin's best known gay bars will retain its late-night dance licences despite complaints from a resident living in an apartment above it. Tommy Bergin claimed the noise coming from the Street 66 bar on Parliament Street was 'bonkers' and he could not sleep before 3am on Friday or Saturday night and also on Sunday nights of a bank holiday weekend. He said the bar now had a late-night licence for 130 days a year. Dublin District Court judge Máire Conneely dismissed his objection to Street 66 bar's late-night licence. She said the court had to take into account where the bar is located and its environs. READ MORE It was 'not reasonable' to live in an apartment in a city centre location where there are lots of bars and late-night venues and expect that the music would be inaudible. Mr Bergin, who moved into an apartment above the bar in 2019, made a similar application last year. He stated that mitigation measures taken after last year's application went before the late Judge Marie Quirke had made little difference to the problem. She ordered that the premises implement a 10 decibel drop in the music levels. Mr Bergin's barrister Conor Duff suggested that the premises was simply not suitable as a late-night venue. Bar owner Siobhán Conmy was emotional on the stand when she told the judge that she had spent €58,000 on noise mitigation measures. 'I have always offered to do anything that people have asked. My heart is really in it,' she told the judge. The late-night licence accounted for 30 per cent of her business and she was fearful of losing it. Acoustics expert Diarmuid Keaney said he had fitted two noise limiters, one in the front bar and the other in the back, to comply with Judge Quirke's order, and neither had been tampered with. Judge Conneely said the management company had said there were others within the building who complained, but none had come forward to give evidence. There were no actual Irish or EU standards that could be referenced in relation to what constitutes a noise breach and experts were divided on the matter. The fact that the premises had been a late-night bar for many years was a 'relevant matter that the courts must take into consideration'. The judge found it 'strange' that Mr Bergin's complaint has been ongoing for three years, but he had not sought to engage directly with the owner about the issue. Taking all that into account, she dismissed Mr Bergin's application.
Irish Times
3 hours ago
- Irish Times
The Irish Times view on house prices: heading ever higher
House prices continue to head higher, with the latest figures from the Central Statistics Office showing a 7.9 per cent annual increase in May, up from 7.6 per cent the previous month. While there are some regional variations, prices for both houses and apartments are increasing across the State. Those who want to buy are having to pay up. Nor is there any sign in the short term that the trend is going to change. Demand remains strong with wages and employment on the rise. Also, as well as new buyers, there are a large number of people with mortgage approvals who have yet to find a property to buy and are continuing to search. Supply, meanwhile, remains inadequate. The result is higher prices and a scramble for properties that are coming on to the market. In terms of transactions, the biggest growth by far is in the first-time buyers market and much of this is concentrated in Dublin and the commuter counties. These borrowers are taking on ever larger mortgages – supported by higher earnings and also, in many cases, by financial support from their families. One concern must be that at least some of these borrowers are taking on very large mortgages and a significant amount of financial exposure, notwithstanding the Central Bank borrowing rules. In turn Government demand supports – the Help-to-Buy and First Home schemes – are allowing buyers to take on more expensive properties. Such is the state of the rental market that despite large mortgage bills, outgoings are in many cases less than would be required in the rental market. READ MORE That new borrowers are having to take on this scale of loans is of concern at a time when the economic outlook is uncertain. A trade war between the US and EU would certainly hit employment and earnings growth. The difficulty for both borrowers and lenders is that the scale of this threat is impossible to calibrate. So, for now at least, property prices continue to head upwards. Whether their current level is justified by economic conditions is, however, now very much open to question.
