Reuters' X accounts blocked in India amid confusion over ‘legal demand'
A message displayed on Reuters ' X account (formerly Twitter) read: '@ Reuters has been withheld in IN in response to a legal demand.'
However, the Indian ministry of electronics and information technology denied issuing any new legal demand to block Reuters' accounts on the Elon Musk -owned platform.
'There is no requirement from the Government of India to withhold the Reuters handle. We are continuously working with ' X ' to resolve the problem,' the spokesperson for the ministry said.
The absence of clear reasons for the block has led to confusion and concern among Indian users and media watchers, once again raising questions over press freedom and digital censorship in India.
The block gained attention on Saturday evening. The Reuters World account became inaccessible shortly afterward, by 11.40pm local time.
An Indian government source told the Press Trust of India that a demand to block several hundred X accounts was made during India-Pakistan tensions in April, particularly when India launched a counter-terrorism operation inside Pakistan-controlled Kashmir.
The unnamed source said the government had issued the order on 7 May, but Reuters seems to have acted only now, calling it a 'mistake on their part'.
India launched what it called Operation Sindoor, carrying out an attack inside Pakistani territory to target terrorist camps. Pakistan denied that terrorists were attacked, claiming all casualties were civilians.
Around the same time, Indian news website The Wire said the Indian government blocked access to its news website and ordered the removal of Pakistan -linked content across digital platforms.
The website of The Wire, a news organisation known for its investigative journalism and critical coverage of the government, became inaccessible across much of the country.
In recent years, the Indian government has expanded its information technology laws to bring social media under its ambit and to allow the blocking of online content on the grounds of national security or public order.
India ranked 151st in the World Press Freedom Index in 2025, a slight improvement from 159th last year.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
9 minutes ago
- Reuters
Facing battlefield setbacks, Ukraine withdraws from mine ban treaty
KYIV, July 7 (Reuters) - Oleksiy, a 26-year-old Ukrainian soldier, is six months into a difficult recovery after losing most of his left leg to an anti-personnel mine. Despite his injuries, he says Ukraine is right to withdraw from a treaty banning such weapons. Facing challenges in securing new U.S. supplies of artillery and munitions, or to recruit enough new soldiers to hold frontline positions, Kyiv announced its withdrawal from the Ottawa Convention on June 29. Military analysts and a Ukrainian unit commander said that doing so could help slow the Russian advances Kyiv is struggling to contain over three years after Moscow's full-scale invasion. "Russia does not adhere to any conventions - so why should we?" Oleksiy, who gave only his first name in line with Ukrainian military requirements, said at a rehabilitation centre for wounded service personnel in Kyiv. "We need to do this, because if we mine (our land) then there is then a chance that we won't give it up." Russia is not a party to the treaty, and military analysts, rights groups and Ukrainian soldiers say it has been using anti-personnel mines widely. Russia's Defence Ministry did not respond to a request for comment. Moscow has not confirmed it uses anti-personnel mines in Ukraine. Russian officials say Ukraine has already used such devices in the war. The United States approved the provision of anti-personnel mines to Ukraine in November, Reuters has previously reported. At the time, U.S. officials said Ukraine was expected to use the U.S. mines on its own territory although it committed to not using them in areas populated with civilians. Russia holds about a fifth of Ukraine including Crimea, which it seized in 2014. Ukraine's defence ministry did not respond to a request for comment on whether it already deploys such munitions, their battlefield usefulness and criticism of the move. Ukraine widely uses anti-vehicle mines not covered by the treaty. About a quarter of Ukraine is contaminated by mines or unexploded ordnance, the Defence Ministry's demining unit says. Frontline areas and pockets of the Kursk region just inside Russia are thickly contaminated with the small devices which explode when triggered by contact, vibration or tripwires. Three military analysts said anti-personnel mines were a useful tool to counter Russia's emerging tactic of sending small assault squads, some riding on motorbikes, that are not stopped by other frontline fortifications. "When our side does not have much infantry on the front lines, creating a system of obstacles with these types of mines strengthens the defence - so that we do not rely solely on UAVs or artillery," said Mykola Bielieskov, a research fellow at Ukraine's National Institute for Strategic Studies, referring to unmanned aerial vehicles, better known as drones. A bomb squad company commander from Ukraine's 59th brigade operating near the eastern city of Pokrovsk said a large rotary drone could be used to deploy up to 70 anti-personnel mines at a time. "They can effectively mine distant areas. And the enemy will take significant losses without even reaching our positions," said the commander, who uses the call-sign Voron. He did not say whether Ukraine was already deploying anti-personnel mines. Anti-mine campaigners condemned Ukraine's decision to leave the Ottawa Convention, following the example of five other European nations bordering Russia. The move opens the way to Ukraine increasing the deployment of a munition that can maim civilians, including children, long after conflict subsides. Ukraine said in July 2024 that nearly 300 Ukrainian civilians had been killed and over 1,000 others wounded by Russian mines. Neither country releases casualty figures for its own soldiers. Tamar Gabelnick, director of the International Campaign to Ban Landmines, told Reuters that Kyiv's decision would put civilians at risk for years. "Why would Ukraine want to copy the abusive, horrible military tactics of their enemy? Why would they want to stoop down to that level?", she said. About 85% of mine deaths worldwide are civilian, she said. After signing a decree to quit the treaty, President Volodymyr Zelenskiy said that often the function performed by anti-personnel mines could not be performed by any other weapon. The decision to exit the treaty, which prohibits anti-personnel mines but not other types such as anti-vehicle mines, needs parliament's approval but is likely to be waved through. Lawmaker Fedir Venislavskiy said the armed forces would use the munitions responsibly and that Ukraine has regulations on use of anti-vehicle mines, including mapping their locations. "The maps of these minefields will allow them to be cleared quite quickly after hostilities end," he said. Ukraine has not said whether it plans to quickly deploy more mines. Venislavskiy said it would now be able to establish its own production. Ukraine destroyed some of its Soviet-era anti-personnel mine stocks after ratifying the convention in 2005 but Venislavskiy said it still has enough to cause Russia problems. Oleksiy set off a mine while defending a patch of forest in territory Ukraine held in Russia's Kursk region at the time. He did not say who set the mine. "I fell and saw that my leg was still there but twisted... it became so painful, I started to shout for help," he said. Oleksiy dragged himself to his comrades, he said, possibly saving their lives. His leg was later amputated but he said the potential reward of mines stopping Russian advances was worth the risks involved in deploying them. "We can demine it later - it's a long process, it can drag on for many years, but it's not giving up your land," he said.
The Guardian
17 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Tesla shares dive as investors fear new Elon Musk political party will damage brand
Shares in Tesla are heading for a sharp fall in the US as investors fear Elon Musk's launch of a new political party will present further problems for the electric carmaker. Tesla stock was down more than 7% in pre-market trading on Monday, threatening to wipe approximately $70bn (£51bn) off the company's value when Wall Street opens. If the shares fell by that much, Musk would see the value of his stock fall by more than $9bn to about $120bn. The Tesla and Space X boss remains comfortably the world's richest person, with a wealth of about $400bn, according to Forbes. Tesla is valued at just under $1tn but its shares have come under pressure due to the Tesla CEO's relationship with Donald Trump. First, Musk's strong support for the US president created a consumer backlash and now the antagonistic turn in his relationship with Trump has investors worried Musk will be distracted from his day job, or that the White House will punish his businesses. Dan Ives, analyst at Wedbush Securities, said Musk's announcement that he is bankrolling a US political party will alarm investors. 'Very simply, Musk diving deeper into politics and now trying to take on the Beltway establishment is exactly the opposite direction that Tesla investors/shareholders want him to take during this crucial period for the Tesla story,' Ives said, adding that there was a 'broader sense of exhaustion' among Tesla investors that Musk – the company's largest shareholder – will not stay out of politics. Trump on Sunday called Musk's plans to form the America party 'ridiculous', launching new barbs at the world's richest person. Sign up to Business Today Get set for the working day – we'll point you to all the business news and analysis you need every morning after newsletter promotion In a post on the Truth Social tech platform, Trump wrote: 'I am saddened to watch Elon Musk go completely 'off the rails,' essentially becoming a TRAIN WRECK over the past five weeks.' Musk announced the creation of the America party on his X platform at the weekend. He wrote: 'When it comes to bankrupting our country with waste & graft, we live in a one-party system, not a democracy. Today, the America party is formed to give you back your freedom.'
The Guardian
43 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Donald Trump calls Elon Musk's new political party ‘ridiculous' and says Tesla owner is ‘off the rails'
Update: Date: 2025-07-07T08:50:10.000Z Title: Trump calls Musk's new political party 'ridiculous' and says Tesla owner is 'off the rails' Content: Welcome to our live coverage of US politics and the second Trump administration. Donald Trump has hit out at Elon Musk's decision to start and bankroll a new US political party that the tech billionaire believes can offer a viable alternative to the Democrats and Republicans. Speaking to reporters before boarding Air Force One yesterday, the US president said: I think it's ridiculous to start a third party. It's always been a two-party system and I think starting a third party just adds to the confusion. Shortly after speaking about his former ally, Trump posted further comments on his Truth Social platform, writing: I am saddened to watch Elon Musk go completely 'off the rails,' essentially becoming a TRAIN WRECK over the past five weeks. Trump and Musk were formerly close allies, with the Tesla boss and X owner appointed to slash federal spending through the unofficial Department of Government Efficiency (Doge) from January through May. Musk fell out with the Republican president over his sprawling tax and spending plan, signed into law on Friday, which is expected to add at least $3 trillion (£2.2 trillion) to the US's already huge $37tn (£27tn) debt pile. Musk has argued that the bill, which he has described as 'utterly insane and destructive', would irresponsibly add to the US national debt. Musk, the world's richest person, posted on X over the weekend that he had set up the America Party to challenge the Republican and Democratic 'Uniparty'. The details of the structure of the new venture or a timeline for its creation are still unclear. But some of his social media posts suggests the new political party would focus on two or three Senate seats, and eight to 10 House districts. We will have more on this and other US politics stories throughout the day so stick with us.
