Ireland set for extreme cold if Atlantic current collapses, new study suggests
Dublin
experiencing temperatures of minus 22 degrees and more days reaching a maximum of zero degrees.
That's according to stark findings by Netherlands-based scientists who published their results on Wednesday in the journal Geophysical Research Letters.
The Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation (Amoc) is a large ocean circulation that plays a crucial role in regulating both the global and European climate by redistributing heat through the ocean.
There has been growing concern among scientists that the Amoc, of which the Gulf Stream is a part, may collapse following a big influx of freshwater. While this would bring colder conditions to northwest Europe, global warming would continue in other parts of the planet.
READ MORE
Commenting on the findings,
Met Éireann
said: 'This research adds to a body of evidence showing that an Amoc collapse would be a high-impact, transformative event. The concern is justified because the consequences, as modelled here, would be severe.
'People should be concerned about the risk that climate change poses to major Earth systems like the Amoc,' it added. 'This paper underscores the severity of what is at stake. However, it is not a prediction that Ireland is headed for an ice age in the coming decades.'
'This study looks at a future where the Amoc has collapsed,' said Dr Gerard McCarthy who is based at
Maynooth University
's climate research unit Icarus.
'The Amoc is a system of ocean currents incorporating the Gulf Stream and is one of the factors that gives Ireland a relatively mild climate,' added Dr McCarthy, who is also co-chair of JPI Oceans, a pan-European initiative aiming to deliver climate assessment of the Amoc.
[
Amoc: Atlantic Ocean current that gives Ireland benign climate 'may not collapse this century', study finds
Opens in new window
]
Specifically for Dublin, the scientists at the Royal Netherlands Meteorological Institute and Utrecht University predict 32 per cent of days per year will go below zero – 95 days more than pre-industrial times.
They conclude 37 days per year will only reach a maximum temperature of below zero in Dublin – 36 days more than pre-industrial levels.
Belfast
will be even harder hit, the scientists predict, with 41 per cent of the year below zero.
Met Éireann said the figures mentioned by the researchers for Dublin and Belfast should be interpreted with 'extreme caution'.
Dr McCarthy said the study was not a forecast, and looks centuries into the future when flooding is expected to increase the freshwater flowing into the North Atlantic by 10 to 40 times.
'That Ireland would have a relatively cooler, stormier future under a scenario where the Amoc collapses has been seen often before,' he said.
'However, this is a study even more dramatic in its projections. Hearing these numbers can be shocking and worrying. There is no doubt that the risks associated with an Amoc collapse would be large for Ireland.'
The study was not a projection of what is likely to happen 'but a warning about what could if we fail to act on climate.'
'In particular, winter sea ice extending as far south as Ireland, with associated sub-zero cold extremes is quite shocking. Action to reduce our greenhouse gas emissions is by far the most important thing we can do to avoid these worst-case scenarios,' he added.
[
Winter flood and storm damage may worsen due to Atlantic wind system changes, scientists warn
Opens in new window
]
For Europe as a whole, this study predicts the advance of sea ice – covering parts of Britain, for example – substantial cooling, more cold extremes, increased winter storms and bigger day-to-day temperature variations.
Major cities such as London and Paris would experience cold extremes of -19 and -18 degrees respectively, and more than two months' worth of additional days with sub-zero temperatures compared with the pre-industrial climate.
In Scotland, researchers predict its cold extremes could drop to -30C, some 23 degrees colder than the coldest episodes there in the late 19th century.
'The relatively mild climate for a city such as Edinburgh would see drastic changes,' said Dr Michiel Baatsen, a co-author of the study.
It would experience 164 days with minimum temperatures below zero, that's almost 50 per cent of the year, and an increase of 133 days compared with the pre-industrial climate.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
2 days ago
- Irish Times
Overshooting 1.5 degrees: What happens now?
What happens to the Paris Agreement once the world breaches 1.5 degrees of global warming? This question, long debated in climate circles, has now become unavoidable. In 2024, the hottest year ever recorded, global temperatures averaged 1.6 degrees above pre-industrial levels. One year doesn't define a trend, and the Paris Agreement focuses on long-term averages. But, at this stage, it's virtually certain that the 1.5 degrees threshold will be exceeded this decade, likely before the end of 2027. Is the goal of limiting warming to 1.5 degrees now a lost cause? READ MORE Some argue it always was. For these pragmatists, 1.5 degrees was always aspirational and unrealistic. With current policies steering us towards 3 degrees of warming this century, they suggest aiming for an interpretation of the Paris Agreement temperature goal is more feasible, and less likely to induce paralysis and disillusionment. But others disagree . The consequence of accepting a higher temperature goal would lock in such profound damages and irreversible tipping points in Earth's climate systems, that 1.5 degrees must remain our North Star. Letting go of this goal accepts locking in greater irreversible changes to Earth's climate systems: the collapse of coral reefs, melting glaciers and ice sheets, disruption of ocean currents (including the one that keeps Ireland's climate mild) and the dieback of the Amazon rainforest. The Paris Agreement's 1.5 degree target was grounded in the understanding of this harm, and is more urgent than ever: the scientific evidence linking catastrophic tipping points to overshoot scenarios has grown even stronger, but policymakers did not anticipate time was so short, and the target would be breached so soon. Keeping 1.5 alive now means facing a tough truth – we are already in climate debt . For many high-emitting countries such as Ireland, this means that net-zero is not sufficient. Any excess carbon we put into the atmosphere after overshooting 1.5 degrees will have to be removed by today's young people and future generations. That will require not just cutting greenhouse gases rapidly, but also removing carbon dioxide from the atmosphere at gigantic scales. Like cleaning up a sticky mess, carbon dioxide removal is far more difficult than avoiding it in the first place. Its concentration in the atmosphere is only 0.04 per cent, and there is no 'low hanging fruit'. Nature-based solutions such as reforestation and soil carbon require vast land areas and are vulnerable to fire, drought and disease, which are exacerbated by climate change itself. Technical approaches like direct air capture, are promising, but still in their infancy and will demand huge energy inputs and infrastructure. There is no guarantee these measures will be technically feasible at the scales necessary to return temperatures to 1.5 degrees. Societal and political feasibility will be an even greater challenge. Look at the current dire situation: climate change is not just getting worse, but getting worse faster , and climate action is being unravelled in the United States. How is it conceivable that humanity will come together to draw down carbon dioxide at vast scales, while running the global economy on carbon-free energy and food? Nevertheless, a recent article in Science made the case that the 1.5 degree goal must endure as both a legal and ethical imperative, arguing that 'exceedance of 1.5 degrees, rather than rendering the goal irrelevant, is a wake-up call alerting parties [Paris agreement signatory countries] to redouble their efforts to bring emissions down and thereby halt or even reverse the increase in global warming'. Regardless of whether climate leaders reaffirm the 1.5 degree goal or accept another interpretation of the Paris Agreement, stabilising global temperatures requires that emissions of carbon dioxide fall rapidly and reach net-zero. Only then will warming stop. It is also incumbent on wealthier countries – which bear more responsibility and have greater capacity – to support decarbonisation efforts and adaptation in developing countries. Addressing methane is another key element. Responsible for about one-third of today's warming, methane's short-term life in the atmosphere means that reducing its emissions reverses its historical warming impact. This very powerful short-term lever to reverse warming is critical for buying time and reducing the peak temperature. For high methane-emitting countries such as Ireland, there is a responsibility to lead. Instead, this government has committed to advocating for reclassifying how methane is accounted for in the EU and international forums, to downplay its warming role rather than committing to strong emissions reductions. Whether 1.5 degrees is feasible or not is a matter for scientific debate , but may be a distraction from political action. At this stage, the more urgent and practical question is how far we overshoot, for how long, and what we do to bring temperatures back down. Focusing solely on the feasibility of 1.5 risks paralysis; instead, debate should centre on how to minimise overshoot, reduce peak warming and prepare for large-scale carbon drawdown. These are the levers we still have, and the outcomes we can still shape. Prof Hannah Daly is professor of sustainable Energy at University College Cork
Irish Times
2 days ago
- Irish Times
The Shrouds review: David Cronenberg's mordant, personal conspiracy thriller is one of director's best films
The Shrouds Director : David Cronenberg Cert : 16 Starring : Vincent Cassel, Diane Kruger, Guy Pearce, Sandrine Holt, Elizabeth Saunders, Jennifer Dale, Eric Weinthal Running Time : 1 hr 59 mins The Shrouds has taken an unusual journey to Irish cinemas. A work that is both typical of David Cronenberg and unlike anything he has ever made (a paradox that works through more than one of his films), this mordant conspiracy thriller arrived at the 2024 Cannes film festival two years after the almost parodically Cronenbergian Crimes of the Future . Derived, like David Lynch's Mullholland Drive, from an ultimately cancelled TV series, the new film – a treatise on grief – was seen by many as a minor work. Who would not allow the director of The Fly, Dead Ringers and A History of Violence such indulgence? The delay in distribution has been kind to The Shrouds. After washing around the brain for 14 months, it now feels a markedly superior work to the place-holding Crimes of the Future. There is an eerie stillness to the piece that says as much about loss as does the disturbing premise at its centre. We first meet Karsh ( Vincent Cassell ) enjoying – if that is the word – a blind date in a hard-surfaced restaurant with an interested divorcee. Small talk leads to him explaining that his late wife, Becca, is buried just outside, in a cemetery wired up to his own appalling innovation. READ MORE 'GraveTech' places a camera within the casket and relays images of the decaying loved one to a screen on the headstone or an app on the mourner's phone. Like all such tech-heads, he can't help enthusing about the specs. There is a 'high-res zoom'. The device allows 3D rotation. From what we gather, the feed is, thank heavens, not yet punctuated by commercials. This could hardly be a more personal film for Cronenberg. He has explained that the recent death of his wife inspired the piece, and, with his slicked-back grey hair and precise diction, Cassell has something of the director's physical presence. [ Horror director David Cronenberg on his wife's death: 'I wanted to get into the coffin, to be with her body' Opens in new window ] As events wind on, a varied array of characters ooze in from stage left and add escalating complications to an already unsteady scenario. Karsh maintains a close friendship with Becca's sister ( Diane Kruger appears as the live sibling and the dead one in troubling visions) while he copes with bugs in the system. An attack on the cemetery sets up parallels with persistent anti-Semitism. Karsh notices suspicious growths on his wife's decaying body. Hackers cause the GraveTech relays to break down. Kersh's technology, though flawed and futile, meshes with thousands of years of human effort to process grief. One could read this as a Protestant appropriation of the Roman Catholic tendency to look the human remains right in the dead eye. The body is not laid out at a boisterous wake. It is studied calmly and coolly on a flat screen as worms eat their way through eye socket and frontal lobe. Very sober. Very grey. Yet Kersh is always aware the process is a cod. 'I lived in Becca's body,' he says. 'It was the only place I lived.' An acknowledgment, common in Cronenberg's cinema, that this fleshy carapace is all we have. Not everything works. If the great man will allow me, making an AI assistant of Kersh's late wife – a Siri or a Microsoft paper clip – feels like clunky, outdated satire in a film that otherwise relishes the oblique. Not everyone will be on board with the nebulous conspiracy theory. But, considered as an exercise in hushed mortal contemplation, The Shrouds, sombrely scored by Howard Shore, earns a spot beside Cronenberg's best work. This is just the sort of unclassifiable oddity that the greatest directors, now less concerned with expectations, manage late into fecund careers. The Shrouds is in cinemas from Friday, July 4th
Irish Times
4 days ago
- Irish Times
Carbon capture technology takes off at Dublin Airport
Groundbreaking technology that captures the global-warming gas carbon dioxide from the atmosphere is being put through its paces at Dublin Airport. The team behind the technology is hoping to demonstrate its wider potential for capturing carbon in aviation and when e-fuels are generated. Developed by Prof Wolfgang Schmitt and Dr Sebastien Vaesen from Trinity's School of Chemistry and the Research Ireland Centre for Advanced Materials and BioEngineering Research (Amber), it focuses on delivering energy-efficient solutions to capture atmospheric carbon dioxide to help reduce industrial emissions of the greenhouse gas. This involves what is known as direct air capture, which is literally sucking carbon dioxide out of the air. Scientists believe such is the level of this greenhouse gas in the atmosphere due to human activities, especially, burning of fossil fuels, capturing carbon will need to be widely deployed. READ MORE The problem up to now is that the technology is expensive and has yet to prove efficient in removing large volumes of carbon dioxide – such as what would be emitted in heavy industry or at major airports. Despite this, leading climate scientists believe capturing carbon will be a critical tool in achieving net-zero emissions, with potential to drive real, measurable change in combatting climate change. This deployment moves the technology out of the lab, marking the first industrial-scale field test of the technology in Ireland. The demonstrator has been operating for three months at the airport, collecting critical data on efficiency, operational stability and energy consumption. This will provide crucial validation of technology performance and shape future development and commercial applications, said Prof Schmitt. The Airin Motion project has been funded by the European Innovation Council and supported by Enterprise Ireland. 'Atmospheric carbon capture innovations are crucial because they directly address one of the most pressing challenges we face today – reducing carbon emissions from industries that can't easily eliminate them at the source,' he added. 'By advancing and integrating this technology across industries, we are not only reducing emissions but also creating economic opportunities through supplying high-purity CO₂ that align with global sustainability goals.' This technology has the potential to be a cornerstone in global efforts to combat climate change, he said. Captured carbon can in theory be repurposed, with possible options including its use in carbonated drinks. 'Our technology is designed for industrial deployment, efficiently capturing carbon dioxide from the air while utilising low-grade waste heat from industries,' said the technical lead on the project, Dr Vaesen saod. 'Deployment at Dublin Airport is a key validation for scaling up and allows us to gather critical performance data in a live operational setting and fine-tune it for long-term sustainable operation,' he said. Their 'test rig' installed at the airport has novel design features, he added, which make it very efficient at removing the carbon dioxide. It was developed in response to the European Commission's ReFuelEU aviation legislation, which requires sustainable aviation fuel (SAF) comprise 2 per cent of fuel at EU airports by 2025, increasing to 70 per cent by 2050. Furthermore, it also requires e-fuels – which are produced from renewable electricity and sustainable carbon dioxide – constitute 50 per cent of SAF. Andrea Carroll, director of sustainability at Dublin Airport Authority (DAA), the operators of airport, said the project offered 'an opportunity to explore carbon capture as a potential means of decarbonising our operations and industry'. Researcher Dr Elham Katoueizadeh said their technology was developed over more than a decade and was ready to be implemented across industries.
