ATO warning for Aussies claiming common $2,560 deduction: ‘Don't miss out'
Taxpayers can claim car expenses using the 'logbook method' or the 'cents per kilometre method'. The logbook method is more onerous but allows you claim more kilometres and can therefore potentially give you a bigger deduction.
But if you want to claim the logbook method, the ATO said it was time to start recording your trips now.
RELATED
ATO warning as ChatGPT's new tool sparks concerns over 'new era' of tax evasion
Centrelink closures and payment changes to hit millions from next week
Supersized RBA interest rate cut coming for Aussie mortgage holders amid ASX volatility
'To claim car expenses using the logbook method, you need to record a 12-week continuous log of all your car trips," the ATO said.
'Your 12-week period must represent your typical travel for the year. Your logbook stays valid for five years—but if your work-related travel changes, then you'll need a new one.'
Aussies can keep an electronic logbook using the myDeductions app or keep a paper logbook.
There are also other apps like Driversnote.
The cents per kilometre method lets you claim up to 5,000 work-related kilometres. The current rate is 88 cents per kilometre, which works out to a maximum deduction of $4,400.
This covers all car expenses, including the vehicle's decline in value, registration, insurance, maintenance, repairs and fuel costs.
The logbook method lets you claim more than 5,000 work-related kilometres but you need to keep a logbook for 12 weeks straight to work out the percentage you can claim.
That includes the destination and purpose of each journey, the odometer reading at the start and end of each journey, and total kilometres travelled.
You also need to keep records of your car expenses, including receipts for fuel, registration, insurance, services, tyres and repairs.
Tax Invest Accounting director Belinda Raso told Yahoo Finance the logbook method was worth doing if you used your car regularly for work and were above the 5,000 kilometre threshold.
'On average, when we have someone that's done the logbook correctly, they can be claiming $10,000 to $12,000 worth of expenses, compared to being stuck at [a maximum of] $4,400,' Raso said.
Raso said someone who missed out on claiming $8,000 on the average 32 per cent tax rate, would be missing out on a refund of about $2,560.
'It makes a huge difference to your tax return,' she said.Sign in to access your portfolio
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Why We Like The Returns At XRF Scientific (ASX:XRF)
To find a multi-bagger stock, what are the underlying trends we should look for in a business? Ideally, a business will show two trends; firstly a growing return on capital employed (ROCE) and secondly, an increasing amount of capital employed. Put simply, these types of businesses are compounding machines, meaning they are continually reinvesting their earnings at ever-higher rates of return. With that in mind, the ROCE of XRF Scientific (ASX:XRF) looks great, so lets see what the trend can tell us. We've found 21 US stocks that are forecast to pay a dividend yield of over 6% next year. See the full list for free. Just to clarify if you're unsure, ROCE is a metric for evaluating how much pre-tax income (in percentage terms) a company earns on the capital invested in its business. To calculate this metric for XRF Scientific, this is the formula: Return on Capital Employed = Earnings Before Interest and Tax (EBIT) ÷ (Total Assets - Current Liabilities) 0.25 = AU$14m ÷ (AU$66m - AU$9.6m) (Based on the trailing twelve months to December 2024). Therefore, XRF Scientific has an ROCE of 25%. In absolute terms that's a great return and it's even better than the Machinery industry average of 13%. View our latest analysis for XRF Scientific Above you can see how the current ROCE for XRF Scientific compares to its prior returns on capital, but there's only so much you can tell from the past. If you'd like, you can check out the forecasts from the analysts covering XRF Scientific for free. XRF Scientific is displaying some positive trends. The data shows that returns on capital have increased substantially over the last five years to 25%. The company is effectively making more money per dollar of capital used, and it's worth noting that the amount of capital has increased too, by 56%. So we're very much inspired by what we're seeing at XRF Scientific thanks to its ability to profitably reinvest capital. In summary, it's great to see that XRF Scientific can compound returns by consistently reinvesting capital at increasing rates of return, because these are some of the key ingredients of those highly sought after multi-baggers. Since the stock has returned a staggering 746% to shareholders over the last five years, it looks like investors are recognizing these changes. In light of that, we think it's worth looking further into this stock because if XRF Scientific can keep these trends up, it could have a bright future ahead. While XRF Scientific looks impressive, no company is worth an infinite price. The intrinsic value infographic for XRF helps visualize whether it is currently trading for a fair price. If you'd like to see other companies earning high returns, check out our free list of companies earning high returns with solid balance sheets here. Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
After losing 21% in the past year, Fortescue Ltd (ASX:FMG) institutional owners must be relieved by the recent gain
Given the large stake in the stock by institutions, Fortescue's stock price might be vulnerable to their trading decisions 52% of the business is held by the top 4 shareholders Ownership research along with analyst forecasts data help provide a good understanding of opportunities in a stock AI is about to change healthcare. These 20 stocks are working on everything from early diagnostics to drug discovery. The best part - they are all under $10bn in marketcap - there is still time to get in early. If you want to know who really controls Fortescue Ltd (ASX:FMG), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. With 54% stake, institutions possess the maximum shares in the company. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company. Institutional investors would probably welcome last week's 5.6% increase in the share price after a year of 21% losses as a sign that returns may to begin trending higher. In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Fortescue. View our latest analysis for Fortescue Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing. We can see that Fortescue does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Fortescue's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters. Investors should note that institutions actually own more than half the company, so they can collectively wield significant power. We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Fortescue. Our data shows that Tattarang Pty Ltd is the largest shareholder with 35% of shares outstanding. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 8.8% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 5.0% by the third-largest shareholder. On looking further, we found that 52% of the shares are owned by the top 4 shareholders. In other words, these shareholders have a meaningful say in the decisions of the company. While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future. While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO. Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances. We can report that insiders do own shares in Fortescue Ltd. It is a very large company, and board members collectively own AU$894m worth of shares (at current prices). Most would say this shows a good alignment of interests between shareholders and the board. Still, it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling. The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 32% stake in Fortescue. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run. Our data indicates that Private Companies hold 12%, of the company's shares. It might be worth looking deeper into this. If related parties, such as insiders, have an interest in one of these private companies, that should be disclosed in the annual report. Private companies may also have a strategic interest in the company. It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Fortescue better, we need to consider many other factors. Be aware that Fortescue is showing 2 warning signs in our investment analysis , and 1 of those is a bit concerning... If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts. NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures. Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
If EPS Growth Is Important To You, Objective (ASX:OCL) Presents An Opportunity
For beginners, it can seem like a good idea (and an exciting prospect) to buy a company that tells a good story to investors, even if it currently lacks a track record of revenue and profit. But the reality is that when a company loses money each year, for long enough, its investors will usually take their share of those losses. Loss making companies can act like a sponge for capital - so investors should be cautious that they're not throwing good money after bad. If this kind of company isn't your style, you like companies that generate revenue, and even earn profits, then you may well be interested in Objective (ASX:OCL). While profit isn't the sole metric that should be considered when investing, it's worth recognising businesses that can consistently produce it. Trump has pledged to "unleash" American oil and gas and these 15 US stocks have developments that are poised to benefit. If a company can keep growing earnings per share (EPS) long enough, its share price should eventually follow. That means EPS growth is considered a real positive by most successful long-term investors. It certainly is nice to see that Objective has managed to grow EPS by 21% per year over three years. So it's not surprising to see the company trades on a very high multiple of (past) earnings. Top-line growth is a great indicator that growth is sustainable, and combined with a high earnings before interest and taxation (EBIT) margin, it's a great way for a company to maintain a competitive advantage in the market. The music to the ears of Objective shareholders is that EBIT margins have grown from 28% to 32% in the last 12 months and revenues are on an upwards trend as well. That's great to see, on both counts. The chart below shows how the company's bottom and top lines have progressed over time. Click on the chart to see the exact numbers. See our latest analysis for Objective In investing, as in life, the future matters more than the past. So why not check out this free interactive visualization of Objective's forecast profits? Prior to investment, it's always a good idea to check that the management team is paid reasonably. Pay levels around or below the median, can be a sign that shareholder interests are well considered. The median total compensation for CEOs of companies similar in size to Objective, with market caps between AU$611m and AU$2.4b, is around AU$1.7m. The Objective CEO received total compensation of just AU$215k in the year to June 2024. First impressions seem to indicate a compensation policy that is favourable to shareholders. While the level of CEO compensation shouldn't be the biggest factor in how the company is viewed, modest remuneration is a positive, because it suggests that the board keeps shareholder interests in mind. It can also be a sign of a culture of integrity, in a broader sense. If you believe that share price follows earnings per share you should definitely be delving further into Objective's strong EPS growth. Strong EPS growth is a great look for the company and reasonable CEO compensation sweetens the deal for investors ass it alludes to management being conscious of frivolous spending. We think that based on its merits alone, this stock is worth watching into the future. Of course, profit growth is one thing but it's even better if Objective is receiving high returns on equity, since that should imply it can keep growing without much need for capital. Click on this link to see how it is faring against the average in its industry. While opting for stocks without growing earnings and absent insider buying can yield results, for investors valuing these key metrics, here is a carefully selected list of companies in AU with promising growth potential and insider confidence. Please note the insider transactions discussed in this article refer to reportable transactions in the relevant jurisdiction. Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
