Iddo Moed: False narratives about Israel have violent consequences
Article content
Article content
The founders of the State of Israel were not aristocrats or members of a wealthy elite. They were refugees and immigrants — men and women who arrived with little more than determination and hope. They fled violence, persecution, and antisemitism from every corner of the world: pogroms in Europe and Asia, attacks by mobs and ultimately expulsion from Arab lands, and the unthinkable horrors of the Holocaust.
Article content
Article content
While Jews have had a continuous presence in the Holy Land for millennia, modern Israel was forged in the crucible of exile and survival. Today, Israel is a thriving liberal democracy with a diverse and multicultural society, a dynamic economy, and a strong defence force.
Article content
Article content
We are proud of these achievements. But we have never forgotten an important lesson from Jewish history: false narratives, when left unchallenged, have violent consequences.
Article content
One need not look far to understand why this lesson is so deeply ingrained in our psyche. Theodor Herzl, the father of modern political Zionism, was moved by what he witnessed during the infamous Dreyfus Affair in late 19th-century France. A Jewish army officer, Captain Alfred Dreyfus, was falsely accused and convicted of treason. The campaign against him was led by the virulently antisemitic press — particularly La Libre Parole, which pushed a dangerous narrative: that Jews were inherently disloyal.
Article content
Given our history, we are highly attuned to the moments these falsehoods begin to surface. That's why, when I woke up Sunday morning to headlines from nearly every major Canadian media outlet — except National Post — about an alleged incident at a Gaza Humanitarian Foundation aid hub in Rafah, I was immediately concerned.
Article content
This war has shown us, time and again, how Hamas manipulates facts on the ground, creating stories of atrocities that either didn't happen or happened in a very different way. The media often amplifies these claims uncritically, and by the time the truth emerges, the damage is done.
Article content
The most egregious example came just weeks after the October 7 massacre. The Hamas-run Palestinian Health Ministry claimed an Israeli airstrike had killed hundreds at Al-Ahli Hospital. Israel immediately launched an investigation — but the media didn't wait. The story exploded across front pages and screens around the world.
Article content
By the time the investigation revealed that the explosion was caused by a Palestinian rocket, which was confirmed by the Canadian Forces Intelligence Command, millions were misled. Worse, some politicians — including Canada's own foreign affairs minister at the time — rushed to condemn Israel before the facts were known.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CTV News
an hour ago
- CTV News
Netanyahu says Israel considering alternatives to ceasefire talks with Hamas, deepening uncertainty
Smoke and fire rise to the sky following an Israeli airstrike in the northern Gaza Strip, as seen from southern Israel, Thursday, July 24, 2025. (AP Photo/Ohad Zwigenberg) CAIRO, Egypt — Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said Friday his government was considering 'alternative options' to ceasefire talks with Hamas after Israel and the U.S. recalled their negotiating teams, throwing the future of the negotiations into further uncertainty. Netanyahu's statement came as a Hamas official said negotiations were expected to resume next week and portrayed the recall of the Israeli and American delegations as a pressure tactic. The teams left Qatar on Thursday as President Donald Trump's special envoy, Steve Witkoff, said Hamas' latest response to proposals for a deal showed a 'lack of desire' to reach a truce. Witkoff said the U.S. will look at 'alternative options,' without elaborating. In a statement released by his office, Netanyahu echoed Witkoff, saying, 'Hamas is the obstacle to a hostage release deal.' 'Together with our U.S. allies, we are now considering alternative options to bring our hostages home, end Hamas's terror rule, and secure lasting peace for Israel and our region,' he said. He did not elaborate. Israel's government didn't immediately respond to whether negotiations would resume next week. A breakthrough on a ceasefire deal between Israel and Hamas has eluded the Trump administration as humanitarian conditions worsen in Gaza. Israel has come under mounting pressure as hunger among Gaza's more than 2 million people has worsened and deaths related to malnutrition have accelerated. In recent days more then two dozen Western-aligned countries and more than 100 charity and human rights groups have called for an end to the war, harshly criticizing Israel's blockade and a new aid delivery model it has rolled out. The charities and rights groups said even their own staff were struggling to get enough food. On Thursday, French President Emmanuel Macron announced that France would recognize Palestine as a state, saying, 'The urgent thing today is that the war in Gaza stops and the civilian population is saved. Hamas official Bassem Naim said Friday that he was told the Israeli delegation returned home for consultations and would return early next week to resume ceasefire negotiations. Hamas said that Witkoff's remarks were meant to pressure the group for Netanyahu's benefit during the next round of talks and that in recent days negotiations had made progress. Naim said several gaps had been nearly solved, such as the agenda of the ceasefire, guarantees to continue negotiating to reach a permanent agreement and how humanitarian aid would be delivered. The sides have held weeks of talks in Qatar, reporting small signs of progress but no major breakthroughs. Officials have said a main sticking point is the redeployment of Israeli troops after any ceasefire takes place. The deal under discussion is expected to include an initial 60-day ceasefire in which Hamas would release 10 living hostages and the remains of 18 others in phases in exchange for Palestinians imprisoned by Israel. Aid supplies would be ramped up, and the two sides would hold negotiations on a lasting ceasefire. The talks have been bogged down over competing demands for ending the war. Hamas says it will only release all hostages in exchange for a full Israeli withdrawal and end to the war. Israel says it will not agree to end the conflict until Hamas gives up power and disarms. The militant group says it is prepared to leave power but not surrender its weapons. Hamas is believed to be holding the hostages in different locations, including tunnels, and says it has ordered its guards to kill them if Israeli forces approach. Some 50 hostages remain in Gaza but fewer than half are believed to be alive. Their families say the start-stop talks are excruciating. 'I thought that maybe something will come from the time that the negotiation, Israeli team were in Doha,' said Yehuda Cohen, whose son Nimrod is being held hostage. 'And when I heard that they're coming back, I ask myself: When will this nightmare end?' Meanwhile Israeli strikes continued across Gaza. At least 22 people were killed since Thursday night, according to hospital records at Nasser Hospital where the bodies arrived. Some were killed in strikes, others and others were killed while seeking aid, said the hospital. ——- Samy Magdy And Wafaa Shurafa, The Associated Press Shurafa reported from Deir al-Balah, Gaza Strip.
CBC
2 hours ago
- CBC
France will recognize a Palestinian state, Macron says
France will recognize a Palestinian state in September at the UN General Assembly, French President Emmanuel Macron has said.
Canada News.Net
3 hours ago
- Canada News.Net
Tehran open to talks, but rules out direct US negotiations
WASHINGTON, D.C.: Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi has declared that Tehran will not abandon its uranium enrichment program, even after suffering significant damage to its nuclear facilities during last month's Israel-Iran conflict. Speaking to Fox News' Special Report with Bret Baier, Araghchi emphasized that the enrichment program remains a symbol of scientific achievement and national pride. "It is stopped because, yes, damages are serious and severe," Araghchi said. "But, obviously, we cannot give up enrichment because it is an achievement of our scientists. And now, more than that, it is a question of national pride." Before hostilities broke out, Iran and the United States had engaged in five rounds of indirect nuclear negotiations mediated by Oman. Despite progress, talks stalled over the permissible level of uranium enrichment Iran would be allowed under a revived agreement. The U.S. and Israel have warned that Iran was nearing weapons-grade enrichment levels. At the same time, Tehran has consistently insisted that its nuclear program is strictly for civilian energy and medical purposes. The recent war, which began when Israel launched strikes on Iran on June 13, lasted 12 days and drew in the United States. U.S. forces joined Israel in targeting Iranian nuclear facilities, causing extensive damage. A ceasefire was agreed upon in late June. Araghchi confirmed that Iranian experts were still assessing the full extent of the destruction but did not indicate abandoning the enrichment program, which he described as deeply tied to Iran's sovereignty. He also addressed speculation about Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei's health, assuring that the 85-year-old leader was in "good health." Araghchi reiterated Iran's openness to diplomacy with Washington, although he ruled out direct negotiations "for the time being." Iran remains a signatory to the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT), which allows for civilian nuclear programs under international inspection. The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) has stated there is "no credible indication" that Iran currently has an active, coordinated nuclear weapons effort. In contrast, Israel, widely believed to possess nuclear weapons, is not a party to the NPT. Israel has defended its strikes, asserting that its military campaign was intended to prevent Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons. It maintains that Tehran's ambitions pose an existential threat to regional and global security. The future of nuclear diplomacy between Iran and the U.S. remains uncertain amid the geopolitical fallout of the recent conflict and growing tensions in the region.
