
Deep Track Capital Sends Letter to Dynavax Technologies Shareholders Offering Final Perspectives on Why Change is Needed in the Boardroom
For more information, including details on how to vote Deep Track's WHITE proxy card, please visit www.RefocusDVAX.com.
The full text of the letter follows:
Dear Fellow Dynavax shareholders,
We would like to express our appreciation for the opportunity we have had over the course of this campaign to engage with so many of you. Deep Track undertook this effort because, as one of Dynavax's largest and longest-tenured shareholders, we believe deeply in the Company and its value creation potential. With the Annual Meeting now only a few days away, we want to convey a few final thoughts about why we believe new, independent and fully objective perspectives should be added to the Board.
First, the numbers speak for themselves. The key asset at Dynavax is Heplisav, but under the Board's increasing pressure for inorganic growth, Heplisav is not reaching its full potential. As outlined in the Company's proxy statement 1, Heplisav failed to achieve both key metrics established by the Board:
Management cautions that market share numbers should only be evaluated on a year-over-year basis and dismisses the slip to 43% market share in the first quarter of 2025. But even through that lens the numbers are troubling: fourth quarter market share in 2023 was 42% 2, which means there were only two percentage points of growth in 2024 – a substantial decline from the seven points achieved in the year prior. At this rate, Heplisav will fall far short of the Company's 60% target for 2030 – yet management contended on the earnings call last month that this is 'exactly how we had planned.' 3 Shares fell 11% the next day. 4
We believe that growing questions about Heplisav growth with a distracted management team combined with an outsized cash pile with no coherent strategy for deployment have taken their toll on the share price. While the Company points to a 'pivot' in 2019 when it made the unsurprising choice to focus on its only approved product, this reference point ignores the multi-year losses since then – both on an absolute basis and against the Company's benchmark historically used in its own proxy filings 5, the Nasdaq Biotechnology Index (NBI):
Slowing market share growth, missed revenue targets, and a stock price meaningfully underperforming the Company's index for years all point to fundamental problems at Dynavax – problems that are a direct result of the questionable Board strategy of diversifying the Company away from its lead asset.
Second, without new voices in the boardroom, nothing will change. As leading proxy advisory firm Glass, Lewis & Co. ('Glass Lewis') noted in its report, 6 our campaign '…highlighted valid and critical questions regarding Dynavax's strategic direction, capital allocation, and board responsiveness.' By voting for the incumbent directors up for election, you would be voting to leave these questions unaddressed and effectively assenting to the current strategy set by Chairman Scott Myers without any further debate, assessment, or new thinking. As Glass Lewis wrote when recommending against Mr. Myers, shareholders would be 'best served' by electing Deep Track directors who would bring 'relevant and differentiated perspectives to the Board.'
Shareholders must also keep in mind that a 'wait and see' approach simply will not work. Due to the Board's imbalanced class of directors and the classified structure not ending until 2028, there is only one independent director up for election next year – making this year's Annual Meeting a uniquely important opportunity to effect real change. 7
Finally, the truth about Deep Track and our nominees. The current Board has made repeated and increasingly baseless mischaracterizations regarding Deep Track, our nominees and our campaign. Consider these facts:
Our director nominees are open-minded and ready to work constructively to do what is best for all Dynavax shareholders. Suggesting that highly respected and experienced professionals like our nominees would violate their fiduciary duties is nothing more than campaign theatre. The Company has particularly targeted Deep Track principal Brett Erkman, accusing him of being 'rigid' in his views. In fact, all evidence points to the contrary: in the years of engagement Brett has had with Dynavax and the communications over the course of this campaign (including the very last settlement offer he proposed to Ryan Spencer on April 17, 2025, which the Board flatly rejected over a week later with no substantive dialogue in the interim), Brett consistently and explicitly made clear that he was always 'open to discussion' and 'happy to engage' on any point of potentially differing opinions, including specifics on capital allocation, board composition and the components of the two-year standstill.
Deep Track is one of Dynavax's largest and longest-tenured investors – the antithesis of 'short-term.' Our principals first invested in Dynavax a decade before any incumbent director up for election this year had joined the Board. The idea that we are looking for a quick profit at the expense of the Company's best interests is simply false. We also do not understand how the Board can believe a single shareholder representative could engineer such an outcome; again, this is more theatre that defies logic and yet another attempt to distract from the facts. Deep Track is not a typical 'activist' – this is the first time we have publicly engaged at all with a portfolio company, much less run a proxy contest.
Our nominees would bring needed valuable experience, independence and investor perspective to the Dynavax Board. Throughout this campaign, we have struggled to understand why Dynavax has fought so hard (while spending shareholder capital) to prevent a nearly 15% shareholder from having a representative on the Board. Regardless of these motivations, the reality is that our directors are needed. As Glass Lewis concluded in its report, '...we find that the board is notably lacking in directors with direct capital markets or institutional investor backgrounds,' and specifically regarding Brett, 'Mr. Erkman's extensive background as a public equity investor in the life sciences sector addresses what we believe is a notable deficiency in the current board's composition and could help sharpen the board's approach to capital allocation, shareholder engagement, and long-term value creation.'
We appreciate you taking the time to consider our views. We truly believe that by voting for all four Deep Track nominees, you can help to unlock the value that Dynavax can deliver and put the Company on a better path to success.
For more information, including details on how to vote Deep Track's WHITE proxy card, please visit www.RefocusDVAX.com
Regards,
David Kroin
Founder and Chief Investment Officer, Deep Track Capital LP
EVERY VOTE MATTERS
Your vote is important, no matter how many shares of Common Stock you own.
If you have any questions, require assistance in voting your WHITE proxy card, or need additional copies of Deep Track's proxy materials, please visit www.RefocusDVAX.com or contact our proxy solicitor, Innisfree M&A Incorporated ('Innisfree'), using the contact information provided here:
Innisfree M&A Incorporated
501 Madison Avenue, 20th Floor
New York, New York 10022
Stockholders call toll-free (877) 687-1865
About Deep Track Capital
Deep Track Capital is a Greenwich, Connecticut-based investment firm focused exclusively on the life sciences industry. We develop long term partnerships with management teams of leading innovative public and pre-IPO biotechnology companies. In addition to capital, we seek to invest our time and expertise, while leveraging our network for the benefit of our partners. We aim to lead transactions while building large syndicates, and also to invest in rounds led by other qualified investors.
CAUTIONARY STATEMENT REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
The information herein contains 'forward-looking statements.' Specific forward-looking statements can be identified by the fact that they do not relate strictly to historical or current facts and include, without limitation, words such as 'may,' 'will,' 'expects,' 'believes,' 'anticipates,' 'plans,' 'estimates,' 'projects,' 'potential,' 'targets,' 'forecasts,' 'seeks,' 'could,' 'should' or the negative of such terms or other variations on such terms or comparable terminology. Similarly, statements that describe our objectives, plans or goals are forward-looking. Forward-looking statements are subject to various risks and uncertainties and assumptions. There can be no assurance that any idea or assumption herein is, or will be proven, correct. If one or more of the risks or uncertainties materialize, or if any of the underlying assumptions of Deep Track Capital, LP ('Deep Track') or any of the other participants in the proxy solicitation described herein prove to be incorrect, the actual results may vary materially from outcomes indicated by these statements. Accordingly, forward looking statements should not be regarded as a representation by Deep Track that the future plans, estimates or expectations contemplated will ever be achieved.
Certain statements and information included herein may have been sourced from third parties. Deep Track does not make any representations regarding the accuracy, completeness or timeliness of such third party statements or information. Except as may be expressly set forth herein, permission to cite such statements or information has neither been sought nor obtained from such third parties. Any such statements or information should not be viewed as an indication of support from such third parties for the views expressed herein.
Deep Track disclaims any obligation to update the information herein or to disclose the results of any revisions that may be made to any projected results or forward-looking statements herein to reflect events or circumstances after the date of such information, projected results or statements or to reflect the occurrence of anticipated or unanticipated events.
CERTAIN INFORMATION CONCERNING THE PARTICIPANTS
Deep Track and the other Participants (as defined below) have filed a definitive proxy statement and accompanying WHITE universal proxy card with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the 'SEC') to be used to solicit proxies for, among other matters, the election of its slate of director nominees at the 2025 annual stockholders meeting (the '2025 Annual Meeting') of Dynavax Technologies Corporation, a Delaware corporation ('DVAX'). Shortly after filing its definitive proxy statement with the SEC, Deep Track furnished the definitive proxy statement and accompanying WHITE universal proxy card to some or all of the stockholders entitled to vote at the 2025 Annual Meeting.
The participants in the proxy solicitation are Deep Track, Deep Track Biotechnology Master Fund, Ltd. (the 'Record Stockholder'), David Kroin (all of the foregoing persons, collectively, the 'Deep Track Parties'), Brett A. Erkman, Jeffrey S. Farrow, Michael Mullette and Donald J. Santel (such individuals, collectively with the Deep Track Parties, the 'Participants'). As of the date hereof, the Deep Track Parties beneficially own an aggregate of 17,791,486 shares (the 'Deep Track Shares') of the common stock, par value $0.001 per share, of DVAX (the 'Common Stock'). The Deep Track Shares collectively represent approximately 14.53% of the outstanding shares of Common Stock based on 122,411,685 shares of Common Stock outstanding as of the record date for the 2025 Annual Meeting as reported in DVAX's Definitive Proxy Statement filed with the SEC on April 17, 2025. Each of the Deep Track Parties may be deemed to have the shared power to vote or direct the vote of (and the shared power to dispose or direct the disposition of) all of the Deep Track Shares. As of the date hereof, none of the other Participants beneficially own any shares of Common Stock.
DEEP TRACK STRONGLY ADVISES ALL STOCKHOLDERS OF DVAX TO READ THE DEFINITIVE PROXY STATEMENT, ANY AMENDMENTS OR SUPPLEMENTS TO SUCH PROXY STATEMENT, AND OTHER PROXY MATERIALS FILED BY DEEP TRACK WITH THE SEC BECAUSE THEY WILL CONTAIN IMPORTANT INFORMATION. SUCH PROXY MATERIALS WILL BE AVAILABLE AT NO CHARGE ON THE SEC'S WEBSITE AT WWW.SEC.GOV. THE DEFINITIVE PROXY STATEMENT, WHEN FILED, AND OTHER RELEVANT DOCUMENTS, WILL ALSO BE AVAILABLE BY DIRECTING A REQUEST TO THE PARTICIPANTS' PROXY SOLICITOR, INNISFREE M&A INCORPORATED, 501 MADISON AVENUE, 20th FLOOR, NEW YORK, NY 10022 (STOCKHOLDERS CAN CALL TOLL-FREE: (877)-687-1865).
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
21 minutes ago
- Yahoo
How SoundHound AI Is Quietly Building a Global AI Empire
SoundHound AI offers integrated and proprietary AI solutions for more than 25 languages. It has huge global opportunities in the automotive and restaurant sectors. It is diversifying into other industries with different monetisation strategies. 10 stocks we like better than SoundHound AI › SoundHound AI (NASDAQ: SOUN) might not enjoy the same hype as Nvidia or Palantir in the stock market, but this mid-cap voice AI company is quietly expanding its footprint across the globe. In doing so, it may be building something far bigger than most investors currently realize. While SoundHound AI is best known for powering restaurant drive-thrus and car infotainment systems, there's far more to its growth story. From Asia to Latin America, it's tapping into one of the most significant, overlooked opportunities in AI: the shift to voice as the primary human-machine interface. Among the most powerful yet underrated assets SoundHound AI has are its integrated and proprietary solutions for more than 25 languages. That's more than just a technical feat. In global markets, offering a voice AI interface that functions properly in native languages is a must-have. English-only won't cut it. As companies continue to integrate AI into new physical systems, from vehicles to smart appliances, the ability to manage local language and cultural nuances will become a significant competitive advantage. That's precisely why SoundHound has been winning new contracts and partnerships. In the first quarter of 2025, it partnered with Chinese tech giant Tencent to expand its footprint in the global auto market, building on its existing relationships in the industry with manufacturers such as Hyundai, Kia, Stellantis, and Samsung's Harman division. SoundHound AI also renewed contracts with two Japanese multinational companies that offer services across numerous industries, and it signed a deal to provide a major Latin American resort developer with an AI agent concierge. These partnerships point to something bigger: Demand for AI-powered voice interfaces isn't limited to the U.S. It's a global trend, and SoundHound AI is emerging as a leader in the space. SoundHound AI's most significant and obvious opportunity lies in the global automotive industry, and it's not hard to see why. In 2024, new light vehicle sales reached 88 million units globally, and this number is expected to increase to 95 million by 2028. Automakers are racing to make vehicles more connected, voice-enabled, and intelligent -- and SoundHound AI is right at the center of that transition. According to the company, its voice AI is in just 3% to 5% of the vehicles sold by its existing customers. In other words, the company has already landed some big clients -- it now needs to grow its relationships with each of them and to sign new deals with other OEMs globally. There are several reasons why SoundHound AI is in the driver's seat when it comes to growing its automotive business. Unlike rival applications like Siri, Alexa, or Google Assistant, SoundHound offers a fully embedded voice AI that runs directly on each vehicle's local hardware -- no cloud connection or external ecosystem is required. That matters a lot to automakers, as it allows them to maintain control over user data and retain their branding rather than handing over the user experience to Apple, Amazon, and Alphabet. This independent, customizable platform is a significant selling point in an era when brands want to control their in-car experience from end to end. Another obvious area for global growth is the restaurant industry. In the U.S., SoundHound is already working with prominent chains such as White Castle, Chipotle, Jersey Mike's, and others to deploy its voice AI to handle customer interactions across phone ordering, kiosks, and drive-thrus. But the bigger prize may be overseas. In the U.S., the company views its total addressable market in the space at around 800,000 restaurants, but globally, the number is far higher. Once it has fully proven the value of its product in the U.S., expansion into international franchises will be the logical next step. While automotive and restaurants are SoundHound's most established verticals today, the company's long-term opportunity goes far beyond these two industries. As voice interfaces become more capable, reliable, and natural, new use cases are emerging, opening the door to broader monetization. The company has already expanded into areas like: Customer service call centers, where AI agents (leveraging generative AI technologies) can automate routine phone interactions, bookings, and support. Smart home and Internet of Things (IoT) devices, where embedded voice interfaces allow manufacturers to create branded, offline-capable experiences. Hospitality and retail, where AI voice assistants help with check-ins, concierge services, or hands-free assistance in stores. Each of these verticals offers a distinct monetization model -- from usage-based software-as-a-service contracts to per-device royalties to potential revenue sharing in commerce and transactions. As more industries adopt voice AI, SoundHound's diversified revenue streams could help it scale efficiently. SoundHound AI may still be at a fairly early stage of its growth, but it's quietly assembling the building blocks of a global voice AI empire. If voice is indeed going to be the next major digital interface -- and there are plenty of signs that it will be -- SoundHound AI is a company that investors will want to keep a close eye on. Before you buy stock in SoundHound AI, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and SoundHound AI wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $699,558!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $976,677!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 1,060% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 180% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join . See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of June 30, 2025 John Mackey, former CEO of Whole Foods Market, an Amazon subsidiary, is a member of The Motley Fool's board of directors. Suzanne Frey, an executive at Alphabet, is a member of The Motley Fool's board of directors. Lawrence Nga has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Alphabet, Amazon, Apple, Nvidia, Palantir Technologies, and Tencent. The Motley Fool recommends Stellantis. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. How SoundHound AI Is Quietly Building a Global AI Empire was originally published by The Motley Fool Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Do CytomX Therapeutics' (NASDAQ:CTMX) Earnings Warrant Your Attention?
Investors are often guided by the idea of discovering 'the next big thing', even if that means buying 'story stocks' without any revenue, let alone profit. Unfortunately, these high risk investments often have little probability of ever paying off, and many investors pay a price to learn their lesson. While a well funded company may sustain losses for years, it will need to generate a profit eventually, or else investors will move on and the company will wither away. So if this idea of high risk and high reward doesn't suit, you might be more interested in profitable, growing companies, like CytomX Therapeutics (NASDAQ:CTMX). Even if this company is fairly valued by the market, investors would agree that generating consistent profits will continue to provide CytomX Therapeutics with the means to add long-term value to shareholders. This technology could replace computers: discover the 20 stocks are working to make quantum computing a reality. In the last three years CytomX Therapeutics' earnings per share took off; so much so that it's a bit disingenuous to use these figures to try and deduce long term estimates. As a result, we'll zoom in on growth over the last year, instead. It's good to see that CytomX Therapeutics' EPS has grown from US$0.21 to US$0.26 over twelve months. That's a 24% gain; respectable growth in the broader scheme of things. One way to double-check a company's growth is to look at how its revenue, and earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) margins are changing. The music to the ears of CytomX Therapeutics shareholders is that EBIT margins have grown from 9.1% to 24% in the last 12 months and revenues are on an upwards trend as well. Ticking those two boxes is a good sign of growth, in our book. The chart below shows how the company's bottom and top lines have progressed over time. To see the actual numbers, click on the chart. View our latest analysis for CytomX Therapeutics In investing, as in life, the future matters more than the past. So why not check out this free interactive visualization of CytomX Therapeutics' forecast profits? As a general rule, it's worth considering how much the CEO is paid, since unreasonably high rates could be considered against the interests of shareholders. The median total compensation for CEOs of companies similar in size to CytomX Therapeutics, with market caps between US$200m and US$800m, is around US$2.5m. CytomX Therapeutics offered total compensation worth US$1.8m to its CEO in the year to December 2024. That comes in below the average for similar sized companies and seems pretty reasonable. CEO compensation is hardly the most important aspect of a company to consider, but when it's reasonable, that gives a little more confidence that leadership are looking out for shareholder interests. It can also be a sign of a culture of integrity, in a broader sense. One important encouraging feature of CytomX Therapeutics is that it is growing profits. Not only that, but the CEO is paid quite reasonably, which should prompt investors to feel more trusting of the board of directors. So all in all CytomX Therapeutics is worthy at least considering for your watchlist. What about risks? Every company has them, and we've spotted 3 warning signs for CytomX Therapeutics you should know about. Although CytomX Therapeutics certainly looks good, it may appeal to more investors if insiders were buying up shares. If you like to see companies with more skin in the game, then check out this handpicked selection of companies that not only boast of strong growth but have strong insider backing. Please note the insider transactions discussed in this article refer to reportable transactions in the relevant jurisdiction. Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Nvidia vs. Microsoft Stock: Which Will Be the First $4 Trillion Company?
Nvidia and Microsoft are knocking on the door of $4 trillion market caps. Nvidia deserves a lot of credit for being the backbone behind AI development. AI has added to Microsoft's investment thesis rather than redefining it. 10 stocks we like better than Nvidia › On Dec. 26, 2024, Apple crossed $3.9 trillion in market capitalization, putting it just 2% away from becoming the world's first $4 trillion company. But it didn't get there. Apple has recovered in recent weeks but remains down big year to date, whereas Nvidia (NASDAQ: NVDA) and Microsoft (NASDAQ: MSFT) just made new all-time highs. Here's why Nvidia will likely become the first company to surpass $4 trillion in market value, what Nvidia and Microsoft must do to continue rising in price, and whether either growth stock is a buy now. In less than three years, Nvidia has gone from billions to trillions in market cap. And now, it is the closest company to $4 trillion -- a little over 3% away as of market close on July 3. Nvidia will likely reach $4 trillion before Microsoft simply because it is closer to the threshold, and its stock is more volatile. Nvidia is now up over 18% year to date (YTD), but it was down around 30% YTD in early April during the worst of the tariff-induced sell-off. So it's not unreasonable that the stock could move a few percentage points higher to pole-vault its market cap above $4 trillion. The better question isn't whether Nvidia or Microsoft will hit $4 trillion in market cap but rather what each company must do to justify that valuation. The two biggest drivers of stock-price appreciation are earnings growth and investor sentiment. If earnings are increasing, investors will likely pay a higher price for the company's shares. But if investors expect the pace of earnings growth to accelerate, then they may be willing to give a stock a premium valuation. Nvidia and Microsoft have been such strong performers in recent years because they are growing earnings and investors are willing to pay a premium price for these companies relative to their earnings. Nvidia went from making under $10 billion in annual net income to a staggering $76.8 billion in just a few years. Microsoft has doubled its net income over the past five years, and its stock price has more than doubled as well. For Nvidia and Microsoft to continue being good investments going forward, both companies must demonstrate that their earnings growth is sustainable and not temporary. Nvidia has greatly benefited from the rapid rise of big tech spending on artificial intelligence (AI). Nvidia has a dominant market share in providing high-powered graphics processing units (GPUs) for data centers and associated AI solutions for enterprises. Due to limited supply and high demand, Nvidia can charge top dollar for its AI offerings, which allows it to convert over half of its sales into pure profit. And because Nvidia's customers are some of the most financially secure, big-budget companies in the world (like Microsoft), then Nvidia knows its customers can afford to spend a ton on AI. However, that wouldn't be the case if challenges arise for key Nvidia customers if there is an industrywide slowdown or if competition comes along and erodes Nvidia's margins. Buying Nvidia now is a bet that the company can continue growing its earnings even if its margins gradually decline over time. The good news is that Nvidia doesn't have to double its earnings every year to be a great buy. Even if it grows earnings at, let's say, 25% per year, it could still reduce its valuation over time and be a market-beating stock. Here's a look at how Nvidia's price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio would go from over 50 to under 35 in five years if it grew earnings at 25% per year, and the stock price gained an average of 15% per year. Metric Current Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Stock Price (15% Annual Growth) $159.20 $183.08 $210.54 $242.12 $278.44 $320.21 Earnings Per Share (25% Annual Growth) $3.10 $3.88 $4.84 $6.05 $7.57 $9.46 P/E Ratio 51.4 47.2 43.5 40 36.2 33.8 Under these assumptions, Nvidia's stock price roughly doubles in five years, but its earnings triple, so the P/E ratio falls considerably. The key takeaway is that Nvidia doesn't have to sustain its parabolic growth to be a good investment. However, the stock could sell off dramatically if investors believe an unforeseen risk will interrupt its growth trajectory. We got a taste of that in April when Nvidia estimated it would incur multibillion-dollar charges due to tariffs, and the stock price nose-dived in a short period. In sum, investors should only consider Nvidia if they are confident in sustained AI spending and the company's ability to pivot as the market matures. Microsoft may be a better choice for investors seeking a more balanced tech stock to purchase. Microsoft has a lower P/E than Nvidia, and for good reason, because it isn't growing as quickly. However, Microsoft also doesn't need a lot to go right for it to continue growing steadily over time. The vast majority of Nvidia's earnings are directly tied to AI. Microsoft has a diverse earnings profile, encompassing cloud computing, software, hardware, platforms such as GitHub, LinkedIn, and Xbox, as well as other areas. AI is accelerating Microsoft's earnings growth and expanding its earnings, but the company can still do extremely well even if AI investment slows and the industry matures. It's also worth mentioning that Microsoft routinely buys back its stock and has raised its dividend for 15 consecutive years. So it has a more balanced capital-return program than Nvidia, which rewards shareholders by growing the core business rather than directly returning capital. Nvidia and Microsoft are exceptional companies. It wouldn't be surprising to see them both surpass $4 trillion market caps and continue building from there. However, investors should be mindful that both companies are seeing their stock prices rise faster than their earnings are growing, which puts pressure on them to bridge the gap between expectations and reality. Before you buy stock in Nvidia, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and Nvidia wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $699,558!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $976,677!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 1,060% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 180% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join . See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of June 30, 2025 Suzanne Frey, an executive at Alphabet, is a member of The Motley Fool's board of directors. John Mackey, former CEO of Whole Foods Market, an Amazon subsidiary, is a member of The Motley Fool's board of directors. Daniel Foelber has positions in Nvidia. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Alphabet, Amazon, Apple, Microsoft, and Nvidia. The Motley Fool recommends the following options: long January 2026 $395 calls on Microsoft and short January 2026 $405 calls on Microsoft. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. Nvidia vs. Microsoft Stock: Which Will Be the First $4 Trillion Company? was originally published by The Motley Fool Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data