JFK assassination hearing live updates: Oliver Stone to testify before lawmakers
JFK assassination hearing live updates: Oliver Stone to testify before lawmakers
Show Caption
Hide Caption
Donald Trump releases remainder of JFK assassination files
The final batch of files surrounding the assassination of John F Kennedy have been released under an executive order by US President Donald Trump.
unbranded - Newsworthy
The assassination of former President John F. Kennedy will take center stage at a House hearing on Tuesday, as a panel of witnesses testifies about the documents recently released on one of the most shocking moments in American history.
However, multiple people expected to speak on Tuesday, including filmmaker Oliver Stone, have been critical of investigations and long-held findings about the assassination. Stone's 1991 film "JFK" faced harsh pushback from historians for its suggestions that Kennedy's death was the result of high-level conspiracies.
Rep. Anna Paulina Luna, R-Fla., the chair of the Task Force on the Declassification of Federal Secrets, said Sunday lawmakers will hear about the value of the flood of documents released by the National Archives earlier this month about the shooting.
Renewed attention on the assassination comes after President Donald Trump signed an executive order in January aimed at fully releasing government documents related to the assassinations of Kennedy, his brother and presidential candidate Sen. Robert F. Kennedy, D-N.Y., and civil rights icon Martin Luther King Jr.
Nothing in the files has changed the long-held findings that Lee Harvey Oswald acted alone in fatally shooting Kennedy on Nov. 22, 1963 while the then-president rode in a motorcade in Dallas.
The other witnesses in Tuesday's hearing include author Jefferson Morley, the vice president of the Mary Ferrell Foundation, a non-profit that promotes access to historical government documents, and James DiEugenio, an author who has targeted investigations into Kennedy's assassination. Stone wrote the foreword to DiEugenio's book "The JFK Assassination."
There may be even more information coming, as estimates said a total of 80,000 pages were expected to be published after a review by Justice Department lawyers.
The National Archives' release page suggests more may be released as well: "As the records continue to be digitized, they will be posted to this page."
But Alice L. George, a historian whose books include "The Assassination of John F. Kennedy," said government records were unlikely to resolve questions some still have.
"I think there may continue to be more record releases," she said. "I seriously doubt that any will include great revelations. The Warren Commission report was done well, but it was done when many of the key players were alive. It's much harder to find the truth when most of the people involved are dead."
– Reuters
A lack of immediate bombshells doesn't surprise some experts.
The National Archives collected the documents from other agencies ‒ like the CIA ‒ years ago, according to James Johnston, author of "Murder, Inc.: The CIA under John F. Kennedy."
'If it was going to embarrass the agency or tell a different story, they wouldn't have turned them over to the National Archives in the first place,' Johnston said.
Fredrik Logevall, a Harvard history professor whose books include "JFK: Coming of Age in the American Century 1917-56," said in an email the new documents may help historians better understand the circumstances around the assassination.
"It's valuable to get all the documentation out, ideally in unredacted form. But I don't expect dramatic new revelations that alters in some fundamental way our grasp of the event," he said.
– Joel Shannon and Josh Meyer
Looking to read the JFK files released earlier this month yourself? You can find them on the National Archives' website here.
Most of the files are scans of documents, and some are blurred or have become faint or difficult to read in the decades since Kennedy's assassination. There are also photographs and sounds recordings, mostly from the 1960s.
– Marina Pitofsky
While an initial review of the papers didn't contain any shocking revelations, the documents do offer a window into the climate of fear at the time surrounding U.S. relations with the Soviet Union shortly after the Cuban Missile Crisis of 1962 nearly led to a nuclear war.
Many of the documents reflected the work by investigators to learn more about assassin Lee Harvey Oswald's time in the Soviet Union and track his movements in the months leading up to Kennedy's assassination in Dallas.
– Josh Meyer
Contributing: Reuters
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
San Francisco Chronicle
28 minutes ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Trump administration sues Los Angeles in latest attack on sanctuary cities
President Donald Trump escalated his war against sanctuary policies on Monday in a lawsuit blaming alleged 'rioting, looting and vandalism' in Los Angeles on the city's refusal to allow its police to enforce immigration law or cooperate with federal agents. The suit comes two months after a judge barred Trump's administration from denying federal funds to sanctuary cities, and five years after the Supreme Court rejected Trump's challenge to California's sanctuary law. 'The United States is currently facing a crisis of illegal immigration,' Trump's Justice Department said in its lawsuit, filed in U.S. District Court. 'But its efforts to address the crisis are hindered by Sanctuary Cities such as the City of Los Angeles, which refuse to cooperate or share information' with immigration agents. 'Sanctuary policies were the driving force of the violence, chaos, and attacks on law enforcement that Americans recently witnessed in Los Angeles,' Attorney General Pamela Bondi said in a statement. But a state official said that as of mid-June, two weeks after Trump's deployment of 4,000 National Guard troops to Los Angeles, less than 20% of them were actually in the city. Some of those troops were sent to a rural area of Riverside County, 130 miles away, to raid a suspected marijuana farm. Meanwhile, studies contradict the administration's claims that undocumented immigrants are more dangerous than American citizens. A report last September by the National Institute of Justice, part of the U.S. Justice Department, said data from Texas showed that undocumented immigrants were arrested less than half as often as native-born Americans for crimes of drugs or violence. Similar findings were reached in October in a nationwide study by the American Immigration Council, a nonprofit that supports immigration. And in 2018, during Trump's first term, the National Institutes of Health, part of his administration, said data from all states between 1990 and 2014 'reveal that undocumented immigration does not increase violence.' In an unusual action, six Republican state legislators released a letter they addressed to Trump on Friday urging him to focus immigration enforcement on violent criminals rather than on all undocumented immigrants. 'Immigrants are essential to the fabric of America,' wrote the lawmakers, led by state Sen. Suzette Valladares, R-Santa Clarita (Los Angeles County), and federal agents should try 'to avoid the kinds of sweeping raids that instill fear and disrupt the workplace.' The Trump appointee whose office filed the suit, U.S. Attorney Bill Essayli, is a Riverside Republican known for attention-seeking behavior while serving in the state Assembly from 2022 to 2024. As a legislator, he denounced gun-control advocates as 'fake leftist groups' and unsuccessfully sought to require schools to notify parents whose children identified as transgender. After a bill banning parental notification won approval in the Assembly last year, Essayli accused its supporters of 'fearmongering,' had his microphone cut off by a Democratic floor leader, then banged his fist on the desk, called the leader a 'f---ing liar' and said he 'wasn't prepared to address the Chinese Communist Party house today.' Kevin Johnson, an immigration law professor and former law school dean at UC Davis, called the Trump administration's latest lawsuit 'a publicity measure.' 'There is no evidence that undocumented immigrants commit crimes at rates higher than U.S. citizens,' Johnson told the Chronicle. 'In fact, the data shows the opposite.' 'It was Trump's immigration enforcement in the Los Angeles area that prompted the massive protests, not the fact that Los Angeles was a sanctuary city,' said Stephen Yale-Loehr, an immigration law professor at Cornell University and author of multiple books on the subject. Trump took control of California's National Guard on June 7, saying its forces were needed to protect federal immigration agents and property from violence in protests against workplace raids. While a federal appeals court has allowed the deployment to continue, California officials are still urging the courts to conclude that the action is both illegal and dangerous. California's 2018 sanctuary law, the first in the nation, prohibits local and state officers from notifying immigration agents of the release dates of undocumented immigrants in their custody and holding them so that they can be picked up for deportation. The law does not apply to immigrants convicted of violent crimes. In a lawsuit by Trump's first administration, the law was upheld in 2018 by U.S. District Judge John Mendez of Sacramento, an appointee of President George W. Bush. 'California's decision not to assist federal immigration enforcement in its endeavors is not an 'obstacle' to that enforcement effort,' Mendez wrote. The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals upheld his ruling, and the Supreme Court denied review of Trump's appeal in June 2020, with only Justices Samuel Alito and Clarence Thomas voting to take up the case. U.S. District Judge William Orrick III of San Francisco cited that case in his ruling April 24 prohibiting the current Trump administration from withholding billions of dollars in federal funding from San Francisco and other local governments with sanctuary policies. As part of that case, multiple Bay Area law enforcement officials submitted declarations with the court detailing how sanctuary policies make things safer for all residents – the opposite of the Trump administration's contention. Sanctuary policies 'create an environment where individuals can be candid and forthcoming with law enforcement, and feel comfortable reporting crimes, serving as witnesses, and assisting with investigations,' San Francisco Sheriff Paul Miyamoto wrote in a declaration. He also said that responding to federal notification requests takes deputies' time away from ensuring the safety of those they're charged with protecting. But while there has been little change in the Supreme Court's membership in the last five years – only Trump's appointment of Justice Amy Coney Barrett to succeed the late Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg – Yale-Loehr said the judicial climate seems to have changed. 'The Supreme Court has taken up many emergency appeals by the Trump administration this year,' the Cornell law professor said. 'Also, the court is more conservative now than in 2020. So we could see a ruling on sanctuary jurisdictions sometime this year.'
UPI
38 minutes ago
- UPI
Feds uncover remote tech workers scheme to benefit North Korea
June 30 (UPI) -- The U.S. Department of Justice on Monday announced a crackdown on North Korea using people to pose as tech workers to earn money and steal sensitive information for the regime. In two unsealed charging indictments in Massachusetts and Atlanta, schemes were outlined to trick U.S. companies into hiring people who funneled their paychecks to the government and stole sensitive information and cryptocurrency. The FBI and Justice Department have investigated in 16 states since 2021 with most searches conducted earlier this month. The targeted companies were not announced. U.S. companies were warned to carefully screen their remote employees to avoid falling victim to similar ruses. "The FBI will do everything in our power to defend the homeland and protect Americans from being victimized by the North Korean government," Roman Rozhavsky, assistant director of the FBI's Counterintelligence Division, said in a statement. The phony North Korean workers were assisted by individuals in the United States, China, the United Arab Emirates and Taiwan, DOJ said. They successfully obtained employment with more than 100 U.S. companies, including Fortune 500 ones. "These schemes target and steal from U.S. companies and are designed to evade sanctions and fund the North Korean regime's illicit programs, including its weapons programs," Assistant Attorney General John A. Eisenberg of the Department's National Security Division said. "The Justice Department, along with our law enforcement, private sector, and international partners, will persistently pursue and dismantle these cyber-enabled revenue generation networks." DOJ announced searches of 29 known or suspected "laptop farms" across 16 states, and the seizure of 29 financial accounts used to launder illicit funds and 21 fraudulent websites from October 2024 to June. From June 10-17, the FBI executed searches of 21 premises across 14 states. In total, the FBI seized approximately 137 laptops. "North Korean IT workers defraud American companies and steal the identities of private citizens, all in support of the North Korean regime," Brett Leatherman, assistant director of the FBI's Cyber Division, said. "That is why the FBI and our partners continue to work together to disrupt infrastructure, seize revenue, indict overseas IT workers and arrest their enablers in the United States. Let the actions announced today serve as a warning: if you host laptop farms for the benefit of North Korean actors, law enforcement will be waiting for you." Obtained were salary payments, and in some cases, sensitive employer information such as export-controlled U.S. military technology and virtual currency. In one scheme, they allegedly created front companies and fraudulent websites. They received access to company-provided laptop computers. Obtained were salary payments. U.S. national Zhenxing "Danny" Wang of New Jersey was arrested in a 50-page, five-count indictment in Massachussets. The document details a multi-year fraud scheme by Wang and his co-conspirators to obtain remote IT work with U.S. companies that generated more than $5 million in revenue. Several Chinese and Taiwanese nationals were charged but haven't been arrested. From approximately 2021 until October 2024, the defendants and other co-conspirators compromised the identities of more than 80 U.S. people to obtain remote jobs at more than 100 U.S. companies. They cost the companies at least $3 million for legal fees, computer network remediation costs, and other damages and losses. In another scheme, people used false or fraudulently obtained identities to gain employment with an Atlanta-based blockchain research and development company where they stole virtual currency worth approximately $900,000. The five-count wire fraud and money laundering indictment charged four North Korean nationals. The defendants remain at large and are wanted by the FBI. These remote works were assisted by individuals in the United States, China, United Arab Emirates and Taiwan. The U.S. Department of State has offered potential rewards for up to $5 million to disrupt the North Korean illicit financial activities, including for cybercrimes, money laundering and sanctions evasion.
Politico
an hour ago
- Politico
The Senate megabill is on a collision course with House fiscal hawks
House fiscal hawks are looking at the math underlying Senate Republicans' sprawling domestic policy legislation, and they don't like what they see. As Senate Republicans try to muscle President Donald Trump's 'big, beautiful bill' for final passage, they're on track to violate a budget framework brokered between House fiscal hawks and Speaker Mike Johnson. Under that framework, if the GOP piles on tax cuts over $4 trillion, they'd need to match them dollar-for-dollar with additional spending cuts beyond the $1.5 trillion in the House-passed bill. 'The Senate version adds $651 billion to the deficit — and that's before interest costs, which nearly double the total,' said the House Freedom Caucus in a Monday afternoon post on X. 'The Senate must make major changes and should at least be in the ballpark of compliance with the agreed upon House budget framework.' It's a wonky hill to die on, but dozens of House conservatives insisted on the deal before smoothing the megabill's path through their chamber. Johnson at one point told the conservatives they could go after his gavel if he didn't hold up the deal — what some of the holdouts considered a 'blood oath.' If the House hawks stand by the deal and the Senate bill doesn't change appreciably during the final amendment vote marathon that got underway Monday, it could force GOP leaders to 'conference' the legislation between the two chambers — likely delaying the bill's passage beyond Trump's deadline of July 4. Now compounding concerns for House GOP leaders, who have ordered members back to Washington to start voting on the bill Wednesday morning, billionaire Elon Musk sent new volleys of criticism at Trump's marquee legislation Monday over the bill's deficit impact. 'Every member of Congress who campaigned on reducing government spending and then immediately voted for the biggest debt increase in history should hang their head in shame!' said Musk on X on Monday. 'And they will lose their primary next year if it is the last thing I do on this Earth.' The House fiscal hawks have been crystal-clear about their fiscal red lines, though many now privately worry that they could end up getting jammed by Senate Republicans — and by Trump — with a far spendier bill. Johnson on Monday would not address whether the pending Senate bill could pass the House but told reporters he's long advised Senate GOP leaders to hew as close to the House version as possible. There's 'a lot of game left to play,' he added. Notably, a group of 38 House Republicans led by Rep. Lloyd Smucker (R-Pa.) wrote Senate Majority Leader John Thune in early June warning that any changes to the GOP megabill needed to adhere to the fiscal framework laid out by the House. Under that plan, if the GOP includes $4.5 trillion in tax cuts in their bill, then they would need to scrounge up at least $2 trillion in spending cuts. It's already looking to be a far cry from what Senate Republicans hope to pass in the coming hours. According to the Joint Committee on Taxation, the Senate's plan includes around $4.45 trillion of tax cuts versus the $3.8 trillion in tax cuts passed by the House. But the spending cuts contemplated by the Senate GOP wouldn't come close to making up the difference, according to the Congressional Budget Office, the other official budget scorer on Capitol Hill. CBO estimates the Senate plan includes around $1.5 trillion in mandatory spending cuts, but that amount is reduced by around $300 billion in one-time investments in border funding and national security policy. 'The Senate bill is currently out of compliance with the budget framework by $651 billion, which is adjusted for dynamic revenue from higher economic growth,' said Paul Winfree, CEO of the Economic Policy Innovation Center and a top economic official during Trump's first administration, in a text. 'I think it will be very important to get that number closer to $0 to avoid conference.' Senate Republicans in many ways made steeper cuts to Medicaid than the House, which would have otherwise helped rectify the difference. But between $200 and $300 billion in spending cuts included in the House-passed bill were knocked out because they didn't comply with Senate budget rules. The chamber's parliamentarian, Elizabeth MacDonough, has been in constant talks with Senate Republican and Democratic staff about whether provisions in the legislation are fit for the filibuster-skirting reconciliation process. 'What we've been told is somewhere around $250 billion, because I've heard $300 and I've heard [$200], so I'm gonna split the difference,' said Sen. Markwayne Mullin (R-Okla.) of the sidelined spending cuts. Mullin added that House Republicans should look at the score of tax cuts under the so-called current policy baseline, which assumes that trillions of dollars of expiring tax cuts would be extended. 'I think it's up to the House how they want to look at this, because they can go in two different directions,' said Mullin. 'If you go underneath current law, then you have a deficit. If you go into current policy, you actually have a surplus of $507 billion.' Still, prominent Republicans such as Budget Chair Jodey Arrington (R-Texas) and conservative firebrand Rep. Chip Roy (R-Texas) have argued that Senate Republicans still need to do the math as laid out in the House budget, regardless of which baseline they use. Rep. Keith Self, another Texas Republican, wrote Monday on X that senators are 'completely ignoring' the House budget framework. 'This isn't just reckless,' he wrote, 'it's fiscally criminal.' Meredith Lee Hill contributed to this report.
