Misleading Description Of Land Sought For Controversial Dam Project Breached Standards
The BSA has ordered local broadcaster Central FM to publish a statement summarising the decision.
A radio discussion describing conservation land sought for a controversial Hawke's Bay dam project as 'only stewardship land' breached the accuracy standard, the Broadcasting Standards Authority has found.
The Authority has upheld a complaint about an item on Central FM's Cockies Hour in which host Steve Wyn-Harris interviewed the Chair of the Tukituki Water Security Project (TWSP) after the project was included on the then Fast-track Approvals Bill's list of projects released in October 2024.
The BSA agreed the description of the 22 hectares of Department of Conservation (DOC) land needed for the project as 'only stewardship land', when some 93% of it has conservation park status, was a material inaccuracy which the broadcaster did not make reasonable efforts to avoid.
The Authority also found the broadcaster failed to correct the error within a reasonable period after being put on notice.
It has ordered local broadcaster Central FM to publish a statement summarising the decision.
The land discussed in the 8 October 2024 broadcast was the subject of a deal between DOC and Hawke's Bay Regional Council for a proposed land swap which would have enabled flooding of the land for what was then known as the Ruataniwha dam project. The project stalled in 2017 after the proposed land swap was halted by a Supreme Court decision finding the Minister of Conservation had inappropriately revoked the conservation park status of relevant land.
Some 20% of the more than nine-minute Cockies Hour item was devoted to the Supreme Court decision and the status and nature of the land, which is still needed for the dam to go ahead. During the interview, the land was incorrectly referred to six times by the TWSP Chair and the show's host.
The BSA noted the controversial nature of the dam project within the local community and the publicity around the Supreme Court's 2017 decision.
'We would have expected the broadcaster to have some understanding of the decision, and the significance of the land's status.
'The broadcast created a misleading impression about the land needed for the project as being stewardship land and having inferior conservation values. This undermined the public interest in the story as the audience did not have the benefit of being informed about the true status of the DOC land, to enable them to reach their own informed opinions.
'We therefore concluded the broadcast had the potential to cause harm which outweighed the broadcaster's freedom of expression and is significant enough to warrant our intervention.'
The full decision can be seen on the BSA website here:
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Newsroom
30-06-2025
- Newsroom
DoC and Treasury arm wrestle over visitor levy funds and ‘high-value' investments
The Department of Conservation and Treasury have butted heads over a $32 million 'shortfall' in the department's funding and a difference in opinion of what constitutes a high-value project. A Treasury report on International Visitor Levy investments for the Department of Conservation outlines for and seeks action from Finance Minister Nicola Willis on approval of the department's 2025/26 visitor levy investment envelope along with Treasury's treatment of a '$32 million shortfall from DoC's IVL allocation'.
Scoop
26-06-2025
- Scoop
We Haven't Sold Out: Council To Clarify Seabed Mine Stance
Article – Craig Ashworth – Local Democracy Reporting Taranaki Regional Council is going public against accusations it has sold out to would-be seabed miners Trans-Tasman Resources. Taranaki Regional Council is going public against accusations it has sold out to would-be seabed miners Trans-Tasman Resources. The Australian company has a permit to mine the seabed off Pātea for an initial 20 years, seeking to extract iron, titanium and vanadium. But Trans-Tasman Resources (TTR) can't begin mining until it gets discharge consents to pump 45 million tonnes of unwanted sediment a year into the ocean. Iwi and community opponents of seabed mining spoke to councillors meeting on Tuesday morning, urging them to stand with their communities against the proposed mine. But the regional council wants to hang on to any influence it might have in the government's new Fast-track process – and fears taking a public stand might block it from decision-making. Councillor Bonita Bigham said Taranaki Regional Council (TRC) needed to state clearly what it's trying to achieve by staying neutral for now. 'I've been… attacked on social media [and] in private for not having a position,' the Māori constituency councillor said. 'I've been accused of being a sell-out and having been bought out by TTR… I think this is a real risk to our reputation as an organisation.' Bigham said those in the room – including opponents – understood the reason for neutrality. 'But we've got 100,000 people out there who don't understand why we aren't saying something.' As previously published by Local Democracy Reporting, TRC has three likely ways to have a say on the fate of Trans-Tasman's application under the Fast-track Approvals Act The council will help pick one of the four (or more) panel members that will approve or deny the seabed mining. And TRC staff are almost certain they'll be a relevant local authority and be one of the few groups allowed to formally comment on Trans-Tasman's application – and on any consent conditions. Councillor Susan Hughes KC advised elected members to be cautious even in their private lives. 'It's just a useful thing to remind ourselves that it's not helpful if we're expressing opinions we think are informal at a social gathering or something like that – it has the potential for coming back to bite us.' She advised councillors keep the discussion between themselves 'so we don't risk undermining the effectiveness that we might otherwise wish to bring to bear on behalf of the regional council.' Council chair Craig Williamson said individuals could have personal discussions to help form their views, but agreed the council would issue a press release to make its position clear.
Scoop
26-06-2025
- Scoop
We Haven't Sold Out: Council To Clarify Seabed Mine Stance
Taranaki Regional Council is going public against accusations it has sold out to would-be seabed miners Trans-Tasman Resources. The Australian company has a permit to mine the seabed off Pātea for an initial 20 years, seeking to extract iron, titanium and vanadium. But Trans-Tasman Resources (TTR) can't begin mining until it gets discharge consents to pump 45 million tonnes of unwanted sediment a year into the ocean. Iwi and community opponents of seabed mining spoke to councillors meeting on Tuesday morning, urging them to stand with their communities against the proposed mine. But the regional council wants to hang on to any influence it might have in the government's new Fast-track process - and fears taking a public stand might block it from decision-making. Councillor Bonita Bigham said Taranaki Regional Council (TRC) needed to state clearly what it's trying to achieve by staying neutral for now. "I've been… attacked on social media [and] in private for not having a position," the Māori constituency councillor said. "I've been accused of being a sell-out and having been bought out by TTR… I think this is a real risk to our reputation as an organisation." Bigham said those in the room - including opponents - understood the reason for neutrality. "But we've got 100,000 people out there who don't understand why we aren't saying something." As previously published by Local Democracy Reporting, TRC has three likely ways to have a say on the fate of Trans-Tasman's application under the Fast-track Approvals Act The council will help pick one of the four (or more) panel members that will approve or deny the seabed mining. And TRC staff are almost certain they'll be a relevant local authority and be one of the few groups allowed to formally comment on Trans-Tasman's application - and on any consent conditions. Councillor Susan Hughes KC advised elected members to be cautious even in their private lives. "It's just a useful thing to remind ourselves that it's not helpful if we're expressing opinions we think are informal at a social gathering or something like that - it has the potential for coming back to bite us." She advised councillors keep the discussion between themselves "so we don't risk undermining the effectiveness that we might otherwise wish to bring to bear on behalf of the regional council." Council chair Craig Williamson said individuals could have personal discussions to help form their views, but agreed the council would issue a press release to make its position clear.
