logo
Muslim leaders must speak out against the horrific grooming gangs

Muslim leaders must speak out against the horrific grooming gangs

Telegraph17-06-2025

Dame Louise Casey's review is a no-nonsense set of findings from someone who always gets to the bottom of things. I have experience of working with Casey some years ago, when she was reviewing extremism and its impacts on social cohesion. She was tough talking, meticulous, caring and committed to social justice; she's a determined campaigner and this is why her work must always be taken seriously.
Casey's review on the grooming gangs has found that where the ethnicity of the suspects was recorded, such as in Greater Manchester and in West and South Yorkshire, the facts showed that white girls were predominantly abused by Asian men of Pakistani heritage. The lack of action by statutory authorities was based on a fear of being called racist; they placed the protection of social cohesion above the lives of vulnerable children.
Whilst there is nothing wrong with trying to do good in society, the sentiments were completely misplaced: young girls were 'adultified', in Casey's words, and they were blamed for their own actions when they were only children.We can't get away, nor can anyone miss, the glaringly obvious point that Casey repeatedly mentions in her report: that there is an over-representation of Asian men of Pakistani heritage amongst the men who abused and raped vulnerable white girls.
This didn't come out of a vacuum. Sermons in British mosques around child safeguarding, the promotion of equality for women and girls, and the need to tackle misogyny could possibly have changed things if they existed some two decades ago. Yet, even to this day, these matters are not discussed by many imams and religious leaders in the UK.
Having worked for over two decades in British Muslim communities, I am aware of the problem of misogyny within them. Many Muslim women are trying to challenge patriarchy but are constantly lectured on their dress sense through the association of piety with 'covering up'. The responsibility in Islam, (and I speak as a Muslim), seems to lie wholly on the shoulders of women around their bodies. This needs to change; there are many historical instances in Islamic history of women leaders who have challenged men.
This is important because mosques have a key role in shaping and changing the behaviours of many Muslim men in the thirty five to sixty age bracket, where many of the child offenders sit within. After Casey's report, there is an added impetus for imams and mosque committees to make child safeguarding and women's rights front and centre in their sermons. For too long I have heard them talk about foreign affairs or discuss issues of no real relevance to the lives of Muslim men and women in Britain. Casey's report is a stark wake up call for things to change.
Muslim leaders need to stand with the women who had their lives shattered when they were girls by Asian men of Pakistani heritage. These men lived split lives, some acting as if they were holier than holy, yet their actions demonstrated that they were monsters who could not spare an ounce of empathy for vulnerable children. Such actions happen because religious, political and social leadership in British Muslim communities have failed to speak up to protect the weakest in our society.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Chilling moment 'jealous' YouTuber stalks his wife to domestic abuse shelter before brutally stabbing her to death as she pushed their son in pram - as he's convicted of her murder
Chilling moment 'jealous' YouTuber stalks his wife to domestic abuse shelter before brutally stabbing her to death as she pushed their son in pram - as he's convicted of her murder

Daily Mail​

time11 hours ago

  • Daily Mail​

Chilling moment 'jealous' YouTuber stalks his wife to domestic abuse shelter before brutally stabbing her to death as she pushed their son in pram - as he's convicted of her murder

A 'violent, jealous, controlling' husband who stabbed his wife to death as she pushed their seven-month-old baby in a pram has been convicted of murder. 'Smiling killer' Habibur Masum, 26, tracked down Kulsuma Akter, 27, to a women's refuge after she forgot to turn off her location on Snapchat. He then confronted her on a street in Bradford, West Yorkshire last April, where in a savage broad daylight attack, he repeatedly plunged the blade into his screaming partner, stabbing her more than 25 times before slitting her throat. Afterwards, Masum was captured on CCTV grinning as he boarded a bus to make his escape, having left his wife for dead and abandoning their baby in the street. The jury heard obsessive Masum banned his wife from wearing makeup, was constantly checking her mobile phone and stopped her drinking tea, because he didn't like the drink. Her killing came just five months after 'cold-blooded' Masum had chillingly warned his wife 'I am going to murder you'. Masum, of Burnley, already pleaded guilty to manslaughter and possession of a bladed article, but had denied a charge of murder. However, a jury at Bradford Crown Court today convicted the 'abusive' 26-year-old of murder. He was also convicted of assault, making threats to kill, and stalking, and now faces life in prison. Masum wiped away tears in the dock after a jury returned a unanimous verdict following five hours and 40 minutes of deliberation. During his trial, the court heard how the couple met and married in Bangladesh, and came to the UK in 2022 after Masum obtained a student visa and enrolled on a masters course to study marketing. But the couple's relationship soon broke down in November 2023 after 18 months of marriage, which had seen Masum making threats to kill his partner in July of that year. Today it can be revealed Masum would have been locked up less than four months before the murder if warnings by the CPS had been heeded. On November 26, 2023 he was charged with assault by beating and making threats to kill against Ms Akter at their then home in Oldham. Two days earlier the jealous student had come at his terrified wife armed with a knife after flying into a rage over an innocuous text message she had received from a colleague. Masum demanded 'tell me what your relationship is with him, or I will kill you' and put the knife to her throat as she cradled their baby. Frightened for her life and fearing he would cut her throat, she clutched her son to her in a desperate hope that he wouldn't attack her. The day before, in what the trial heard was a chilling forewarning of what was to come, he had told her: 'I am going to murder you, and the police will be taking me.' Masum was arrested and his wife was allocated a social worker, confiding to her she feared he was going to kill her. When he appeared from police custody at Tameside Magistrates' Court on November 27, 2023, entering not guilty pleas, the Crown Prosecution Service argued he should remain locked up. But fatefully magistrates instead granted him bail on condition he did not contact Ms Akter and another person or go to her address. She and her son were placed in a refuge in what was meant to be a secret location in Bradford. Meanwhile her estranged husband - a free man due to the court's decision - dedicated himself to tracking her down. On March 28, 2024, West Yorkshire Police were informed she'd been receiving death threats. Officers passed 'intelligence' to colleagues in Greater Manchester on March 31, the Independent Office for Police Conduct said today. But on April 6 - two days before she was due to be rehoused - and believing her estranged husband was in Spain, Ms Atker 'felt safe to leave the refuge'. However, at 3pm Ms Akter - who was walking with a friend while pushing her seven-month-old son in a pram - was shocked to be confronted by Masum, Bradford Crown Court heard. CCTV footage played in court showed Masum walking with Ms Akter until he stopped her, then spinning her and the pram around before pulling a knife from his jacket. Prosecutor Steven Wood KC said: 'He grabs Kulsuma and pushes her into a wall, stabbing her to the body. 'You will see that Kulsuma then goes to the ground only for the defendant to launch a ferocious and deadly attack. 'When the defendant had finished stabbing her, as a final act of sheer gratuitous violence, he kicks Kulsuma before moving away, but not before ensuring that he disposed of the knife.' The court heard Ms Akter suffered multiple stab wounds to her body and face including a wound to the neck which partly cut her windpipe and severed her left jugular vein. Mr Wood said her killing represented 'cold-blooded, calculated, pre-meditated murder'. During his closing speech on Monday, the prosecutor told jurors the defendant appeared to revel in his crime, grinning after he left his wife dying. Jurors were shown Masum walking through Bradford after the attack, with Mr Woods saying there were no signs of him being 'distressed', as he had claimed in his evidence. Mr Wood told the court a close-up of Masum getting on a bus showed him smiling, which 'removed all possible doubt' about his state of mind. 'There were no tears, there was no distress. Perhaps, members of the jury, the smile you can clearly see form as he gets on that bus is as a result of him thinking at that point he's getting away. The smiling killer.' Mr Wood said that although Masum was suffering from depression at the time, this did not provide an explanation for the savage slaughter of his partner. 'It was not his depression which caused him to kill Kulsuma, it was his other longstanding personality traits of controlling behaviour, jealousy and paranoia. She had rejected him. She had to die,' he said. 'And were there any residual thought that this was about seeing his son - having left his wife literally in the gutter, bleeding to death, he leaves his son alone. 'He could so easily have walked away with him. But he knew if he walked away with that pram it would increase his chances of getting caught. 'But he very quickly got himself out of the area and down to Aylesbury. 'In the meantime he changed his appearance - shaved his beard, cut his hair, changed his clothing.' Mr Wood said the marriage between Masum and Ms Akter was 'an abusive relationship characterised by his jealousy, possessiveness and controlling behaviour with violence being both used and threatened'. 'He is a man who resorts to violence... and when he resorts to actual violence, it's with a knife,' he added. Earlier, the court heard evidence from Ms Akter's sister-in-law, who said Masum had stopped his wife wearing make-up and would regularly check her phone to see who she was talking to. A statement from Minara Begum read in court explained Ms Akter had to ask permission from her husband before going out. She said they 'both seemed happy' and Masum appeared 'quite obsessed with' Ms Akter, who started working at Park Cakes in Oldham. Ms Begum added: 'Masum was not too keen on Kulsuma working but she would worry about paying the bills. 'I told her she could enhance her beauty even more with the right make-up ... Masum would get jealous if he saw photos and told her not to do make-up any more, so she didn't.' Jurors heard how arguments soon escalated to a 'more serious level' before Ms Akter tried to escape, going to stay with her brother and sister-in-law at one point. Ms Begum said: 'He kept messaging her telling he was going to do crazy things because she was with us and not at home, and kept asking her where the kitchen knife was. 'After this happened I told Masum his behaviour was not right and their relationship should not be this way. 'Masum did not like this coming from a woman or me speaking to him this way. He did not like me very much.' Jurors heard Ms Akter returned to Masum, but arguments between them 'got worse after the baby was born' and Ms Akter 'always complained he wasn't helping her with the baby and always expected his food to be prepared after work'. However, warnings of the explosive nature of the couple's relationship were seen right at the beginning of their marriage. Jurors heard that more than a year before he murdered his wife, Masum had told a doctor he 'felt like he would kill her'. The trial heard that in August 2022 Masum was found by police at a tram station, where he had stayed all night after an argument with Ms Akter. He was taken to hospital where he told a doctor 'I feel like I would kill her' and said 'when he fights with her he feels like he is going to kill her'. Medical notes showed he 'disclosed thoughts to harm himself and his girlfriend and admitted to carrying a knife while having these thoughts'. Masum told the trial he had never carried a knife in Ms Akter's presence. Asked by his barrister Frida Hussain KC why he had made those comments at the hospital, he replied: 'I said: 'I feel I'm having some mental health issues and I would like to share something with the doctor'... I just wanted to share all that with the doctor.' The defendant, who gave evidence through a Bengali interpreter, told the court the couple had 'occasional disagreements or arguments' about when they should live together and she would 'block him' when she was angry. Masum said: 'I used to feel if I can't be with her I would die.' Masum said during the trial he had taken a knife with him on the day he killed Ms Akter because he intended to stab himself if she did not 'listen to him'. Mr Wood said the 26-year-old's threats of self-harm were 'empty threats', adding: 'He has never made an attempt on his own life, he has never harmed himself. These are examples of his emotional blackmail.' He told jurors that during the fatal attack on Ms Akter, Masum put her on the ground, stabbed her 'many, many' times, kicked her 'as a final insult'' then took hold of the back of her head and cut her throat. Mr Wood said: 'Such a brutal and violent assault by the defendant, culminating in a deliberate cutting of his wife's throat, only points to an intention to kill. That is what he wanted, that is what he did.' Today the IOPC said its investigations into Ms Akter's prior contact with both the Greater Manchester and West Yorkshire forces had found no breaches of professional standards. Its director Emily Barry said: 'Our thoughts remain with Ms Akter's family and friends, who have lost a loved one in tragic circumstances, as well as all those affected by this deeply distressing incident. 'This was a harrowing case which caused widespread understandable concern. 'It was appropriate we carried out a thorough investigation into the relevant contact between police and Ms Akter.' Masum will be sentenced next month.

Starmer has failed at the first political hurdle
Starmer has failed at the first political hurdle

Telegraph

time18 hours ago

  • Telegraph

Starmer has failed at the first political hurdle

Next week marks the first anniversary of Labour's 2024 election victory. At the time, many commentators called it 'historic'. Even if Labour's winning vote – both in numbers and percentage – was one of the lowest in modern times, the party's parliamentary majority of 174 was indeed among the largest ever. A year on, however, and it is difficult to point to a single achievement for future historians to compare with those of the Attlee, Wilson or Blair administrations. In fact, the conviction is hardening, even among Sir Keir Starmer's loyalists, that the party's first year in office has been wasted. Even worse, the Prime Minister gives the impression of a man who has lost his way. His policies, strategy and tactics swing about wildly, almost from day to day. Last month he talked tough on migration, setting his face against allowing Britain to become 'an island of strangers'. Yesterday, he confessed in an interview that had no idea that his most memorable phrase was an echo of the jeremiads of Enoch Powell: ' I deeply regret using it.' It has been a similar story across the board: a prime minister who appeals to the public one minute and then protests that he did not mean a word of it. Or who claims to be unshakeable until the polls persuade him to ditch his policy and his comrades. Notoriously, he changed sides on transgender and other culture war issues. This month alone, he has U-turned on grooming gangs, by conceding a national inquiry, and on winter fuel payments. At first he backed Israel, but only until it became inconvenient to do so. On Iran, his position is so muddled that his own ministers are reduced to speechlessness. His tergiversations on foreign affairs have prompted the US and other allies to leave us in the dark at a crucial time. But the most obvious case in point is welfare. If a Labour prime minister with a large majority cannot reform welfare, what is the point of him? Having initially promised to get a grip on the ballooning cost of disability and sickness benefits, Sir Keir backed what was trumpeted as a 'welfare reform', though in truth it was merely a modest package of cuts. Even this feeble attempt to slow the rate of increase, however, was enough to provoke cries of betrayal from the massed ranks of the Parliamentary Labour Party. After over 120 backbenchers had threatened to rebel when the Bill returns to the Commons next Tuesday, the Prime Minister lost his nerve. After days of disarray, with briefings flying in all directions, he finally caved in, watered down the Bill and mortgaged his own political future to the rebels. The net effect of Sir Keir's concessions is to reduce the promised savings by some estimates by more than half, from about £5 billion by 2030 to perhaps just £2 billion. The balance will have to be found from higher taxes, more borrowing or both. But these numbers are merely a fraction of the sums that Rachel Reeves will have to find in her next Budget, just a few months from now. At the Nato summit, the Prime Minister was bounced into a pledge to raise defence spending at a faster rate than at any time since the Cold War. Yet at present, we are spending more on sickness and disability benefits (£65 billion) than on defence (£57 billion). Next week the 10 Year Health Plan will put the focus back on the NHS, on which spending has risen rapidly without reducing waiting lists significantly. Despite (or because of) inflation-busting deals to end the strikes, doctors are still demanding huge pay rises. Meanwhile the economy is crippled by the effects of another Starmer U-turn: the hike in employers' National Insurance contributions, breaking a solemn manifesto promise. Together with the extension of inheritance tax to farmers, family businesses and pensions, this is blighting the prospect of serious growth. The middle classes are squeezed by the effects of fiscal drag, with seven million people now paying higher rate income tax, and by VAT on school fees. Not only has this been a wasted year, but Labour's legacy threatens to turn Britain into a wasteland. It was Sir Keir Starmer's duty to tackle welfare, as only a man of the Left could. He has failed. The rest is silence.

Driver, 20, who inhaled laughing gas moments before he hit and killed cyclist, 81, on pedestrian crossing faces a 'very long time in jail'
Driver, 20, who inhaled laughing gas moments before he hit and killed cyclist, 81, on pedestrian crossing faces a 'very long time in jail'

Daily Mail​

time19 hours ago

  • Daily Mail​

Driver, 20, who inhaled laughing gas moments before he hit and killed cyclist, 81, on pedestrian crossing faces a 'very long time in jail'

A driver who allegedly inhaled laughing gas just moments before he hit and killed an elderly cyclist on a pedestrian crossing faces a lengthy spell in jail, a court has heard. Cain Byrne, 20, smashed into Graham Slinn, 81, as he walked across the A57 near Todwick, South Yorkshire beside his bicycle, prosecutor Laura Marshall told Sheffield Crown Court. The motorist, who has never held a driving licence, is said to have ignored a red light while driving his Volkswagen Golf, throwing the victim at least 15ft in the air. Witnesses claimed Byrne made no attempt to stop and was travelling at speeds above the 50mph limit, with some saying he was driving at 80mph. He allegedly sped off after the collision on April 4, with dashcam footage showing his tyres smoking as he left the scene. Clips shown in court on Friday showed the defendant inhaling nitrous oxide gas from a yellow balloon as he was driving, both before and after the collision. Father-of-two Byrne admitted causing death by dangerous driving and a number of other offences at a previous hearing. He was due to be sentenced on Friday but, after hearing about his 'astonishing and appalling' driving record, Judge Jeremy Richardson KC ordered a report prepared by probation officers. Ms Marshall told the judge that Byrne had a range of convictions for 27 offences, including dangerous driving, despite having no driving licence. Rebecca Stephens, defending, told the court her client drove off because he believed he had only hit another vehicle with his wing mirror. Judge Richardson responded to this claim, saying: 'This shows how completely inebriated he was.' Ms Stephens told the court that her client had written a letter expressing his remorse for what he had done. She said Byrne had lost two brothers in traumatic circumstances: one in a car accident when he was 11; and the other being stabbed to death when he was 17. Judge Richardson said he also accepted the defendant had a 'very deprived background in every conceivable way'. In a statement read to the judge on Friday, Mr Slinn's wife, Jaqueline, described how she and her husband had been due to celebrate their 60th wedding anniversary this year. Mrs Slinn explained how the couple met through a love of cycling and her husband had a life-long love of riding his bike, which he did multiple times a week, despite his age. She said Mr Slinn worked as a scaffolder until he had to retire early following a heart attack, but he then helped care for adults with learning disabilities. He was also a keen singer who would perform in pubs and clubs in Sheffield. Mrs Slinn said: '60 years of marriage, almost, wiped out by the defendant.' Judge Richardson remanded Byrne in custody, saying: 'This young man is utterly, utterly out of control.' Telling the defendant he will now be sentenced on July 21, he said: 'For nearly 60 years Mr and Mrs Slinn lived thoroughly decent lives. 'I have heard quite a lot about Mr Slinn today and he seemed to have been a very good man.' Judge Richardson told Byrne: 'They were going to celebrate in the very near future their diamond wedding anniversary. 'That will not happen, and the reason that will not happen is because you drove a motor car when had no driving licence and had a truly astonishing and appalling driving record for someone aged 20 years. 'You drove that car with cloned licence plates at great speed, well in excess of the speed limit, on a dual carriageway, straight through a red light. And, you hit Mr Slinn as he was perfectly lawfully crossing the road.' The judge described how Bryne drove off with him and two others in the car with him inhaling nirous oxide. He said that, after killing Mr Slinn, he went about his business 'as if you did not have a care in the world'. Judge Richardson said: 'You come from a disordered family. You have led a disordered life. You were, at the material time, completely out of control.' He told him: 'You are facing a very, very long time in custody, this case demands that. This is about as bad as it gets'. After his death in April, Mr Slinn's family issued a statement through police which said: 'He was gentle. Funny. Kind to his core. And now he's gone. He and my mum were about to celebrate 60 years of marriage. 'Now she faces silence, heartbreak, and a future without the man who made her laugh every day.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store