Trump touts flood of foreign investments, but local economic officials aren't yet seeing it
To the contrary, economic development officials and lawmakers from several states say that the uncertainty fueled by Trump's on-again, off-again trade wars is keeping many foreign businesses from pouring money into the U.S. market right now. And it signals the uneven impact the tariffs are having on reshoring American manufacturing — Trump's stated goal for raising rates to the highest levels in a century.
'One of our contacts described it to me as driving a car in the fog,' Lee Lilley, North Carolina's Commerce Secretary, said in an interview Tuesday at the Commerce Department's SelectUSA Summit, an annual conference aimed at promoting foreign investment in the U.S. 'You're driving along, the fog descends, you slow the car down. Depending on how bad the fog is, you might pull the car over and turn on the blinkers. And we feel like we're in that space a little bit.'
Buffeted by news of companies raising prices as a result of the president's dramatic tariff increases, the Trump administration has made economic development pledges a centerpiece of its messaging strategy. As businesses across the country fret over the administration's global trade war, the White House has responded by releasing a running list of billion-dollar commitments from major companies, a sign, the president and his aides argue, that his economic strategy is working by forcing more companies to build their products in the U.S.
'There's never been anything like what's happening right now to the United States, I can tell you. Nothing,' Trump said at a roundtable in the United Arab Emirates, part of a multi-day swing through the Middle East where the president touted a slew of new foreign investments. He claimed that, as a result, the U.S. is headed toward $12 trillion in investments since he took office. 'There's never been anything like it. We're at a level that no country has seen.'
The White House, however, is indiscriminate about what announcements it claims come from 'the Trump effect.' Some have been in the works for yearsbefore they are announced. Others are in line with what the company would have invested, regardless of the tariffs. Some are inflated, adding previous investments to new pledges.
The reality for economic developers is more complicated. Officials work for years building relationships that can one day, hopefully, translate into hundreds, or even thousands, of well-paying jobs. They go to conferences, chat up companies and foreign investors, tune-up their workforce development programs at community colleges and attempt to carve out a tax landscape that will help lure business.
'These are large investments that businesses are making and they're going to do them thoughtfully and they're going to take time,' said Barbara Coffee, the director of economic initiatives for the City of Tucson, Arizona. 'When they're doing site searches, just to determine the location, it takes years, two and three years.'
Some major companies have leaned into Trump's affinity for splashy investment announcements. Apple announced a $500 billion investment in February, promising to expand facilities across nine states and create a new factory in Texas. But that spending may have already been planned, according to the Wall Street Journal.
Kush Desai, a spokesperson for the White House, said the administration is focused on laying the groundwork for future investment, noting that gross domestic investment spiked by 22 percent in the first quarter of 2025. That, however, was before most of the president's most dramatic tariff increases took effect.
'The Trump administration is using a multifaceted and nuanced approach to deliver economic relief for the American people while laying the groundwork for a long-term restoration of American Greatness,' Desai said. 'President Trump's tariffs are driving historic investments into the United States in conjunction with a full suite of supply-side reforms, from deregulation to historic tax cuts.'
While a favorite benchmark for both Democratic and Republican lawmakers alike, economic development pledges are notoriously difficult to pin down. Companies sometimes fail to follow through with the plan, or spread out the investment over a longer period of time depending on economic circumstances. Congress even passed a law in 1995 that encourages businesses to put a disclaimer on news releases about investment decisions, saying that they are subject to change.
The Trump administration has been so eager to show signs of economic growth that it has celebrated companies that are merely 'considering' increasing production in the United States. In April, as the markets were see-sawing after Trump paused his global tariffs, the Trump administration highlighted news articles that French luxury goods giant LVMH was considering expanding its U.S. footprint, that the olive oil company Dcoop was pondering whether to increase U.S. production and that BMW was considering adding shifts to U.S. factories.
While BMW has yet to officially add shifts, other auto manufacturers have highlighted similar moves. Last week, Honda announced that it would move production of its popular CRV from Ontario to the U.S., the latest blow to the Canadian auto manufacturing industry as Trump has a 25 percent tariff on vehicles imported into the U.S.
But those announcements may conceal the economic reality. Even as the administration has touted decisions from auto companies like Honda and Stellantis to move production to the U.S., auto manufacturing jobs are down 20.8 percent from 2024, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics. Auto manufacturing jobs fell 4.7 percent between March and April, when Trump's 25 percent tariffs on foreign auto imports went into effect.
Other industries are watching the domestic economic and political climate as well. Despite a $50 billion investment pledge, Roche, a pharmaceutical company, said it was evaluating that pledge after Trump issued an executive order aimed at driving down drug prices.
'We still intend to invest $50 billion in pharmaceutical R&D and manufacturing and diagnostics in the U.S.,' said Dean Mastrojohn, a spokesperson for Roche. 'However, should the EO go into effect, the business reality is that the pharma industry would need to review its expenses, including investments.'
The sense of economic uncertainty has unsettled lawmakers from both political parties. While Sen. Ron Johnson (R-Wisc.) has thus far been unwilling to sign onto legislation to remove Trump's power to impose tariffs or implement trade deals unilaterally, Johnson said Wednesday at a POLITICO Live event that he's concerned about how uncertainty surrounding tariffs is affecting businesses in his state.
'What I'm hearing from Wisconsin businesses, manufacturers, the National Association of Manufacturers, The Business Roundtable, is right now investment is on hold,' said Johnson. 'Again. I come from the private sector. You want as much certainty and stability' as possible.
Despite Trump's fast-changing policies, local economic development officials say businesses continue to express interest in making investments. Officials from several states said in interviews at the SelectUSA Summit that they have plenty of new investment deals in their pipeline, even if they are slower to make a major decision amid the current uncertainty.
'I would say it hasn't come to a full stop,' Michelle Grinnell, the senior vice president for market growth and business attraction in Michigan. 'Some of those timelines have slowed a little bit, especially projects that are maybe earlier in the process are taking a minute. But projects that have been moving forward and are a little more mature in the process, we're seeing those continue.'
Still, investments are projected to slow in 2025, according to industry analysts. The consulting firm Deloitte projected that investments would slow slightly from 3.7 percent 2024, before picking up significantly once the upheaval produced by the administration's trade and tax policy fades.
That's a hopeful sign for local officials like Lilley, who's eager to bring more jobs to North Carolina's growing population.
'I think the more we can get that certainty back, the more our investors can pencil out the project and decide where it works and when it works and on what timeline,' Lilley said. 'Because the capital is clearly there, the demand is really there.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
22 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Pete Hegseth's Senior Advisor Justin Fulcher Resigns from the Pentagon After 6 Months
"We wish him well in his future endeavors," Chief Pentagon Spokesman Sean Parnell said in a statementNEED TO KNOW Justin Fulcher, who served as a senior advisor to Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth, has departed from the Pentagon after six months "This is just the beginning," he wrote in a statement on X Fulcher made headlines in April when he allegedly accused a colleague of calling the Pentagon police on himJustin Fulcher, who served as a senior advisor to Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth, has departed from the Pentagon after six months. Fulcher announced his exit in a statement shared on X on Saturday, July 19. "As planned, I've completed 6 months of service in government to my country," he wrote. "Working alongside the dedicated men and women of the Department of Defense has been incredibly inspiring," Fulcher continued. Reflecting on his time in office, the former aide said, "Revitalizing the warrior ethos, rebuilding the military, and reestablishing deterrence are just some of the historic accomplishments I'm proud to have witnessed. Still, this is just the beginning." Fulcher then expressed his gratitude to Hegseth for his "decisive leadership" and to President Donald Trump for his "continued confidence in our team." "I'm grateful to both, and to the extraordinary civilians and service members who turn vision into action every day," Fulcher wrote, then adding that he will continue to support "all future endeavors" of the Department of Defense. In a statement shared with PEOPLE, Chief Pentagon Spokesman Sean Parnell said, "The Department of Defense is grateful to Justin Fulcher for his work on behalf of President Trump and Secretary Hegseth. We wish him well in his future endeavors." Fulcher previously worked in the Department of Defense as part of Elon Musk's Department of Government Efficiency, according to CBS News. Three sources claimed to the outlet that Fulcher was "ousted" from the department. Hegseth's office has lost three other staff members this year alone, including senior adviser Dan Caldwell and deputy chief of staff Dan Selnick, who were both fired, and chief of staff Joe Kasper, who transitioned into a new role, per CBS News. Fulcher made headlines in April when he allegedly accused a colleague of calling the Pentagon police on him, The Independent reported. Never miss a story — sign up for to stay up-to-date on the best of what PEOPLE has to offer, from celebrity news to compelling human interest stories. Speaking with Fox Digital, Fulcher said he resigned on Thursday, July 17. Hegseth, a former Fox News host, was confirmed as the Secretary of Defense in January. His nomination in November 2024 was controversial given his sexual assault allegation from 2017. Read the original article on People Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
22 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Transcript: Rep. Jim Himes on "Face the Nation with Margaret Brennan," July 20, 2025
The following is the transcript of an interview with Rep. Jim Himes, Democrat of Connecticut, that aired on "Face the Nation with Margaret Brennan" on July 20, 2025. MARGARET BRENNAN: We turn now to the top Democrat on the House Intelligence Committee, Representative Jim Himes. He joins us from Connecticut. Good morning to you. Congressman, you are on the Financial Services Committee, so let's pick up right there. The Supreme Court indicated that the President of the United States does not have the authority to fire the Fed Chair unless there is cause. It sounds like the White House is trying to build a case that they have cause. If they go ahead with it, what happens? CONGRESSMAN JIM HIMES: Yeah, well, you know, Margaret, the last question you asked the Secretary, shows what a con man he is. And I just listened to his whole thing. And, you know, if you're over the age of five, you've dealt with hucksters and con men. Everything is going to be great in two weeks. By August 1st, we're going to have a deal. The American people are going to be so happy. Complete failure to understand the facts, right? He said that tariffs are paid by foreign countries. Tariffs are not paid by foreign countries. He said, Jay Powell is torturing the American people. Margaret, you didn't have the time, but if you'd had a minute, you would have said, wait a minute. There's a Federal Open Market Committee that is comprised of seven Fed governors, and all of the heads of the central bank offices around the country. That committee, comprised of people who have been appointed by Democratic and Republican Presidents, set the interest rates, right? So, this notion that Jay Powell is unilaterally stopping a decline in interest rates, which, by the way, in the of- in the face- for those of those folks who know a little bit about economics, in the face of up-ticking inflation, which we're seeing, would be absolutely bananas. So, what you just saw was a master class by a huckster and a con man who uses words like torture that are very, very dangerous words, not just for the economy, but for the physical safety of people like Jay Powell. MARGARET BRENNAN: Well, just to be clear, that's why I said it's not the Chairman's unilateral decision for exactly the reason you raised, that there is a committee that makes the decision. The inflation rate for the CPI was 2.7% if you strip out food- energy and food, which is more volatile, it's up two-tenths of a percent. So, that economic data is what we are pointing to there, not opinion on pricing. But, is there congressional pushback that can be done? I mean, what happens if there's a tweet that says the Fed chair is gone? REP. HIMES: Well, interestingly, inside the White House, and I don't know who it is, my guess is it's maybe the Treasury Secretary is saying, and this is a very difficult thing to say to a person like Donald Trump, that if you fire the Fed chair, either illegally, which they're happy to do, or because you trump up some baloney-like-charge associated with a renovation of the headquarters, there is going to be a massive market reaction, because you cannot lie to the capital markets. We saw this the day after Liberation Day, before we all were familiarized with the TACO trade. The day after liberation day, the stock and the bond markets took a nosedive. So, my guess is that somebody is saying to the president because he doesn't care if he follows the law or not, and the law is very clear that he can't fire the Fed chair. But somebody is saying to the President, the economic instability that gets caused when the cornerstone of the global economy and capital markets all of the sudden has a politically driven interest rate policy. I think that's the one thing that's holding them off. MARGARET BRENNAN: Congressman, we're going to take a quick break and continue our conversation on a variety of topics. We need to bring up with you on the other side of it, stay with us. [COMMERCIAL BREAK] MARGARET BRENNAN: Welcome back to Face the Nation. We are continuing our conversation now with Connecticut Congressman Jim Himes, who is the ranking member on the Intelligence Committee. Congressman, I want to pick up on that topic. Just a statement of fact here: A bipartisan Senate Intelligence Committee investigation found that the US intelligence community assessment of Russian interference in the 2016 election was correct. They deemed it to be so on a bipartisan basis. I'm saying that because today and yesterday, the director of the intelligence community, Tulsi Gabbard, has said that she is referring for prosecution former American officials she accused of treasonous conspiracy, a years-long coup against President Trump, because they assessed Russia had tried to influence the election. This is weeks after the CIA Director issued a report critiquing the tradecraft that went into that 2016 assessment. Is there any legal basis for any kind of prosecution here? REP. HIMES: None, absolutely none. Margaret, what you saw from the Director of National Intelligence, Tulsi Gabbard, was not just a lie, but a very dangerous lie, because when you start throwing around language like sedition and treason, somebody is going to get hurt. Now, you pointed out that the Senate committee, then led by Marco Rubio, a Republican and now Secretary of State, found unanimously that Russia meddled in the election to try to assist Donald Trump. John Durham, special counsel appointed by Donald Trump, investigated this, found that the Senate report was correct. Now, what Tulsi is doing it's a little sleight of hand, but it's worth focusing on. She is saying that the Intelligence Committee, early on, said that the Russians could not use cyber tools to mess with the voting infrastructure, the machines that tally our votes. And that was true then, and it is true now, though the Russians tried to break into a couple of states, you know, election technical infrastructure. They didn't do it, but it is well known and well established that the Russians hacked into the DNC and undertook any number of other influence operations, including buying reams of Facebook ads to discredit Hillary Clinton. That is not in contention, right? And what is horrifying about this whole lie out of Gabbard is, number one, it puts people at risk. And right now, you know, the mouth-breathers on MAGA online are just going out of their minds based on a lie. And number two, the intelligence community is full of very, good people who do their jobs every single day, and now they're watching their leader do something that each and every one of them knows is dishonest and it is a really, really bad thing for the safety and security of the American people when that dynamic is- is out there. MARGARET BRENNAN: That Senate report is online, the findings are there, but I understand your distinction there, and it's an important one in influence versus physical hacking. You're-- REP. HIMES: -- By- by the way Margaret, if I may- if I may, you asked about the referral. Here's the test. This is Epstein all over again. Criminal referrals. We're going to prosecute Barack Obama, you know, treasonous and seditious. Here's the thing, and I hope that 4, 5, 6, weeks from now- don't take it from this Democrat. 4,5,6, weeks from now, let's see if this administration, Tulsi Gabbard, accusing a former president of treason. Let's see if they bring charges. They won't. They won't, because there's not a judge in the land, not a single judge who will treat this with anything other than laughter that will be heard from the Atlantic to the Pacific in this country. So the test of this is 4,5,6 weeks from now, is the DOJ bringing charges? And the answer to that is no. And now we're going to be in Epstein world. We're like, wait a minute, treasonous conspiracy by a former president. Why isn't the Department of Justice bringing charges? And the answer to that question is that it is a lie. MARGARET BRENNAN: Understood. On the other topic, I want to ask you about as a Democrat, the New York Times-- the DNC-- is reporting the DNC examination of what went wrong in the last election is going to steer clear of the decisions made by the Biden turned Harris campaign. You were very direct early on in calling for then President Biden to drop out of this race. You don't parse your words normally. Do you actually think it is possible for your party to self-diagnose problems without looking at the presidential race itself in terms of the candidates? REP. HIMES: Look, we need to acknowledge and every- and all of America saw it on the night of that disastrous debate in the July before the election that Joe Biden was not going to win the election. That was not just evident in the debate. It was evident in the polling that his people were keeping from him. Okay, so that is a fact. Now, Democrats are a big tent party. We go from Joe Manchin, who's practically a Republican, to AOC who is a Democratic socialist. So, we always have a struggle in coming up with sort of one set of policies, one set of messaging, and it's particularly hard to do when we don't have a presidential candidate. You know, a presidential candidate, of course, attracts the attention, is sort of the one person who must run nationwide and speak for the party as a whole. Right now, we're having a lot of conversations with a lot of different views, and I understand that's enormously frustrating to Democrats who are so upset over the result of the election. But you know, other than fight back with the tools that we have right now, we've got to be introspective about what we have done wrong that resulted in a dramatic win by Donald Trump in 2020*. There's an awful lot of rage in the Democratic Party, and my message to my Democratic friends is fine. I get the rage, believe me. I was in the chamber on January 6, 2021, and worried for my own life. But the thing to do right now is to be introspective and ask yourself, what can we do better to appeal to more people, including those people that we have lost time and time again in elections. MARGARET BRENNAN: 15 months out from the midterm races. Congressman Jim Himes, thank you. We'll be right back. *President Donald Trump won the 2024 election. Former President Biden won the 2020 election. A new you: The science of redesigning your personality Would you go on a retirement cruise? ICE head Todd Lyons says agents will arrest anyone in U.S. illegally, not just criminals
Yahoo
22 minutes ago
- Yahoo
D-Wave Quantum (QBTS) Achieves Successful US$400 Million Equity Offering
D-Wave Quantum recently experienced a notable exit from numerous Russell indexes, amid its successful $400 million equity offering. While index removals can reflect shifts in a stock's perceived value or stability, the substantial capital infusion might support its future endeavors. During the last quarter, despite these index exits, D-Wave Quantum saw a significant share price increase of 203%, outperforming a flat broader market alongside its ongoing developments such as the launch of the Advantage2 system and a strategic collaboration with South Korean institutions. These factors likely contributed positively to investor sentiment and price movements. Every company has risks, and we've spotted 4 warning signs for D-Wave Quantum (of which 1 is potentially serious!) you should know about. Uncover the next big thing with financially sound penny stocks that balance risk and reward. Over the past year, D-Wave Quantum's shares have experienced a very large increase of 1751.96%, highlighting substantial long-term shareholder returns. In comparison to the US Software industry and the broader US market, which returned 26.3% and 14.8% respectively over the past year, D-Wave's performance has been exceptional. The considerable capital infusion from the $400 million equity offering mentioned in the introduction might aid in supporting D-Wave's revenue growth, which is forecasted to increase by 35% annually. However, despite recent share price surges and a closing price of $18.89, the current share price exceeds the consensus analyst price target of $16.57, indicating a potential overvaluation relative to market expectations. This price movement, juxtaposed with the company's ongoing unprofitability, raises questions about earnings forecasts in the near term. Learn about D-Wave Quantum's future growth trajectory here. This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned. Companies discussed in this article include QBTS. This article was originally published by Simply Wall St. Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@