&w=3840&q=100)
Emerging Asia turns away from dollar as confidence in US fades
The US dollar, long considered the cornerstone of international finance, appears to be losing its lustre in Asia, as countries across the continent embrace de-dollarisation. Analysts at Societe Generale and observers across Asia are noting that the greenback's appeal is being undermined by both geopolitical tensions and structural changes in global trade.
As reported by the South China Morning Post, the dollar's decline is being accelerated by rising interest in national currencies, scepticism about US economic policy and the long-term effects of the Trump-era tariff wars.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
According to a Societe Generale report led by Frank Benzimra, the shift away from US-dollar assets is gaining strength. The French bank attributed this trend to eroding confidence in dollar stability, a slowing US economy and declining oil prices since crude oil is priced in USD.
The first half of the year saw an 11 per cent drop in the US dollar index, marking its worst performance since 1973. This dramatic slump has pushed many investors toward Asia, where equity markets have offered better returns and currency strength.
Why Asia is leading the exodus
Asian markets are not only benefitting from the dollar's weakness, they're also becoming more proactive about using local currencies. According to Benzimra, currencies like the Taiwan dollar, Japanese yen and South Korean won have gained significantly against the dollar this year.
Meanwhile, the MSCI Asia-Pacific Index has risen by 12 per cent, nearly double the gain of the S&P 500. These developments, Benzimra explained, stem from 'contained inflation, benign growth, and additional central banking easing' in the region.
Adding to this, a report by Ksenia Muratshina in New Eastern Outlook provided a deeper geopolitical context. Muratshina argued that the rise of de-dollarisation in Asia is not just a matter of economic efficiency but a political necessity.
Asian countries, including China, India, Iran and Russia, have been actively shifting to non-dollar settlements as a form of financial sovereignty particularly in response to US sanctions and global dollar dependency.
Strategic motivations: From tariffs to sanctions
The Trump administration's trade policies, specifically the introduction of 'reciprocal tariffs,' are seen by many analysts as a turning point in global attitudes toward the dollar. Societe Generale noted that such moves led to widespread distrust and concern about the dollar's reliability as the world's reserve currency.
Muratshina echoed this by stating that Washington's weaponisation of the dollar through sanctions catalysed a reconsideration of currency choices, especially after the 2008 financial crisis and the US-China trade war.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
These events made it clear to many Asian nations that the dollar was not a neutral global tool, but one influenced by American geopolitical interests. In response, countries began seeking out trade mechanisms based on national currencies or bilateral arrangements.
Multilateral moves: Asean, Brics and beyond
Regional cooperation is reinforcing this shift. As New Eastern Outlook reported, multilateral institutions like the Eurasian Economic Union and Brics are increasingly conducting transactions in national currencies.
In fact, around 80 per cent of trade in the Eurasian bloc now bypasses the dollar. The Brics New Development Bank (NDB), under the leadership of Dilma Rousseff, is also working toward complete de-dollarisation, aiming to issue loans and securities in local currencies.
Asean, too, has jumped on board. The group's 2023 summit saw a commitment to expanding non-dollar settlements, which members believe will boost regional trade, shield economies from external shocks and reduce vulnerability to US policy changes.
As inflationary pressure from the US Federal Reserve's interest rate hikes created strain on emerging market currencies, the need for alternatives became urgent and clear.
National perspectives: China, India, Iran
On an individual country level, the motivations vary but converge on sovereignty. In China, the push to internationalise the yuan is framed as a long-term strategy to promote the currency as a global reserve option. The Indian government has set the internationalisation of the rupee as a policy goal, especially to provide flexibility for its trade partners who face restrictions or costs in dollar-based trade.
Iran presents a more urgent example. Facing severe US sanctions, the country has almost entirely removed the dollar from its trade and financial systems. Its central bank has developed mechanisms to facilitate foreign trade and maintain financial stability without reliance on Western institutions.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Southeast Asia's calculated caution
Southeast Asia is taking a more gradual, yet steady, path. Nations like Indonesia, Malaysia and Vietnam are experimenting with rupee and yuan settlements. Bank Indonesia officials have openly stated that using local currencies reduces transaction costs and strengthens macroeconomic stability.
The UAE and other Gulf states are following suit seeing currency diversification as a way to boost investment and protect financial systems.
While these countries are not rejecting the dollar outright, they are clearly hedging against overdependence. They are weighing risks and benefits before formalising permanent currency realignment, according to Muratshina's analysis.
A world without a single hegemon
Ultimately, de-dollarisation in Asia reflects a broader desire to create a multipolar global financial system. Rousseff of the Brics NDB believes that currency diversity in international finance is key to reducing economic asymmetries. It could ease burdens on developing economies, lower costs for imports and external debt and promote fairer global trade terms.
The sentiment is echoed by Benzimra, who noted that while US equities are still strong underlying structural trends—like de-dollarisation—are likely to reshape global investment flows over the long term.
In both economic and political terms, the consensus is growing. Countries in Asia are not just responding to current economic shifts, they are actively shaping a future where financial power is more evenly distributed and national currencies play a more central role in global commerce.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)

Business Standard
23 minutes ago
- Business Standard
Sports visa controversy: Why can't India deny a visa to Pakistani athletes?
Even as India and Pakistan remain locked in a diplomatic standoff, a new chapter is unfolding in cross-border sports. While cricket remains on ice—with both countries agreeing to play only at neutral venues until 2027—India has made it clear that athletes from Pakistan will be allowed to compete in other international tournaments held in the country. Olympic javelin champion Arshad Nadeem may not take part in the Neeraj Chopra Classic—an invitational event—but when it comes to qualifiers and multi-nation meets, Pakistan's presence is assured. Business Standard takes a look at the controversy over visas for Pakistani athletes: The clarity comes after months of confusion sparked by India's decision to suspend visa services for Pakistani nationals on April 24, 2025, in the wake of the Pahalgam terror attacks. The move raised serious doubts about the participation of Pakistani athletes in events scheduled in India, a country set to host at least a dozen major international tournaments in 2025. India opens the door—with conditions A senior sports ministry official addressed the concerns on Thursday, confirming that while bilateral sporting ties remain suspended, multi-nation competitions are exempt. 'We won't stop Pakistani athletes from participating in the international tournaments India is hosting,' the official said. 'Bilateral engagement is off the table, but the spirit of competition in global sport will be upheld.' This means athletes will be welcomed in events like the Asian qualifiers for the Olympics, World Championships in swimming, weightlifting, squash, and more—while the cricket pitch remains conspicuously empty. Pakistan hockey team to get visas The Pakistan men's hockey teams have been given the green signal to participate in two major upcoming tournaments in India — the Asia Cup in Rajgir, Bihar, and the FIH Men's Junior World Cup in Madurai, Tamil Nadu. According to a report in the Indian Express government confirmed the development, adding that any move to bar their entry would have violated the Olympic Charter. The clearance was jointly granted by the Ministry of External Affairs and the Ministry of Home Affairs, with the visa process for the visiting athletes already in motion. A senior official said that the decision has been formally conveyed to Hockey India, which has in turn informed its Pakistani counterpart to facilitate travel and logistics. Observers note that denying Pakistan's participation in these tournaments could have put India at odds with the International Olympic Committee. Such a move might have triggered disciplinary action against the Indian Olympic Association (IOA), given the IOC's strict stance on political interference and non-discrimination in sport. A history that changed the playbook India's current stance reflects lessons from 2019, when Pakistani shooters were denied visas after the Pulwama attack, prompting global backlash. The International Olympic Committee (IOC) accused India of violating the Olympic Charter and temporarily suspended talks on future hosting opportunities. That moment led to a key policy shift—India's written assurance that it would not bar any qualified athlete from competing, regardless of their nationality. Why rule 44 still matters? The IOC's Rule 44 remains central to the equation. It mandates that host countries must not discriminate on grounds of race, religion, or nationality. India's decision to honour this principle, even during political friction, protects its ambitions of hosting major events, including the 2030 Commonwealth Games and the 2036 Olympics. No government clearance yet for Pakistan hockey team: Tirkey Former India captain and current Hockey India president Dilip Tirkey has said that the board has not yet received formal clearance from the government regarding the participation of Pakistan's men's hockey team in two major upcoming tournaments in India — the Asia Cup and the Men's Junior Hockey World Cup. Responding to ongoing speculation, Tirkey told news agency ANI that while Pakistan is expected to take part in both tournaments, Hockey India has not yet received any official go-ahead. 'We've witnessed over the years how much global attention an India–Pakistan hockey match draws. Pakistan is scheduled to participate in both events we're hosting. But as of now, there's no clearance. Once we get it, we'll proceed accordingly,' he said. India is set to host the Asia Cup from August 29 to September 7 at the newly built Rajgir Hockey Stadium in Bihar, followed by the Junior World Cup in Tamil Nadu from November 28 to December 10. Pakistan's men's hockey team toured India for the Hockey World Cup in 2018. Apart from Pakistan, India will host Japan, Korea, China, Malaysia, Oman and Chinese Taipei in the next month's Asia Cup. Meanwhile, in the Junior Hockey World Cup, India and Pakistan have been drafted in Pool B alongside Chile and Switzerland. While the Pakistan hockey team is travelling to India, it remains to be seen if their men's cricket team will cross the border for the Asia Cup, which is scheduled to be held in India, the official host of the tournament, later this year. In February this year, the Indian team didn't travel to Pakistan for the Champions Trophy and played all their matches at a neutral venue in Dubai. It was also confirmed that the hybrid model will be adopted for all ICC events in the 2024-27 cycle, which will be held in India or Pakistan.


Hans India
24 minutes ago
- Hans India
Indian stock markets end week lower amid trade deal concerns, profit booking
The Indian equity markets closed lower for the week as investors turned cautious ahead of the crucial July 9 US-India trade deadline and the start of the corporate earnings season, experts said on Saturday. Both benchmark indices -- the Sensex and the Nifty -- slipped 0.7 per cent each on a weekly basis, as broader market sentiment remained clouded by global uncertainty and profit booking after the recent rally. The Nifty ended the week at 25,461, while the Sensex closed at 83,432.89. The indices had started the week with a strong breakout, but the momentum faded amid concerns over a possible delay in finalising trade agreements. However, reports suggesting an interim deal between India and the US helped limit the downside in the latter half of the week. According to Ajit Mishra of Religare Broking Limited, the pullback was largely driven by investors booking profits following recent gains. 'The cautious tone was evident with the looming trade deadline. However, optimism around a potential agreement between India and the US acted as a cushion,' he noted. India's fiscal health remained strong, supported by a robust Rs 2.69 lakh crore dividend transfer from the RBI, which helped contain the fiscal deficit at just 0.8 per cent of the annual target. June GST collections also remained firm, rising 6.2 per cent year-on-year (YoY) to Rs 1.84 lakh crore. Vinod Nair, Head of Research, Geojit Financial Services, said, 'The week saw some consolidation after sharp gains in previous sessions. Global cues remained mixed, and investors preferred to stay on the sidelines ahead of the US tariff decision." 'FIIs turned cautious due to high valuations, but support from DIIs kept the market from falling sharply,' Nair mentioned. From a sectoral perspective, defensive sectors like IT and healthcare outperformed, supported by stock-specific action and stable demand. Meanwhile, rate-sensitive sectors such as banking, auto, and realty witnessed pressure from profit booking. FMCG stocks also edged lower. Defence stocks, however, saw strong buying after the government cleared several high-value contracts. Technically, the market entered a consolidation phase. Bajaj Broking Research noted that the Nifty has formed a small bear candle with a higher high and low on the weekly chart, signalling consolidation amid stock specific action after the recent strong upward move. 'Key support levels are seen around 25,150–25,200, coinciding with the 20-day exponential moving average, while resistance is expected near the 25,600–25,740 zone,' according to Angel One. 'A breakout above this range could trigger the next leg of the rally,' the brokerage added.


Mint
28 minutes ago
- Mint
Why There Isn't a Best Chef in the World
(Bloomberg Opinion) -- In victory, top chefs are much like the classiest of professional tennis players: self-deprecatory, admiring of their rivals, grateful to their teachers. Two weeks ago, just after his restaurant Maido was proclaimed No. 1 among the 50 Best Restaurants in the World at a ceremony in Turin, Italy, Mitsuharu Tsumura told me, 'There is competition, but when you finish, you shake hands, you have a beer.' Unlike tennis and other sports, though, the world of haute cuisine doesn't really have a universally recognized ranking system like the Association of Tennis Professionals and the Women's Tennis Association. For those who point to the Michelin Guide, I will politely say the French tire company provides ratings not rankings. The 50 Best franchise certainly provides a glitzy showcase for some of the finest eating establishments in the world, but it's incomprehensive. The list has lots of Latin American representation, like Maido in Peru, but sparse North American luminaries. (One of my favorites, Atomix in New York City, placed 12th this year, dropping six spots; the next US restaurant isn't even in the top 50: Single Thread in Healdsburg, California, at 80.) Once upon a time, the best chef in the world was whoever was at the top of the French culinary universe. Paul Bocuse — who died in 2018 and whose name is enshrined in the Bocuse D'Or cooking competition in his native Lyon — was perhaps the most infallible of these culinary arbiters of fine dining. However, for about a three-decade span — from the very end of the 20th century to the onset of the Covid-19 pandemic — there was wide consensus that two non-French cooks were the world's most influential chefs. For the first half of the period, it was Ferran Adria of El Bulli in Spain. For the second half, it was Rene Redzepi of Noma in Copenhagen. Their primacy is reflected in the history of the 50 Best: Adria has won the top spot five times; Redzepi has done it four times. In 2019, the organization changed its rules, automatically promoting all past and future top-notchers into a 'Best of the Best' hall of fame. It was a way of getting new restaurants into the rankings while assuaging the older guard with apotheosis. The reform was a polite way to freshen up the list, but it unwittingly reflects a real change in the nature of the culinary world, one effected by the legacies of Adria and Redzepi. Let me summarize it by way of an anecdote. During a dinner, the Spanish chef, who is a friend, turned to me with one of the terrifying restaurant history questions he likes to hurl at friend and foe alike. Get the answer right and you are golden. Get it wrong and you'll get an hourlong lecture to set you right. 'What is the greatest lesson of El Bulli?' he asked me. Fortunately, a couple of months before, I had heard the answer — from Rene Redzepi. The Dane, whom I also consider a friend, had worked briefly in Adria's kitchen and has feted the Spaniard on his birthday at Noma. And so, I repeated what I'd learned: 'The most important rule of El Bulli is that there are no rules.' Adria smiled approvingly and I got no lecture. Adria dethroned the French as world champions with his genre-busting kitchen techniques; and Redzepi pushed the revolution further by turning Nordic notions into haute cuisine, further showing everyone that their local cuisines too could become global standard-bearers. You didn't have to be French — or Spanish or Danish. Today, I find it quite moving that among the James Beard Awards and nominations for best restaurants in the various US regions were establishments serving Filipino, Tamil, Thai, Korean, Mexican, Vietnamese and a host of other non-European cuisines. It's also inspiring that one of the chefs who got the most attention at the Turin ceremony was Pichaya Soontornyanakij and her restaurant Potong in Bangkok. Ikoyi, the highest-placed London restaurant at 15, has its roots in West African cooking. A quick round of interviews with top contenders for the 50 Best revealed a consensus for the cuisines with increasing global influence: Mexican, Chinese, Korean and Indian. It's going to be hard to figure on parameters that will allow you judge whether the wok hei technique of a Hong Kong chef is better than the bhuna caramelization of a top restaurant in Mumbai. Even as all this decentralization continues, the world of chefs seems to be settling into two semi-ideological camps. Or perhaps the word is egocentric. The 50 Best appears to be a favorite annual stop of Adria; his disciples have followed. Meanwhile, a more nebulous but just as influential group gathers around Redzepi, who not only has been taking Noma around the world (Kyoto last year; Los Angeles next) but also this year revived the MAD Symposium, which was legendary in the 2010s for allowing chefs to voice big and deep thoughts. Both men continue to project their authority and personality onto a cooking universe without a center of gravity. But chefs still like prizes — especially those with the label 'best.' I started this column with tennis players. If you believe that they are as gracious in private as their victorious personas on the podium, well, you haven't been watching enough matches with the athletes grunting, growling and scowling. Chefs share the same passions and instincts. This year at the 50 Best, a popular expectation was that the No. 1 spot would go to Bittor Arginzoniz's Asador Etxebarri in Spain's Basque country. Maido, with its celebration of Peru's Japanese immigrant Nikkei cuisine, has been working its way up the list for years, but Etxebarri, with its innovative grilling, has been one of the most influential restaurants in the world for a long time. Its chef is also famously fiery and competitive. So, despite his smiling demeanor in Turin, he was probably unhappy that the restaurant came in at No. 2. One foodie friend — who asked not to be named because he knows too many sensitive chefs — quipped that 'Bittor is probably so mad at the snub that he's only going to make Etxebarri better than ever, just to show everyone up. Better book a table now.' More From Bloomberg Opinion: This column reflects the personal views of the author and does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners. Howard Chua-Eoan is a columnist for Bloomberg Opinion covering culture and business. He previously served as Bloomberg Opinion's international editor and is a former news director at Time magazine. More stories like this are available on