logo
2 new stealth fighter jets will expand who's in the world's top air forces

2 new stealth fighter jets will expand who's in the world's top air forces

Ever since the introduction of the F-22 Raptor in 2005, 5th-generation fighters have been the undisputed kings of the skies.
These state-of-the-art fighter jets have characteristics like high maneuverability, advanced electronics, the ability to supercruise, and, most importantly, low observability to enemy radar detection. They are both feared and vaunted, and are at the top of the wish lists of the world's best air forces.
To date, twelve countries operate one of the four models that can claim 5th-gen status; the American F-22 and F-35 built by Lockheed Martin, China's J-20, and Russia's Su-57. That club could grow to twenty by 2030.
But it's not just the number of 5th-gen fighter operators that's set to grow. The even more exclusive club of 5th-gen fighter producers may get two new members by the 2030s: South Korea and Turkey.
While not traditionally global military powers, both countries are increasingly seen as rising powerhouses in the global defense industry and have been hard at work for over a decade on their own advanced fighter designs.
South Korea's 'fighting hawk'
Developed by Korean Aerospace Industries (KAI) and officially unveiled on April 9, 2021, the KF-21 is South Korea's first domestically-made fighter jet, which officials aim to upgrade to a stealth fighter.
Also called the Boramae or 'fighting hawk' in Korean, the KF-21's origins stem as far back as 2001, when then-South Korean president Kim Dae-Jung declared his country's intent to replace South Korea's aging F-4 Phantom fighter-bombers and F-5 light fighters with a domestically made fighter.
The first prototype was rolled out and unveiled at KAI headquarters in 2021. On July 19, 2022, it made its maiden flight, and on January 17, 2023, it reached supersonic speeds for the first time.
The KF-21 program has since conducted over 1,000 sorties across six prototypes, including weapons separation tests and an air-to-air refueling exercise. Two of the prototypes feature a tandem seat arrangement.
The KF-21's specifications are just as impressive as its development speed. The jet can reach a speed of Mach 1.8 (or 1,400 miles per hour), has a ceiling of 50,000 feet, and can carry 17,000 pounds of ordnance.
The KF-21 also has an advanced suite of avionics and other electronics, like an active electronically scanned array (AESA) radar; a cutting-edge system that uses thousands of tiny antennas to rapidly scan, track, and target multiple objects simultaneously. The two-seater variant is expected to be capable of teaming with South Korea's Low Observable Unmanned Wingman System (LOWUS), a collaborative combat aircraft under development.
Despite its impressive capabilities, the KF-21 is not a 5th-gen fighter, as it does not have the same stealth capabilities as its American, Chinese, and Russian counterparts.
While the jet does feature an angular design to reduce its radar cross section, it lacks radar-absorbent materials (RAM) across its entire body and does not have internal weapons bays, instead relying on ten external hardpoints.
Consequently, KAI and analysts often refer to the KF-21 as a "4.5 generation" fighter — in other words, an advanced 4th-gen fighter with some 5th-gen characteristics.
But that may not be the case for long. KAI has announced that it intends to upgrade a version of the KF-21 to a full stealth fighter. Dubbed the KF-21EX, these upgrades will include internal weapons bays, more advanced RAM coatings, conformal antennas (flat sensors embedded in the airframe's skin that replace protruding antennas), and possibly low-observable exhaust nozzles for engine exhaust and infrared signature reduction. Internal weapons bays are important for a 5th-generation fighter because external weapons produce sizable radar returns.
The KF-21EX may arrive by the late 2030s or early 2040s.
South Korea's air force signed its first contract for 20 KF-21s last year, with deliveries expected between the end of 2026 and summer of 2027. A second order of 20 more is expected to come by the end of this year. The country hopes to acquire 120 of the jets by 2032.
Turkey's 'king of kings'
Turkey's entrant to the 5th-gen fighter club, the TAI TF Kaan, is claimed to be a fully fledged stealth fighter.
Turkey had planned to replace its fleet of F-16s with a mix of high-end/low-end 5th-gen fighters since 2010, with the Kaan intended to form the low-end portion and around 100 F-35s bought from the US forming the high end.
But Turkey's expulsion from the F-35 program in 2019 over its purchase of Russian air defense systems forced the Turks to commit to developing the Kaan as a fully fledged 5th-gen fighter.
In the summer of 2019, state-run Turkish Aerospace Industries (TAI) displayed a full-scale mockup at the Paris Air Show. Construction on the first parts finished in 2021, and in 2023, the jet was finally unveiled to the public and officially named the Kaan — Turkish for 'ruler.'
A little more than a year later, the Kaan conducted its maiden flight, which was followed in 2024 by a second test flight.
With a wingspan of 44 feet and a length of 66 feet, the Kaan is similar in size and appearance to the F-22. TAI officials have said that the Kaan can carry up to 20,000 pounds of ordnance, though it has been reported that it can only carry 1,000 pounds internally; Internal capacity is important for a 5th-generation fighter because external weapons produce sizable radar returns. It is also equipped with an AESA radar.
That Turkey has the capability to build a 5th-gen fighter is not far-fetched. Formerly a Tier 3 partner of the F-35 program, Turkish companies provided some 900 components for the F-35, including the air inlet ducts, exterior panels for the airframe, weapons bay doors, and other structural components and assemblies.
In fact, TAI was one of only two suppliers for the F-35's center fuselage — a critical structural core that connects the wings to the airframe and partially houses the jet's fuel tanks, weapon bays, and a portion of its avionics.
The degree of the Kaan's stealth, however, is unknown, especially since it has several features that make it difficult to maintain low observability. The Kaan's two F110-GE-129 engines (the same General Electric jet engines on F-15s and F-16s), for instance, were never designed for stealth aircraft and lack features like specially designed exhaust systems and nozzles, which would reduce both high infrared signatures and radar reflections.
More importantly, it is unknown if Turkey has radar-absorbent materials for the Kaan. The Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey has said that it is developing "Radar Absorbing Multilayered Thin Film Surface Coating" for the Kaan, and TAI and Turkish officials have said that the Kaan has advanced technologies that make it stealthy, but there have been no official statements on the status of the RAM's development or its quality, beyond general claims of stealth.
Two more Kaan prototypes are under construction, with three more to be built before serial production begins. TAI expects to deliver the first of 20 Kaans to the Turkish Air Force by 2028 or 2029.
More producers, more customers
The KF-21 and Kaan will almost certainly be flown by countries that previously had no real hope of obtaining stealth fighters.
Fifth-generation fighters are hard to acquire due to their cost-prohibitive prices (often in the tens to hundreds of millions of dollars per unit) and complex procurement processes. Their advanced tech make countries hesitant to share them, fearing secrets could reach hostile powers, with sales typically limited to very close allies capable of fulfilling stringent assurances.
Cheaper fifth-generation fighters from producers with fewer geopolitical constraints and ambitions to expand influence through high-end arms sales could make acquisition more feasible.
As a development partner in the KF-21 program, Indonesia is slated to acquire 48 of the 4.5-gen KF-21 variant, though issues with funding and data theft may change that. Other countries have reportedly either expressed interest or been courted by KAI, including Saudi Arabia, Malaysia, the Philippines, the UAE, Poland, and Peru — though these countries would likely opt for the 4.5-gen variant.
The Kaan, meanwhile, has received a lot of interest. Close Turkish ally Azerbaijan became a partner of the Kaan program in 2023, which might make it the first foreign customer. In January, it was reported that Turkey and Pakistan may establish a joint factory for Kaan production, and that Saudi Arabia had expressed interest in acquiring 100 of the fighters. The UAE has also reportedly indicated interest in joining the program as well.
Ukraine, meanwhile, has expressed interest in both purchasing the Kaan and competing for a future contract that would see it be involved in the production of its future engines.
Even if the initial versions of the KF-21 and the Kaan do not prove to be as stealthy as their American, Chinese, or Russian counterparts, their development so far shows that the monopoly held by the world's superpowers on 5th-gen aircraft is likely approaching its end.
Moreover, it may also serve as something of a warning that more countries — including ones not seen as global or even regional powers — may field their own undetectable aircraft in the near future.
Benjamin Brimelow is a freelance journalist covering international military and defense issues. He holds a master's degree in Global Affairs with a concentration in international security from the Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy. His work has appeared in Business Insider and the Modern War Institute at West Point.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

CEOs globally brace for tariff turmoil with a new game plan
CEOs globally brace for tariff turmoil with a new game plan

NBC News

time29 minutes ago

  • NBC News

CEOs globally brace for tariff turmoil with a new game plan

Trade tensions are rising, forcing top executives to rewrite the rulebook on how their companies operate, where they invest and what customers buy. In interviews with CNBC this earnings season, CEOs across industries — from aluminum and aerospace to chocolate, banking, telecoms, and energy — sent a clear message: tariffs are no longer just a political tactic. As trade rules grow more uncertain and tariffs resurface in policy discussions, business leaders say they're rethinking everything from where factories are located to how products are priced. The old 'just in time' model is giving way to something more cautious: make goods closer to the buyer, ask for exemptions where possible, and stay alert to shifting consumer habits. This earnings season has been marked by currency swings, inflation, and political uncertainty. And in that environment, tariffs are no longer background noise. They're front and center in how companies are managing risk. For many in the C-suite, the threat isn't just about short-term costs — it's about staying competitive for the long haul. Build local, think political 'We are concerned about the competitiveness of aluminum compared to other materials,' Hydro Chief Financial Officer Trond Olaf Christophersen told CNBC earlier this week. The company is already passing U.S. tariff costs onto customers. But the deeper worry is how, 'some customers in packaging are already testing steel and plastic alternatives. That's the long game we're watching.' For Christophersen, it's not just a quarterly issue — it's a warning sign. And Hydro's concern reflects a broader shift: tariffs are speeding up lasting changes in how companies do business. One of the most common responses is moving production closer to customers. Ericsson CEO Börje Ekholm told CNBC the company's North American factory, opened in 2020, was a forward-looking move. 'We've had that 'Made in America' stamp for some time,' he said. The facility now helps protect the company from shifting global politics. Volvo Cars CEO Håkan Samuelsson is also focused on the U.S. 'We want to fill our factory in South Carolina,' he told CNBC, noting that the company is breaking operations into more independent regions so local teams can respond quickly to new trade policies. Pharma giant AstraZeneca is also pivoting its footprint, rapidly shifting manufacturing to the U.S. and planning a $50 billion investment in local operations. 'We have lots of reasons to be here,' CEO Pascal Soriot said on the company's earnings call. For others, localization is as much about sovereignty as it is about logistics. 'We are building data centers for American hyperscalers in Europe, but also for Europeans in the U.S. It's a conscious decoupling,' Skanska CEO Anders Danielsson told CNBC. 'Sovereign tech is a real priority.' Not every company can shift where things are made. Some are relying on diplomacy. Rolls-Royce CFO Helen McCabe told CNBC the aerospace firm worked with U.K. and U.S. governments to win exemptions for key parts. 'It's not just about tariffs,' she said. 'It's about aligning our industrial footprint to minimize any friction.' That kind of behind-the-scenes outreach points to a bigger change: trade policy has become a key part of business planning. More companies are factoring in government relations and political risk when making decisions. Price hikes, policy risk and volatility Even the most proactive companies can't prepare for everything. Some are eating the higher costs. Others are raising prices — carefully. Lindt & Sprüngli, the premium chocolate maker, raised prices by 15.8% this year to offset soaring cocoa costs, driven partly by export restrictions in West Africa. 'We saw only a 4.6% decline in volume mix,' CEO Adalbert Lechner told CNBC. But he admitted that U.S. consumers are becoming more price-sensitive. Givaudan CEO Gilles Andrier shared a similar view. 'Some of our natural ingredients come from Africa and Latin America,' he told CNBC. 'So we're exposed to some tariffs there.' Even companies with local factories can't avoid all trade impacts when raw materials come from abroad. For companies tied to commodities, the trade duties are just one piece of a bigger puzzle: unpredictability. 'The tricky thing was, it was non-fundamentals-based volatility,' Shell CEO Wael Sawan told CNBC, describing recent swings in the oil market. 'This wasn't a change to physical commodity flows. This was really sort of paper-induced volatility.' That, he said, makes it harder to plan investments or manage price risk. Even in banking, where the direct impact of tariffs might seem small, the consequences are showing up. 'When you price risk now, you can't just look at credit or liquidity. You have to model policy unpredictability,' UniCredit CEO Andrea Orcel told CNBC. That includes trade tensions, regulatory surprises, and election-related gridlock. This quarter makes one thing clear: policy is now a core business risk, not background noise. With elections ahead and industrial policy shifting, companies are localizing, diversifying, lobbying, and repricing faster than ever. Tariffs aren't just a cost — they're reshaping industries. When customers trade aluminum for steel or chocolate for cheaper treats, the threat isn't just margins. It's market share. So yes, leaders are building closer to home, pricing smarter, negotiating harder as they scramble to stay ahead of the next curveball.

Corporate America is not falling for the left's outrage over Sydney Sweeney's ‘good jeans' ad
Corporate America is not falling for the left's outrage over Sydney Sweeney's ‘good jeans' ad

New York Post

timean hour ago

  • New York Post

Corporate America is not falling for the left's outrage over Sydney Sweeney's ‘good jeans' ad

The left is trying its best to stir up a furor over the recent Sydney Sweeney jeans (or is it genes) TV commercial to ignite a backlash similar to the Dylan Mulvaney-Bud Light debacle. Sorry progressives, it ain't happening. Yes, there's lots of chirping from lefty columnists, purple-haired TikTok influencers, late-night hosts who are still employed, and assorted wokesters after American Eagle had the audacity to feature the attractive blond, blue-eyed actress expressing her sartorial flair in a pair of tight-fitting blue jeans. Advertisement 'Genes are passed down from parents to offspring, often determining traits like hair color, personality, and even eye color . . . my jeans are blue,' the 'Euphoria' star says. The ad ends with a voice-over: 'Sydney Sweeney has great jeans.' Blond women? Blue-eyed? Good genes (I mean jeans)? Oh, the horror! That's if you are listening to the leftist commentariat that still hasn't piped down weeks after the spot first appeared. The lefties are freaking because they think the jeans company is looking to bring back the bad old days, pre-George Floyd of course, when white blond oppressors ruled over American culture. Advertisement It's all very Hitler-like to the progressive numbskull class, but not to just about every other segment of American society. Most Americans of all colors and genders either don't care, or they know good genes and jeans when they see it. I know this based on lots of reporting on the mind virus known wokeness — the progressive orthodoxy that embraces everything from cultural Marxism, DEI and, of course, the oppressor-oppressed theology. We are a diverse country, and that's good. The wokesters take it to a level that excludes rather than includes. Good-looking white people, particularly if their hair is that evil shade known as blond, are nowhere near the intersectional matrix they demand for hiring or image making in their version of America. Advertisement That's why Sydney Sweeney, known more for her cleavage than her politics, has become a touchstone in our culture wars, and here's why the attacks won't work: Wokeness was once big in the business world, but notice my use of the past tense. Corporate America listened to these kooks for many reasons, including their own progressive management leanings, with disastrous results. They learned the hard way that most Americans of all races hate being proselytized with political dogma, particularly of the left-wing variety that pushes the limits of identity and gender politics beyond cultural norms. I chronicled this spectacle with a healthy dose of schadenfreude in my book 'Go Woke Go Broke: The Inside Story of the Radicalization of Corporate America.' Just a few short years ago, DEI was the norm; so was radical environmentalism pushed by asset managers through something called ESG investing. It was difficult finding a straight man or woman — God forbid a blond — who survived the Madison Avenue woke censor machine. Budweiser thought its customers were ready for a commercial featuring a half-naked trans woman in a bubble bath. Disney decided it could sell more kids programming featuring same-sex kissing scenes. Money managers like BlackRock thought they could increase returns by advocating environmentalism and de facto racial quotas on their portfolio companies. Advertisement All of the above resulted in some of the biggest brand-destroying disasters in modern business history. Marketing is a lot like politics. It's a business of addition, not subtraction. You build customers just like you attract voters, through messaging that unites rather than divides — or customers flee. There are exceptions, of course. Niche brands like Ben & Jerry's ice cream attempt and succeed at targeting the tree-hugger demo. Try this stuff on a mass audience and you will get the beatdown of the century. The predictable customer revolt impacted the businesses of Budweiser, Disney and BlackRock in such a measurable way that shareholders revolted, too, forcing some of the most progressive CEOs in the world to course-correct. That's why the Sydney Sweeney uproar will go nowhere with the people who matter most: Most American consumers, and American Eagle shareholders. Unless you're stretching it like Silly Putty, there's nothing inherently political about a pretty blond (dare I say 'All American'-looking) woman in jeans and pointing out the health of her genes to sell stuff. Zero. Zilch. Otherwise, Pamela Anderson would have been a poster child for Aryan Nations instead of the 'Baywatch' babe most American men and many women adored, and still do. Shares of American Eagle are up since the Sydney Sweeney ad ran, despite the backlash. NYU Marketing Professor Eitan Muller points out the obvious, telling Fox Business's Teuta Dedvukaj that the commercial 'attracts attention, drives Google searches, and boosts the brand. Yes, she does have great genes — and it rings authentic. That's what you want from an ad.' My bet: You will be seeing a lot more of Sydney Sweeney. Most men will be rejoicing, many women will buy the company's jeans. Management will be rewarded with higher sales and a stock price that matches. The attacks will ultimately fail for the same reason Mulvaney's tenure as a spokeswoman for Bud Light was so short-lived. Recall: The nation's Number 1-selling beer dropped to Number 3 and never recovered. Sydney Sweeney has both good jeans and genes and there's nothing the wokesters can do to change that reality.

Trump's tariffs leave a lot of losers, from Laos to Brazil. And there were no real winners
Trump's tariffs leave a lot of losers, from Laos to Brazil. And there were no real winners

Los Angeles Times

timean hour ago

  • Los Angeles Times

Trump's tariffs leave a lot of losers, from Laos to Brazil. And there were no real winners

WASHINGTON — President Trump's tariff onslaught this week left a lot of losers — from small, poor countries such as Laos and Algeria to wealthy U.S. trading partners such as Canada and Switzerland. They're now facing especially hefty export taxes — tariffs — on the products they export to the U.S. starting Thursday. The closest thing to winners may be the countries that succumbed to Trump's demands — and avoided even more pain. But it's unclear whether anyone will be able to claim victory in the long run — even the United States, the intended beneficiary of Trump's protectionist policies. 'In many respects, everybody's a loser here,'' said Barry Appleton, co-director of the Center for International Law at the New York Law School. Barely six months after he returned to the White House, Trump has demolished the old global economic order. Gone is one built on agreed-upon rules. In its place is a system in which Trump himself sets the rules, using America's enormous economic power to punish countries that won't agree to one-sided trade deals and extracting huge concessions from the ones that do. 'The biggest winner is Trump,' said Alan Wolff, a former U.S. trade official and deputy director-general at the World Trade Organization. 'He bet that he could get other countries to the table on the basis of threats, and he succeeded — dramatically.'' Everything goes back to what Trump calls 'Liberation Day'' — April 2 — when the president announced 'reciprocal'' taxes of up to 50% on imports from countries with which the United States ran trade deficits and 10% 'baseline'' taxes on almost everyone else. He invoked a 1977 law to declare the trade deficit a national emergency that justified his sweeping import taxes. That allowed him to bypass Congress, which traditionally has had authority over taxes, including tariffs — all of which is now being challenged in court. Trump retreated temporarily after April announcement triggered a rout in financial markets and suspended the reciprocal tariffs for 90 days to give countries a chance to negotiate. Eventually some of them did, acceding to Trump's demands to pay what four months ago would have seemed unthinkably high tariffs to maintain their ability to sell to the vast American market. The United Kingdom agreed to 10% tariffs on its exports to the United States — up from 1.3% before Trump amped up his trade war with the world. The U.S. demanded concessions even though it had run a trade surplus, not a deficit, with the U.K. for 19 straight years. The European Union and Japan accepted U.S. tariffs of 15%. Those are much higher than the low-single-digit rates they paid last year, but lower than the tariffs he was threatening — 30% on the EU and 25% on Japan. Also cutting deals with Trump and agreeing to hefty tariffs were Pakistan, South Korea, Vietnam, Indonesia and the Philippines. Even countries that saw their tariffs lowered from April without reaching a deal are still paying much higher tariffs than before Trump took office. Angola's tariff, for instance, dropped to 15% from 32% in April, but in 2022 it was less than 1.5%. And while the Trump administration cut Taiwan's tariff to 20% from 32% in April, the pain will still be felt by a U.S. ally that China claims as its territory. 'Twenty percent from the beginning has not been our goal. We hope that in further negotiations we will get a more beneficial and more reasonable tax rate,' Taiwan's President Lai Ching-te told reporters in Taipei on Friday. Trump also agreed to reduce the tariff on the tiny southern African kingdom of Lesotho to 15% from the 50% he'd announced in April, but the damage may already have been done there. Countries that didn't knuckle under — and those that found other ways to incur Trump's wrath — got hit harder. Even some of the poor were not spared. Laos' annual economic output comes to $2,100 per person and Algeria's $5,600 — versus America's $75,000. Nonetheless, Laos got rocked with a 40% tariff and Algeria with a 30% levy. Trump slammed Brazil with a 50% import tax largely because he didn't like the way it was treating former Brazilian President Jair Bolsonaro, a close Trump ally who is facing trial for trying to overturn his electoral loss and inspiring a riot in the capital in 2023 — recalling Trump's role in the Jan. 6. insurrection two years earlier at the U.S. Capitol. Never mind that the U.S. has exported more to Brazil than it's imported every year since 2007. Trump's decision to plaster a 35% tariff on long-standing U.S. ally Canada was partly designed to threaten Ottawa for saying it would recognize a Palestinian state in light of the humanitarian crisis in the Gaza Strip. Trump is a staunch supporter of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. Switzerland was clobbered with a 39% import tax — even higher than the 31% Trump announced on April 2. 'The Swiss probably wish that they had camped in Washington'' to make a deal, said Wolff, now a senior fellow at the Peterson Institute for International Economics. 'They're clearly not at all happy.'' Fortunes may change if Trump's tariffs are upended in court. Five American businesses and 12 states are suing the president, arguing that his April 2 tariffs exceeded his authority under the 1977 law. In May, the U.S. Court of International Trade, a specialized court in New York, agreed and blocked the tariffs, although the government was allowed to continue collecting them while its appeal wends its way through the legal system, and may end up at the Supreme Court. In a hearing Thursday, the judges on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit sounded skeptical about Trump's justifications for the tariffs. 'If [the tariffs] get struck down, then maybe Brazil's a winner and not a loser,'' Appleton said. Trump portrays his tariffs as a tax on foreign countries. But they are actually paid by import companies in the U.S. who typically pass along the cost to their customers via higher prices. True, tariffs can hurt other countries by forcing their exporters to cut prices and sacrifice profits — or risk losing market share in the United States. But economists at Goldman Sachs estimate that overseas exporters have absorbed just one-fifth of the rising costs from tariffs, while Americans and U.S. businesses have picked up the most of the tab. Walmart, Procter & Gamble, Ford, Best Buy, Adidas, Nike, Mattel and Stanley Black & Decker have all raised prices due to U.S. tariffs. 'This is a consumption tax, so it disproportionately affects those who have lower incomes,' Appleton said. 'Sneakers, knapsacks ... your appliances are going to go up. Your TV and electronics are going to go up. Your video game devices, consoles are going to up because none of those are made in America.'' Trump's trade war has pushed the average U.S. tariff from 2.5% at the start of 2025 to 18.3% now, the highest since 1934, according to the Budget Lab at Yale University. And that will impose a $2,400 cost on the average household, the lab estimates. 'The U.S. consumer's a big loser,″ Wolff said. Wiseman writes for the Associated Press. AP writer Christopher Rugaber contributed to this report.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store