New London-Stirling train service expected to begin in mid-2026
There will be four return services a day (three on Sundays) on the full route, with an additional daily return service between Euston and Preston.
This will provide more competition for several operators such as LNER and Avanti West Coast.
FirstGroup holds track access rights from regulator the Office of Rail and Road (ORR) for the route on the West Coast Main Line until 2030.
Trains will be operated under FirstGroup's Lumo brand, which currently runs only on the East Coast Main Line between London King's Cross and Edinburgh.
The new West Coast services were initially planned to start this year, but FirstGroup said they are 'currently expected to commence mid-2026 following the delivery of the trains and staff training'.
The company said the agreement with Eversholt Rail is for five Class 222 diesel trains, each with a capacity for about 340 standard-class seats.
It expects the services will achieve annual sales of about £50 million and a 'low double-digit' operating profit margin.
The Government started the process of renationalising all remaining franchised train services last month when it brought South Western Railway into public ownership.
Lumo runs on a separate open access basis, meaning it sets its own fares, takes on all revenue risk and receives no taxpayer-funded subsidies.
In January, Transport Secretary Heidi Alexander wrote to ORR chairman Declan Collier expressing concerns that the open access model can cause 'potential congestion' and result in taxpayers being 'left to fill shortfalls' in maintenance costs.
She stated it is her 'expectation' that 'the impacts on the taxpayer and on overall performance' are 'given primacy' by the regulator when it analyses proposals.
FirstGroup chief executive Graham Sutherland said: 'The mobilisation of our new service between London and Stirling is another important step towards rolling out Lumo as a nationwide operator and growing our open access capacity, a key priority for the group.
'Our investment and capabilities in open access rail have delivered reliable, value-for-money services, grown rail demand and helped to spur economic growth and connect communities.
'We look forward to doing the same on our new services.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
13 hours ago
- The Independent
Virgin's bid for west coast mainline rail route rejected by regulator
The UK rail regulator has rejected a bid from Richard Branson's Virgin Trains franchise for rail services on the west coast mainline (WCML). The Office of Rail and Road (ORR) rebuffed the application citing concerns over delays and cancelled journeys. The regulator also rejected bids from First Group's East Coast Trains, known as Lumo, and Wrexham, Shropshire & Midlands Railway (WSMR) The majority of existing services on Britain's busiest rail line, which runs between London, Birmingham, Manchester and Glasgow, are operated by Avanti West Coast. In a statement, Stephanie Tobyn, ORR's director of strategy, policy and reform, said: 'After thorough assessment of each application, it was clear that there was insufficient capacity to approve any of the services without a serious negative impact on the level of train performance that passengers experience on the west coast mainline. 'Additional services within the current timetable structure and planned capacity use would further weaken punctuality and reliability, not just at the south end of the WCML but elsewhere as well.' A Virgin Trains spokesperson told The Independent that the decision marked 'a blow for consumer choice and competition'. 'Virgin's proposed services on the west coast mainline would have delivered excellent value for customers and taxpayers alike by adding five million additional seats every year from a trusted brand with a track-record for delivering award-winning, reliable train services for its customers.' The government plans to renationalise passenger services on the route by October 2027 – a move Virgin is critical of. The spokesperson continued: 'Anyone who remembers British Rail would rather forget it. Competition improves services, increases rail ridership, and drives better results for everyone, including the taxpayer.' They went on to highlight their desire to launch passenger train services through the Channel Tunnel. 'For now, Virgin is focused on bringing much-needed competition to the cross-Channel route by igniting a new era in international rail services for travellers on both sides of the Channel.' The company announced there were 'no more hurdles' after a key regulatory decision by the ORR in March.
Times
a day ago
- Times
Virgin Trains' attempt to get back on to the railways blocked
Virgin Trains' attempt to get back on to the railways has been blocked by the rail regulator. The Office of Rail and Road (ORR) has turned down all three existing applications to run private company train services out of London Euston along the west coast mainline. The regulator says there is insufficient capacity on the line and it would affect existing passenger train and freight users. The ruling comes after pressure from Heidi Alexander, the transport secretary, for the regulator to clamp down on 'open access' train services because they might take income away from the government's renationalised Great British Railway (GBR). Virgin had planned to run services along the line to Glasgow as well as separate services to Manchester and Liverpool. The other rejected applications were from First Group, which wanted to run a new cut-price Lumo service to Manchester, and the French company Alstom, which had wanted to run a service to north Wales. Virgin, which ran the west coast mainline franchise for two decades after privatisation, immediately vented its frustration. 'The decision is a blow for consumer choice and competition,' a Virgin Group spokesperson said. 'We believe that given the opportunity, Virgin's open access routes could play a valuable role in delivering the high-quality train services the British public deserve and GBR wants to encourage. 'Anyone who remembers British Rail would rather forget it. Competition improves services, increases rail ridership and drives better results for everyone, including the taxpayer.' In a statement, the regulator said: 'ORR has concluded there is insufficient capacity on the west coast main line southern section for the introduction of any of the proposed services. 'To introduce any of these proposals would be detrimental to performance on the line and therefore all passengers and freight customers.' Open access rail services, which popped up during the years of privatisation, are operations run by a private company filling gaps in the timetable or the network and are run outside the ambit of the Department for Transport (DfT) without subsidy and retaining all their own profit. Earlier this year Alexander had warned the ORR that such open access operations risked taking revenues from GBR and the taxpayer and creating congestion on the network. The ORR said revenue abstraction was not the issue in its ruling: 'In the case of these three applications, lack of capacity and the anticipated impact on performance alone meant we could not approve them. As such, our duty to have regard to the funds available to the secretary of state was not relevant to this decision.' FirstGroup has been a leading open access operator, running Lumo, a London-Edinburgh service and Hull Trains. The services at times or on routes ignored by the DfT have proved to be highly profitable. It has already gained licences to provide new open access services between London Paddington and Carmarthen in Wales and London Euston and Stirling in Scotland. It is the operator of Avanti Trains' intercity services under DfT contract on the west coast mainline. Of the decision to block a new Lumo service from Euston to Rochdale north of Manchester, First said: 'We are disappointed. Open access services are good for the communities they serve, offering new travel options and reaching under-served stations, and giving great value fares for passengers. These operators bring significant private investment to both the rail sector and UK [train] manufacturing.' Alstom said it had spent two years preparing the Wrexham, Shropshire & Midlands Railway and had received encouragement and support from the DfT for the open access operation. 'We are extremely disappointed,' a spokesman said. 'We have received overwhelming support from local people, businesses, councillors and MPs, who all recognise the urgent need for this connectivity. We will now urgently seek to re-engage with the ORR and determine our next steps regarding the future of this vital passenger service.' 'A setback for passengers seeking greater choice' Open access train operations are a legacy of the gaps in the network or the timetable created during the privatised era, when private companies launched new services, taking all the risk without state subsidy, and reaped all the profit if they made it work. All current open access operations are on the east coast main line into and out of London Kings Cross competing with — or complementing — services run by state-owned LNER: FirstGroup's Hull Trains direct services to Humberside; FirstGroup's Lumo service to and from Edinburgh; and Grand Central, owned by Arriva, serving northern towns and cities. Tony Lodge, a research fellow of the Centre for Policy Studies and a long-term campaigner for open access, criticised the decision by the Office for Rail and Road (ORR) to block all three extant applications to run services on the west coast main line into and out London Euston. He said: 'It is a significant setback for passengers seeking greater choice, reduced fares, and expanded route options. Open access competition on the east coast main line has successfully delivered all of these, driving increased passenger numbers and revenue growth. The recent pressure from Whitehall to reject these open access proposals is particularly concerning.' Heidi Alexander, the transport secretary, had instructed the ORR to think very carefully about revenue abstraction and network congestion before green-lighting any new open access applications. Notwithstanding the unedifying precedent of ministerial interference in an independent regulator, Alexander will have been influenced by a look at the books of FirstGroup. As a Department for Transport contractor running the giant regional networks of Avanti, GWR and South West Railway, FirstGroup last year made a profit of £107 million on annual revenues of about £3.5 billion, a profit margin of up to 3 per cent. In the same period Hull Trains and Lumo made £34 million on annual revenues of just £106 million for a profit margin of 32 per cent, returns unprecedented on Britain's railways. Open access operations are minuscule compared with the network as a whole. As a battlefield for the argument of private versus public ownership, the issue could become a noisy cuckoo in the nest.
Telegraph
a day ago
- Telegraph
Branson's Virgin Trains revival blocked after government opposition
Sir Richard Branson's attempt to resurrect Virgin Trains on Britain's railways has been blocked after opposition from the Government. The Office of Rail and Road (ORR) confirmed on Thursday it had rejected Virgin's proposal to relaunch services between London and a range of major cities. As well as turning down Virgin's application, the regulator also snubbed proposals from FirstGroup and Wrexham, Shropshire & Midlands Railway (WSMR) over fears that the West Coast mainline north of the capital was already too busy. Virgin, which had planned to offer an alternative to state-run trains on the inter-city route, said the decision was 'a blow for consumer choice and competition'. It comes after the Government and senior Whitehall officials lobbied against the so-called open access applications, arguing that new services would have robbed Labour's new nationalised railway of vital ticket revenue. In a letter to the ORR dated June 20, Richard Goodman, director general for rail reform and strategy at the Department for Transport, said that new rail applications must 'deliver benefits without undue cost to taxpayers or existing passengers'. That followed comments from Heidi Alexander, the Transport Secretary, who told the ORR in January that it should adopt a more rigorous stance on private bids. The industry group Rail Partners said at the time that the Government appeared to be intent on 'creating the conditions for existing operators to wither on the vine'. FirstGroup, which was blocked from running trains from Rochdale to Euston via Manchester, said the ORR must be able to 'work without interference,' while stopping short of accusing the DfT of twisting the regulator's arm. A spokesman said the decision will come at a cost to jobs, private sector investment and growth. Virgin, which increased annual passenger numbers on the West Coast franchise from 8m to 42m during its 22 years in charge of the route following privatisation in the 1990s, had planned to provide services from London Euston to Liverpool, Birmingham and Preston, adding 5m additional seats. It would have competed with Avanti, Britain's worst-performing rail operator in the first quarter, with almost 60pc of trains delayed and 6pc cancelled. A Virgin spokesman said: 'We still believe that, given the opportunity, Virgin's open access routes could play a valuable role in delivering the high-quality train services the British public deserve and GBR wants to encourage. 'Anyone who remembers British Rail would rather forget it. Competition improves services, increases rail ridership, and drives better results for everyone, including the taxpayer.' The ORR said it reached its decision to block all three applications after concluding that the southern section of the West Coast route had insufficient capacity and that adding further trains would be 'detrimental to performance.' Stephanie Tobyn, its strategy director, said: 'It was clear that there was insufficient capacity to approve any of the services without a serious negative impact on the level of train performance that passengers experience on the West Coast Main Line.' Virgin said it would now focus on its bid to compete with Eurostar on the Channel Tunnel route to Paris and Brussels.
