IGP Kashmir reviews SANJY, Muharram security plans
According to a release, at the onset of the meeting, participating officers briefed the chair on the security arrangements planned for the smooth and peaceful conduct of Amarnath Ji Yatra-2025, Muharram, and other significant events. The officers shared valuable insights from past experiences, emphasising the need for robust communication channels, seamless coordination among forces, and advanced real-time monitoring systems. Discussions focused on strengthening the existing security infrastructure, enhancing surveillance tactics, and optimising personnel deployment along the key locations.
As per the release, IGP Kashmir conducted a detailed review of the security framework and directed the officers to ensure the installation of CCTV cameras at all strategic locations. He emphasised the need for adequate manpower deployment at each camp and in sensitive areas to maintain a secure environment. V K Birdi also stressed the importance of intelligence-driven operations, timely threat assessments, and proactive measures to mitigate potential risks, ensuring the safety of all participants.
The meeting was attended by DIG CKR Rajiv Panday-IPS, DIG NKR Maqsood Ul Zaman-IPS, DIG SKR Javid Iqbal Matoo, SSP PCR Kashmir, all district SSsP of Kashmir Zone and other officers.
The meeting concluded with a strong commitment from all the officers to ensure the smooth and peaceful conduct of the forthcoming events. (ANI)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
7 minutes ago
- Indian Express
What are the foundational values of civil services? (Part 2)
The Indian Civil Service stands as a cornerstone of our democracy, deeply rooted in ethical values that ensure not only efficiency at work but also pave a clear path for service aimed at uplifting the nation, its institutions, and individuals. In this second part on the foundational values of civil services, we continue from where we left off, addressing the question: What does it mean to be a civil servant with integrity and purpose? To address the case of objective decision-making, as well as behavioral errors at the macro and micro levels, a civil servant must possess the logical competency which Hegel referred to as a triadic movement, consisting of the dialectic illustration of thesis, antithesis, and synthesis. In such a case, self-knowledge reaches a stage where the subject and object are no longer different or distinct. Furthermore, to bring objectivity into decision-making, partisanship must be removed. A person must not take any side except the side of ethics, and thus reach a level where impartiality guides the decision-making process. If objectivity means remaining unbiased and being consciously certain or grounded in reason, then impartiality is that transparent conduct which is guided by fairness and equality. However, such states of reason depend on emotional stability, where the pain and pleasure of the self, as well as others, can be recognized. This can only be exhibited through the value of empathy, which is the highest form of emotional maturity. Ultimately, ethics deals with issues of morality and investigates the standards of moral judgment and the purpose of life. The value of empathy brings a person out of rival positions and prepares them to receive feelings—spoken or unspoken. Often, in a country like India, poor people feel frightened to talk to doctors, teachers, lawyers, bureaucrats, or even strangers. That hesitation and fear in communication have always been observed and remain vivid in public perception. Here, the value of empathy can bring the needed light of humanity, which is expected from those in power—officers who are diligent and astute. Objectivity, non-partisanship, and empathy are always needed in a democracy like India, where there is a huge gap in the purchasing power of the poor and the rich. Such values are relevant not only at the macro behavioral level but also at the micro, interpersonal level. Practicing these values consistently helps shape healthier personalities and minimizes internal contradictions like ego and inferiority/superiority complexes—especially within the services such as IAS, IPS, IFS, and State administrations. Values also help public servants build stronger teams, recognize others' contributions, and speak and act with maturity. For example, in the India-England Test series, more ethical conduct could have avoided naming a single player repeatedly in a press conference. Such restraint is part of ethical leadership. Ethical values also help in appreciating excellence, even amidst rivalry. That's why sportspersons like Tendulkar, Federer, or Jannik Sinner become role models—not just for their skill but for their humility. Values protect individuals from ego-driven conduct and promote emotional balance. By practicing these cardinal values, a person qualifies for the stage of integrity—the quality of having strong moral convictions and the will to abide by them in both professional and personal life. Given the impact a civil servant has on public welfare and resources, integrity becomes non-negotiable. It also enables officers to serve as ethical role models and provide effective leadership. Integrity naturally leads to commitment, the unwavering dedication to public service goals. Without it, the power or privileges of a position may derail a person from their duties. Commitment ensures that the officer remains focused on societal welfare rather than personal gain. In all interactions, cardinal values act like Kavach-Kundal (armor), freeing the self from ego and complexities, and evolving a person into their best version. If a civil servant succeeds in building trust, solving problems, promoting inclusion, and spreading peace and positivity, the purpose of public service is fulfilled. And that's exactly what the last person in a democracy is looking for—that person, that officer, being good. How does practicing cardinal values help a person attain integrity, and why is integrity non-negotiable for a civil servant responsible for public welfare and resources? (The writer is the author of 'Being Good', 'Aaiye, Insaan Banaen', 'Kyon' and 'Ethikos: Stories Searching Happiness'. He teaches courses on and offers training in ethics, values and behaviour. He has been the expert/consultant to UPSC, SAARC countries, Civil services Academy, National Centre for Good Governance, Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI), Competition Commission of India (CCI), etc. He has PhD in two disciplines and has been a Doctoral Fellow in Gandhian Studies from ICSSR. His second PhD is from IIT Delhi on Ethical Decision Making among Indian Bureaucrats. He writes for the UPSC Ethics Simplified (concepts and caselets) fortnightly.) Subscribe to our UPSC newsletter and stay updated with the news cues from the past week. Stay updated with the latest UPSC articles by joining our Telegram channel – Indian Express UPSC Hub, and follow us on UPSC section of The Indian Express on Instagram and X. For your queries and suggestions write at
India Today
an hour ago
- India Today
Centre ready for Op Sindoor discussion in Parliament, won't shy away: Kiren Rijiju
Union Minister Kiren Rijiju on Sunday said the government is ready to hold discussions on key issues, including Operation Sindoor, during the monsoon session of Parliament, which begins Monday, July 21. He assured that the Centre will not shy away from any topic and is committed to running the House after an all-party meeting, Rijiju said, 'We are open to discussing important issues like Operation Sindoor in Parliament. There must be coordination between the government and the Opposition to ensure proper functioning of the House.'advertisementWhen asked about the Opposition's plan to raise US President Trump's ceasefire claims, Rijiju responded that the government will address all questions inside Parliament, not outside. 'We will respond appropriately during the Parliament,' he said.#WATCH | After the all-party meeting, Parliamentary Affairs Minister Kiren Rijiju says, "This is a very good opinion. The all-party delegations to different parties in the aftermath of Operation Sindoor had gone down very well, effectively and all those great experiences must be ANI (@ANI) July 20, 2025 Rijiju also stressed the importance of constructive debate, adding that Prime Minister Narendra Modi is always present in Parliament whenever important matters added that the government is prepared to table 17 bills during the monsoon session and will respond to all queries during debates. 'We are ready for discussions with an open heart. We value rules and parliamentary traditions,' Rijiju all-party meeting saw participation from 51 political parties, with 54 members attending. Rijiju called the meeting constructive, stating that parties from all sides, NDA, UPA (INDIA bloc), and independents, shared their views and demanded debates on various Centre has taken note of these points and urged both the ruling party and the Opposition to work together. 'We may belong to different ideologies, but ensuring that Parliament runs properly is everyone's responsibility - Opposition's as well as Government's," ' Rijiju the issue of Justice Yashwant Verma, Union Minister Kiren Rijiju said that more than 100 MPs have signed a motion seeking his impeachment, which the government plans to bring forward during the current Parliament session. Rijiju added that the timeline for its introduction is yet to be decided and will be shared in due course."The government will bring an impeachment motion against Justice Yashwant Varma in this session. MPs have signed the motion for impeachment. Timeline can't be told right nowwe will decide and tell you later,' he said.#WATCH | After the all-party meeting, Parliamentary Affairs Minister Kiren Rijiju says, "In the Justice Varma case, the process will be undertaken together by all parties. This is not the move by the Government alone." ANI (@ANI) July 20, 2025Furthermore, while speaking to the media, Rijiju acknowledged that MPs from parties with fewer members often get less time to said the government will raise the matter with the Lok Sabha Speaker and Rajya Sabha Chairman to ensure fair time allocation and it will be taken up in the Business Advisory Committee (BAC).- EndsTune InMust Watch
Mint
2 hours ago
- Mint
The new Income Tax Bill: Will linguistic makeover lead to taxation simplicity?
India's Income Tax Act is getting its biggest rewrite in over six decades. The Select Committee of Parliament has unanimously adopted the draft Income Tax Bill, 2025, which proposes 285 amendments to the original draft tabled in the Lok Sabha on 13 February. The government has accepted most of the committee's recommendations, paving the way for its likely passage in the ongoing monsoon session. At first glance, the new Bill appears to simplify India's notoriously dense tax code. It's shorter, cleaner, and more intuitively laid out. But scratch the surface, and questions emerge: does a change in language truly make for a simpler law? A clean slate While the new Income Tax Bill boasts a significantly reduced word count—almost half of the existing Income Tax Act—this brevity is largely a result of smart formatting and presentation rather than a fundamental simplification of the law. Much of the detailed content that previously existed as dense prose in long-winded sections, sub-sections, provisos and explanations has now been streamlined into clearer tables, schedules, and structured sections. For instance, the existing bulky sub-clauses containing saving and investment avenues in section 80C have now been moved into a separate Schedule XV. This reorganization enhances readability and accessibility, but the underlying legal complexity and scope of the law largely remain intact. Words that matter The Bill replaces traditional legal expressions like 'notwithstanding anything" with 'irrespective of anything." While the latter may sound simpler, it lacks the legal clarity that decades of judicial interpretation have attached to the former. 'Notwithstanding" indicates overriding power—'irrespective" does not carry that settled meaning, potentially reigniting legal disputes courts had already resolved. Moreover, for a common taxpayer, both phrases remain equally opaque. Replacing legalese with plain language doesn't necessarily make the law easier to follow—certainty in interpretation matters more than tone. There's no change in the fundamental classification of income. The new Bill retains all five heads of income—salaries, house property, business or profession, capital gains, and other sources. These are simply presented in a neater layout. Key provisions, such as tax slabs, standard deductions, and the ₹12 lakh threshold under the new regime, remain as defined in the Finance Act, 2025. This ensures continuity and avoids compliance shocks—but also means that long-standing complexities such as capital gains computation, valuation rules, and transfer pricing remain intact. Provisos reimagined A major shift lies in how the Bill handles provisos. The 1961 Act used them to carve out exceptions to main provisions, often viewed as subordinate. The new Bill, however, replaces many of these with separate sub-sections. While this improves visual clarity, it can change legal interpretation—turning what was once an exception into a standalone obligation or right. This could reopen settled positions and generate fresh litigation, particularly when courts try to interpret these new standalone sub-sections. In an unexpected move, the new Bill dials back the codified certainty around faceless assessments and appeals. Instead of clear statutory mandates, it leaves much of the process to be prescribed via future government notifications or schemes. This opens the door to discretionary interpretations and potential confusion around procedure. The Bill explicitly grants tax authorities powers to access digital devices, cloud storage, and social media during search and seizure operations. Though these were often exercised informally, they now gain legal footing. This raises privacy concerns and the urgent need for clear procedural safeguards to prevent misuse. The real test ahead To its credit, the Bill streamlines definitions, introduces logical sequencing, and replaces dense legal blocks with structured tables and sub-sections. It also adopts more intuitive terminology—such as replacing 'previous year" and 'assessment year" with 'tax year." These changes will certainly help professionals and users navigate the law more easily. But true simplification requires more than a cosmetic facelift—it must reduce ambiguity and litigation, not merely restructure it. The Income Tax Bill, 2025 brings welcome clarity in format and a future-ready design. But tax law isn't just about how it reads—it's about how it works. The law's strength lies in the continuity of judicial interpretation, and rewriting it without preserving this context risks making it unpredictable in practice. The real test won't be readability. It will be how well the new law holds up—in assessment proceedings, in courts, and in reducing taxpayer disputes. Mayank Mohanka is founder, TaxAaram India, and a partner at S.M. Mohanka & Associates.
