Jersey politician creates website which ranks States Members on their contributions to the Assembly
This number is more than the 17 quietest politicians combined.
The data has been curated by Deputy Alex Curtis on a new website based off official records, revealing the highest and lowest contributing members in the States during this political period.
Whilst Deputy Tadier holds the top spot for talking the most, Deputy Richard Honeycombe ranks last, speaking just 1,109 words.
The website, 'digitalStates', was created by Deputy Curtis to make it easier for people to access and interpret public records.
As well as words spoken, it also ranks politicians in order of their contributions in the Assembly since the start of the political term in 2022 - the top ten are:
External Relations Minister, Deputy Ian Gorst, ranked 14th and says: "It is important that I'm held to account for my responsibilities as a minister and answer questions.
"I also like to contribute to those debates where I either have something unique or influential to say. But equally, one has to be mindful that one doesn't get so used to one's voice that we talk for the sake of talking."
The politicians who scored lowest on the contribution chart:
St Lawrence Connétable, Deidre Mezbourian: 148 contributions
Grouville and St Martin Deputy, Carolyn Labey: 142 contributions
St Mary Connétable, David Johnson: 131 contributions
St Helier South Deputy, Beatriz Porée: 99 contributions
St Clement Deputy, Barbara Ward: 91 contributions
St Clement Connétable, Marcus Troy: 80 contributions
Trinity Connétable, Phillip Le Sueur: 75 contributions
Grouville Connétable, Mark Labey: 38 contributions
Grouville and St Martin Deputy, Rose Binet: 14 contributions
St Ouen Connétable, Richard Honeycombe: 9 contributions
Connétable Le Sueur explains: "Quite clearly, if something has already been said, then there is no need to get up and say something, and therefore I only contribute when I feel my contribution will make an impact in the debate."
Analysing the data, Sir Mark Boleat, Senior Advisor at Jersey's Policy Centre, says: "I don't think the amount of minutes they have spoken for is a good test of how effective they are.
"There can be some people who can speak a lot and achieve a lot, some speak very little and achieve a great deal as well.
"And there are some who don't achieve a lot but go to enormous lengths. So it's not a good measure of effectiveness as to how many minutes they speak.
"People can chair a scrutiny panel that produces an excellent report and it doesn't require them to speak once.
"I think one of the problems with the Assembly is that people do think it is about passing laws, but we know what people are concerned about in Jersey, the cost of living, the health service; neither of those requires any laws to be passed, they simply require the services to be dealt with effectively.
"If there is going to be a league table on who speaks the most, then we are going to have much longer States' meetings with everyone feeling they have got to speak or they won't be in the league table."
The website also showcases propositions brought forward by different State Members with a breakdown of who has voted pour (for) and contre (against).
Deputies Steve Ahier, Malcolm Ferey and Max Andrews voted the most, while Lucy Stephenson, Philip Ozouf and Deidre Mezbourian voted the least.
Explaining his website, Deputy Curtis says: "There is a lot of content said in the States, hundreds of pages worth, sometimes almost every day.
"But it's not easy for us to go back and say, 'Well, what did so and so say?' or, 'I want to know every time Les Sablons or a development was mentioned'.
"Now I have built a way that people can do that. They can search for information in ways they haven't done before."
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
4 hours ago
- Reuters
US Justice Dept civil rights unit faces mass exodus
WASHINGTON, July 23 (Reuters) - The U.S. Justice Department office tasked with protecting peoples' civil rights has lost 368 employees since President Donald Trump took office, in a mass exodus that has coincided with a dramatic policy shift away from its historical mission of protecting marginalized populations. The staffing decrease at the Civil Rights Division, disclosed on Wednesday in a congressional memo, opens new tab from U.S. Senator Peter Welch, represents an unprecedented exodus of career officials who usually remain in their roles from administration to administration, regardless of political party. He said DOJ provided the figures to his office on July 15. Prior to Trump's inauguration, the division employed more than 400 attorneys. Reuters could not determine how many of the departed 368 officials worked as attorneys, as opposed to other roles such as office support staff. Of those who left, 270 took the government's deferred retirement program while 98 resigned. Welch, a Democrat from Vermont, released the figures ahead of a Senate Judiciary subcommittee hearing on Wednesday where Harmeet Dhillon, Trump's head of the Civil Rights Division, will testify to Congress for the first time since her confirmation hearing in February. In his memo, Welch said that since Trump took office in January, the Civil Rights Division had disregarded its statutory responsibilities to enforce laws that prohibit discrimination, and had enabled civil rights violations to be committed against people and institutions as part of Trump's political agenda. The Civil Rights Division's mandate dates back to the passage of the 1957 Civil Rights Act, which was initially enacted to protect the rights of Black people by undoing discriminatory Jim Crow segregation, enforce peoples' voting rights and pursue hate crime cases. Congress has expanded the division's responsibilities over the years to include protecting Americans from discrimination on the basis of race, national origin, sex, disability, religion, sexual orientation, gender identity and military status. Dhillon has upended the division's traditional enforcement priorities and refocused them on Trump's directives mandating such actions as curbing the use of diversity, equity and inclusion policies, banning transgender youth from playing on sports teams that do not align with their birth gender and prohibiting transgender youth from accessing gender-affirming care. Earlier this year, Dhillon rescinded most of the investigative findings issued by the division during President Joe Biden's tenure, which documented widespread civil rights abuses by police departments against predominantly people of color or people with disabilities. She also nixed two pending court-approved settlements to implement reforms with the Minneapolis and Louisville police departments following the deaths of George Floyd and Breonna Taylor. The division's leadership has also ordered career staff to dismiss a variety of other ongoing civil rights cases involving discrimination against people of color, while simultaneously pursuing probes against jurisdictions and institutions it accuses of improperly implementing DEI policies. Dhillon and some of the division's other politically-appointed attorneys have also taken the unusual step of publicly announcing the targets of various employment discrimination probes, such as the University of California and George Mason University, over DEI policies or antisemitism. At the start of her tenure, Dhillon issued new mission statements to each section of the Civil Rights Division, some of which were previously reported on by Reuters. Many of the new mission statements appeared to omit key statutes customarily enforced by each of the units, while at the same time ordering attorneys to focus on other issues such as ensuring women and girls have "unfettered access" to sports programs that "exclude males." Welch's memo on Wednesday highlighted each new mission statement and expressed concerns with each of them.
The Independent
a day ago
- The Independent
US Olympic and Paralympic officials bar transgender women from competing in Olympic women's sports
The U.S. Olympic and Paralympic Committee has effectively barred transgender women from competing in women's sports, telling the federations overseeing swimming, athletics and other sports it has an 'obligation to comply' with an executive order issued by President Donald Trump. The change, announced Monday with a quiet change on the USOPC's website and confirmed in a letter sent to national governing bodies, follows a similar step taken by the NCAA earlier this year. The USOPC change is noted obliquely as a detail under 'USOPC Athlete Safety Policy' and reference's Trump's executive order, 'Keeping Men Out of Women's Sports,' signed in February. That order, among other things, threatens to 'rescind all funds' from organizations that allow transgender athlete participation in women's sports. The national governing bodies will likely follow the USOPC's directive.
Reuters
2 days ago
- Reuters
Fed reform may move markets more than Powell ouster
LONDON, July 22 (Reuters) - Changing the way the Federal Reserve operates or assesses the economy may have a more durable impact on policy and markets than firing the Fed boss. U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent added another twist to President Donald Trump's ongoing criticism of Fed Chair Jerome Powell on Monday by claiming he wanted to review the entire Fed institution and its performance. In an interview with CNBC, Bessent claimed the Fed's "fear-mongering over tariffs" without significant signs of inflation was justification for considering a root-and-branch review of the central bank's functioning. "What we need to do is examine the entire Federal Reserve institution and whether they have been successful," he said. "All these PhDs over there, I don't know what they do." It's not yet clear whether Bessent was merely heaping more pressure on the Fed to speed up interest rate cuts, as Trump has been demanding almost daily, or whether the administration is actually planning to conduct a formal review of Fed operations, analysis and execution. While recent weeks have been filled with anxious noise about Trump attempting to fire Powell, this latest development - possible changes to the way the Fed ticks - could be much more far-reaching and impactful than simply truncating the tenure of one Chair. Of course, the Fed Chair is an important role, and a politically motivated ouster would be a serious challenge to Fed independence. Yet the Fed boss ultimately remains just one vote on the rate-setting board, and the Fed's policymaking structure is partly designed to insulate the central bank from any undue political influence. The Federal Open Market Committee that sets policy is made up of seven Fed board members and five regional Fed bosses, but the FOMC chair and vice chair are voted in by the committee at the start of each year. The Fed Chair typically takes the helm by convention, but not necessity. If a majority of the FOMC members balked at a politically partisan appointee to the top job, they could theoretically vote for a different Chair of the FOMC in an act of defiance. But, regardless, the Chair is still only one vote. Changing the Fed's institutional structure would require Congressional approval, a process likely to be protracted as many Republicans, including strong Trump supporters, may be wary of tampering with the Fed. Moreover, a recent Supreme Court ruling also suggested Fed structures should be left in place due to "a special historical status". But influencing the way the Fed thinks, forecasts and operates is a different matter. To complicate matters further, the Wall Street Journal on Monday claimed Bessent counseled Trump against firing Powell, arguing that the current Fed Chair might sue, or Congress could drag its feet on approving a replacement. Both scenarios could result in a leadership hiatus that would see Joe Biden appointee Vice Fed Chair Philip Jefferson assume the role. Bessent argued the price of removing Powell now was potential market disruption and economic uncertainty for no real gain in influence compared with waiting for Powell's term to just expire in May, the WSJ said. Trump, already battling with the WSJ on another story, dismissed the report as 'fake'. Bessent said the decision was ultimately up to Trump. But the messiness of Powell's removal may be why the administration sees other pressure on the Fed to buckle on rates soon as more fruitful. After all, two Trump appointees to the board - Christopher Waller and Michelle Bowman - already arguing for immediate cuts and two more board positions, including Powell's, are likely to come up by this time next year. That would leave a majority on the board being Trump appointees - even though not the FOMC. SGH Macro Advisors' Tim Duy reckons that to reshape the Fed, the White House needs even more seats to shift the board - building a block of Trump nominees sufficient to out-vote the five regional Presidents that make up the rest of the FOMC. Without that, it leaves the Trump team trying to change the DNA of Fed thinking and a major review that shifts standing assumptions, forecasting patterns and public presentations may be significant longer-term. Current favorite to be Trump's pick for the Chair, former Fed policymaker Kevin Warsh, who is a known critic of orthodox Fed analysis, doubts there's a trade-off between jobs and inflation the way it's currently presented and claims rates can move lower if balance sheet policies were tighter. If markets think it's inappropriate to ease now, of course, then inflation expectations may just build on fears of undue political influence and long-term borrowing rates should rise. But it may not be that clean. "The goal appears to be to keep policy rates low while shifting U.S. Treasury issuance to the front end of the curve," wrote SGH Macro's Duy. "While excessively loose policy would be expected to raise long term rates, there is the possibility that Fed and Treasury manage the debt with an eye toward yield curve control." That's a delicate balance that might come off - but guaranteeing the Fed comes on board will not be easy. The opinions expressed here are those of the author, a columnist for Reuters -- Enjoying this column? Check out Reuters Open Interest (ROI), your essential new source for global financial commentary. Follow ROI on LinkedIn. Plus, sign up for my weekday newsletter Morning Bid U.S.
