5 takeaways from Trump's tariff tussle with Brazil
'The way that Brazil has treated former President Bolsonaro, a Highly Respected Leader throughout the World during his Term, including by the United States, is an international disgrace,' Trump wrote in a letter to President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva. 'This Trial should not be taking place. It is a Witch Hunt that should end IMMEDIATELY!'
Trump cited several other reasons for imposing the tariff, including rulings from the country's Supreme Court on American social media companies and what he claimed was a trade deficit with Brazil. The U.S. in fact has a trade surplus with Brazil.
But Trump's particular focus on Bolsonaro, who is facing criminal charges over an alleged coup following claims of a stolen election, is a particularly pointed step in a months-long series of tariff threats that have sought to twist the arms of foreign countries.
Bolsonaro served as Brazil's president from 2019 to 2022 until he lost to Lula in the presidential election. After he questioned the veracity of the results, thousands of his supporters stormed the country's Supreme Court, Congress and presidential headquarters.
Prosecutors called it an attempted coup, and Bolsonaro is now on trial facing criminal charges.
Here are five things to know about Trump's latest tariff threat.
Lula pushes back
Lula has vowed to retaliate if the U.S. goes ahead with the tariff, which Trump said will start Aug. 1. He issued a forceful statement Wednesday night defending the independence of Brazil's judiciary.
'Brazil is a sovereign nation with independent institutions and will not accept any form of tutelage,' Lula wrote on social media.
'The judicial proceedings against those responsible for planning the coup d'état fall exclusively under the jurisdiction of Brazil's Judicial Branch and, as such, are not subject to any interference or threats that could compromise the independence of national institutions,' he continued.
Lula has no power to shape Brazil's Supreme Court proceedings against Bolsonaro. Staring down the possibility of tariffs, he has prepared a task force to analyze possible reciprocal levies against the U.S., Bloomberg reported Thursday.
Several people close to the Brazilian president also said that he could use a fight with Trump to bolster his sagging approval rating ahead of the 2026 presidential election, the outlet reported.
US is Brazil's No. 2 export partner
The U.S. runs a trade surplus with Brazil, meaning it exports more goods than it imports. Brazil's biggest export partner is China, not the U.S., which comes in at number two.
Brazil, however, is a significant supplier of coffee for the U.S., accounting for about $2.4 billion — about a quarter of America's total coffee imports — between May 2024 and April 2025.
Coffee prices surged on Thursday after Trump's tariff announcement. Combined with additional tariffs on Vietnam, another top coffee producer, some industry watchers warn that coffee prices could rise for American consumers.
Brazil is also among the countries impacted by Trump's tariffs on steel and aluminum.
Trump-Bolsonaro bromance persists
Trump and Bolsonaro have enjoyed a warm relationship, especially when the two men overlapped in office. Bolsonaro has been nicknamed 'Trump of the Tropics,' and the two men effectively backed each other's bid for reelection after their first terms — and when they lost, they both called into question the validity of their respective results.
Bolsonaro's son Eduardo also has close ties to several Trump advisers, including MAGA strategist Steve Bannon and Donald Trump Jr., Time reported.
Bolsonaro even decamped to Florida after his supporters stormed Brazilian government buildings in an attempt to restore him to power. He largely kept a low profile, posting on TikTok and attending a smattering of events.
President Trump came to Bolsonaro's defense earlier this week, comparing the former Brazilian president's legal challenges to his own stemming from the Jan. 6, 2021, storming of the U.S. Capitol.
'LEAVE BOLSONARO ALONE!' Trump wrote in a Truth Social post on Monday.
Tariff threats to twist arms
Trump's announcement is the latest of several attempts to wield the threat of a tariff with the goal of forcing a domestic policy change unrelated to trade.
In January, Trump threatened tariffs and visa restrictions on Colombia after President Gustavo Petro's decision to reject two Colombia-bound airplanes carrying deportees from the U.S. Colombia eventually agreed to accept deportation flights as Trump backed down from his tariff posture.
Trump's imposition of tariffs on Mexico and Canada in February were also intended to spur the two countries to crack down on illegal immigration and the flow of fentanyl and other drugs across both the northern and southern borders, although the vast majority of the drug trade comes from the south.
Other more ambitious trade policies, including Trump's 'Liberation Day' tariffs, remain in limbo. After the White House promised '90 deals in 90 days' to implement a worldwide tariff scheme, Trump's administration has punted on issuing firm plans until at least August.
Levy comes amid domestic legal challenges
In ordering many of his tariffs, Trump has relied on a 1977 law called the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA), which allows the president to regulate a broad array of economic matters following a declaration of a national emergency. The administration has argued that long-standing American trade deficits qualify as such an emergency.
A federal court in May struck down the tariffs based on that justification, but they have been allowed to remain in effect as the administration pursues an appeal. The Supreme Court rebuffed an effort to fast-track the case in June.
Nearly 200 Democratic lawmakers signed on to a brief supporting the lawsuit after Trump hit Brazil with the tariffs, arguing that the IEEPA does not give Trump any power to issue the levies.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


USA Today
11 minutes ago
- USA Today
Donald Trump's Jan. 6 pardons cast a long shadow over justice six months later
President Donald Trump has done more than pardon J6 rioters. He's also targeting the FBI investigators as he weaponized the Department of Justice. On this, the six-month anniversary of President Donald Trump's sweeping pardons for more than 1,500 people accused or convicted of invading and ransacking the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021, let's check in on some of the people arrested for that riot and how the president's team is rewriting history to make the FBI and Department of Justice the bad guys. People Trump pardoned for Jan. 6 crimes have since been arrested for soliciting a minor for sex, for commercial burglary and for home invasion. And the FBI agents and federal prosecutors who worked on those Jan. 6 cases have been demonized by Trump as his administration ends their careers for the offense of doing their jobs. One J6er tried to use Trump's pardon to beat child porn charges Kyle Travis Colton, a California man arrested and accused in December 2023 for using a flagpole to assault a police officer at the Capitol on Jan. 6, pleaded guilty in October 2024. Trump pardoned him three and a half months later. But Colton had more trouble with the law. An FBI search when he was arrested found Colton's computer held "copious images and videos depicting graphic sexual abuse of young children." Colton's attorney argued that Trump's pardon applied to his child porn, too, because it was discovered as part of the Jan. 6 investigation. A federal judge didn't buy that, and a jury in California convicted Colton on July 15. He faces a mandatory minimum of five years in prison when sentenced on Oct. 27. Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington, a good government nonprofit known as CREW, tracks pardoned insurrectionists accused of other crimes before or after the Jan. 6 riot. Matthew Huttle, an Indiana man sentenced to six months in prison for crimes he committed on Jan. 6, pulled a gun and struggled with a sheriff's deputy during a traffic stop six days after Trump pardoned him. The deputy shot and killed him. Edward Kelley of Tennessee was convicted in November 2024 for assaulting police officers at the Capitol on Jan. 6. Trump pardoned him before he was sentenced. But Kelley was also convicted in November 2024 on charges that he conspired to kill the FBI agents who investigated him. His lawyers had argued that Trump's pardon should also apply to the murder plot. He was sentenced to life in prison earlier this month. What's the messaging on election results going forward? Noah Bookbinder, CREW's president, told me he expects more people pardoned for Jan. 6 crimes will be re-arrested. And he worries that federal investigators and prosecutors now know they face retaliation if their work runs counter to what Trump wants. "These are people who showed their lawlessness and who feel empowered," Bookbinder said. "And so there's a very specific danger there, on the flip side of that, at the Department of Justice, that attorneys who work at the department and agents who work at the FBI feel very uncertain in their roles, uncertain that they can do their jobs without facing consequences if the president and the administration see anything that these Justice Department personnel do as adverse to their interests." The Jan. 6 insurrection was a failed bid to overturn the free and fair 2020 election, egged on by Trump, who continues to routinely lie about how American elections are run. So what happens if Trump doesn't like the results of next year's midterm elections, when control of Congress is up for grabs? "I think we have to assume, going forward, that a lot of people in this country are going to feel like they don't have to accept the results of elections if they don't like those results, particularly if those results are seen as going against Donald Trump," Bookbinder said, "and that using force to get to the election results they want is OK and is even encouraged." Republicans have made it clear they want to target law enforcement Just look at the DOJ team Trump has assembled and ask yourself if they prioritize justice or pleasing the president. Emil Bove, a senior DOJ official who privately represented Trump when he was convicted of 34 felonies in a 2024 business fraud criminal case, saw his appointment for a lifetime seat on a federal appeals court advance on a party-line vote in a Senate committee on July 17. This happened despite a letter sent to the Senate from more than 900 former DOJ employees, accusing Bove of being a "leader in the assault" on the careers of prosecutors and FBI agents who did their jobs investigating Jan. 6 to hold rioters accountable. Trump, who sparked the Jan. 6 riot, campaigned on retribution. Bove is his retribution delivery boy. The DOJ alumni noted Bove's "breathtaking act of hypocrisy," since he had previously overseen parts of the Jan. 6 investigation as an assistant U.S. Attorney in New York before pivoting to target his colleagues for the same thing. Then there's Jared Wise, a former FBI supervisory special agent from Oregon who was accused of rooting for rioters to attack police officers at the Capitol on Jan. 6 and was indicted for that in May 2023. He was standing trial on Jan. 20 when Trump was sworn in for a second term and included Wise in his sweeping pardons. The DOJ dropped his case that day. Wise got more than a reprieve from responsibility. Trump gave him a job. At the DOJ. In the so-called "Weaponization Working Group," which grew out of Trump's Jan. 20 executive order – the same day Wise got his pardon – which whined that the DOJ had "ruthlessly prosecuted more than 1,500 individuals" for crimes committed on Jan. 6. Read between the lines, and what you really see is that Trump knew Jan. 6 was a stain on our democracy and was directly his fault. So he wants to rewrite that history, to make himself the victim of the calamity he caused. And he's building a team to do just that. So the next time a MAGA crowd decides to storm a government building, beating police officers, smashing windows, stealing computers and smearing their feces on the walls, ask yourself if Team Trumpers like Wise will root for rioters while searching for ways to blame Trump's perceived enemies. Will Bove, if a full Senate vote gives him a lifetime federal judgeship, consider cases according to the strictures of the U.S. Constitution – or just focus on whatever result Trump wants? Trump has twisted and transformed the Republican Party in many ways. The GOP used to tout "law and order" as a bedrock of democracy. Justice is now a team sport, where accountability for action can be canceled with adulation for authority. Follow USA TODAY columnist Chris Brennan on X, formerly known as Twitter: @ByChrisBrennan. Sign up for his weekly newsletter, Translating Politics, here.


Bloomberg
12 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
What Happens When the World's Population Starts Shrinking?
Welcome back to The Forecast from Bloomberg Weekend, where we help you think about the future — from next week to next decade. This weekend we're looking at depopulation — as well as whether Trump will fire Powell, elderly college students and more.


Boston Globe
an hour ago
- Boston Globe
Trump's attack on in-state tuition for Dreamers is bad law — and worse policy
Get The Gavel A weekly SCOTUS explainer newsletter by columnist Kimberly Atkins Stohr. Enter Email Sign Up Other surveys — by the Advertisement Among the targets of the administration's hostility, none elicits more sympathy from the public than the so‑called Dreamers — young people brought here unlawfully as children, who have grown up as Americans in everything but paperwork. (According to Gallup, Advertisement In lawsuits filed this spring against Texas, Minnesota, and Kentucky, the Justice Department maintains that offering in‑state tuition to students without legal immigration status — even if they were brought here as small children and essentially grew up American — violates federal law. In reality, it is the administration's assault that distorts federal law. It is also a brazen power grab that tramples states' rights, to say nothing of basic decency. Beginning in 2001, Democratic and Republican legislatures decided that if young people grow up in a state, are educated in its schools, and want to pursue higher education within its borders, it makes no sense to penalize them financially merely because of their immigration status. If there are good reasons to give a break on tuition to local students who want to go to a local college, what difference does it make whether they have a passport, a green card, or neither? Yet on April 28, President Trump Advertisement But that isn't true. Federal law does not say that undocumented immigrants must be excluded from any in-state tuition benefit. It Accordingly, the states that offer reduced tuition to undocumented immigrants condition the offer on criteria other than residency. States that offer in‑state tuition to undocumented students are acting not just humanely but rationally. Such policies reflect the common-sense principle that justifies giving a tuition break to any local student: It is in every state's interest to help its homegrown young people be as successful and well educated as possible. Lower tuition makes higher education more affordable, which in turn boosts the number of local families that can send their kids to college, which in turn expands the state's population of educated adults. A more educated population strengthens the state's economy, since college graduates are more likely to be employed and to earn higher incomes. For states like Massachusetts, which suffers from high outmigration, a particularly strong argument for the in-state tuition break is that graduates of public institutions are more likely to Advertisement None of these arguments has any logical connection to immigration or citizenship. They apply with equal force to those born abroad and to those born locally. And it is irrelevant whether those born abroad were brought to America by parents who had immigration visas or by parents who didn't. Dreamers aren't freeloaders. Like their families, they pay taxes — property taxes, sales taxes, income taxes, and even the payroll taxes that fund Social Security and Medicare benefits, for which they are ineligible. (In 2022, according to the latest estimate from the Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy, undocumented immigrants Aside from the Trumpian hard core, most Americans sympathize with the plight of undocumented immigrants who grew up in this country and have known no other home. That explains why (as Gallup reports) 85 percent of them would like Congress to make it possible for them to acquire citizenship. It also explains why in-state tuition for Dreamers has bipartisan support: The states that have enacted such policies include Oklahoma, Kentucky, California, and New York. Advertisement The Trump administration's lawsuits deserve to be dismissed on their legal merits, but they also deserve to be reviled as one more example of MAGA malevolence, which is grounded in nothing except a desire to hurt immigrants — Few Americans have any desire to punish young people who have done nothing wrong. The cruelty at the heart of Trump's immigration policy may thrill his base, but it repels a far larger America unwilling to abandon its values. Jeff Jacoby can be reached at