logo
Kiko urges SC to conduct oral arguments on VP Sara impeachment

Kiko urges SC to conduct oral arguments on VP Sara impeachment

GMA Network14 hours ago
According to Pangilinan, a former chairman of the Senate Committee on Justice and Human Rights, the SC should 'seriously consider' the earlier proposal of retired Chief Justice Artemio Panganiban, particularly the issuance of status quo ante order and the conduct of oral arguments.
Senator Francis 'Kiko' Pangilinan on Monday called on the Supreme Court (SC) to consider issuing a status quo ante order and call for oral arguments concerning the impeachment case against Vice President Sara Duterte.
This, as the House of Representatives, through the Office of the Solicitor General, filed a motion for reconsideration, seeking to reverse the high court's decision junking Duterte's impeachment case.
According to Pangilinan, a former chairman of the Senate Committee on Justice and Human Rights, the SC should 'seriously consider' the earlier proposal of retired Chief Justice Artemio Panganiban, particularly the issuance of status quo ante order and the conduct of oral arguments.
'By doing so, all parties—the Senate, the House of Representatives, the Supreme Court, and the wider legal community—can take pause, step back, and prevent the nation from sliding into a spiraling abyss of a constitutional war of attrition, both in words and in deeds,' Pangilinan said.
'Such a conflict will only further erode the people's trust in our democratic institutions and inflict lasting harm upon them,' he added.
Pangilinan also asked the SC to act on the motion for reconsideration 'towards the path enunciated in its own ruling in the case Civil Liberties Union v. Executive Secretary of harmonising and giving legal validity and binding effect to the Constitutional prerogatives, powers and duties of the Supreme Court, the HoR and the Senate.'
Meanwhile, Senate Minority Leader Vicente 'Tito' Sotto III said the motion filed by the House could be an issue the Senate could take up on Wednesday, August 6.
The Senate is set to discuss and decide on the SC decision declaring the articles of impeachment against Duterte as unconstitutional on August 6, according to Senate President Francis 'Chiz' Escudero said Tuesday.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Brazil police place former President Bolsonaro under house arrest
Brazil police place former President Bolsonaro under house arrest

GMA Network

timean hour ago

  • GMA Network

Brazil police place former President Bolsonaro under house arrest

Former Brazilian President Jair Bolsonaro speaks with the media as he leaves the Federal Police headquarters after testifying, in Brasilia, Brazil, June 5, 2025. REUTERS/ Adriano Machado BRASILIA - Brazilian authorities placed former President Jair Bolsonaro, who is standing trial on charges of plotting a coup, under house arrest on Monday, in a move that could escalate tensions with the administration of US President Donald Trump. Supreme Court Justice Alexandre de Moraes issued the arrest order, saying in his decision that the right-wing firebrand did not comply with judicial restraining orders imposed on him last month. Bolsonaro is facing charges that he conspired with dozens of his allies to overturn his 2022 electoral loss to leftist President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva. Moraes also banned Bolsonaro from receiving visits, with exceptions for lawyers and people authorized by the court, and use of a cell phone either directly or through third parties. A press representative for Bolsonaro confirmed that he was placed under house arrest late afternoon on Monday and that a cell phone had been seized. In a statement, Brazil's federal police said it had complied with the Supreme Court's orders for house arrest and to seize cell phones, though it did not name the target of the operation. The restrictions on Bolsonaro had been imposed over allegations that he courted the interference of Trump, who recently tied steep new tariffs on Brazilian goods to what he called a "witch hunt" against Bolsonaro, his ideological ally. The house arrest order follows over two years of investigations into Bolsonaro's role in an election-denying movement that culminated in riots by his supporters that rocked Brasilia in January 2023. The unrest drew comparisons to the riots at the US Capitol after Trump's electoral defeat in 2020. In contrast with the tangle of criminal cases which mostly stalled against Trump, Brazilian courts and investigators moved swiftly against Bolsonaro, threatening to end his political career and fracture his right-wing movement. Bolsonaro's son Eduardo Bolsonaro, a Brazilian congressman, moved to the US around the same time the former president's trial kicked off to drum up support for his father in Washington. The younger Bolsonaro said the move had influenced Trump's decision to impose new tariffs on Brazil. Trump last month shared a letter he had sent to Bolsonaro. "I have seen the terrible treatment you are receiving at the hands of an unjust system turned against you," he wrote. "This trial should end immediately!" Washington late in July hit Moraes with sanctions, accusing the judge of authorizing arbitrary pre-trial detentions and suppressing freedom of expression. The State Department did not immediately respond to a request for comment on Bolsonaro's house arrest. However, Trump's tactics may be backfiring in Brazil, compounding trouble for Bolsonaro and rallying public support behind Lula's leftist government. In an interview with Reuters last month, Bolsonaro called Moraes a "dictator" and said the restrictive measures against him were acts of "cowardice." —Reuters

Romualdez sa inihain nilang mosyon sa SC: 'This is not an act of defiance. It is an act of duty'
Romualdez sa inihain nilang mosyon sa SC: 'This is not an act of defiance. It is an act of duty'

GMA Network

time7 hours ago

  • GMA Network

Romualdez sa inihain nilang mosyon sa SC: 'This is not an act of defiance. It is an act of duty'

Naghain ng apela ang Kamara de Representantes para baligtarin ng Korte Suprema (SC) ang nauna nitong desisyon na unconstitutional ang impeachment complaint laban kay Vice President Sara Duterte. Giit ni Speaker Martin Romualdez, hindi nila kinakalaban ang pasya ng mga mahistrado ng Kataas-taasang Hukuman, sa halip ay ginagampanan lamang nila ang kanilang tungkulin. Sa ulat ni Tina Panganiban-Perez sa GMA News Saksi nitong Lunes, sinabing ang Office of Solicitor General ang tumatayong abogado ng Kamara sa kanilang inihaing apela sa SC, ilang araw bago ang itinakdang deadline sa Agosto 9. 'This is not an act of defiance. It is an act of duty,' ani Romualdez. 'We do not challenge the authority of the Court. We seek only to preserve the rightful role of the House – the voice of the people – in the process of accountability.' Kasabay ng paggiit na malinaw umano sa Konstitusyon na ang Kamara ang may ekslusibong karapatan sa pag-initiate ng impeachment, sinabi ni Romualdez na sinunod nila ang Konstitusyon at ang mga nagdaang desisyon ng SC sa ginawang pag-impeach ng mga kongresista kay Duterte. Sa kanilang apela sa SC, iginiit ni Romualdez na isang impeachment complaint lang "initiated" kay Duterte, at hindi apat, gaya ng nakasaad sa desisyon ng SC. Paliwanag ng Speaker, inilagay lang sa archive ang tatlong naunang impeachment complaint nang maipadala na sa Senado ang ika-apat na complaint na pirmado ng 215 na kongresista. 'On February 5, 2025, the House transmitted the fourth impeachment complaint filed and signed by 215 Members to the Senate. Only after this transmittal did we archive the earlier three complaints. That sequence matters. It proves there was only one valid initiation, not four,' ayon kay Romualdez. Iginiit din ng lider ng Kamara na walang nakasaad sa Konstitusyon na kailangang pasagutin muna si Duterte kaugnay ng mga akusasyon laban sa kaniya bago ipadala sa Senado ang articles of impeachment. Ang paliwanag at sagot umano ni Duterte laban sa mga akusasyon ay dapat mangyari sa paglilitis na ng Senado bilang impeachment court--gaya ng ginawa sa ibang na-impeach na opisyal. Sinabi pa ni Romualdez na ang pagkakaroon ng mga bagong patakaran na nakasaad sa desisyon ng SC na biglang ipatutupad ay hindi lang umano "unfair" kung hindi "constitutionally suspect" din. Kabilang din kasi ang mga mahistrado ng SC sa mga impeachable officials na maaari umanong makinabang sa mga ipapataw nilang bagong kondisyon o patakaran. 'When the Court lays down rules for how it, or others like it, may be impeached, it puts itself in the dangerous position of writing conditions that may shield itself from future accountability,' ayon kay Romualdez. 'That is not how checks and balances work.' -- FRJ GMA Integrated News

Jinggoy seeks accountability from DPWH over fallen Isabela bridge
Jinggoy seeks accountability from DPWH over fallen Isabela bridge

GMA Network

time13 hours ago

  • GMA Network

Jinggoy seeks accountability from DPWH over fallen Isabela bridge

'This incident is more than a structural failure. It is a failure of governance. It exposes weaknesses in our systems, weaknesses that will persist if we refuse to confront them with transparency and resolve,' Estrada said. Senate President Pro Tempore Jinggoy Estrada on Monday questioned the lack of accountability on the part of the Department of Public Works and Highways (DPWH) nearly six months after the collapse of the P1.2 billion Cabagan-Sta. Maria Bridge in Isabela. In his privileged speech, Estrada emphasized that aside from the truck driver, design consultant, and bridge contractor, there should also be public officials who exercised oversight functions that must be held accountable for the collapse. 'Why is there no mention of disciplinary actions against these supervising officials whose approval and oversight, or lack thereof, enabled this tragedy? Mr. President, wala tayong nabalitaan na nasuspinding opisyal ng DPWH na may kinalaman sa proyektong ito. Wala rin tayong nabalitaang inimbestigahan sila upang panagutin,' the Senate president pro tempore said. (Mr. President, we have not heard that any DPWH official was suspended concerning this project. We've also not heard that any official was investigated to be held accountable.) 'This incident is more than a structural failure. It is a failure of governance. It exposes weaknesses in our systems, weaknesses that will persist if we refuse to confront them with transparency and resolve,' he added. Estrada urged the DPWH to take full responsibility and accountability on the matter, not just by pursuing private contractors, but also by holding its officials who were involved in the planning, approval, and implementation of the project liable. 'Explain the approval process, identify the lapses in monitoring and enforcement, and most importantly, assure the public that this will never happen again—not through promises, but through concrete reforms in design, review, safety compliance, and project oversight,' he said. On February 27, a portion of the bridge that connects the town of Cabagan to Santa Maria in Isabela province collapsed, leaving six people injured. The DPWH said the bridge can only accommodate up to 44 tons, which is far from the weight of the truck, which was 100 tons. President Ferdinand 'Bongbong' Marcos Jr. visited the collapsed bridge a week after the incident and noted that it had a 'design problem.' But the engineer behind the bridge refuted this, asserting that the structure adhered to the Bridge Code of the Philippines. During the Senate Blue Ribbon subcommittee's investigation in March, Senator Alan Peter Cayetano expressed belief that the collapse of the Sta. Maria-Cabagan Bridge was not an 'accident,' as he presented several reports from the DPWH and a private construction firm that claim to show there are defects in the bridge even during its construction. –NB, GMA Integrated News

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store