logo
Capstone Copper Corp. (TSE:CS) surges 6.6%; retail investors who own 42% shares profited along with institutions

Capstone Copper Corp. (TSE:CS) surges 6.6%; retail investors who own 42% shares profited along with institutions

Yahoo01-06-2025
Capstone Copper's significant retail investors ownership suggests that the key decisions are influenced by shareholders from the larger public
The top 23 shareholders own 50% of the company
Insiders have been selling lately
We've found 21 US stocks that are forecast to pay a dividend yield of over 6% next year. See the full list for free.
Every investor in Capstone Copper Corp. (TSE:CS) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. We can see that retail investors own the lion's share in the company with 42% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.
Retail investors gained the most after market cap touched CA$5.7b last week, while institutions who own 32% also benefitted.
Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Capstone Copper.
View our latest analysis for Capstone Copper
Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.
As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Capstone Copper. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Capstone Copper's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.
Hedge funds don't have many shares in Capstone Copper. Hadrian Capital Partners Inc. is currently the largest shareholder, with 13% of shares outstanding. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 10% and 2.8%, of the shares outstanding, respectively.
Looking at the shareholder registry, we can see that 50% of the ownership is controlled by the top 23 shareholders, meaning that no single shareholder has a majority interest in the ownership.
While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.
The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.
Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.
Shareholders would probably be interested to learn that insiders own shares in Capstone Copper Corp.. The insiders have a meaningful stake worth CA$145m. Most would see this as a real positive. If you would like to explore the question of insider alignment, you can click here to see if insiders have been buying or selling.
With a 42% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Capstone Copper. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.
Private equity firms hold a 10% stake in Capstone Copper. This suggests they can be influential in key policy decisions. Sometimes we see private equity stick around for the long term, but generally speaking they have a shorter investment horizon and -- as the name suggests -- don't invest in public companies much. After some time they may look to sell and redeploy capital elsewhere.
Our data indicates that Private Companies hold 13%, of the company's shares. It's hard to draw any conclusions from this fact alone, so its worth looking into who owns those private companies. Sometimes insiders or other related parties have an interest in shares in a public company through a separate private company.
I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Consider risks, for instance. Every company has them, and we've spotted 1 warning sign for Capstone Copper you should know about.
But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

This AI Startup Cracks Open Pre-IPO Investing For Everyone
This AI Startup Cracks Open Pre-IPO Investing For Everyone

Forbes

time32 minutes ago

  • Forbes

This AI Startup Cracks Open Pre-IPO Investing For Everyone

Jarsy's AI-driven platform bridges the gap between retail investors and private equity — no finance ... More degree or crypto wallet required. When Han Qin launched Jarsy, he didn't just want to build another investing app. He wanted to crack open the velvet ropes of private equity — where firms like SpaceX, Anthropic, and Stripe trade hands in boardrooms, not browsers. Qin's startup, now out of stealth with $5 million in backing led by Breyer Capital, is betting that a new generation of investors won't wait around for IPOs they can't touch. They want in. Now. With AI DNA — Built For Believers, Not Billionaires Jarsy offers retail investors access to pre-IPO companies via tokenized shares that are 1:1 backed by real equity held in custody. It's not equity in the legal sense — token holders have no voting rights or ownership — but it's price-exposure. And for many, that's enough. Minimum investment? Ten bucks. Regulatory hoops still exist. In the U.S., Jarsy must follow Regulation Fair Disclosure, meaning users must self-certify as accredited investors. But Qin is quick to point out that the income threshold for accreditation is $200,000 individually, or $300,000 for a household — not the million-dollar club most assume. Outside the U.S., Jarsy leans on Regulation S, allowing wider participation. So far, users have requested tokens tied to AI companies like Anthropic and Perplexity, fintech firms like Circle and even lesser-known names like Redbud Materials. If enough users express interest in a company, Jarsy pursues it. Demand drives the portfolio. 'We don't push deals top-down,' Qin said. 'We listen to what our users want, then go get it.' Not A Blockchain Project — Just A Better AI-Based Fintech Qin isn't trying to woo crypto maximalists. In fact, half of Jarsy's users have never touched blockchain before. They sign in with an email. No seed phrases. No gas fees. Jarsy creates the wallet, handles 'know your customer' and anti-money laundering verification requirements as well as manages the paperwork. They don't even issue a Jarsy token — only asset-backed tokens linked to specific companies. AI is a quiet force in the background. 'We're leveraging AI for coding, which really makes our development efficient,' Qin said. 'And on our roadmap, we're building a chatbot-style financial service experience. Younger users don't want to call someone. They want fast answers. They want AI to handle it.' Under the hood, Jarsy runs on Ethereum and other compatible blockchains, with plans to add Solana. Transactions settle in the USDC stablecoin. And once a company goes public, users can redeem their tokens for the market equivalent in a stablecoin. If the company never IPOs? Users can eventually list their tokens on a secondary market inside Jarsy, naming their price. That feature isn't live yet, but it's in the works. Jarsy is building slowly, deliberately. The platform is live on mainnet. The user interface mimics Robinhood. And the team — ex-Uber, ex-Facebook, ex-Square — is tiny but experienced. Jarsy's AI Code Versus The Incumbents Three other platforms dominate the 'pre-IPO for the people' category. Each takes a different path. None offer Jarsy's full combo of blockchain transparency, a retail-friendly AI user interface and global reach. Fundrise requires just $10 to get in, same as Jarsy. It's an SEC-registered fund open to non-accredited investors. The twist: it operates like an index of pre-IPO and public tech companies, spreading risk across high-profile names like OpenAI, Ramp and Databricks. Fundrise doesn't tokenize shares, and users don't pick individual companies. It's passive exposure, not direct access. ARK Venture Fund offers hybrid exposure to private and public innovation stocks. The entry point is higher with a $500 minimum and liquidity is limited to quarterly redemption windows. ARK's advantage is brand recognition. It's not a blockchain play either. But it gives users a professionally managed basket of bold bets: SpaceX, Tesla OpenAI. Jarsy, by contrast, is self-directed and responsive. Hiive is the most direct and transparent pre-IPO marketplace but only for accredited investors. Minimum investment thresholds start at $25,000. Users trade shares directly with existing shareholders. Hiive offers real-time bid-ask spreads and facilitates more than $100 million in monthly volume. It's Wall Street's private exchange. Jarsy wants to be Main Street's. Pre-IPO Investing Future Looks Brighter With AI Jarsy doesn't promise ownership. It doesn't pretend to be fully decentralized. It's not trying to replace venture capital. But it does give retail investors a simple way to ride the upside of companies they actually care about—long before Wall Street gets in. The question now isn't whether people want access. It's whether Jarsy can scale that access fast enough. Because the gates are cracked open. And Gen Z is already pushing through.

What's Next For Rigetti Stock?
What's Next For Rigetti Stock?

Forbes

time33 minutes ago

  • Forbes

What's Next For Rigetti Stock?

CANADA - 2025/05/09: In this photo illustration, the Rigetti Computing logo is seen displayed on a ... More smartphone screen. (Photo Illustration by Thomas Fuller/SOPA Images/LightRocket via Getty Images) Rigetti Computing (NASDAQ: RGTI), a company specializing in quantum computing, experienced a 15% increase on July 2 — a significant movement that concluded nearly a 70% rise over the preceding four months. The recent surge followed Cantor Fitzgerald starting coverage with an Overweight rating and a $15 price target, suggesting a potential further increase of about 19% from current prices. Rigetti's one-day increase was part of a wider movement in the sector — IONQ (NYSE: IONQ) rose 12%, while D-Wave Quantum (NYSE: QBTS) also benefited — as expectations of Federal Reserve interest rate cuts and a new U.S.–Vietnam trade agreement bolstered risk appetite. Coupled with increased U.S. government investment in quantum technology (recently committing $2.7 billion), the conditions for speculative tech stocks like Rigetti appear more favorable. As is the case with any cutting-edge technology, volatility comes with the territory. If you seek growth potential with less volatility than a single stock, consider the High-Quality Portfolio, which has surpassed the S&P 500 with over 91% returns since its inception. Also noteworthy: Super Micro Stock to $100? Why Are Investors Paying Attention? Rigetti develops superconducting quantum processors and provides cloud-based Quantum Computing as a Service (QCaaS). Additionally, it's the creator of Ankaa-3, an 84-qubit system with enhanced fidelity and lower error rates. The strategy is clear: transition from single-chip systems to multi-chip modules, ultimately achieving machines with over 100 qubits—and laying the groundwork for the 336‑Qubit Lyra in 2026. Their strategy is bolstered by advanced fabrication (ABAA) and robust external partnerships, positioning RGTI for significant advancements toward practical quantum computing. Hype Exceeds Revenue Here's the reality. Despite the technological achievements, Rigetti remains firmly in research and development mode. CEO Subodh Kulkarni has indicated that commercial demand is still 3–5 years away, and widespread adoption could take a full decade. This positions Rigetti's valuation as striking: Nonetheless, the company is well-funded, holding more than $575 million in cash, bolstered by a $350 million equity capital raise and a $250 million partnership with Quanta. It has no debt and a long runway ahead. Significant aspirations. Competitive Position: Strong but Saturated Rigetti's end-to-end approach is managing everything from chip design to cloud access — granting it greater flexibility compared to quantum competitors such as IBM, IonQ, and Google. Its partnership with Quanta further enhances commercialization potential. However, progress made by Google's Willow chip and Amazon's Quantum Embark program indicates increasing competition in this sector. The Final Verdict Rigetti is among the more intriguing players in the quantum computing market, showcasing credible technology, solid partnerships, and a robust balance sheet. However, investors need to view this for what it is: a high-risk, high-reward speculation in an industry that may take a decade to develop fully. Investing in a single stock carries risks. We implement a risk assessment framework when constructing the 30-stock Trefis High Quality (HQ) Portfolio, which has a history of comfortably outperforming the S&P 500 over the past four years. Why is that? As a group, HQ Portfolio stocks delivered superior returns with lower risk compared to the benchmark index; providing a less turbulent experience, as shown in HQ Portfolio performance metrics.

US private sector lost 33,000 jobs in June, missing expectations for an increase of 115,000
US private sector lost 33,000 jobs in June, missing expectations for an increase of 115,000

CNN

time37 minutes ago

  • CNN

US private sector lost 33,000 jobs in June, missing expectations for an increase of 115,000

CNN — The US private sector lost jobs in June, the first negative month in more than two years, according to new data Wednesday from payroll provider ADP. US employers lost an estimated 33,000 jobs, according to ADP's monthly national employment report. Economists were expecting ADP's report to show a net gain of 115,000 jobs, according to FactSet. The losses were driven largely by stalled hiring plans, Nela Richardson, chief economist for ADP said. 'Though layoffs continue to be rare, a hesitancy to hire and a reluctance to replace departing workers led to job losses last month,' she said in a statement. 'Still, the slowdown in hiring has yet to disrupt pay growth.' ADP's tabulations don't always correlate with the official federal jobs report — for example, ADP's March 2023 reading was eventually revised down to a net loss of 53,000 jobs, while the official jobs data shows a net gain of 48,000 private-sector jobs of the overall 85,000 jobs added (largely due to a 30,000-job lift then from state and local governments). However, the trajectory of what ADP reports is sometimes looked to as a proxy for overall hiring and wage growth activity. At the time, March 2023 marked the slowest monthly gain since a decline in December 2020. When the latest employment snapshot from the Department of Labor is released Thursday at 8:30 a.m. ET (one day early due to the July 4th holiday), economists expect it to show that 115,000 jobs were added in June. That's a pullback from the 139,000 initially estimated for May, according to FactSet. They also expect the unemployment rate to increase by 0.1 percentage point, to 4.3%, which would be the highest jobless rate since October 2021. What ADP signals for Thursday Wednesday's ADP tally is the first negative reading since March 2023 and, when considering unrevised first reports, it's the first negative reading anytime in the past few years, noted Abiel Reinhart, economist at JPMorgan. During the past year, the average absolute error between ADP and the BLS number has been about 75,000 the past year, Reinhart said, noting that one reason for the discrepancy is that the BLS number is higher on first estimate and revised downward. 'But the bigger story here beyond the month-to-month forecasting performance of ADP is that the series is clearly weakening, and this has been occurring quite steadily since the start of the year,' he wrote in a note to investors on Wednesday. Some economists said Wednesday they weren't changing their estimates for Thursday in the wake of the ADP news. Pantheon Macroeconomics economists said they were anticipating private payrolls to see a net gain of 100,000 jobs, which would probably still be strong enough for the Federal Reserve to stay on pause later this month. Pantheon economists said the ADP number 'defies credulity,' noting a loss of 52,000 jobs in health care and education, a sector that's been adding 77,000 on average the past six months. Still, there's a potential for education and health care to have weaker growth in June. That sector's job gains tend to be softer in the summer, and the slowdown may be worse this year 'due to the low hiring-low firing labor market' and federal spending cuts, Bank of America economists noted this week. ADP's negative number did appear to move the rate cut needle a little bit for investors. The markets expectations for a July rate cut increased to 25% from just under 21% the day before, according to CME Group's FedWatch Tool. How policy changes are affecting the labor market Labor market data can often be a slow burn. Typically, it takes a little time for economic shifts to be reflected in the numbers (with exceptions being major shocks, say, like a global pandemic). The first six months of President Donald Trump's second term in office have been marked by sweeping policy actions — including broad-based tariffs, deportations, federal spending cuts and government workforce layoffs — that have the potential to reshape the American economy and global order. However, while it may take time for these policies to work their way through the economy and become clearer in economic data, the indirect impacts already are making their mark: Job growth is becoming anemic, Ron Hetrick, senior labor economist at Lightcast, told CNN in an interview. And it wasn't supposed to be that way. Economists, markets and businesses alike were pretty sure they'd have one, if not two, rate cuts from the Federal Reserve by now that would have helped juice the economy (something Fed Chair Jerome Powell said himself Tuesday). 'We were starting to see some excitement toward the end of last year,' Hetrick said, referencing hiring plans conveyed to him by IT staffing companies. 'When the uncertainty entered in, when the tariff uncertainty entered in, the Fed got nervous about changing rates, and you just saw all of that retracted overnight. All of these discussions, all of these [hiring] plans, everybody just said, 'Well, not right now.'' 'There's a difference between true economic weakness — which is no one's buying my stuff, and I'm going to go out of business — and a lack of hiring because of uncertainty,' Hetrick said. 'I don't believe we have a weak labor market because the economy is poor. I think we have a weak labor market because companies don't feel good.' But that weakness ultimately could feed on itself and make the labor market — and economy — more vulnerable to shocks, cautioned Elizabeth Renter, senior economist at NerdWallet. 'It will be months or even years before we see the full effects of tariffs, federal cuts and immigration policies in the labor market,' she told CNN in an email. 'But if we continue to see increasing weakness, these things may have a more resounding impact, as the labor market won't be robust enough to weather a storm.' How the unemployment rate could get fuzzy The headline numbers from the May jobs report indicated that the labor market was cooling, but not collapsing. Employers added an estimated 139,000 jobs, while the unemployment rate held steady at 4.2%. However, the guts of the report indicated that cracks were continuing to spread. Nearly 91% of the month's job gains came from health care and leisure and hospitality. The labor participation rate fell, and the main reason the unemployment rate didn't budge was because more workers left the labor force. The unemployment rate is a critical indicator of economic health; however, in part due to seismic shifts around immigration, it's losing its luster and instead turning into a math problem. 'Unemployment is still low, but we've got to watch how we get to that unemployment number,' Hetrick said. 'If you're doing it because your labor force is shrinking, you're not doing it through strength. You're doing it through a math equation.' Foreign-born workers, irrespective of legal status, have accounted for about three-quarters of total labor force growth since February 2020, according to an analysis released in June from Wells Fargo economists. And recent efforts to curtail unauthorized immigration are contributing to a shrinking of the labor force, they noted. 'Whereas immigration overstated the pace of labor market cooling last year, it could now paint an overly rosy picture of its health,' they wrote. 'We expect the unemployment rate to peak at just 4.5% in the year ahead as weaker demand for workers coincides with weaker supply. Although this would mark a less abrupt increase than the rise in the unemployment rate that helped spur the Fed to ease monetary policy last year, the uptick amid a slowing supply backdrop (and from a higher starting point) would make the increase more precarious.' What unemployment indicators are showing The labor market is in a state of low churn: Hiring activity is running near 10-year lows and workers aren't feeling confident enough to quit; however, employers, for the most part, are holding on to the workers they have. Layoff activity hasn't accelerated recently, according to weekly jobless claims data, layoff announcement reports, Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification Act postings, and the government's Job Openings and Labor Turnover Survey report. On Wednesday, Challenger, Gray & Christmas released its latest report that tracks layoff announcements. In June, US-based employers announced 47,999 job cuts, marking a 49% decline from May and a 2% drop from June of last year. Layoff announcements tend to decrease in June — a month when some companies' fiscal year ends — and July, Challenger historical data shows. Year to date, layoff announcements are running at the hottest rate since the pandemic and, before that, the Great Recession, Challenger noted. However, 288,628, or nearly 40%, of the 744,308 announced cuts made in the first half of 2025 came from mass layoffs conducted by the Department of Government Efficiency initiative launched by the Trump administration with Elon Musk at the helm. Plans can change, and announcements (or reported cuts) might not result in job losses. For example, not all federal workers were laid off immediately, some have been rehired, and other actions are being challenged in court. The BLS data shows that the federal government has shed jobs since February. Through May, the sector has lost a combined 56,000 jobs. Still, the federal government accounts for a tiny share (1.8%) of overall employment, and the federal workforce has remained largely stable for much of the past 80 years: Most of the public sector job gains (schools, utilities, etc.) have occurred at the state and local level. Tuesday's JOLTS data showed that layoffs fell in May from 1.79 million to 1.6 million, staying below pre-pandemic levels. The rate of layoffs remains near record lows. The most recent jobless claims data will be released Thursday morning at the same time as the jobs report. First-time claims have slowly moved higher; however, continuing claims are running near four-year highs, indicating that people are having a harder time finding work. 'The early impacts of tariffs are just one drag on the job market,' Daniel Zhao, economist for Glassdoor, wrote last month. 'A bevy of other headwinds are accumulating including federal layoffs and funding cuts, slowing immigration and revocation of TPS work authorization, high interest rates, and more. While each alone would be too small to cause a recession, the combination of headwinds risks decelerating the job market just before the full weight of the tariff shock arrives.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store