logo
Principal allegedly shielded accused sex pest teacher, court reveals

Principal allegedly shielded accused sex pest teacher, court reveals

IOL News4 days ago
The principal of Harvester Primary School is under investigation after she allegedly obstructed and defeated the ends of justice.
Image: Supplied
The principal of Harvester Primary School is under investigation after she allegedly obstructed and defeated the ends of justice following the arrest of a former teacher for sexual grooming of a child and exposing a child to explicit material.
Police spokesperson, FC van Wyk, said: 'This office can confirm that a criminal case docket is being investigated in which the school principal is the subject. The charges as outlined by the Directorate of Public Prosecution are obstructing and defeating the ends of justice and contravention of Section 54 of Sexual Offences Act 32 of 2007 - failing to report that a child is a victim of sexual offence.'
The investigation follows after the 35-year-old former Grade R teacher was caught after she allegedly sent an explicit video of herself to a Grade 7 learner.
She is currently appearing in the Mitchells Plain Magistrate's Court on charges of sexual grooming of a child and exposing a child to explicit material.
The court previously heard a testimony from the investigating officer in the case, Warrant Officer Roland Peters, who said the case was reported to Lentegeur police station on June 9.
The court heard that he went to the school on June 10, when the principal allegedly said she was made aware of the allegations by a concerned parent of an explicit dirty video sent by the teacher on June 4.
Video Player is loading.
Play Video
Play
Unmute
Current Time
0:00
/
Duration
-:-
Loaded :
0%
Stream Type LIVE
Seek to live, currently behind live
LIVE
Remaining Time
-
0:00
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque
Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps
Reset
restore all settings to the default values Done
Close Modal Dialog
End of dialog window.
Advertisement
Next
Stay
Close ✕
Ad loading
Peters said the principal went to the house of the victim on June 6 to collect the cellphone to gather evidence on the allegations, however, the court heard that she did not report the matter to SAPS but rather the Western Cape Education Department (WCED).
Peters said she told him she felt it was not her responsibility to report it to the police as she had already informed the WCED.
The court heard that on June 12, Peters returned to the school and informed the principal that they were going to arrest the teacher; however, she informed them that the teacher was doing administration work at the WCED regional offices.
She then informed police officials to meet her at the WCED regional offices.
Peters said: 'We waited for a half an hour and the principal did not arrive. We then entered the building and we spoke to the manager who informed us that he had just returned back from dropping off the [teacher] at a family member's house in Strandfontein. He was given information by the principal to remove [the teacher] from the premises as there was protest action… From there we proceeded to the Strandfontein address, but did not find the teacher.'
The court heard that police officials were given an address in Athlone where they found the accused at her home and arrested her.
The matter against the principal is still under investigation while the teacher is awaiting her bid for bail. Get your news on the go, click here to join the Cape Argus News WhatsApp channel.
Cape Argus
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Principal allegedly shielded accused sex pest teacher, court reveals
Principal allegedly shielded accused sex pest teacher, court reveals

IOL News

time4 days ago

  • IOL News

Principal allegedly shielded accused sex pest teacher, court reveals

The principal of Harvester Primary School is under investigation after she allegedly obstructed and defeated the ends of justice. Image: Supplied The principal of Harvester Primary School is under investigation after she allegedly obstructed and defeated the ends of justice following the arrest of a former teacher for sexual grooming of a child and exposing a child to explicit material. Police spokesperson, FC van Wyk, said: 'This office can confirm that a criminal case docket is being investigated in which the school principal is the subject. The charges as outlined by the Directorate of Public Prosecution are obstructing and defeating the ends of justice and contravention of Section 54 of Sexual Offences Act 32 of 2007 - failing to report that a child is a victim of sexual offence.' The investigation follows after the 35-year-old former Grade R teacher was caught after she allegedly sent an explicit video of herself to a Grade 7 learner. She is currently appearing in the Mitchells Plain Magistrate's Court on charges of sexual grooming of a child and exposing a child to explicit material. The court previously heard a testimony from the investigating officer in the case, Warrant Officer Roland Peters, who said the case was reported to Lentegeur police station on June 9. The court heard that he went to the school on June 10, when the principal allegedly said she was made aware of the allegations by a concerned parent of an explicit dirty video sent by the teacher on June 4. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ Ad loading Peters said the principal went to the house of the victim on June 6 to collect the cellphone to gather evidence on the allegations, however, the court heard that she did not report the matter to SAPS but rather the Western Cape Education Department (WCED). Peters said she told him she felt it was not her responsibility to report it to the police as she had already informed the WCED. The court heard that on June 12, Peters returned to the school and informed the principal that they were going to arrest the teacher; however, she informed them that the teacher was doing administration work at the WCED regional offices. She then informed police officials to meet her at the WCED regional offices. Peters said: 'We waited for a half an hour and the principal did not arrive. We then entered the building and we spoke to the manager who informed us that he had just returned back from dropping off the [teacher] at a family member's house in Strandfontein. He was given information by the principal to remove [the teacher] from the premises as there was protest action… From there we proceeded to the Strandfontein address, but did not find the teacher.' The court heard that police officials were given an address in Athlone where they found the accused at her home and arrested her. The matter against the principal is still under investigation while the teacher is awaiting her bid for bail. Get your news on the go, click here to join the Cape Argus News WhatsApp channel. Cape Argus

'Sex pest' accused teacher 'had her eye on minor', court hears
'Sex pest' accused teacher 'had her eye on minor', court hears

IOL News

time11-07-2025

  • IOL News

'Sex pest' accused teacher 'had her eye on minor', court hears

A former Harvester Primary Grade R teacher returned to the Mitchell's Plain Magistrates Court on Thursday, which heard shocking details from the minor she is accused of sexually grooming. The 35-year-old accused teacher returned to court to proceed with her bail application while facing charges of sexual grooming of a child and exposing a child to explicit material. The court heard details claiming that the teacher "had her eyes on the minor for a while" while a criminal case is under investigation against the school's principal. The investigating officer in the matter, Warrant Officer Roland Peters, returned to the stand, and said the case was reported to Lentegeur police station on June 9. The court heard that he went to the school on June 10, when the principal said she was made aware of the allegations of an explicit video sent by the teacher on June 4. Peters said the principal went to the house of the victim on June 6 to collect the cellphone to gather evidence on the allegations, however, the court heard that she did not report the matter to SAPS but rather the Western Cape Education Department (WCED) as that was the correct process to follow. The court heard that police officials were given an address in Athlone where they found the accused at her home and arrested her. Peters said that he took a statement from the 13-year-old minor who told him that he was uncomfortable with those chats he had with the teacher. Peters said: 'They chatted on TikTok and he asked her if they can rather chat on WhatsApp because he is more familiar with WhatsApp. He indicated that on the chats she asked him not to call her ma'am and to call her by her first name. He reported that it made him feel uncomfortable calling an adult person by their first name yet alone an educator. The chats later evolved to where he asked her specifically what she wants from him. She indicated that she likes him, that she has been watching him at school, she wants to kiss him and that she wants to do things." The court heard that the boy did not know how to respond to this and showed the chats to his friends as the nature of the chats involved words that he did not know like 'vibrator" and "dildo.' Peters added: 'The teacher sent him this video, he was shocked and surprised as he did not expect that video of that nature. He said the very next day he blocked her on WhatsApp because it was disgusting." The case was postponed to July 15 for arguments and judgment for the teacher's bail. Get your news on the go, click here to join the Cape Argus News WhatsApp channel. Cape Argus

Pressure mounts for Principal charges in Harvester Primary School teacher scandal
Pressure mounts for Principal charges in Harvester Primary School teacher scandal

IOL News

time03-07-2025

  • IOL News

Pressure mounts for Principal charges in Harvester Primary School teacher scandal

A Harvester Primary School teacher faces charges of sexual grooming and exposing a learner to explicit material. Image: Kim Swartz/Independent Newspapers As parents for Equal Education question whether the Harvester Primary School principal will be among more people charged in the case of the teacher accused of sending explicit videos to a Grade 7 learner, the Western Cape Education Department (WCED) said all protocol has been followed. The former Grade R teacher, who resigned when the scandal broke, is expected to make her next appearance in the Mitchell's Plain Magistrate's Court on Thursday for her formal bail application. She faces charges of sexual grooming of a child and exposing a child to explicit material Vanessa le Roux, from Parents For Equal Education, said they questioned why the principal did not face charges. 'Why is the principal not arrested yet? 'The DPP (Directorate of Public Prosecution) initiated the charges after obtaining statements from the mother, grandmother, and principal. 'The DPP initiated charges against the principal, and the charge is defeating the ends of justice. "While on the phone with the investigating officer (last Thursday) morning, he explained to me that they are still waiting for the docket to come back from the prosecutor. 'This also exposes the lies of the WCED, when they say the principal did what she was supposed to do. 'The only duty on her was reporting the matter to SAPS and the WCED. "She is not a police woman, what business did she have getting into her car, and demanding the victim's cellphone. 'We are not playing about the lives of our children anymore, no one is above the law, even if I have to elevate that question to a national level.' But Bronagh Hammond, spokesperson for the WCED, said protocol was followed. 'We are aware of the allegations made by Ms Le Roux, which the principal denies and the police are investigating,' she said. 'An affidavit detailing the exact timelines and the processes followed has been sent to the South African Police. 'Sadly, there have been many false facts communicated by various parties in this case. We therefore wait on SAPS to complete their processes before jumping to any conclusions or making potentially libelous statements in public. 'We cannot comment further at this point.' The Department of Justice said it was for the National Prosecuting Authority (NPA) to comment on while the NPA said it was a police matter. Earlier, the investigating officer took the witness stand during the bail application where he informed the court of how the teacher allegedly instigated conversations on TikTok with the 13-year-old learner. It was also further revealed that prior to allegedly sending the learner an explicit video of herself, she requested him to send a video of himself. He sent one in return of himself and his younger brother playing video games. The detective also testified that when the accused realised that she had sent the video and could lose her job, she asked the boy to delete it and that he asked her for a R500 for it to be erased. Get your news on the go, click here to join the Cape Argus News WhatsApp channel. Cape Argus

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store