Edinburgh cab drivers given one-year reprieve from needing to sell off old vehicles
Councillors voted on Monday to approve a waiver to the city's hire vehicle age and emissions policy, meaning cabs older than a decade are still allowed to travel on city streets.
Under the city's hire car regulations, as of 2021, any petrol cabs or private hires need to be 10 years old or less, and either comply with Euro 6 emissions standards or be Euro 5 and retrofitted to meet council requirements.
However, every year since 2020, the council has approved a four year extension to this time period, meaning the maximum age of a cab or private hire car on city streets is 14 years.
Every six months after a vehicle passes ten years old, it needs to go through an inspection to make sure it is still in compliance with the city's regulations.
A report by officers to councillors said that some members of the taxi trade had found difficulty in finding vehicles that meet the city's current age and emissions standards.
SNP councillor Norman Work asked council officer Andrew Mitchell: 'Was there any sort of timescale for this? There have been these extensions. Was there any idea how long it would go on for?'
Mr Mitchell said: 'The initial target was 2021. The pandemic intervened, and the committee quite rightly gave an adjustment to the timeline.
'So the final timeline for Euro 6 then became 2023. The vast majority of the fleet has been compliant for quite some time.
'A smaller number [of drivers] have struggled, either for financial reasons or various other reasons.'
Regulatory Committee convener, Liberal Democrat councillor Neil Ross, asked: 'Over two thirds [of vehicles over ten years old] have failed their first presentation for testing.
'I know there have been efforts made to encourage compliance with these older vehicles, but I'm wondering if there's anything else that could be done to incentivise better presentations?'
He said: 'You're in the territory of, if you repeatedly fail, then you bring the operators to committee.
'It's not something we've done except in fairly extreme examples. But if you're testing them twice a year, and they're still turning up for their annual tests and failing, I struggle to see [what can be done].'
Another council officer, Catherine Scanlin, added: 'What we're finding on testing is that it's wear and tear of the rest of the vehicle. And with the best will in the world, it's very very difficult, and very expensive in the main, to keep on top of that.
'So when they're coming for tests, even when the vehicles are prepped, they can't forsee some of the issues.
'Historically, older vehicles were passed down the line to new people coming into the trade. That's not possible with these vehicles.
'Ultimately, it is the responsibility of the operator to ensure that vehicle is fit for public service. It is a challenge, and it's difficult. Even the best maintained vehicles – it's a challenge for them as well.'
The report also said that a report would come to the committee in the near future updating on the council's progress towards a 100% wheelchair accessible taxi fleet.
By Joseph Sullivan Local Democracy Reporter
Like this:
Like
Related
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Coin Geek
4 hours ago
- Coin Geek
ECB pushes ahead with digital euro amid stalled legislation
Getting your Trinity Audio player ready... European Central Bank (ECB) President Christine Lagarde has hinted again at the Bank's preference for launching its long-planned central bank digital currency (CBDC), the digital euro, to sit alongside cash. In a June 30 speech at the opening reception of the ECB Forum on Central Banking 2025, Lagarde spoke of uncertainty dominating the current narrative and the impact on inflation of uncontrollable events, such as tariffs and supply disruptions. In her speech, the ECB president said the Bank's strategy assessment has been an exercise in 'evolution, not revolution' and that 'even as the world changes around us, we know our purpose. And we will do whatever is necessary to deliver on it – ensuring price stability for the people of Europe.' While she didn't specifically mention the digital euro, the language was reminiscent of how Lagarde has previously spoken of the ECB's mooted CBDC. Earlier in June, in an interview with Xinhua News Agency, Lagarde again spoke of uncertainty— her favorite catchphrase of the moment —but also gave the strongest indication that the ECB is hoping to get the necessary support from the European Parliament for the digital euro. When asked about the ECB's exploration of a digital euro and whether it could cooperate in the future with the People's Bank of China (PBOC)—which launched its own CBDC, the digital yuan, in 2022—Lagarde said: 'Both the PBOC [People's Bank of China] and the ECB are working on a digital currency. China was ahead; it started earlier. We started six years ago, and we are getting to the point where, if the legislature supports the proposal, we should be ready to launch.' She added that the ECB wants 'to make sure that we have a European offer that is available, so that within the entire euro area there is a means of payment and a solid currency that can help you transact both online, peer-to-peer, business-to-business, and that's the purpose of the digital euro.' Lagarde also explained the reasons behind the ECB's decision to plough ahead with the preparations for a CBDC: 'Because of client demand, to put it very simply. Because many Europeans – not all, but many – like to pay electronically, digitally, without cash.' However, Lagarde did qualify this by stating that 'many Europeans still like cash. I like cash. So we will continue to have cash… but we need, as a sovereign expression on the financial stage, to be able to respond to the demand of our customers, Europeans.' She added that 'if they want cash, we should be able to print secure banknotes. If they want digital cash, we should be able to offer a digital euro.' In other words, there is a public demand for a digital euro. The ECB has been developing it for many years, and it is now ready to go. In Lagarde's opinion, it is in the interests of all to launch it. The only missing ingredient is the legislative framework, which the European Parliament must establish. Awaiting legislation Ultimately, the ECB will decide whether to launch a digital euro, and it appears clear which way it is leaning in this regard. However, the decision requires the approval of a regulation establishing a legal framework for a digital euro. Thus, in 2023, the European Commission, the executive arm of the EU, put forward a digital euro package to regulate the main aspects of a digital euro in order to ensure the same rules and conditions are applied throughout the euro area when using it. This package was referred to the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs (ECON) in the European Parliament. On February 9, 2024, a draft report on the package and the ECB's digital euro investigation phase was tabled, but as yet no vote on this draft report has taken place. Therefore, the ECB remains without the necessary legislative framework to launch the digital euro, no matter how much it wants to. The insistence with which Lagarde extols the merits of the digital euro, along with the ECB's repeated assertions about its readiness to launch it, could be read as a sign of impatience with the EU parliament dragging its feet on regulation. This was made explicit on April 8, 2025, when Piero Cipollone, Member of the ECB Executive Board, presented to the ECON Committee an update on the developments of the digital euro project, and at the same time urged members of the European Parliament (MEPs) to make progress on the legislative file. Digital euro's development In 2021, at the height of the COVID-19 pandemic and the accompanying dramatic drop in physical cash payments, the ECB launched an investigation phase into a Eurozone CBDC to be used by citizens and businesses for retail payments. This lasted for two years, after which the central bank began the digital euro 'preparation phase,' in November 2023. After positive progress, in November 2024, the ECB called for partners to test conditional payments in a CBDC simulation to start in February 2025. When February rolled around, the ECB announced it was expanding the initiative to settle transactions between institutions with a wholesale CBDC payment system. A month later, Lagarde reaffirmed the ECB's commitment to the project, saying that the team behind the digital euro was 'focused on accelerating the pace,' as well as highlighting how they were campaigning to get other stakeholders, like the EU Parliament and European Commission, on board. Lagarde also said that the 'testing phase' of the digital euro is scheduled to end this October. After that, the ECB will publish a final report and decide whether to issue a CBD, pending the necessary legislation. More recently, on May 5, the ECB announced that it had established an 'innovation platform' with 70 participants to collaborate on testing the digital euro project. According to the central bank, the platform simulates the envisaged digital euro ecosystem, 'in which the ECB provides the technical support and infrastructure for European intermediaries to develop innovative digital payment features and services at European level.' This brings us to the current state of limbo, with the ECB continuing tests but apparently already decided and united behind a digital euro, while the necessary regulation— as is often the case —plays catch-up. Watch: CBDCs are more than just digital money title="YouTube video player" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share" referrerpolicy="strict-origin-when-cross-origin" allowfullscreen="">
The National
9 hours ago
- The National
The Scottish Government should be fighting for zonal pricing
So, where's the outcry from the SNP or Greens? Where's the analysis by broadcasters at this enormous economic slap in the face by Westminster to Scotland? There's only a deafening silence. Now, unquestionably, energy pricing is complicated. The media has few dedicated energy correspondents. And government ministers experience endless lobbying by developers. Yes, poor lambs, it's difficult. But for folk facing 1300 actual and proposed wind farm developments in Highland glens and Europe's highest energy bills, it's actually very easy. READ MORE: David Lammy hands taxpayer-funded Foreign Office job to Labour donor The UK Government could have reformed a widely criticised energy pricing structure to give renewables-producing Scots cheaper bills. They didn't. And our own Scottish Government could have complained. But they didn't. So now, the people will. The UK rejection of zonal pricing means Scottish voters surrounded by 'green crap' – as David Cameron used to call turbines, pylons, battery plants, converter stations, cables, construction traffic and hardware – have no reason to stay green, tolerant, trusting or broad-minded. On this issue, they also have no reason to vote Labour, the SNP or Green in 2026. These parties could have backed Octopus Energy boss Greg Jackson, who believes zonal pricing would give Scots some of the lowest bills and Scotland the lowest electricity costs in Europe. He claims zonal pricing would encourage energy-hungry industries like data centres, AI supercomputers and other manufacturers to move to Scotland from the over-heated, energy-expensive south of England. That could have happened. But it won't. Instead, green energy is being cabled at huge expense to the south of England and Highland glens are becoming the collective sacrifice zone for the whole UK. Now, it's true, there are worries about zonal pricing. Some 55 firms wrote to the UK Government warning that zonal pricing would make projects too risky to complete and the UK Energy Research Centre said government auctions for new wind farms could cost £20 more per megawatt-hour, as investors priced in additional risk. So even daring to dream about lower bills will end up costing Highland consumers more. Wow. What a load of scaremongering tripe. Here's a different perspective. John Proctor, convener of Energy Scotland (a new policy group of energy professionals) and former general manager of electricity generator InterGen UK ,says: 'Most big renewable investments participate in the Contracts for Difference mechanism which insulates developers from market price fluctuations. 'Ed Miliband must broaden his mind and explore solutions beyond those offered by the London-based market consultants, market traders and industry lobby groups who thrive on market complexity and volatility. You would not reform the gambling industry based upon the advice of casino owners. 'From a Scottish perspective, we have a surplus of generation and managing congestion is a challenge. Mr Miliband has battery storage in mind – but that only offers a very short-term solution. A truly strategic move would be to encourage green hydrogen – with electrolysers and fuel cells – which community groups might own for a sustainable storage solution. This market model exists and if Scotland had control of energy policy, strategy and governance through independence, could be readily implemented.' But as things stand, it won't. Instead, the Scottish Government is rubber-stamping a wild-west, wind-developer free-for-all. The damage this will do to the SNP as a party and to independence is incalculable. As Times commentator Iain Macwhirter warns: 'Green energy has become a more potent recruiting sergeant for the right than immigration. It's no accident Nigel Farage is saying net zero is the new Brexit.' Indeed. No Yesser is surprised that zonal pricing was rejected by Westminster Labour. But why has our own First Minister sat on the fence? The danger is that renewable energy – an independent Scotland's greatest asset – is fast becoming a political liability for the SNP. Of course, it's Labour pushing through the big connectors, pylons and legally set objectives for green energy that have apparently prompted the Scottish Government lawyers to say every wind farm proposed in the Highlands must be nodded through – all 1300 of them. But everyone is blaming the Scottish Government because they believed planning would restore some sense of order and proportion. It hasn't. Yes, of course there's a massive need for green energy. But the way it's being done means small community energy projects are being sent to the back of the queue for grid connection, while Strathdearn – 22 miles long – has enough turbines projected and built to power 70% of Scottish households. And sky-high bills. It's as if Miliband thinks Scots are compliant suckers who won't complain. But it's also as if our own government thinks the same. Otherwise, why has the Scottish Government not used its control over planning to force community space on the grid, force developers into joint community ownership projects, overturned projects rejected by Highland Council and, while we're at it, not moved to break up the massive Highland Council so communities have actual local planning power? Of course, the big boys and developers won't like that. But balancing demands is what governance is all about. As it is, Farage only has to promise a halt to all wind farm proposals and Reform will clean up. You could feel sorry for local MSPs like Kate Forbes and Maree Todd, but the SNP's determination to ignore communities is part of the problem. (Image: PA) Established parties think the world stands still, but it doesn't. Zarah Sultana (above) knows that in England. It's too early to say how the Scottish wing of her new party will operate. But Highland campaigners who've been pro green energy and pro independence are now thinking of standing candidates in 2026 to halt the wind farms till a strategy is produced, because the SNP are acting as if a commercial-wind-farm-covered Highlands is a done deal. READ MORE: UK Government's refusal to help family leave Gaza is 'unlawful', court told Economy minister and local MSP Forbes will say nothing on the record because of active planning proposals. But she may believe Scotland needs Westminster-funded grid improvements in the same way we need railway connections and broadband. But Scotland can take the grid without playing host to every wind farm – surely? The Western Isles are also affected. Their long-awaited subsea connector will take energy to the mainland grid via Skye. But now that island has a new larger cable, it too has hundreds of wind farm applications – and if the new grid is filled with Skye energy, there'll be no space left for Outer Hebrides communities to feed into it as well. What a total mess. There's no doubt the British Government is to blame. Brave Miliband and the Labour Government at Westminster have caved to big banks who are hugely invested in the current trading 'game', whereby wind farms are paid billions not to produce (kerching) while Britain imports gas from the continent (kerching) and renewables-rich Scotland cannot escape the crazy, privatised mess we never voted for in the first place. But at least southern voters can calm down – don't worry, chaps. Bold lads and lasses in faraway Highland glens will produce cheap green energy for you, thole the visual and construction interference, get bawbees in payback and help pay for the turbines, cables, cables, pylons, giant converter stations needed to get their energy to you while still paying among the highest energy bills in Europe. Even the Daily Mail might agree – this is crazy. There's no reason why the south east can't become as energy self-sufficient as Scotland, removing the need for vast wind farms here and expensive inter-connectors. But who is making this political argument? Not the SNP. Why the heck not?
South Wales Guardian
15 hours ago
- South Wales Guardian
Reform-led council to announce ‘first big savings' after Farage visit
Earlier this week, Reform party leader Nigel Farage visited Kent County Council (KCC) headquarters in Maidstone and promised announcements at the full council meeting on Thursday. Last month, Reform UK launched a Department of Government Efficiency (Doge) initiative to cut council spending after taking 677 seats at the local elections on May 1. The party said it plans to use artificial intelligence, advanced data analysis tools and forensic auditing techniques to 'identify wasteful spending and recommend actionable solutions'. It follows the US Doge which was launched during Donald Trump's presidency to cut federal spending which billionaire Elon Musk spearheaded before his departure. On Monday, speaking to the PA news agency in Kent, Mr Farage said: 'We've established a cabinet, we've got a first big full council meeting this Thursday at which our first big savings will be announced.' However, KCC opposition leader Liberal Democrat Antony Hook said that 'no key decisions have been taken' by Reform and that most committees are yet to meet. The Conservatives have called for an information watchdog to regulate Reform's cost-cutting drive due to the data protection risks involved. Shadow communities secretary Kevin Hollinrake warned that handing the data to Reform is a 'cyber-security disaster waiting to happen' as he wrote to the Information Commissioner's Office (ICO) calling for an investigation. KCC's Reform leader Linden Kemkaran said that a 'legal framework' is being drawn up to ensure the Doge project works within data protection rules. 'The councillors have been elected to be here in Kent County Council, we have jurisdiction to do stuff, we can pull data, we can look at figures, we can go through everything – head office doesn't,' she said. She added: 'They're ready and waiting, they're just waiting for our call saying 'we're ready come in' but until that legal framework is drawn up to everyone's satisfaction we're just carrying on with our own internal work.' Despite the absence of the head-office Doge project, Ms Kemkaran maintained that she will be announcing savings on Thursday including a vote on a cut to councillors' allowances. By population, KCC is the largest local authority in England and Mr Farage's Reform party took 57 of the 81 seats in the elections on May 1. Prior to their victory the council had been controlled by the Conservatives for 28 years. Critics of the Reform-led authority have pointed to a lack of council meetings and conflicting announcements made via social media. Last week, Ms Kemkaran and a member of her cabinet announced on social media that transgender-related books were to be removed from libraries across the county after receiving a report from a member of the public. It was later revealed that no such books were in the children's section of Kent libraries, but instead one related book was on a welcome stand in Herne Bay. KCC then issued a statement that the announcements were not a change of policy, but rather reiterating an instruction to the 99 libraries under their control. Labour MP for Chatham and Aylesford Tristian Osbourne told the BBC the alleged removal of the books was 'unedifying gender-baiting of the LGBT community'. On Monday, Ms Kemkaran defended the announcements, saying: 'It was a completely valid point to make, it was a completely valid question to ask because I think we've seen a lack of child safeguarding,' Mr Hook said: 'The committee that would deal with library issues met on Tuesday. No mention of this issue but instead they hit up social media on Thursday. It's such poor governance.' The council meeting begins at Sessions House in Maidstone at 10am on Thursday.
