Sen. Mike Lee Backtracks After Deranged Tweets About Minnesota Assassination
WASHINGTON ― Sen. Mike Lee (R-Utah) on Tuesday deleted a series of disgusting tweets he posted in response to a gunman assassinating Minnesota Democratic state Rep. Melissa Hortman and her husband.
Lee posted several tweets from his personal account on Saturday, baselessly claiming that the man who went to the homes of four Minnesota state lawmakers with the intent to kill them has ties to the political left.
'This is what happens When Marxists don't get their way,' the Utah Republican wrote in his first tweet, as details were still emerging on what had even happened.
'Nightmare on Waltz Street,' Lee wrote in his second now-deleted tweet, an apparent and misspelled reference to Minnesota Democratic Gov. Tim Walz, who was Kamala Harris' vice presidential running mate last year.
His third now-deleted tweet called Marxism a 'deadly mental illness' in response to the Minnesota shootings.
Lee drew widespread condemnation for his posts, including former Republican National Committee chairman Michael Steele telling him to 'grow the hell up' and one Utah PAC calling on Lee to resign over his 'sick' and 'depraved' comments.
It was initially unclear what drove Lee to delete his posts three days later. They were still up as of early Tuesday afternoon, and a Lee spokesperson did not respond to a request for comment.
But the Utah Republican later told a Capitol Hill reporter that he deleted his posts after speaking with Sen. Amy Klobuchar (D-Minn.).
'It was important to her that I take it down,' Lee told journalist Matt Laslo. 'We're good friends. I took it down.'
Asked about their talk, a Klobuchar spokesperson said only, 'They had a good conversation this morning and she is glad he took them down.'
Lee didn't delete a handful of other inflammatory social media posts that either implicitly or explicitly reference the Minnesota shooting.
'Fact check: TRUE,' he posted Monday on his personal X account, in response to an Elon Musk tweet falsely claiming, 'The far left is murderously violent.'
'Marxism kills,' Lee said in another Monday tweet, in response to someone falsely claiming 'the left … kills a MN state rep and her husband and injures a Senator and his wife.'
On Saturday, the same day the lawmaker and her husband were assassinated at home, Lee had this to say in response to someone posting about the FBI reviewing the gunman's cellphone records: 'My guess: He's not MAGA.'
Sen. Tina Smith (D-Minn.) pulled Lee out of a Senate Republican-only meeting on Monday night to talk to him about how 'cruel' and 'hurtful' his comments were. Beyond the horror of the situation, Smith was also friends with Hortman.
She told HuffPost earlier Tuesday, when Lee's posts were still up, that the Utah Republican was 'sort of shocked' when she pulled him aside to address his posts.
'The point here is that there are consequences to the things that you do in the social media world, as a U.S. senator, and he has a big megaphone,' Smith said. 'He's choosing to use it to spread misinformation and to hurt people.'
Minnesota authorities captured the suspect, Vance Boelter, 57, on Sunday night. They said he had a 'hit list' of 45 elected officials, all of whom were Democrats.
Smith was among those on the list.
Asked Tuesday if Lee apologized to her for his posts, Smith replied, 'Not really.'
Sen. Tina Smith Confronts Sen. Mike Lee Over His Appalling Minnesota Posts
Here's What We Know About The Minnesota Shooting Suspect's List Of Names
Minnesota Assassination Suspect Stopped At 4 Democratic Politicians' Homes
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Boston Globe
33 minutes ago
- Boston Globe
With Zohran Mamdani's win in New York, voters spoke. Is the Democratic establishment listening?
Advertisement Even Senator Kirsten Gillibrand of New York, who pushed for Cuomo's resignation in 2021 after a state investigation concluded that he Get The Gavel A weekly SCOTUS explainer newsletter by columnist Kimberly Atkins Stohr. Enter Email Sign Up A majority of voters rejected Cuomo in a primary with a larger than usual turnout on a day that was Advertisement Mamdani's victory — and, to be clear, he still needs to win the November election to become New York's next mayor — shows that Democratic voters are tired of the same old faces in the same old places. They want to vote for, and not just against, someone, and that's what Mamdani represents across a spectrum of voters and communities. His win recalls 2018, when Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, also a democratic socialist, defeated Joe Crowley, a 10-term New York incumbent, to become, at 29, the youngest woman ever elected to Congress. Later that year, Ayanna Pressley, the first Black woman elected to the Boston City Council, was also elected to Congress, besting Michael Capuano, who had represented the Massachusetts 7th Congressional District since 1999. Pressley, who trailed Capuano in the polls right up to the election but That could be what voters want from Mamdani — a different kind of leader who is relatable, engaging, and dynamic. He spoke with people, not to them. And he presented economic policies like rent freezes and free buses that ordinary New Yorkers — not billionaires — could embrace and understand. Meanwhile, Cuomo borrowed the GOP's politics of fear and tried to scare everyone to death. He Advertisement The former governor's dismissive tone had the tinny echo of Maybe voters didn't want a political nepo baby running on familiarity and name recognition. Maybe they rejected a man who left his previous job in disgrace over credible sexual harassment accusations. Or perhaps people needed the light and hope Mamdani offers in these difficult times instead of Cuomo's doom and darkness. In a CNN interview, Democrat Senator Chris Murphy of Connecticut said, 'I know that this feels like a shock to a lot of folks but it doesn't seem like rocket science. [Mamdani is] focused on reordering economic power, he's dynamic, and he's a new voice. Check, check, check.' Democrats don't need a wildly popular podcaster, someone who could be their liberal Joe Rogan, to win again. They need candidates who generate passion and stand fast for the values of equity and justice that the Democratic establishment espouses but abandons when elections don't go their way. Related : Mamdani's road to Gracie Mansion — the New York mayor's residence — won't be easy. Cuomo appears likely to run an independent campaign, which is what Eric Adams, the problematic President Trump-appeasing incumbent, already has done. Mamdani will continue to face baseless accusations of antisemitism as well as hostility from bellicose billionaires like Advertisement So far, there's been more noise from Mamdani's detractors than from the leaders of the party he belongs to. They should recognize and replicate how he has connected, especially with young voters. In his Renée Graham is a Globe columnist. She can be reached at


Fox News
an hour ago
- Fox News
Trump threatens to support a primary challenger against GOP senator for opposing 'big, beautiful bill'
President Donald Trump on Saturday said he is looking for a GOP candidate to mount a primary challenge against Sen. Thom Tillis, R-N.C., after the lawmaker announced he would not support the president's "big, beautiful bill." "Numerous people have come forward wanting to run in the Primary against 'Senator Thom' Tillis," Trump wrote on Truth Social. "I will be meeting with them over the coming weeks, looking for someone who will properly represent the Great People of North Carolina and, so importantly, the United States of America," he continued. "Thank you for your attention to this matter!" Tillis, who is up for re-election in 2026, came out against Trump's spending bill earlier on Saturday over concerns about deep cuts to Medicaid. The senator vowed not to support the measure through a procedural hurdle needed to kick off a marathon of debate and amendment voting that would eventually lead to a vote on the measure's final passage. As he was leaving the Senate GOP's closed-door lunch on Saturday, the North Carolina lawmaker said he has a "great relationship" with his colleagues, but that he could not support the colossal bill. "We just have a disagreement," he said. "And, you know, my colleagues have done the analysis, and they're comfortable with the impact on their states. I respect their choice. It's not a good impact in my state, so I'm not going to vote on the motion to proceed." The Senate cleared the hurdle late Saturday to start debate on the bill by a 51-49 vote. Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., was another Republican who joined Tillis in voting no. "Did Rand Paul Vote 'NO' again tonight? What's wrong with this guy???" Trump wrote on Truth Social. Senate Republicans hold a slim 53-47 majority and can only afford to lose three votes. Sen. Susan Collins, R-Maine, said earlier that she would help advance the bill through the first step, but was leaning against voting to pass the bill's final passage unless the legislation was "further changed." Collins and other initial GOP holdouts, Sens. Josh Hawley, R-Mo., and Ron Johnson, R-Wis., voted to at least advance the legislation through the first key procedural hurdle. The latest version of the bill pushed back the provider rate crackdown by one year and also added another $25 billion for a rural hospital stabilization fund over the next five years. During a closed-door lunch earlier this week, Tillis reportedly warned that North Carolina could lose as much as $40 billion in Medicaid funding if the changes were codified. He is also planning to unveil further analysis on the impact of Medicaid cuts on his state that he said no one in the "administration or in this building" has been able to refute. "The president and I have talked, and I just told him that, 'Look, if this works for the country, that's great. And if my other colleagues have done extensive research and concluded it's different in their states, I respect that,'" he said. "We just have a disagreement based on the implementation in our respective states."


Boston Globe
an hour ago
- Boston Globe
History, schmistory — MAGA has its eyes on the future
Advertisement However, if the issues that MAGA Americans find most vexing are either solved or substantially improved (by data and objective sources), their continued contempt for history will be justified and little attention will be given to precedent. In this scenario, all established American institutions will be in some form of jeopardy. I attribute the continued success of the MAGA ideology and its practices to a desire of many to deal with problems simply and in a straightforward manner. I also contend that this methodology is itself too simple and lacks the depth needed to solve complex problems. Advertisement As our Framers taught us all those years ago, successful outcomes are the result of intelligent, detailed, and informed compromise, which, sadly, is in short supply these days. Peter Vangsness Medway