An open letter to Jacinda Ardern on open letters to Jacinda Ardern
Hello Jacinda Ardern,
Thank you for reading this letter, which I have sent in a genuine effort to contact you, and not as a hackneyed vehicle for a tedious, self-aggrandising sermon relitigating some bugbear from years ago. Anyway, I remember years ago, New Zealanders aired their disagreements the traditional way, by either getting drunk and arguing with each other or getting drunk and fighting. If the dispute was of national significance, it could be resolved through warring newspaper opinion columns, or in the case of Winston Peters, by calling someone a cuck in parliament.
I yearn bitterly for those more sweet, innocent days. Back then I could go weeks or even years without seeing some minor gripe or whinge escalated into an open letter to the former prime minister of New Zealand, the Rt Honorable Dame Jacinda Ardern. Jacinda, hi, I'm sending this letter to see if you can do something about the scourge of people sending you open letters all the time.
It didn't start with you, of course. Writers have been penning open letters for decades. Who could forget Paul's open letter to the Ephesians, Jacinda Ardern's open letter to MediaWorks chief executive Mark Weldon, or more recently, Spinoff fool's open letter to the Waitangi Dildo? But over the last six or so years, these missives have increasingly been addressed to one person alone. Open letters to Jacinda Ardern have been published by The Spinoff, The 13th Floor, the Herald, the Country, the Outdoors Party, the Taxpayers Union, and The Spinoff again.
Whenever a New Zealander has a quibble or setback, their first port of call is to contact the nearest media outlet and fling a letter out in the general direction of our former prime minister. In 2021, Stuff published an open letter to Jacinda Ardern from a woman complaining she'd been forced to put her 'bi-hemispheral life' on hold and miss 'pea season' over the trifling matter of a global pandemic. Just last week, Sir Ian Taylor published what scientists estimate to be his 73rd open letter to Jacinda Ardern complaining that seeing your book in the airport made him spend 22 hours obsessing about the Covid response, which was definitely justified, your fault, and not cause for self-reflection.
Enough! Jacinda, I know you're reading this. There has to be a way to put a stop to the madness. Maybe set up a PO Box where people can send their gripes about climate change and vaccines without subjecting the rest of us to their grousing. Lobby the government for a bespoke, financially crippling open letter tax. If all that fails, maybe quit politics and move to the US, where surely only the most desperate or deluded would continue to write you open letters.
Dame Jacinda Ardern, I expect quick action over this issue. This letter is my attempt to effect meaningful change for our great nation. If it wasn't, you could be forgiven for thinking I'm shoehorning your name into the world's most parasocial media format for the sake of attention and clicks, and cloying, folksy, first-person sentences like this one are kind of a bit disingenuous and patronising.
But we both know that's not the case, eh mate. How's the fam? Let's catch up soon to talk progress on this one.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scoop
17 minutes ago
- Scoop
ACT Announces John Bolt As ACT Local Candidate For Timaru
ACT Local has selected John Bolt, a longtime South Canterbury dairy farmer and father, as its candidate for the Timaru Ward of the Timaru District Council in this year's local election. Originally from the Waikato, John made South Canterbury his home 20 years ago and has farmed in Temuka ever since. A lifetime in dairy farming has taught him how to make tough decisions, manage through challenging circumstances, and plan for the long term – skills he believes are vital for good local government. John is standing to bring a practical, peoplefocused voice to council. He believes in wellconsidered, longterm decisions that benefit the whole community, not shortterm thinking or political games. 'Farming has taught me to plan for the long term, make tough calls when they're needed, and always look after the people around you. "Those lessons matter in local government too. I want Timaru to be a district where rural and urban communities are supported to get ahead, where rates are spent carefully on the things that really matter – safe roads, reliable water, and strong local services. "Council needs to deliver value for every dollar, cut waste, and make decisions that respect everyone equally. I'll bring that practical, nononsense approach to council so our district can thrive now and for the next generation.' – John Bolt Earlier this year, ACT New Zealand announced it would be standing Common Sense Candidates for local government for the first time — after hearing from New Zealanders across the country who are sick of rising rates, ballooning budgets, and councils that ignore the basics while chasing ideological vanity projects. When you vote ACT Local, you know what you're getting: Fixing the basics Lower Rates Cutting the waste Ending race-based politics Restoring accountability Stopping the war on cars ACT Local Government spokesperson Cameron Luxton says: ' ACT Local candidates are community-minded Kiwis who've had enough of wasteful councils treating ratepayers like ATMs. It's time to take control on behalf of ratepayers — to restore accountability and deliver real value for money. ACT Local is about getting the basics right: maintaining roads, keeping streets clean, and respecting the people who pay the bills. Our candidates won't divide people by race or get distracted by climate vanity projects. They're here to serve, not lecture." – Cameron Luxton
Scoop
4 hours ago
- Scoop
Luxon's Cost Of Living Promise In Tatters
New data shows National's flagship plan to help families with the cost of living is a failure. National promised 21,000 families $150 a fortnight – but only 153 have received the full amount. 'New Zealanders are struggling with the high cost of living, and Christopher Luxon is making things worse,' Labour finance and economy spokesperson Barbara Edmonds said. "National has abandoned families that are finding it difficult to cover the weekly shop and pay the bills. It's no wonder that a record number of Kiwis are packing up for Australia. 'The latest figures show Christopher Luxon's flagship cost of living programme has failed. A year in, only 153 people have received the full FamilyBoost entitlement for the entire year. 'When National tried to fix their failure, the best they could do was to make struggling families wait until April 2026 for just $7 a week, which is barely enough for a block of butter. "Christopher Luxon has been making excuses for nearly two years. People are sick of it, and it shows how out of touch he is. 'People cannot afford another three years of this Government. Labour will prioritise help with the cost of living, and proper investment in jobs, health and homes,' Barbara Edmonds said.
Newsroom
6 hours ago
- Newsroom
Planned terrorism law overhaul ‘slippery slope to authoritarianism'
New Zealanders who publicly express support for terrorist groups could be charged with a criminal offence, as part of secretive proposals being considered by the Government. While officials say the changes are a necessary update, one civil liberties group has expressed concerns the law may be misused to suppress free speech on politically contentious issues. The Terrorism Suppression Act, enacted in 2002 following the September 11 terror attacks, allows governments to formally designate people or groups as terrorist entities, freezing their assets and making it illegal to financially support, recruit for, or participate in a designated terrorist entity. The coalition Government is eyeing reforms to the law, with limited consultation currently taking place behind closed doors with a handpicked selection of groups and experts. In a copy of the consultation document seen by Newsroom, the Ministry of Justice said the Government had agreed to progress 'targeted amendments' to the law, which had not been substantively reviewed since its enactment. The document said existing offences in the law 'don't capture the full range of behaviours or activities of concern that are part of the contemporary threat from terrorism', and needed to be updated. Among the changes being considered were making membership of a terrorist entity a criminal offence, creating new offences to capture public expressions of support for a terrorist act or designated entities (such as showing insignia or distributing propaganda), and modernising definitions for terms like 'material support' to capture new online forms of support. The consultation document also raised the possibility of a streamlined designation process, saying the current decision-making system was lengthy and the designation period was short. Officials asked those being consulted whether the current requirement to have the Prime Minister review decisions twice 'balances robustness of decision and the speed of decision-making appropriately', as well as whether it was still appropriate for the Attorney-General to be consulted on designation-related decisions. The document also proposed extending the renewal period for terrorist designations to five years, from three at present. In addition, officials outlined a 'disconnect' between the designation framework and the regulation of harmful online content, with designated terrorist entities still able to influence and exploit New Zealanders via online platforms. To address those concerns, content disseminated by a designated entity could be defined as terrorist content, with a mechanism developed to identify and sanction terrorist-operated websites. The NZ Council for Civil Liberties, which was not selected for the targeted consultation process but had been leaked a copy of the document, is concerned with both the secretive nature of the discussions and the changes being proposed. The council's chairperson Thomas Beagle said the Terrorism Suppression Act already gave governments strong powers to outlaw organisations. Misuse of the definition of 'terrorism' in other countries had led to the outlawing of groups that did not engage in violence, with the aim of suppressing free speech on an issue. 'Laws that enable governments to outlaw organisations and any show of support for them are amongst the most dangerous tools the public in any democracy can give to ministers.' Thomas Beagle, NZ Council for Civil Liberties As an example, Beagle cited the British government's decision to designate Palestine Action as a terrorist group, after the group's members broke into a Royal Air Force base and sprayed red paint on refuelling planes to protest the United Kingdom's support of Israel over the war in Gaza. UK home secretary Yvette Cooper argued the move was necessary and followed 'a nationwide campaign of direct criminal action against businesses and institutions', but United Nations experts, Amnesty International and others have accused the Government of legal overreach and criminalising legitimate activities by innocent members of the group. With expressions of support for Palestine Action now a criminal offence in the UK, more than 100 people were arrested at demonstrations over the weekend, many for displaying placards in support of the group. In a separate incident, a protester holding a Palestinian flag and signs saying 'Free Gaza' and 'Israel is committing genocide' was accused of breaching the country's terrorism laws, despite explicitly saying they did not support any designated terror groups. Beagle said the changes being proposed by the Government could easily be misused in similar ways to shut down organisations it did not like politically. 'People will be criminalised not just for being members of an organisation but for expressing support for the issue it was focused on. These are highly dangerous attacks on freedom of expression and freedom of association.' It was 'a disgrace' that the Government's policy work and consultation was taking place behind closed doors, he said, given the expectations of open government 'Laws that enable governments to outlaw organisations and any show of support for them are amongst the most dangerous tools the public in any democracy can give to ministers. 'There is a very strong public interest in consultation on this law reform project being as open as possible. Without it, the government will foment public distrust in its intentions, and in the processes of policy making.' The Government needed to open public consultation to all New Zealanders at an early stage, rather than when a bill was introduced to Parliament, given the proposals could take the country 'further down the slippery slope of authoritarianism'. Justice Minister Paul Goldsmith says some parts of the Terrorism Suppression Act are no longer fir for purpose. Photo: Lynn Grieveson Justice Minister Paul Goldsmith told Newsroom the changes followed the Royal Commission of Inquiry into the Christchurch terror attack, which called for a review of all counter-terrorism legislation to ensure it was current and allowed agencies to operate effectively. 'Aspects of the Terrorism Suppression Act are no longer fit for purpose and need to be modernised and future-proofed,' Goldsmith said. The Ministry of Justice's criminal justice general manager Alida Mercuri told Newsroom the proposals were not targeted at any particular group, but were about improving the effectiveness of the designation system. The Terrorism Suppression Act already contained protections against misuse to suppress free speech and non-violent protest, which would not be removed or reduced. Mercuri said a range of agencies, experts, academics and stakeholders 'with relevant experience', including public sector agencies, had been chosen for the targeted consultation process.
