
Donald Trump's approach to Africa is very, well, African
Yet Mr Trump is showing surprising enthusiasm for meeting his African counterparts. On July 9th he will host presidents from five African countries in the first of what is mooted as a series of meetings. In May he met Cyril Ramaphosa, South Africa's president. The leaders of Congo and Rwanda, which signed an American-brokered peace deal in June, may also soon visit. A much bigger summit involving dozens of African leaders is planned for September.
Chart
The upshot is a paradox. Under Mr Trump America will do a lot less in Africa than it has done for decades. But African leaders will get more chances to have the ear of the American president.
Mr Trump, who has called Namibia (or maybe Zambia) 'Nambia' and said of Congo 'I don't know what that is', may end up hosting more African leaders than any of his predecessors. Data from Judd Devermont, a former official covering Africa in the White House, show that George W. Bush holds the record, welcoming an African leader on 3% of his working days in office—or roughly once a month (see chart). If judged on his first term Mr Trump would be bottom of the list. In his second he may move higher up.
The meeting on July 9th is a sign of his personalised and often random approach. Beyond being from coastal states in or close to west Africa (Gabon, Guinea-Bissau, Liberia, Mauritania and Senegal), the guests have little in common. There is no regional hegemon among them. Some have mining prospects, but they lack the mineral resources of, say, Congo.
Instead, the meeting is the result of lobbying by Umaro Sissoco Embaló, president of Guinea-Bissau. The former Portuguese colony of 2m people is one of Africa's less important states; indeed it is probably the third-most important of the three African countries named Guinea. One of about 10% of all countries globally without an American embassy, it is best known as a coup-prone narco-state.
Yet Mr Sissoco Embaló fancies himself as Mr Trump's Africa whisperer. The meeting is in keeping with his hyperactive approach to political networking. He has made around 300 foreign visits since taking power in 2020; many of them, according to one African leader, without being invited. An opposition figure from Bissau says that he will go to Washington with the message: 'I'm your man, tell me what you want me to do to help you.'
For Mr Sissoco Embaló the meeting is a way of trying to win support for his efforts to stay in power. Mr Trump, who is as transactional as your typical African leader, felt it was worth an hour of his time to have lunch. The other guests were added later, seemingly on the basis that they were from the same rough neighbourhood without being of first-tier importance.
The Trump administration is clear that its priority in Africa is business. 'We no longer see Africa as a continent in need of handouts, but as a capable commercial partner,' says Troy Fitrell, the outgoing senior official for Africa in the State Department. The goal is 'to increase US exports and investment in Africa, eliminate our trade deficits and drive mutual prosperity.' If more business for America means less business for China, all the better.
To that end American ambassadors will have more of their performance assessed on whether they can seal deals for American firms. Government agencies that offer financial incentives to American firms to invest in Africa (and other places) have been told to get money out of the door more quickly.
The White House is hoping the leaders will bring ideas for projects. 'I really hope that these heads of state come prepared and don't expect that spontaneous good things will happen,' says Joshua Meservey of the Hudson Institute, a right-wing think-tank. 'If they are unprepared and the meeting doesn't go well, then it will make it harder for other African presidents.'
The culture of the Trump administration is familiar to many African leaders, argues Alex Vines of Chatham House, another think-tank. Neo-patrimonialism, a term used to describe how in post-colonial Africa formal state institutions exist alongside informal networks involving business associates and members of the same family or tribe, is a useful way of thinking about Trump world, says Nic Cheeseman of the University of Birmingham in Britain. Massad Boulos, father-in-law to Mr Trump's youngest daughter and a member of a Lebanese family with business interests in Africa, is the president's senior Africa adviser. Gentry Beach, a university friend of Donald Trump junior, is reportedly exploring a deal to invest in a mine in eastern Congo in the wake of the peace deal with Rwanda.
Yet it is far from clear that Africa benefits when American policy is all realism and no altruism. America has fallen behind China as African countries' main trading partner in large part because it has less to sell and less demand for the continent's natural resources. Most African countries lack leverage. 'Each deal is an appeasement mechanism,' argues Gyude Moore, a former Liberian cabinet minister. 'Something to stave off further deterioration of an already negative situation.' Except for some resource-rich countries, most will not be able to offset the impact of aid cuts and higher tariffs.
Some of the poorest countries in Africa have tried to gain advantage by offering to take migrants deported from America. These include Lesotho, whose textiles factories are downsizing because they depend on AGOA. On July 3rd the US Supreme Court cleared the way for eight migrants to be sent to South Sudan, though only one of the group is South Sudanese.
Mr Devermont notes that 'on balance' presidents with the most Oval Office meetings with African leaders left the largest impact on the continent. Mr Bush created PEPFAR, an anti-AIDS initiative. Kennedy set up USAID. Mr Trump's legacy, if he leaves one, will be defined by deals, not do-goodery.
Sign up to the Analysing Africa, a weekly newsletter that keeps you in the loop about the world's youngest—and least understood—continent.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


United News of India
3 minutes ago
- United News of India
Stalin slams Modi govt. as ‘National Dictatorship Arrangement' fomenting communalism
Chennai, July 18 (UNI) Giving a new nomenclature to the BJP-led NDA at the helm at the centre as 'National Dictatorship Arrangement', Tamil Nadu Chief Minister and DMK president MK Stalin today charged the Modi government with fomenting communalism in the past 11 years it is in office. 'Crushing the democratic rights of the people, stripping the States of their legitimate rights, imposing Sanskrit & Hindi everywhere, fostering communalism and especially discriminating Tamil Nadu marks the 11-years of the Union government under the BJP, which is a #National Dictatorship Arrangement,' he wrote on 'X'. 'I have suitably advised the DMK MPs to be the voice of democracy in opposing the National Dictatorship Arrangement,' he added. In another post, marking the anniversary of DMK founder and late Chief Minister CN Annadurai re-christening the Madras State as 'Tamil Nadu' in 1967, Stalin said 'Realising a dream that generations have kept dear in their hearts, it was a historic moment. On June 18, 1967, the Tamil land got its new nomenclature – Tamil Nadu. Anna (on the passage of the Bill), declared 'Tamil Nadu' thrice to the thumping of the desks in the Assembly. In the 1967 Assembly election, the DMK had dethroned the Congress and since then no national party could come to power in the Dravidian heartland, being ruled alternately by either the DMK or the AIADMK. Many congress leaders were defeated, including the stalwart K Kamaraj, who had been AICC President as well, had to bite the dust in his native Virudhunagar. He lost to a greenhorn. UNI MCR GV 1512


Indian Express
3 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Donald Trump jokes about passing executive order to relabel ‘soccer' to ‘football' in USA; Soccer is an Oxford University British coinage
It's not exactly a real war, settling which can get anyone a peace prize. But US President joked he would try. As the Club World Cup wound up, DAZN reporter Emily Austin on Sunday (13 July) following Trump's presence on the pitch after Chelsea's win at the MetLife stadium, drew Trump into a discussion over difference between the British (football) and American (soccer) terms for the popular game. 'They call it football, we call it soccer. I'm not sure if that change can be made very easily,' Trump told her first up. After Ms Austin wondered if he could issue an executive order instead so only the word football is used, the US president guffawed and replied: 'I think we could do that.' USA has a few slightly more urgent matters to attend to, so 'soccer' might yet survive. But it drew attention to the serendipitous route the words have taken – always influenced by the presence of a more popular rival sport. Encyclopedia Britannica notes that the term 'soccer' originated in England as a slang abbreviation of 'association football.' After the formation of the Football Association in late 1800s, the rules of football, were slotted in stone by 'Association Football.' However, not the most interesting variety of kicking the ball with the foot, it faced jostles from other football codes, like rugby. That's when Oxford University students coined the term 'soccer' as a casual, shortened version, using the 'soc' from 'association' and adding the '-er' suffix common in Oxford campus slang. So, soccer set itself apart from rugger. Britannica writes, 'Although football-type games have been around for centuries, the sport we know today is often said to have begun in 1863, when England's newly formed Football Association wrote down a set of rules. At the time, it was the most widely played game of its kind in the country, but it wasn't the only one. Rugby football, named after an English boarding school, was a rebellious variation that allowed players to carry and run with the ball to advance it toward the goal.' So, the football of Pirlo, Canavaro, Gigi Buffon, Big Brazilian Ronaldo, Gatusso, del Piero, Gerrard, Raul Gonzalez Blanco, Miroslav Klose and the great Juan Roman Riquelme was called by the Football Association's as association football. Britannica further mentions that linguistically creative students at the University of Oxford in the 1880s distinguished between the sports of 'rugger' (rugby football) and 'assoccer' (association football). 'The latter term was further shortened to 'soccer' (sometimes spelled 'socker'), and the name quickly spread beyond the campus. However, 'soccer' never became much more than a nickname in Great Britain. By the 20th century, rugby football was more commonly called rugby, while association football had earned the right to be known as just plain football.' Onto the United States where the womens team salvages ineptness of the men, and actually wins World Cups. Another sport, Britannica says, emerged in the late 19th century that borrowed elements of both rugby and association football. 'Before long, it had proved more popular than either of them. In full, it was known as gridiron football, but most people never bothered with the first word.' So Anerican football came into being. Cornered by yet another mire popular sport, American association-football players defiantly adopted soccer to refer to their sport. 'The United States Football Association, which had formed in the 1910s as the official organizing body of American soccer, changed its name to the United States Soccer Football Association in 1945, and it later dispensed with the 'Football' altogether. No longer just a nickname, soccer had stuck,' Britannica writes. Football, of the Buffon kinds, also faced competition from gridiron football in Canada, Gaelic football in Ireland and Australian rules football (which is derived from rugby). 'In places where football can be ambiguous, soccer is usefully precise,' Britannica writes. Thus was sulkingly born soccer. Which might need a presidential decree to lose its British slang name in the lead up to next year's World Cup. The real issues facing football in US however are quality of playing turf, humid hot temperatures and American general disinterest.


News18
12 minutes ago
- News18
Stephen Colbert Says The Late Show Will End After 33-Year Run: Is It Because Of Trump?
Last Updated: CBS will end The Late Show with Stephen Colbert in May 2026, citing financial reasons. This follows a $16 million lawsuit settlement with Donald Trump. The CBS revealed it will end The Late Show with Stephen Colbert in May 2026, marking the conclusion of a 33-year late-night legacy. While the network insists the move was 'purely a financial decision", the timing- just two weeks after CBS parent company Paramount settled a $16 million lawsuit with US President Donald Trump- has fueled political speculation. Donald Trump, a long-standing target of Stephen Colbert's satirical stance, sued the network over a 60 Minutes segment featuring his 2024 opponent Kamala Harris, alleging the interview was deceptively edited to favor Democrats. Though Paramount said the settlement funds would go toward Donald Trump's future presidential library and not directly to him, critics aren't buying the apolitical spin. What Stephen Colbert Said On The Late Show Ending? Stephen Colbert broke the news to his studio audience, prompting boos, as he said, 'It's not just the end of our show- it's the end of The Late Show on CBS. I'm not being replaced. This is all just going away." Stephen Colbert, who took over from David Letterman in 2015, built his version of The Late Show into a bastion of liberal comedy and sharp political commentary. Before that, he hosted The Colbert Report on Comedy Central, where he famously parodied conservative punditry. Why Democrats Are Not Happy With The Late Show Ending? US Senator Adam Schiff, who had taped an interview with Stephen Colbert just hours earlier, questioned on X (formerly Twitter) whether the cancellation was tied to the Donald Trump settlement, saying, 'If Paramount and CBS ended The Late Show for political reasons, the public deserves to know." view comments First Published: July 18, 2025, 16:14 IST Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.