logo
Pulong: Dad Duterte says his Davao City house not for sale

Pulong: Dad Duterte says his Davao City house not for sale

GMA Networka day ago
The house of former president Rodrigo Duterte in Davao City is not for sale as far as he is concerned, his son Congressman Paolo "Pulong" Duterte said Tuesday.
In a video report from GMA One Mindanao, Duterte said his father, who is detained in The Netherlands due to alleged crimes against humanity over the drug war killings, is unaware that the house, which he shares with partner Honeylet Avanceña, is on the market, despite a "for sale" sign reportedly seen at the house.
'I asked him if he will sell the house in Doña Luisa, and he just said why would it be sold when it was my first house, and Honeylet has her own house which is huge,' the congressman said in Bisaya in an interview in The Hague.
Congressman Duterte said he also asked his father whose name is on the title of the house, but that his answer was unclear.
The congressman also said that his mother, Duterte's ex-wife Elizabeth Zimmerman, wants the former president to live in a house with their children in the event that the Hague-based International Criminal Court (ICC) grants Duterte's bid for interim release.
'Our mother said that hopefully, by God's grace, if he is released, he will live with us,' the Congressman said.
The governments of Australia and Belgium earlier said that they are not the unnamed country stated by Duterte's camp in their bid for interim release that is willing to host Duterte pending resolution of the charges leveled against him. — BM, GMA Integrated News
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Tongol: Certifications asked from House not ‘traps' in impeachment process
Tongol: Certifications asked from House not ‘traps' in impeachment process

GMA Network

time8 hours ago

  • GMA Network

Tongol: Certifications asked from House not ‘traps' in impeachment process

Senate impeachment court spokesperson Atty. Regie Tongol on Wednesday denied that the certifications being required from the House of Representatives are 'traps or measures to impede' the impeachment trial of Vice President Sara Duterte. This, as House prosecutor and Akbayan Rep. Chel Diokno said Tuesday that the Senate impeachment court's order for the House under the 20th Congress to submit a certification of its willingness to pursue Duterte's impeachment may impair the prosecution's case. Tongol maintained that such certifications are 'all part of the effort to guarantee procedural legitimacy and to uphold constitutional standards.' 'This certification procedure should not be seen as traps or measures to impede, but these certification processes help prevent any legal impediment or challenges or technicalities that could undermine the impeachment process once it starts rolling and to uphold the proceeding's integrity,' Tongol said at a press conference. Senate impeachment court spokesperson Atty. Regie Tongol says that specific certifications being required from the House of Representatives 'should not be seen as traps or measures to impede' the impeachment process. @gmanews — Giselle Ombay (@giselleombay_) July 2, 2025 'So, the disrespect for or attempts to undermine the impeachment court processes threaten the independence and credibility of the court and jeopardizes public trust in the process itself,' he added. The House already submitted the first required certification that the complaint complied with the one-year ban on subsequent impeachment complaints and that it followed the Constitution. The House under the 20th Congress has yet to submit the second certification concerning its willingness to prosecute. The House of Representatives impeached Duterte on February 5, with over 200 lawmakers endorsing the complaint. The Vice President was accused of betrayal of public trust, culpable violation of the constitution, graft and corruption, and other high crimes. The Senate impeachment court convened on June 10, with the trial proper expected to begin in the 20th Congress. —AOL, GMA Integrated News

OCTA survey on PH rejoining ICC shows public wants justice —Conti
OCTA survey on PH rejoining ICC shows public wants justice —Conti

GMA Network

time9 hours ago

  • GMA Network

OCTA survey on PH rejoining ICC shows public wants justice —Conti

A lawyer on Wednesday said she believes that the results of an OCTA survey, showing that the majority of Filipinos are in favor of rejoining the International Criminal Court (ICC), indicates that the public is hungry for justice. 'Para po sa amin, ang tingin nga namin dito ay uhaw ang tao sa hustisya at tinitignan nila ang isang international court para magbigay ng hustisya na maaaring hindi nila natagpuan sa Pilipinas o kaya hindi nila maabot dito,' ICC assistant to counsel Kristina Conti said on Balitanghali. (For us, we believe that this shows that people are thirsty for justice, and they are looking to an international court to provide the justice that they may not have found or may not be able to attain here in the Philippines.) The Tugon ng Masa nationwide survey, conducted from April 20 to 24, showed that 57% of Filipinos want the country to rejoin the ICC while 37% are opposed to the move, and 6% remain undecided. A total of 1,200 male and female respondents aged 18 and above were interviewed face-to-face for the study. Conti said they support this move, especially since there is a pending case before the international tribunal. A general view of the International Criminal Court on the day former president Rodrigo Duterte arrives at Rotterdam The Hague Airport after his arrest at the request of the ICC, in The Hague, Netherlands, March 12, 2025. REUTERS/ Wolfgang Rattay Former President Rodrigo Duterte is currently under the custody of the ICC to face his crimes against humanity case over his controversial war on drugs. 'Kailangan lang pumirma ng Pilipinas dito sa treaty pero kailangan ito aprubahan ng two-thirds of the Senate, same as with the other treaties. Ito 'yung Senate concurrence. At saka, kumbaga sasabihin kumpleto na ayon sa aming batas ang pag-sang-ayon, both ng executive at ng legislative, sa pagpasok sa treaty na ito,' she said. (The Philippines only needs to sign the treaty, but it must also be approved by two-thirds of the Senate, same as with other treaties. This is called Senate concurrence. And then, it's like saying that under our laws, both the executive and legislative have fully agreed to enter into this treaty.) 'Simple kasi pipirma tapos ire-rehistro 'yung ganitong pagsali muli, pero komplikado dahil may kaunting politika ito,' she added. (It's simple because you just sign and register to participate again, but it becomes complicated because there's a bit of politics involved.) Asked if rejoining the ICC will affect Duterte's crimes against humanity case before the ICC, Conti said there may be effects. She said that should the Philippines rejoin the ICC, the government will be obligated to cooperate in investigations, cooperate with the serving of arrest warrants, and may affect matters of detention. Meanwhile, in a separate interview on Super Radyo dzBB, Conti said that the document containing the charges against the former president will be released on July 4, Friday. 'Ito ang paghahandaan niya para sa tugon niya sa September 23,' Conti said. (This is what he is preparing for in his response on September 23.) She explained that only Duterte's identity was confirmed during the initial hearing. The confirmation of charges against Duterte is set on September 23. —KG, GMA Integrated News

Bill penalizing public officials for red-tagging filed
Bill penalizing public officials for red-tagging filed

GMA Network

timea day ago

  • GMA Network

Bill penalizing public officials for red-tagging filed

A bill penalizing red-tagging has been filed in the House of Representatives. Red-tagging is the practice of accusing people and groups of having ties to communist rebels or terrorist groups, and during the Duterte administration was wielded against government critics, including lawmakers, activists, progressive groups, private citizens, and schools. Several deaths have been linked to red-tagging, and in 2024 the Supreme Court ruled that it poses "threats to a person's right to life, liberty, or security." In House Bill 213, Party-list Representatives Antonio Tinio of ACT and Renee Co of Kabataan cited the high court's ruling. 'This judicial affirmation validates the lived experiences of activists and the long-held position of human rights advocates that red-tagging is a direct and credible threat that warrants decisive legislative action,' the lawmakers said. Under the bill, a public official, employee, and/or their agent who red-tags any individual will be meted a jail time of six months to six years. If the individual was injured by reason or by any cause arising from the red-tagging by a public official, employee, and/or their agents, the public official, employee, and their agents will be punished by a degree higher than those in accordance with Articles 262 to 265 (Physical Injuries) of the Revised Penal Code and a fine not exceeding P6,000 plus damages. In the event the individual is killed by reason or by any cause arising from the red-tagging by a public official, employee, and/or their agents, the public official, employee, and their agents will be punished in accordance with Article 248 or Murder of the Revised Penal Code. If the individual involuntarily disappears by reason or by any cause arising from the red-tagging by the public official, employee, and/or their agents, the public official, employee, and their agents, will punished under An Act Defining And Penalizing Enforced Or Involuntary Disappearance. Lastly, any public officer, employee, and/or their agents who are found guilty of any of the aforementioned offenses will be perpetually disqualified to hold public office. The bill defines red-tagging as the act of publicly labeling, vilifying, branding, naming, accusing or caricaturing individuals, groups, or organizations of being state enemies, subversives, armed rebels, communists or terrorists, or fronts thereof, thereby implying or insinuating involvement or engagement in armed rebellion, acts of terrorism or any wrongdoing or criminal acts; provided, that such act is committed with the use, directly or indirectly, of public position and/or of public funds. 'To allow red-tagging to continue with impunity is to sanction violence perpetrated by the state. It is to surrender our fundamental freedoms and allow the state to operate as an instrument of repression rather than a protector of rights,' the lawmakers said. 'Criminalizing this heinous act is an urgent and necessary step to defend our democracy, uphold the rule of law, and protect the lives of the Filipino people,' they added. — BM, GMA Integrated News

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store