
Sanders moves to ban cellphones in schools
Context: The proposed legislation — dubbed the "Bell to Bell, No Cell" Act — comes after the governor's pilot program where the state provided pouches to store students' phones during class for participating school districts.
At least 114 of the states 237 school districts are participating in the pilot program, the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette reported.
What they're saying:"We have seen a staggering rise in mental illness among young people over the past decade," Sanders said in a news release. "The culprit is clear: unrestricted access to smartphones and social media."
"After the overwhelming success of our phone-free schools pilot program, it's clear that it's time for Arkansas to ban smartphones, bell to bell, in every school in our state."
Zoom out: Cellphone bans in schools have been gaining momentum, both in Democratic and Republican-run states, Axios' April Rubin writes.
Eight states have bans, and more than 20 have policy recommendations to do so, are trying out pilot programs or have introduced legislation that would ban cell phones in schools.
The other side: Those who oppose the bans, especially parents of K-12 students, argue that parents should be able to reach their children when needed, Rubin writes.
What's next: Sen. Tyler Dees (R-Siloam Springs) and Rep. Jon Eubanks (R-Subiaco) will sponsor the bill, according to Sanders' news release.
We're watching for the bill to be filed for more details.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


New York Post
23 minutes ago
- New York Post
Arizona political battle over border rages as local governments choose whether to cooperate with ICE
National news constantly highlights the turmoil at the U.S.-Mexico border, but in southern Arizona—where red desert dust swirls and cacti rise like sentinels—the people living closest to the issue face a daily reality shaped by more than headlines. Amid this rugged landscape, a political battle simmers as local leaders grapple with balancing community safety and the broader national immigration debate. Kathleen Winn, chair of the Pima County Republican Party, expressed her dissatisfaction with how federal budgets have been managed over the past four years. Speaking to Fox News Digital, Winn said infrastructure received 'millions and millions of dollars' under the Biden administration, alleging that some of those funds were used to 'encourage the facilitation of illegal immigration into this country.' Advertisement 'That money went unaccounted for, it was infused into the budgets. And so now they're finding that they have to cut programs because they don't have that money anymore,' she continued. 'We were the front door for the last four years of all kinds of atrocities happening in this country… we're paying a price for it now.' In a statement to Fox News Digital, Eric Robbins, chair of the Pima County Democratic Party, sharply criticized what he described as the Trump administration's legacy of cruelty and misinformation on immigration policy. 7 Kathleen Winn, chair of the Pima County Republican Party, in an interview. Fox News Digital 'Arizonans are exhausted by the Trump administration's gaslighting, cruelty, and lies,' Robbins said. He accused Republican leaders—both nationally and within Arizona—of profiting from fear, citing what he called a surge in unjustified arrests by 'masked, unidentifiable agents' targeting individuals without criminal records. Advertisement 'These agents have reportedly detained mothers en route to buy food, leaving their children alone by the roadside,' he said. Robbins further claimed that such tactics have undermined local law enforcement efforts and funneled detainees into what he described as 'for-profit detention centers.' Labeling these practices as part of a 'documented pattern of abuse,' Robbins cited allegations, including the harassment of nonprofit workers, increased privatization and militarization at the border, due process violations, and widespread family separations. 'This isn't security—it's systemic failure dressed as patriotism,' Robbins stated. 'Trump is not a patriot. He's a nationalist, and Americans need to recognize that distinction.' Advertisement On the other hand, Jesus Jerez, a member of the Santa Cruz County Republican Committee, echoed Winn's concerns and claimed enforcement had been limited during the last four years. 7 Military vehicles and a soldier overlooking a border fence. AP 'The last four years, there was no enforcement activity,' Jerez told Fox News Digital. '[Agents were] told that you can't arrest anybody, but you give them these papers, and you hold them until someone can take them to be processed and then released.' Winn underscored Tucson's importance in the national immigration flow. Advertisement 'Everything that happens at the border in order to get into the innermost regions of the country. [Tucson is] a stopping point once you go into the country,' she said. 'It erodes the quality of life here because people don't have [financial] means, so crime gets increased, people steal… We are at the effect of whatever is happening at the border.' When asked about border security changes under Trump, Winn aligned her view with that of Customs and Border Patrol (CBP). 'We're not seeing as many illegal immigrants,' she said, although she acknowledged that drug smuggling remains an issue in the region. 'Even though human being smuggling has stopped, the drug smuggling has not. And there's a huge network set up in Arizona. So drugs come over the border in whichever way,' Winn said. Winn also outlined the challenges facing Pima County due to what she described as a mismanaged policy. 7 When asked about border security changes under Trump, Winn aligned her view with that of Customs and Border Patrol (CBP). REUTERS 7 Winn also outlined the challenges facing Pima County due to what she described as a mismanaged policy. AFP via Getty Images 'Pima County is experiencing high homelessness, high drug use, and not a lot of solutions, and we're low on police because… they underfunded the police over the last three years. So we are at the effects of the bad policies from the last four years. 'Although it's getting better, it seems that it got worse, to [the] great detriment of the people of Pima County,' she added. Advertisement Dan Dellinges, a state committeeman for the Santa Cruz County Republican Party, noted an uptick in property theft along common travel routes. 'We've had an increase in general property theft along routes of travel [and] pass-throughs here. We also have a number of people who die crossing the desert here to the east, coming into the country illegally, and oftentimes those bodies are discovered by hunters or hikers or side-by-side drivers and then the county or the border patrol comes in and recovers those bodies,' he said. Dellinges criticized what he described as a breakdown in cooperation between local and federal authorities. 7 Jesus Jerez, member of the Santa Cruz County Republican Party. Fox News Digital Advertisement 7 U.S. Army soldiers stand next to Stryker combat vehicles on a hilltop overlooking the U.S.-Mexico border fence in Nogales, Ariz. AP 'Arizona state constitution recognizes supremacy with federal, United States Constitution. At this county it's not recognized, there's very little cooperation with the federal government,' he explained. When asked to expand on this claim, Dellinges pointed to a fundamental disagreement he has with the county sheriff. In the context of immigration enforcement, the Santa Cruz County Sheriff's Office in Arizona, led by Sheriff David Hathaway, has shown reluctance to fully cooperate with U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). Advertisement According to a January report from KGUN9, Hathaway pulled his deputies out of a program where they worked alongside Border Patrol. 'The City of Nogales, Arizona is 95% Hispanic. The County of Santa Cruz is 80% Hispanic. I don't want there to be fear or tension between the community and my Sheriff's Office. We run the 911 dispatch center for the county, and most households are Hispanic here, so I don't want them to fear that they're inviting an immigration officer, a border patrol agent, into their house if they hear an intruder at the back door. I want them to not fear calling us,' he said at the time. 7 Vehicle driving near border wall with razor wire. AP Hathaway has pointed to courts ruling that state and local agencies cannot be forced to enforce immigration law, labeling it a federal issue. He also believes his team does not have the specific training or funding necessary for immigration enforcement–instead urging his office to focus on local violent crimes. Advertisement Jerez warned of the risks posed by letting in large numbers of unvetted migrants. 'We let in so many people: unknown people, unvetted people, and some very bad people. The people here know how many people came through… These people are desperate and they don't know our rules. We're catching up, slowly catching up,' he said. He also expressed concern about public complacency.


Axios
23 minutes ago
- Axios
Scoop: Senate Dems launching last-ditch bid to block Trump tariffs
Senate Democrats on Wednesday will mount a last-ditch effort to block President Trump's tariffs from taking full effect at the end of this week, Axios has learned. Why it matters: Democrats, who argue Trump's tariffs could add $2,400 to the average American household expenses, are making signs of economic angst a centerpiece of their 2026 midterm messaging. Sen. Jeanne Shaheen (D-N.H.) on Wednesday evening will ask lawmakers to unanimously pass a bill affirming that the tariffs can't be authorized under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act, Axios has learned. That's the law the administration is citing as giving it the authority to impose the levies. Friday is the date when tariffs rise for dozens of countries, as threatened by Trump in letters earlier this month. Many are lower than the rates he first imposed in April, though some are higher. Driving the news: It will take just one lawmaker to block Shaheen's move, and Republicans will almost certainly do so. But it gives Democrats the opportunity to get Republicans on the record in support of the tariff hikes. Shaheen's move comes one day before a federal appellate court hears arguments on whether to overturn a lower-court ruling that the IEEPA tariffs were illegal. Zoom out: The unanimous consent request is part of broader anti-tariff push that Democrats will hold on the Senate floor on Wednesday evening, according to people familiar with the matter. Shaheen will lead a half dozen Democratic senators in highlighting the impact the duties will have on working families. "And now, on Friday, the Administration is planning to make the goods businesses and families need 10, or 30 or even 40 percent more expensive overnight," Shaheen will say, according to remarks shared with Axios.


Axios
23 minutes ago
- Axios
What to know about Texas' proposed congressional map
Texas Republicans released a proposed new congressional district map Wednesday that targets Democrats in an attempt to create five new GOP seats ahead of the 2026 midterms. Why it matters: The move to redraw district boundaries in the middle of the decade is unusual, and comes as President Trump seeks to keep hold on the U.S. House. The effort is drawing pushback and will likely be challenged in court. Zoom in: The proposed map makes the following districts, currently represented by Democrats, more favorable to Republicans, per the Texas Tribune: 9th District, Al Green: The southern Houston seat would shift to eastern Houston. 28th District, Henry Cuellar: This heavily Hispanic South Texas seat would no longer extend into San Antonio's South Side. 32nd District, Julie Johnson: This Dallas area seat would extend into more rural areas. 34th District, Vicente Gonzalez: Another largely Latino South Texas district that would pick up more presumed Republican voters. 35th District, Greg Casar: This seat would shift from following Interstate 35 from Austin to San Antonio and instead include south Bexar County and more rural areas, completely excluding the Austin area. The draft map packs more Democratic voters into urban districts already represented by Democrats: U.S. Reps. Joaquin Castro in San Antonio, Sylvia Garcia in Houston and Jasmine Crockett in Dallas would continue to have safely blue seats. It could set up a blockbuster Democratic primary between Casar and U.S. Rep. Lloyd Doggett, who represents the 37th District. What they're saying: Doggett said in a statement Wednesday that "Trump is taking a hatchet to chop up Austin and our state with the sole objective of maintaining his one-man rule. This is designed to eliminate accessibility, accountability and a strong voice for our shared values." "Merging the 35th and the 37th districts is illegal voter suppression of Black and Latino Central Texans," Casar said in a statement. "Everyone who cares about our democracy must mobilize against this illegal map," Casar added. Between the lines: The proposed map "really seeks to take advantage of the shifting loyalties of Texas Latino voters," SMU political science professor Matthew Wilson tells Axios. The proposal would increase the number of majority-Hispanic districts, Wilson adds. "That's possible because Hispanic voters have become more Republican," he said. "That's an effort to blunt race-based criticism they may get with this map." Democrats will "inevitably criticize the proposed maps as racist and partisan," Wilson said. "Whether racist or not, they're certainly partisan. But Republicans by drawing these maps have a fairly strong retort: 'You're not interested in protecting Hispanic representation, you're interested in protecting only Hispanic Democrats.'" Zoom out: The proposed map has largely avoided imperiling sitting Republicans, Wilson says. Reality check: The map is just a draft, and could still change. What's next: There will be a committee hearing on the proposed changes at the state Capitol 10am Friday.