Hey Siri, Am I Okay? : AI tools are being trained to detect suicidal signals.
Suicidal risk identification on SNS:
The prompts fed to AI do not remain confined to tasks related to needing help in everyday activities, such as asking Alexa to play the family's favourite song, asking Siri on a random Tuesday to set a reminder, or asking Google Assistant to search the song based on humming. But what if users, in an especially low moment, were to ask, 'Am I okay?' Or maybe other such prompts that insinuate the user's want to harm themselves, whether through means of self-harm or suicide.Suicide and suicide attempts remain alarmingly prevalent, requiring more effective strategies to identify and support individuals at high risk. Current methods of suicide risk assessment largely rely on direct questioning, which can be limited by subjectivity and inconsistent interpretation. Simply put, their accuracy and predictive value remain limited, regardless of the large variety of scales that can be used to assess the risk; predictability remains unimproved over the past 50 years.Artificial intelligence and machine learning offer new ways to improve risk detection, but their accuracy depends heavily on access to large datasets that can help identify patient profiles and key risk factors. As outlined in a clinical review, AI tools can help identify patterns in the dataset, generate risk algorithms, and determine the effect of risk and protective factors on suicide. The use of AI reassures healthcare professionals with an improved accuracy rate, especially when combined with their skills and expertise, even when diagnostic accuracy could never reach 100%.According to Burke et al. , there are three main goals of machine learning studies in suicide: the first is improving the accuracy of risk prediction, the second is identifying important predictors and the interaction between them, and the last one is to model subgroups of patients. At an individual level, AI could allow for better identification of individuals in crisis and appropriate intervention, while at a population level, the algorithm could find groups at risk and individuals at risk of suicide attempts within these groups. Social media platforms have become both the cause and solution for the mental health crisis. While they are often criticized for contributing to the mental health crisis, these platforms also provide a rich source of real-time data to AI, enabling it to identify individuals portraying signs of suicidal intent. This is achieved by analyzing users' posts, comments, and behavioral patterns, allowing AI tools to detect linguistic cues, such as expressions of hopelessness or other emotional signals that may indicate psychological distress. For instance, Meta employs AI algorithms to scan user content and identify signs of distress, allowing the company to reach out and offer support or even connect users with crisis helplines. Studies such as those by the Black Dog Institute also demonstrate how AI's natural language processing can flag at-risk individuals earlier than traditional methods, enabling timely intervention.There are also companies such as Samurai Labs and Sentinet that have developed AI-driven systems that monitor social media content and flag posts that insinuate suicidal ideation. For example, Samurai Labs 'One Life' project scans online conversations to detect signs that indicate high suicide risk. Upon detecting these indicators, the platform then leads the user to support resources or emergency assistance. In the same manner, Sentient's algorithms analyze thousands of posts on a daily basis, triggering alerts when users express some form of emotional distress, allowing for timely intervention.While AI isn't a replacement for human empathy or professional mental health care, it offers a promising advancement in suicide prevention. By identifying warning signs at a much faster and more precise rate than human diagnosis and enabling early interventions, AI tools can serve as valuable allies in this fight against suicide.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mint
19 minutes ago
- Mint
The AI boom's hidden risk to the economy
In the past two weeks one big tech company after another reported blowout earnings amid a wholesale embrace of artificial intelligence. Look a little closer, and a more unsettling side to the AI boom emerges. All the spending on chips, data centers and other AI infrastructure is draining American corporations of cash. This underscores the hidden risks from the AI boom. No one doubts its potential to raise growth and productivity in the long run. But financing that boom is straining the companies and capital markets. Since the first quarter of 2023, investment in information processing equipment has expanded 23%, after inflation, while total gross domestic product has expanded just 6%. In the first half of the year, information processing investment contributed more than half the sluggish 1.2% overall growth rate. In effect, AI spending propped up the economy while consumer spending stagnated. Much of that investment consists of the graphics-processing units, memory chips, servers, and networking gear to train and run the large language models at the heart of the boom. And all that computing power needs buildings, land and power generation. This is transforming big tech's business models. For years, investors loved those models because they were 'asset-light." They earned their profits on intangible assets such as intellectual property, software, and digital platforms with 'network effects." Users flocked to Facebook, Google, the iPhone, and Windows because other users did. Adding revenue required little in the way of more buildings and equipment, making them cash-generating machines. This can be seen in a metric called free cash flow, roughly defined as cash flow from operations minus capital expenditures. It excludes things such as noncash impairment charges that can distort net income. This is arguably the purest measure of a business's underlying cash-generating potential. Amazon, for example, tells investors: 'Our financial focus is on long-term, sustainable growth in free cash flow." From 2016 through 2023, free cash flow and net earnings of Alphabet, Amazon, Meta and Microsoft grew roughly in tandem. But since 2023, the two have diverged. The four companies' combined net income is up 73%, to $91 billion, in the second quarter from two years earlier, while free cash flow is down 30% to $40 billion, according to FactSet data. Apple, a relative piker on capital spending, has also seen free cash flow lag behind. For all of AI's obvious economic potential, the financial return remains a question mark. OpenAI and Anthropic, the two leading stand-alone developers of large language models, though growing fast, are losing money. Much of big tech companies' latest profits reflect their established franchises: ad spending for Meta and Alphabet, the iPhone for Apple. As to when their AI hardware will pay off, they counsel patience. Meta, parent of Facebook, reported a 36% rise in earnings for the second quarter, but a 22% drop in free cash flow. It said capital expenditure in 2025 would be roughly double last year's, with 'similarly significant" growth in 2026. Meta has said much of its AI-related capital spending supports core businesses, such as ads and content, and is already paying off. The balance goes toward generative AI such as its Llama model. 'We are early in the life cycle" of the latter investments, Chief Financial Officer Susan Li told analysts, and 'we don't expect that we are going to be realizing significant revenue from any of those things in the near term." Amazon began tapering its build-out of fulfillment centers in 2022, allowing free cash flow to turn positive. But in the last year, it has ramped up investment in Amazon Web Services, which hosts data and runs AI models for outside clients, and free cash flow is down by two-thirds from the previous year. Meta is among the major tech companies making big AI-related capital expenditures. For now, investors are pricing big tech as if their asset-heavy business will be as profitable as their asset-light models. So far, 'we don't have any evidence of that," said Jason Thomas, head of research at Carlyle Group. 'The variable people miss out on is the time horizon. All this capital spending may prove productive beyond their wildest dreams, but beyond the relevant time horizon for their shareholders," he added. In the late 1990s and early 2000s, the nascent internet boom had investors throwing cash at startup web companies and broadband telecommunications carriers. They were right the internet would drive a productivity boom, but wrong about the financial payoff. Many of those companies couldn't earn enough to cover their expenses and went bust. In broadband, excess capacity caused pricing to plunge. The resulting slump in capital spending helped cause a mild recession in 2001. A dot-com-style bust looks far-fetched now. AI's big spenders are mature and profitable companies, and the demand for computing power exceeds the supply. But if their revenue and profit assumptions prove too optimistic, their current pace of capital spending will be hard to sustain. Amazon Web Services is spending $11 billion on a data center campus near South Bend, Ind. After the global financial crisis of 2007-09, big tech was both a beneficiary of low interest rates, and a cause. Between that crisis and Covid, these companies were generating five to eight times as much cash from operations as they invested, and that spare cash was recycled back into the financial system, Thomas, of Carlyle Group, estimates. It helped hold down long-term interest rates amid high federal deficits, as did inflation below the Federal Reserve's 2% target and the Fed buying bonds. Low interest rates, in turn, made investors value these companies' future profits even more highly. Today, government deficits are even larger, inflation is above 2% and the Fed has been shrinking its bondholdings. Meanwhile, corporations face steep investment needs to exploit AI and reshore production to avoid tariffs. Thomas estimates that since 2020, their cumulative free cash flow has been 78% lower, relative to GDP, than in the equivalent period following 2009. All this suggests that interest rates need to be substantially higher in the years ahead than in the years before the pandemic. That is another risk to the economy and these companies that investors may not fully appreciate. Write to Greg Ip at
Hindustan Times
19 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Zuckerberg's total pay offers to poach AI talent in 2025 was higher than box office gross of Avengers, Superman
Mark Zuckerberg is set on Meta getting the best talent for AI development as the tech race heats up. In 2025, Zuckerberg has reportedly sent out a slew of offers, not all of which were accepted, trying to poach talent from notable players in the field like OpenAI, and other tech giants like Apple. Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg is seen here. Meta is committed to spending $72 billion on capital expenditures in 2025.(Reuters) He has not ignored startups as well, offering eye-watering pay packages for the best minds to join Meta's AI team. In fact, the total amount in pay packages that he has offered this year goes well beyond the box office collection of popular blockbusters like Avengers and Superman. Here's a look at how much Zuckerberg offered to attract AI talent. Zuckerberg offers billions to poach AI talent It's not even a millions game anymore for Zuckerberg, who is currently the world's third richest man. He reportedly offered $1 billion to poach one staffer from Mira Murati's AI startup, Thinking Machines Lab. The co-founder of the venture, Andrew Tulloch, was reportedly offered $1.5 billion to join Meta, but he refused. Zuckerberg has also tried to get others from there with packages ranging from $200 million to $500 million over a four-year period. Notably, the billion dollar package is also a multi-year offer. However, the Meta head assured that those taking up the offers would get $50-100 million in the first year itself. He also made offers in the ballpark of $300 million, over four years, to OpenAI talent, Wired reported. Showing aggression, and no signs of stopping, Zuckerberg also went after a 24-year-old AI researcher, Matt Deitke. When he turned down a $125 million offer, over four years, to join Meta, Zuckerberg personally met him and sweetened the deal to $250 million. He's also reportedly giving a $200 million multi-year package to Ruoming Pang, the former Apple AI head. Together, Zuckerberg offered around a whopping $2.6 billion (if we take $350 mn to be the median offered to other Thinking Machines Lab staffers). How Zuckerberg's offer compares to Hollywood hits? Zuckerberg's offer far outdoes the performance of the best of Marvel and DC films. These mega budget projects with ensemble casts often rake in a lot of money at the box office, and 'Avengers: Endgame' or 'Superman' (2025) are no exceptions. However, 'Avengers: Endgame' made $858.37 million in the US box office, while 'Superman' has now crossed $300 million. Even if we were to add the two, it would come to around $1.16 billion – well shy of the mark by a billion. Notably, Zuckerberg's pay package offers have been calculated not just on the basis of salary, but equity and other components. Meta is committed to spending $72 billion on capital expenditures in 2025.
News18
26 minutes ago
- News18
Who Is Andrew Tulloch? The AI Expert Who Turned Down Meta's $1.5 Billion Offer
Last Updated: Meta, led by Mark Zuckerberg, is hiring top AI experts from OpenAI and Microsoft. Andrew Tulloch rejected a $1.5 billion offer. Alexandr Wang was hired as Chief AI Officer. Andrew Tulloch: Mark Zuckerberg-led Meta is on a poaching spree to acquire the top-level AI researchers and experts from companies in the field globally, including OpenAI, Microsoft, and rising AI startups. Some reports say Meta is offering up to $100-million whopping payout to these coveted experts to join its Meta's Super intelligence Team. One of such figures whose name is making headlines is Andrew Tulloch, though the reason is quite different. Tulloch has made headlines by turning down an almost $1 billion offer, a nine-figure salary. In India, when a six-figure salary is considered as a dream job, it's unusual for someone to turns down a 9-figure salary. Who Is Andrew Tulloch? Andrew Tulloch is a machine learning expert and co-founder of Thinking Machines Lab, an AI company led by Mira Murati that aims to push the boundaries of artificial intelligence beyond chatbots. He recently made headlines after The Wall Street Journal reported that he turned down a staggering nine-figure offer from Meta. The Journal noted that even in Silicon Valley—where massive paychecks are common—it's rare for someone to walk away from such a deal. Sources familiar with the matter said the $1.5 billion offer included bonuses and stock-based compensation, making the decision all the more surprising. Before this, he played a key role in developing GPT-4o and GPT-4.5 during his time at OpenAI, where he worked on large-scale ML systems and o-series reasoning. Tulloch spent over 11 years at Meta as a Distinguished Engineer, where he focused on machine learning systems and worked extensively with PyTorch. He began his career at Goldman Sachs, developing financial and trading strategies. Academically, Tulloch holds a Master's in Mathematical Statistics and Machine Learning from the University of Cambridge, where he earned a distinction and a college prize. He also graduated with First Class Honours and a University Medal from the University of Sydney in Advanced Mathematics. Meta Hires AI Prodigy Alexandr Wang To Lead Meta's Superintelligence Labs The co-founder of Alexandr Wang was hired by Meta to lead the Meta's Superintelligence team and was given a title of Chief AI Officer. His appointment followed Meta's investment in Scale AI, which valued the data-labelling startup at $29 billion. Earlier, Meta brough Yunazhi from OpenAI and Anton Bakhtin from Anthropic. 2 Indians Among 44 Members Team 2 India-origin were part of the Meta's Superintelligence team. Other than Trapit Bansal, Hammad Syed also joined the elite team as a software engineer. view comments First Published: News business Who Is Andrew Tulloch? The AI Expert Who Turned Down Meta's $1.5 Billion Offer Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
