LA County Lawmaker Wants Audit To Examine Eaton And Palisades Fire Responses
In the months since the Eaton and Palisades wildfires ravaged through the LA County area, a local lawmaker is now calling for an official statewide audit to examine the fire responses to ensure that when future issues of a similar nature arise, the county is better prepared.
Democratic assemblyman John Harabedian, who represents Pasadena, recently announced his decision to request a state audit, as impacted residents still have a host of questions about what went wrong during that disastrous day back in January.
'Generally speaking, why did alerts not go out? The 18 deaths in Altadena happened primarily in the western part of Altadena, where the fires had been raging for eight hours before alerts were received,' Harabedian said. 'By that time at three or four in the morning, the fire was on the doorsteps for many of my neighbors and some of whom didn't make it out.'
In addition to the 18 people who were left dead in Altadena due to the Eaton fire, 12 people also died in the Palisades fire.
'I really think we owe it to my constituents and my neighbors to figure out what happened,' Harabedian continued. 'So I've requested an independent audit to examine the state and local response to the fires in both Altadena and the Palisades.'
If approved by the Joint Legislative Audit Committee, the audit will examine the complete timeline response of both the Eaton and Palisades wildfires—including investigating the evacuation orders, first responders' resources, and vegetation management in the area.
'The audit will focus on a number of things, but mainly on how systems function in real time, looking at evacuation alerts, agency coordination, equipment deployment, utility preparedness, everything,' Harabedian explained.
'And really I think that it is incumbent on the state to push for this type of transparency, accountability, and the improved readiness that will hopefully come from this will help when the next disaster strikes,' he added.
Harabedian's audit request is running alongside other California and LA County investigations into the fire response.
He shared what he hopes will be accomplished with the audit and how it will impact any future natural disasters in the area. 'At a minimum, I want to see improved coordination and communication during future disasters,' Harabedian said.
'All coordination and being able to communicate during these disasters, whether it's the fire, whether it's the earthquake, whether it's a flood, that is something that needs to be looked at across the board,' he continued. 'Because unfortunately, we will be dealing with the next disaster very soon.'
SEE ALSO:
Real Estate Developers Are Buying Altadena's Burned Lots As Residents Face Harsh Financial Realities Of Rebuilding
Evidence Of Human Error Grows In Altadena Fire Evacuation Investigation
SEE ALSO
LA County Lawmaker Wants Audit To Examine Eaton And Palisades Fire Responses was originally published on newsone.com
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
35 minutes ago
- Yahoo
NH rejects Trump request for list of registered voters
Citing a black-and-white voting records privacy law, Secretary of State David Scanlan flatly rejected the Trump administration's demand for New Hampshire's list of all registered voters, part of an organized White House campaign to seek millions of names from targeted states in advance of the 2026 midterm elections. A little over a week ago, President Donald Trump signaled his focus remains on the falsehoods that he has spread about his 2020 presidential election defeat. Trump posted on social media that Attorney General Pam Bondi will be looking into 'The Rigged and Stolen Election of 2020.' The push for the voting data has election observers wondering if the aim is to build a file of voter intelligence that could help Trump become more immune to partisan losses in the midterm elections. More than 350 election officials from at least 33 states joined a recent conference call to hear from Democratic and Republican lawyers who offered their insights about the implications of the administration's demands. On June 25, Acting Chief of the Civil Rights Division Maureen Riordan and Deputy Assistant Attorney General Michael Gates wrote Scanlan, presenting him with a 15-point punch list of voter information. N.H. rejects Trump administration request for registered voters list The Trump administration's Justice Department sent demand letters to election officials in New Hampshire and eight other targeted states requesting a complete list of registered voters along with 14 other items. Secretary of State David Scanlan said the state can't meet that demand, citing a 2003 law that defines these records as confidential. This image is from a town meeting last March which was the first election when a new law kicked in that new voters would have to prove identity, citizenship and domicile to register to vote. The letter cited the federal Help America Vote Act as the authority for Justice to request information on voter registration, including how the state identifies illegal immigrants who may seek to vote or culls from the voting rolls dead voters or those convicted of a felony. 'Please include both active and inactive voters,' the letter states in asking for lists of registered voters. The Washington Post first reported this story, noting that the inquiries for the voter list were a mix of blue and red states including New Hampshire, Alaska, Colorado, Florida, Minnesota, Nevada, New York, Oklahoma and Wisconsin. On that list, Wisconsin and Nevada were the only two that were battleground states that decided the 2024 election, an electoral vote romp for Trump over Democrat Kamala Harris because Trump swept all seven battleground states. Trump was competitive in the Granite State, but he has lost all three presidential races in New Hampshire. Curiously, the Union Leader has confirmed there were other states such as Pennsylvania that received the same letter demand, which was identical except it did not have the critical 15th action item — a copy of the voter registration list. Pennsylvania has long been a battleground state. Its majority for Joe Biden ensured Trump's defeat in 2020, but Trump recovered to take it last November. Law created in 2003 The New Hampshire Legislature in 2003 created a law spelling out how the voter database is to be compiled, monitored and protected. It contains a strikingly stark privacy provision that makes the documents not only secret but undiscoverable in a court case. 'The voter database shall be private and confidential and shall not be subject to RSA 91-A (Right-to-Know Law) and RSA 654:31 (Voter Checklist Law) nor shall it or any of the information contained therein be disclosed pursuant to a subpoena or civil litigation discovery request,' the law reads. Anna Sventek, Scanlan's communications director, confirmed Scanlan's office spoke with a Justice Department official about the request. 'We had a conversation with them about New Hampshire statutes relative to the availability of voter checklist information and made them aware of RSA 654:45,' Sventek said, alluding to the law and its privacy provision.' N.H. rejects Trump Justice Dept. demand for registered voter list David Scanlan 'No further action has been taken or requested.' The law permits designated local and state ballot officials to have access to the database for the purpose of verifying registration information for elections. Also, the law permits the data to be shared with state and federal court officials strictly for the preparation of jury lists. Judge granted exception in ALCU suit vs. N.H. A federal judge recently granted an exception to the New Hampshire privacy law, agreeing to allow the American Civil Liberties Union of New Hampshire access to it. The ACLU-NH sued the state over a new Republican-led law that compels first-time voters to show proof of citizenship when they register. State prosecutors argued giving the ACLU the database was too much of a risk. A New Hampshire federal judge disagreed, pointing to a previous lawsuit in which the same information was shared with opposing lawyers without adverse consequence. The Post reported that Colorado and Florida provided information to the Justice Department from their lists while officials in other states said they were reviewing requests. David Becker, executive director of the nonpartisan Center for Election Innovation & Research, who was on that conference call, said election officials worry about 'federal imposition' that could override their authority. Some inquiries 'The DOJ seems dead set on acquiring personal information on voters, including driver's license numbers, Social Security numbers and dates of birth — records that are highly protected under federal law and under state law and which state election officials are sworn to protect,' Becker said. Some of the inquiries to states went beyond the fact finding sought from New Hampshire and others. Colorado Secretary of State Jena Griswold told ABC News her office got a letter in May after Justice officials said they 'recently received a complaint alleging noncompliance' with the Voting Rights Act. The letter was signed by Harmeet Dhillon — an assistant attorney general for the Civil Rights Division — who was formerly a Trump campaign legal adviser. klandrigan@
Yahoo
41 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Jeffries touts ‘constructive' meeting with Mamdani, says they will ‘reconvene'
House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-N.Y.) said he had a 'constructive meeting' with Democratic New York City mayoral nominee Zohran Mamdani in Brooklyn on Friday. The meeting, which took place in Jeffries's home district, lasted an hour, according to Jeffries's spokesperson Justin Chermol. 'The meeting between Leader Jeffries and Assemblyman Mamdani was constructive, candid and community-centered, with a particular focus on affordability,' Chermol said, adding that the two also discussed public safety, rising antisemitism, gentrification and the importance of Democrats taking back the House majority in 2026. 'They agreed to reconvene shortly, alongside other members of the New York City congressional delegation and a few high-level community leaders,' he added. Jeffries and Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) have not yet endorsed Mamdani following his primary win last month. While the New York state Assembly member enjoys support among the progressive wing of the Democratic Party, he has faced skepticism from moderate members of the party. Mamdani has been working to consolidate support from Democrats ahead of the general election, where he will run against sitting Mayor Eric Adams and former New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo, who are both running as independents. Republican Curtis Sliwa is also in the race. The Democratic nominee was in Washington on Wednesday for a closed-door breakfast hosted by progressive Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.). A number of House Democrats in attendance praised the state lawmaker following the event, including Reps. Robert Garcia (Calif.) and Pramila Jayapal (Wash.). Meanwhile Republicans have sought to tie Democrats to Mamdani. On Friday, the National Republican Congressional Committee rolled out a digital ad campaign tying Mamdani to Democratic New York Reps. Josh Riley, Laura Gillen, Tom Suozzi, and New Jersey Rep. Nellie Pou. All four members potentially face competitive reelection bids next year. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Los Angeles Times
43 minutes ago
- Los Angeles Times
Newsom needs to stop kidding around. He's running for president
SACRAMENTO — No outsider politicians venture into sultry South Carolina in July unless they are running for president. Certainly not a West Coast politician. Especially a California governor who lives in delightful Marin County near wonderful cool beaches. A governor who could easily vacation at spectacular Big Sur or hike a wilderness trail into the majestic Sierra. We can assume Gov. Gavin Newsom didn't choose South Carolina for its nightly light show of amazing fireflies or symphony of crickets. He was attracted to something so alluring that he was willing to brave skin-eating chiggers and oppressive humidity. The lure, of course, was that South Carolina will hold one of the earliest — perhaps the first — Democratic presidential primaries in 2028. The precise calendar for contests hasn't been set. But Newsom knows this: South Carolina propelled Joe Biden to the party's nomination in 2020. And it provided a huge boost for Barack Obama in 2008. 'What South Carolinians saw this week as … Newsom made a two-day swing through the state was more than a highly visible candidate who probably will run for president in 2028,' wrote Andy Brack, editor, publisher and columnist at the Statehouse Report and Charleston City Paper. 'They saw a guy sweating through a white shirt in the South Carolina heat who was having fun. Yep, he seemed to enjoy engaging with voters in rural places too often forgotten by many candidates.' Yes, Newsom, 57, loves campaigning on the stump — a whole lot more than he does toiling in the nitty-gritty of governing. I'd only bicker with Brack's word 'probably' when characterizing Newsom's White House bid. We're talking semantics. California's termed-out governor actually has been running for months. And he'll run as far as he can, slowly for a while and try to pick up speed down the road. That's conventional politics. Most candidates — especially office holders — initially claim that running for president is 'the furthest thing' from their mind, then ultimately declare their candidacy with all the hoopla of a carnival barker. OK, I admit to having been wrong about the governor in the past. I should have known better. I took him at his word. He persistently denied any interest in the presidency. 'Subzero,' he asserted. But to be fair, he and reporters previously were centered on the 2024 race and the distant 2028 contest got short shrift. I figured Newsom mostly was running for a slot on the 'A' list of national political leaders. He wanted to be mentioned among the roster of top-tier potential presidents. He clearly savors the national attention. But I've also always wondered whether Newsom might be leery of running for president because of his lifelong struggle with dyslexia. He could view the task with some trepidation. The governor has acknowledged having difficulty reading, especially speeches off teleprompters. That said, he has adapted and is an articulate, passionate off-the-cuff speaker with a mind full of well-organized data. He excels on the stump — especially when he restrains a tendency to be long-winded and repetitive. Newsom is finally starting to acknowledge the White House glimmer in his eye. 'I'm not thinking about running, but it's a path that I could see unfold,' he told the Wall Street Journal last month. More recently, in a lengthy interview with conservative podcaster Shawn Ryan, Newsom said: 'I'll tell you, the more Trump keeps doing what he does, the more compelled I am to think about it.' Newsom's proclaimed hook for traveling to South Carolina was to 'sound the alarm' about President Trump's brutish policies and to light a fire under Democratic voters to help the party win back the U.S. House next year. He's again trying to establish himself as a leader of the anti-Trump resistance after several months of playing nice to the president in a losing effort to keep federal funds flowing to California. But it's practically inevitable that a California governor will be lured into running for president. Governors have egos and ears. They constantly hear allies and advisors telling them they could become the leader of the free world. And, after all, this is the nation's most populous state, with by far the largest bloc of delegates to the Democratic National Convention — 20% of those needed to win the nomination. But there's a flip side to this California benefit. There's a California burden. In much of the country, we're seen as a socialist horror with dreadful liberal policies that should never be emulated nationally. 'People who live in other states just don't like us, whether they're Democrats or Republicans,' says Democratic strategist Darry Sragow. 'A Democrat from California is going to have an uphill fight no matter who they are. That's just a reality. 'The odds [for Newsom] are pretty long, although he has a shot because the field is totally open.' But Democratic strategist Bill Carrick — a South Carolina native — says the California burden 'is exaggerated. That's just the Republican stereotype of California. Who cares? 'If Newsom runs, he'll be competitive. He's smart. Good charisma. South Carolina was a good trip for him.' Former Democratic consultant Bob Shrum, director of the Center for the Political Future at USC, says: 'Too many people write Newsom off. He has a realistic chance. 'He's very good at pushing off against Trump. It all depends on whether he goes into the election with a message about the future. The message has to center around the economy. The two times Trump was elected he won the message war.' Can Newsom win the nomination? Maybe. The presidency? Probably not. But there's no certainty about anything in an antsy country that swings from twice electing Barack Obama to twice anointing Donald Trump. Newsom is smart to roll the dice. The must-read: Forget the high road: Newsom takes the fight to Trump and his allies The TK: Will she or won't she? The California governor's race waits on Kamala Harris The L.A. Times Special: The forgotten godfather of Trump's scorched earth immigration campaign Until next week,George Skelton —Was this newsletter forwarded to you? Sign up here to get it in your inbox.
